fraud Fraud omnia vitiate fraud vitiates everything Must be specifically pleaded and strictly proven It can be presumed when consideration is woefully and shockingly inadequate Can be rebutted by evidence ID: 682577
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Fraud, Discharge, Remedies" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Fraud, Discharge, RemediesSlide2
fraud
Fraud
omnia
vitiate
– fraud vitiates everything
Must be specifically pleaded and strictly proven
It can be presumed when consideration is woefully and shockingly inadequate
Can be rebutted by evidence
Makes a contract voidable – party must act timeously upon discovering it Slide3
Discharge of Contractual obligations and RemediesSlide4
Where a party is freed from performing his obligations under a contract
Hence there are no outstanding obligations under the contract.
There are 4 ways in which a contract can be discharged or terminated:Slide5
Discharge by agreement
Discharge by performance
Discharge by frustration
Discharge by breachSlide6
Discharge by Agreement
Contracts may be discharged/terminated by agreement just as they are created by agreement
This may be provided for by a termination clause in the contract
If the performance of the obligations under the contract are in the future and neither party has performed his obligations then the parties may agree that each be released from his obligations
Can also apply where parties are replacing an existing contract with a new one, or varying the terms of an existing oneSlide7
Fish & Meat Co Ltd v Ichnusa Ltd –
pg
98
Novation – agreement to substitute one of the parties or the terms of the contract.
Obligations under the old contract are discharged.
Japan Motors v Randolph Motors –
pg
99Slide8
To successfully plead
it:
Intention to substitute, which may be by words or conduct. Conduct must be clear and unambiguous
There must, in fact, be a substitution of the old with the new
Mutual consent – express or by conductSlide9
Discharge by Performance
Performance is where one or both parties have fulfilled their obligations under the contract in accordance with the terms of the contract.
General rule is that performance must be exact and complete. Partial performance is no performance. E.g.:
Goods to be supplied under a contract must be of the right kind and of the right quantity. If it is not, the goods could be rejected
Money to be paid in cash must be in cash and not cheque. It will only be exact when the cheque is honoured
The effect of this (exact and complete performance) is to discharge a party/parties from any or further obligations under the contract Slide10
Time
Generally time is not an issue unless the parties expressly state so,
Or where the nature of the contract makes time of the essence, e.g., the supply of perishable goodsSlide11
Exceptions
If the contract can be divided into several parts, complete performance of each part constitutes performance in respect of those parts, but the obligation to perform the rest remains.
Where party who is to benefit accepts part performance
Where the party who is to benefit prevents the other party from performing his obligations
Where there is substantial performance of the entire obligation, this can arise in situations where hardship would be occasioned otherwise. E.g., a carpenter contracted to produce 4 chairs, but who is able to produce 3. He will be paid for the 3 and discharged. Slide12
Discharge by Frustration
Frustration is where the performance of obligations under the contract becomes impossible as a result of events beyond the power and control of either party
Effect is to discharge the parties from the contract. No legal action can be taken against either.Slide13
Frustration can occur in the following ways:
Death of a party to the contract
Destruction of the subject matter,
Taylor v. Caldwell:
a contract to hire a hall for a musical show was frustrated because the hall was destroyed by fire through no the fault of the owner.
non occurrence of an event – where the performance is dependent on an event,
Krell v. Henry:
held that a contract to hire a room overlooking the proposed route of the coronation procession of King Edward VII was frustrated when the procession was cancelled due to the king’s illness. Purpose of the contract was to view the coronation, not just to hire a room.Slide14
Commercial purpose defeated
Government intervention, e.g. compulsory acquisition, change in law has made performance illegal
Where frustration will not apply:
Self induced events –
Afrifa
v Class Peters –
pg
102
Where parties foresaw the frustration and made provision for it Slide15
Effects of frustration under the Contracts Act
All monies paid would be recovered, and all monies payable would cease to be payable
Where a party has incurred expenses, he may be allowed to recover or retain
If there is part performance, courts may sever parts of the contract as if it were a separate contract Slide16
Discharge by Breach
Where a party, without lawful reasons, and without consent of the other party fails to perform his side of the contract
Types of breach:
Total failure to perform
Anticipatory – where before the date of performance, party indicates his intention not to perform
Incomplete or defective performanceSlide17
Effects of Breach:
Not all breaches will warrant discharge from the contract. Mostly fundamental and serious conditions will lead to a discharge
Where the other party has put himself in a position which makes it impossible to perform then the innocent party may be discharged and may sue for damages Slide18
Exercise
Red Army
is a carpenter. He contracted with Early Steps Pre-School to construct tables and
chairs
for use of the toddlers of the school.
Under the contract, he was to build a 100
chairs and
tables over a period of 7 days. At
a point when
RA
had constructed 80 chairs and 83 tables, he received an urgent message from his village that his
relative had passed
away. As the oldest son, he immediately left for the village, after advising the school proprietor of his predicament. He did not return till two weeks
later and was
told that someone else
had completed the contract
and
the school intends
to sue him for breach.
Advise the parties?Slide19
breakSlide20
Remedies for breach of contract
Once a breach has occurred, the innocent party may seek redress in accordance with the terms of the contract.
This may be by initiating a court action or arbitration. Slide21
There are several means of
redress:
Damages
Specific performance
Injunction
Rescission
RectificationSlide22
Damages
Awarded to compensate the innocent party for the breach
basis is to put the injured party in a position he would have been in, as far as money can, if the other party had performed his obligations
Case:
J
uxon-Smith v KLM Dutch Airlines- 110
Losses which are remote or cannot reasonably be linked to the breach cannot be paid for.Slide23
Damages may be general or special
General flows from the breach
Special –
liquidated, verifiable
and provable
sums, e.g., lost income, expenses incurred etc
In determining damages, the court considers two things
Remoteness
Measure of damages Slide24
Remoteness of damages
Damages must not be remote –
they must be proximate to the breach
Hadley v Baxendale – 111
2 tests established under this case:
Do the damages arise naturally from the breach?
Was it in the reasonable contemplation of both parties as being a probable result of the breach?
If the answer is yes, then damage is not remote and therefore recoverableSlide25
Horne v Midland Railway – 115
Note also page 116 on the essential principlesSlide26
Measure of damages
This is the computation of how much money must be paid by the party in breach to the party suffering from the breach.
Arkoful v State Fishing Corp
– 117
Note: An aggrieved party is required to mitigate his damages by taking reasonable steps
Attitsogbe v Posts and Telecommunications - 118Slide27
Societe Generale de Compensation v Ackerman – 118
Loss incurred
Wages due and payable
Value of any other benefit [one] is entitled to
Kisco Products (
Gh
) Ltd v
Delmas
America
America
Africa lines -119 to 120 Slide28
Quantum Meruit
An equitable remedy meaning “how much it is worth”.
Absent express terms the courts will assess an amount which is fair and reasonable
Skanska v Klimatechnik Engineering Ltd
– “reasonable, ..just right; not too little or too much” Slide29
Applies where
Party is precluded from completing a contract
No concluded contract
122Slide30
Money had and Received
Frafra v Boakye – 123
An order compelling a defendant to refund monies paid by or on behalf of the plaintiff to the defendant, the ground being that the defendant has not at all performed his contractual obligations.Slide31
Specific Performance
An equitable and discretionary remedy
It is not automatically available to a party who prays for it
An order of the court directing a party to perform his contractual obligations
It will be available if damages will be inadequate, where the subject matter is of special interest and value to the plaintiff, where time is of the essence etcSlide32
The one seeking the remedy must come with clean hands and must not himself be tainted by fraud or crookedness.
IBM World Trade Corporation v Hasnem Enterprises Ltd – 127
Addo v Ghana Co-operative Marketing Association Ltd
Koglex v Field
–
“the relief of SP lies whenever agreement between parties have got to a stage that it would amount to fraud on the part of the other party to refuse to perform his side of the bargain”Slide33
Redco Ltd v Sarpong
– 129
Where a third party has provided valuable consideration, and acquired an interest in the subject matter, and has no notice of the rights and interests of the plaintiff, then SP would not lie, but rather damages
Basare v Sakyi & Another - 131Slide34
Summary
The courts will therefore consider the following for the grant of SP:
Whether there is a contract
Where damages will not be an adequate remedy
Where the subject matter is unique and special
Whether
time is of the essence
Part performance and clean hands
Is Remedy sought
in a timely manner
Where conduct of Plaintiff makes it fair and equitable
Whether there is a
bona fide purchaser for value without notice of any prior interest Slide35
Injunction
An equitable remedy directed at a party to refrain from doing a specified Act
Fish & Meat Co Ltd v Ichnusa Ltd
- 132Slide36
Rescission
Remedy granted to one party to set aside a contract on grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, mistake.
Car & Universal Finance Co. Ltd v Caldwell – 135
SA Turqui & Bros v Lamptey – 136
Restoration of both parties to their original positions must be possible for this remedy to lieSlide37
Rectification
An equitable remedy where the court corrects or amends an error in a written contract to bring it into conformity with the actual agreement reached between the parties
it ensures that the written contract is in consonance with the oral or prior agreement
It is to restore the instrument to the true intention of the parties
Walker Property Investment (Brighton) Ltd v Walker -
137Slide38
Questions?