International Financial Crisis The Aftermath Joseph E Stiglitz Trinidad and Tobago September 9 2011 The big questions Where are we now four years after the breaking of the bubble and almost three years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers ID: 731574
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " Global Risks and Opportunities" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Global Risks and Opportunities
International Financial CrisisThe Aftermath
Joseph E.
Stiglitz
Trinidad and Tobago
September 9, 2011Slide2
The big questions
Where are we now, four years after the breaking of the bubble, and almost three years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers?How did we get here?What are the choices we have?
What are the choices that are likely to be made—and what will they imply?
What does all of this imply for emerging markets and developing countries, including the Caribbean?Slide3
A divided world
Global growth reasonably good—for 2011, projected to be about 4.4%Slightly lower than 2010
But much better than 2009, when it shrank .5%
Continuing weakness in US and Europe
Europe 2011 projected to be only around 1.6%
But large differences within Europe—Germany 2.5%
Strong growth in emerging markets, especially Asia
China projected to grow at slightly less than 10%
Though government is trying to cool economy
Developing Asia projected to grow at 8.4%
Sub-Saharan Africa projected to grow at 5.5%Slide4
Prospects for US and Europe: A Japanese-style malaise
Continuing weaknesses in Europe and the U.S.
Some chances of a much deeper downturn (double-dip)
Growth too slow to create enough jobs to bring down unemployment
Official US unemployment rate 9%
Teen unemployment 23%
African-American teen unemployment 40%
Still, almost 1 out of 6 of those who would like a job can’t get one
Jobs deficit almost 25 million
More than 40% of the jobless are long-term unemployedSlide5
Fundamental problem
Lack of aggregate demandBefore crisis, US economy (and much of the world) was fueled by unsustainable housing bubble
Savings rate plummeted to zero
Bubble hid underlying problem
Structural transformation—
successes in increasing manufacturing productivity meant fewer jobs
Changing global comparative advantage
Growing inequality
Those whose incomes were stagnant and declining told to continue consuming
Not sustainable
Reserve build-up in emerging markets
Precautionary savings
Export led growthSlide6
Why prospects of US recovery are so dim
Breaking of bubble left in its wake a legacy of excess capacity in real estate and debt—exacerbating fundamental problemsSolving financial crisis by itself would not resolve underlying problemsBut we have not fully addressed problems in financial sector
Continuing problems of lack of transparency
Continuing problems of excess risk taking
Continuing problems of undercapitalization
Problems of too-big-to fail worsened
Haven’t fixed problems in housing market
Prices continue to fall, foreclosures continue at rapid rate
Haven’t done anything to address underlying economic problems
Again, in some areas, they have become worse
Countries with large reserves did better—incentive to build up reserves further
High unemployment is contributing to increasing inequalitySlide7
Why prospects of US recovery are so dim
Consumption likely to remain weak, given overhang of debt, high unemployment, weak wages
And it would be bad for long-run prospects if US returned to profligate consumption pattern
Investment
likely to remain weak, given excess capacity, overhang from excess investment in real estate during boom years
Small businesses cannot get access to credit
Source of job creation
Banking system—especially the part engaged in lending—remains weak
Most borrowing is collateral based; collateral real estate; real estate prices down markedly
Exports
uncertain, given weaknesses in global economy
US lost capacity for exporting in many industriesSlide8
Weak prospects for US
Government, rather than offsetting weaknesses in private sector, is exacerbating them
End of stimulus implies fiscal contraction
Stimulus worked, but was too small and not well designed
Administration underestimated depth and duration of downturn
Thought that the underlying problem was
just
a banking crisis; repair the banks and the economy will be repaired
Even if banks were working perfectly, economy would be weak
Exacerbated by declines in state revenues
States have balanced budget frameworks
Responses of states—cutting expenditures rather than raising taxes—bad for short-run stability
Problems exacerbated by federal aid cutbacksSlide9
What US needs – and what it is likely to get
Needed: large second round of stimulus
Aimed at high return investments (in education, infrastructure, technology)
Stimulating the economy today
And providing basis for long-term growth
Helping address some of US long term problems
Aid to states, to prevent further cutbacks (total government employment now less than in 2008)
Can the U.
S. afford stimulus?
Can’t afford not to
Long-term fiscal position will be improved if government spends on investments
“Balanced budget” multiplier also large
But Congress unlikely to agree to large increases in revenuesSlide10
What US needs – and what it is likely to get
Actually getting:Two-year extension of Bush tax cuts
Likely to stimulate economy only a little
But will probably increase deficit substantially: low bang for buck
One-year extension of payroll tax
Will have some positive effect
But what happens January?
Dose of austerity
Weakening the economy further—overwhelming evidence that austerity is wrong medicine, deficit reduction will
not
restore confidence in economy
Budget compromise entailed only small dose of austeritySlide11
Monetary Policy will continue to be ineffective
Played an important role in creating crisisBut much less effective in helping economy get out of crisisLow interest rates have not workedLow interest rates are not likely to work—even with commitment to keep them low
Excess capacity
SME lending still restricted—haven’t fully fixed banking sector
Large firms flush with money—credit is not the problem
Low interest rates contributing to jobless recovery
Inducing firms to substitute low cost capital for laborSlide12
QE II did not workMoney goes where returns are highest—emerging markets, not US
It goes where it’s not needed, not where it is neededConsequence of global capital marketsMay contribute to increase in commodity prices (inflation)Responses of emerging markets contributing to fragmentation of global capital markets
May have had slight benefit in competitive devaluation
And in temporary increase in equity pricesSlide13
Europe is equally frail
Some countries in particularly bad fiscal positionBut even those that are not (such as UK) are engaging in austerity
We were all Keynesians, but for a moment
Austerity will slow growth markedly
Uncertainty in euro area
Took away interest rate and exchange rate mechanisms for adjustment, put nothing in place
Problem
is not a
surprise—predicted at the onsetSlide14
From bank bailouts to sovereign bailouts
Bank bailouts meant socializing losses (Ireland)Bad economics, bad politics
Hard to ask ordinary citizens to bear consequences for mistakes of private bankers—when they walked off with so much money
Even without
bailouts, though,
crisis caused by financial sector has weakened fiscal positions
But with the potential of future bailouts, bank balance sheets and governments are intertwined
Future bank losses likely to be borne by public
Including those arising from real estate (Ireland) or sovereignsSlide15
The end of the euro?
Bailout measures only temporary palliative—haven’t changed basic economics
Political issue: will they be able to create more permanent
institutions?
(“solidarity fund for stabilization”)
Or will they be even willing to roll over the
debt?
Austerity measures imposed on Greece will depress economy, unlikely to produce hoped for improvement in public finances
Fire sale
privatizations and further cutbacks are likely to be politically unacceptable
But will further assistance without still more measures be acceptable to the rest of Europe?
Without real assistance, default is inevitable
But default (restructuring) may not be enough—will need to devalue
Argentina showed that there is life after default and devaluationSlide16
The end of the euro?
I believe European leaders are committed to preserving euroBut strong opposition from voters in many countries for assistance to Greece and other countriesProcess of reaching and implementing agreements very slowToo slow for changing market realitiesJuly agreement was a good one
Recognized principle of private sector involvement, importance of growth, need for assistance, interdependence of Europe
But there have been significant problems in implementation
Finish demand for collateral
Slovak refusal to bring to parliament
And even before implementation, events have shown not enough money
Uncertainty will cast pallor over Europe and global economy
Break up would have significant effects on global economy, banks
Already contributing to credit tightening, banking problemsSlide17
So what does this mean for emerging economies?Slide18
Big questions for emerging economies
Can emerging economies have sustainable growth even in the presence of weakness in the West? Answer: Yes, on the strength of the growth of domestic demand.
Is there a risk of the emerging markets overheating—and then crashing?
Answer:
Yes, but China, at least, is acting to limit that risk.Slide19
Lessons from Asia: a changing global economic landscape
Unprecedented growth in AsiaRapid convergence
China already 2
nd
largest economy
On the way to being largest economy
Already largest source of savings
“Correcting” a two-century-long aberration
Economic model markedly different from American-style capitalism (especially in East Asia)
Larger role for government
More government controls
Especially in financial marketsSlide20
Asian economic model has workedNot only to promote unprecedented growth
But also for stabilityAvoided the excesses of the USAnd even to manage the instability foisted on them Slide21
After the crisis
Recognized that excessive deregulation was responsible for the crisisAnd financial and capital market liberalization may have contributed to the rapid spread of crisis around the worldCountries that had maintained regulations (including on cross-border capital flows) fared better
But US Treasury does not seem to have fully learned the lesson Slide22
A new global economic order:1. New Governance
Rules governing global economic system have largely been written by advanced industrial countries, for advanced industrial countries—or for special interests within those countries
Based on “free market” ideology
But justified in terms of “economic principles”
Similarly, for international institutions governing globalization
Marked by flawed governanceSlide23
A new global economic order:2. New Balance of economic power
Rapid growth in emerging markets, continued slow growth in advanced industrial countriesHigh savings in emerging marketsWhy should they rely on the flawed financial markets of advanced industrial countries to manage their finances?
Closing the knowledge gap
With many even becoming a source of innovation
Growth enhances fiscal resources, giving government more room to promote growth with equity
US wastes large amounts on defense, costly wars
Leaving less room for growth enhancing investment
Most Americans worse off than they were a decade agoSlide24
A new global economic order:3. New Ideas
The end of market fundamentalism?Key lesson: need a balanced view of role of government and market, civil societyNot just size of each, but what each does and how they interact
Many models of market economy, some perform better than others
Scandinavian model has performed better than others
On a broad range of indicators
Key has been a larger role of government, more social cohesion, low levels of inequality
Markets on their own also do not “solve” other problems
Role of government in education, technology, infrastructure, social protection and promoting environmentSlide25
Some implications for the Caribbean and Trinidad and Tobago
Close ties with US economy will have adverse effect on growthTourism likely to remain weakExcept high-end tourismPersistence of /increase of inequalityBut the price of oil is likely to remain high
Strong demand in China, other emerging markets likely to offset weaknesses in advanced developing countries
But large increase in supply of gas in US likely to moderate gas prices Slide26
Latin America increasingly reorienting itself toward Asia
May be able to sustain growthFor Caribbean (and others) obvious implicationsDiversificationReorientationSlide27
Some implications for financial markets
Equities (except for banks) may do better than one might expect, given weaknesses in economyLow interest ratesLow wagesCost-cutting measuresBut these responses are likely to contribute to ongoing weaknesses in economySlide28
But high degree of uncertainty—episodic “mini-crises” (e.g. associated with Europe’s problems) –will ensure high volatility, overall “flight to safety”
With some risk that one of these mini-crises becomes a real crisisWith center of crisis in Europe, euro may weaken, hurting US exports, weakening US economy furtherConsiderable uncertainty about US financial systems exposure to Europe
One of consequences of lack of transparency of financial systemSlide29
Concluding RemarksThe policies that have been pursued by the US and some countries in Europe failed to enhanced the well-being of most their citizens and were not sustainableSlide30
Measuring successGDP is not a good measure of success
Objective of economic policies should be sustainable, equitable, democratic developmentTrickle down economics doesn’t work: most Americans are worse off today than they were a decade agoLower real incomes
More insecurity
Lower quality of life
Need to look at how benefits of growth are being sharedSlide31
Sustainability
Many dimensions: economic, political, social, and environmental sustainabilityUS economic policies before the crisis were not economically sustainable—true for many other countries around the worldCurrent patterns of growth are not environmentally sustainableThe planet will not survive if everyone aspires to America’s profligate lifestyle
For the world, increasing sustainable investments is key to addressing the world’s short-run and long-run problems
Could help US and Europe emerge from the malaise into which they seem to be sliding
Countries that adapt to the new reality sooner are more likely to prosperSlide32
Managing Resources
Resource wealth has to be carefully managedCountries like Chile that did so have weathered storm betterMaximizing value obtained
Using new global competition to extract the maximum rents
Making sure that resources are well used
Transparency is key
Macroeconomic management
High level of volatility
Risks of exchange rate appreciation (Dutch disease)
Many countries have failed
Low growth, high inequality
But some have succeeded
If wealth below ground is not reinvested above ground, country is poorerSlide33
Final Remarks US, Europe, and the world are not likely to take the policy actions that would ensure greater stability going forward—or even a quick recovery for US and Europe
Smaller trade-dependent countries around the world have to adapt to this unfortunate turn of eventsSlide34
This makes it all the more imperative that they design policies to buffer themselves against this volatility and which promote growth, even when there is limited scope for expansion of exports to traditional markets
Monetary and exchange policiesFiscal policiesIndustrial policiesEducation and infrastructure
Social protection
In doing so, they can achieve equitable and inclusive, stable and sustainable growth