/
X-Ray Populations in the Norma and X-Ray Populations in the Norma and

X-Ray Populations in the Norma and - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
391 views
Uploaded On 2015-11-17

X-Ray Populations in the Norma and - PPT Presentation

Scutum Crux Spiral Arms Francesca Fornasini UC Berkeley In collaboration with J A Tomsick F Rahoui A Bodaghee R A Krivonos H An E V Gotthelf V M Kaspi F E Bauer D Stern S E Boggs ID: 196655

meeting 2013 head 13th 2013 meeting 13th head sources ray stars mass norma spectral hardness high hmxbs group spectra

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "X-Ray Populations in the Norma and" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

X-Ray Populations in the Norma and Scutum-Crux Spiral Arms

Francesca Fornasini, UC Berkeley

In collaboration with: J. A.

Tomsick

, F.

Rahoui

, A.

Bodaghee

, R. A.

Krivonos

, H. An, E. V.

Gotthelf

, V. M.

Kaspi

, F. E. Bauer, D. Stern, S. E. Boggs Slide2

Chandra Observations of the Norma Region

Bodaghee

et al. 2012

Search for new

HMXBs

and study hard X-ray populationsTwenty-seven 20 ks pointingsRed: 0.5-2 keV Green: 2-4.5 keV Blue: 4.5-10 keV

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013

338°

l

337°

-0.4° b 0.4°

HMXB

Magnetar

PWN

Supernova Remnants

Young Massive ClustersSlide3

Now I wonder what you areTwo main analyses to help classify X-ray sources:

Dividing sources into spectral groups

Making stacked spectra, analyzing variability and counterparts of sources in each group

Near-IR follow-up of individual sources

30

J, H, K spectra obtained using OSIRIS on the SOAR telescope Selected sources based on X-ray brightness, spectral hardness, variability, and IR counterpart reliability and magnitude HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide4

Now I wonder what you are

Two main analyses to help classify X-ray sources:

Dividing sources into spectral groups

Making stacked spectra, analyzing variability and counterparts of sources in each group

Near-IR follow-up of individual sources

30 J, H, K spectra obtained using OSIRIS on the SOAR telescope Selected sources based on X-ray brightness, spectral hardness, variability, and IR counterpart reliability and magnitude HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide5

Defining Spectral Groups

Quantile

grid method developed by Hong et al. 2004

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013

Broadness

Hardness

>3σ sources (0.5-10 keV)Slide6

Defining Spectral Groups

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013

Broadness

HardnessSlide7

Defining Spectral Groups

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013

Hardness

Broadness

Soft, low absorption

Soft, high absorption

Hard, high absorptionHard, moderate absorption

Hard, low absorption Slide8

Group D

Probably dominated by intermediate

polars

in the far Norma arm.

HMXBs are most likely to be in this group.

Power-law:Γ = 0.7±0.1NH = 6.8±0.6 x 1022 cm-2Fe line

:Line = 6.62±0.03 keVEq width = 360±70 eVHEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide9

Dominant X-Ray Populations

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013

Hardness

Broadness

X-ray active stars, RS

CVn

CVs, RS CVnCVs

IPs,

HMXBs

Colliding wind binaries, high-mass starsSlide10

>3σ sources (2-10

keV

)

Broadness

Hardness

LogN-logS

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Corrected for differences in sensitivity across surveyed area and Eddington bias as discussed in Georgakakis et al. 2008Slide11

Now I wonder what you are

Two main analyses to help classify X-ray sources:

Dividing sources into spectral groups

Making stacked spectra, analyzing variability and counterparts of sources in each group

Near-IR follow-up of individual sources

30 J, H, K spectra obtained using OSIRIS on the SOAR telescope Selected sources based on X-ray brightness, spectral hardness, variability, and IR counterpart reliability and magnitudeHEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide12

Low-mass counterparts13 show CO lines typical of low-mass stars and cool giants

consistent with a dominant CV population

1 shows accretion disk signatures > magnetic CV

Γ

= 1.1 ± 0.1, NH

= 1.2 ± 0.1 x 1021 cm-2 , P ≈ 3500 sec, L2-10~ 1032 erg/sHEAD 13th Meeting, 2013K band

K bandNear-IR diagnostics: Wallace & Hinkle 1996, Meier et al. 1998, Förster Schreiber 2000, Ivanov

et al. 2004, Rayner et al. 2009Slide13

High-mass counterparts

6 spectra show lines typical of O, B, Be, or WR stars

2 are possible

HMXBs

in the far Norma arm

2 are likely massive stars in the far Norma arm

2 are sources in the

Scutum

-Crux or near Norma arm

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013

K band

H band

Hardness

Broadness

Near-IR diagnostics: Hanson & Conti 1996, Morris et al. 1996, Hanson et al. 1998, Meier et al. 1998, Hanson et al. 2005Slide14

Summary and Outlook

Magnetic CVs are the dominant X-ray population in the Norma spiral arm, many of which appear to be intermediate

polars

.

The potential

HMXBs we have discovered are faint and could be useful in constraining the faint end of the HMXB luminosity function. Ongoing IR follow-up and a NuSTAR survey of this region will help to uncover other potential HMXBs and to constrain their hard X-ray spectral properties.HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide15

IR counterparts from VISTA VVV surveyLow-mass, foreground starsCool giants and high mass stars, near arm

Cool giants and high mass stars, far arm

Other clues for classifying sources

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide16

Other clues for classifying sources

Short-timescale variability

21 of 28 variable sources (95% confidence) belong to groups A and B > consistent with foreground flaring stars

Long-timescale variability

RS

CVn systems can flare by factor of 10 in amplitudeHMXBs and X-rays from high-mass winds are variableIntermediate polars have fairly constant emission

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide17

Group A

Dominated by low-mass X-ray active stars, RS

CVn

systems in the foreground.

Red dashed:

kT = 2.1+0.3-0.1 keVNH = 5+5-4 x 1020 cm-2

Blue dotted:kT = 0.76±0.04 keVNH = 3±1 x 10

21 cm-2

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide18

Group B

Mixture of foreground active stars and magnetic CVs in the

Scutum

/near Norma arms.

Red dashed component:

kT = 5.9 keVNH = 3.0 x 1021 cm-2Blue dotted

component:kT = 1.0 keVNH < 4 x 1020 cm-2

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide19

Group C

Dominated by magnetic CVs in the

Scutum

/near Norma arms.

Red dashed component:

Γ = 1.2NH = 1.5 x 1022 cm-2Blue dotted component:

Line = 6.8 keVEq width = 400 eVHEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide20

Group E

Mixture of isolated high-mass stars, colliding wind binaries, symbiotic binaries in the far Norma arm. Possible contamination from group D

IPs

.

Red dashed component:

kT = 1.8 keVNH = 2.3 x 1023 cm-2Blue dotted

component:kT = 1.45 keVNH = 4.1 x 1022 cm-2

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide21

AGN Contribution

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide22

LogN-logS for all groups

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Slide23

>3σ sources (2-10

keV

)

Broadness

Hardness

LogN-logS

HEAD 13th Meeting, 2013Sensitivity curve method developed by Georgakakis et al. 2008Slide24

HMXB Luminosity Function

Blue: if all 4 potential

HMXBs

are

HMXBs

HEAD 13th Meeting, 201317-60 keV––– INTEGRAL: Lutovinov et al. 2013

– – Swift BAT: Voss & Ajello 2010- - - Chandra: Grimm et al. 2002