/
Linkages between the Public Expenditure Analysis, Incentive Linkages between the Public Expenditure Analysis, Incentive

Linkages between the Public Expenditure Analysis, Incentive - PowerPoint Presentation

liane-varnes
liane-varnes . @liane-varnes
Follow
402 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-24

Linkages between the Public Expenditure Analysis, Incentive - PPT Presentation

Incentivedisincentive Analysis This analysis will not consider specific commodity policies in estimating the indicators but examine the impact of overall policy environment on commodity markets T ID: 267844

analysis policies price policy policies analysis policy price prices agricultural costs commodity public production indicators development producers investments consumers

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Linkages between the Public Expenditure ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Linkages between the Public Expenditure Analysis, Incentive/disincentive Analysis and Performance and Development Indicators Slide2

Incentive/disincentive Analysis

This analysis will not consider specific commodity policies in estimating the indicators but examine the impact of overall policy environment on commodity markets.

T

o explain and analyze the indicators, we use:

The policy review

The PE analysis results

Performance and development indicators

To demonstrate these linkages, we present few examplesSlide3

Impacts of Agricultural Price Policies

Agricultural price policies will affect producers, consumers, and the government budget.

Depending on the type of policy, there will be transfers between two or all three groups.

This means in all cases one group loses and at least one other group benefits.

Commodity and sector-specific transfers will come from the PE analysis Slide4

(Producer’s) Taxes

and subsidies

For agricultural commodities such policies result in transfers between the public budget and producers and consumers.

Taxes transfer resources to the government, whereas subsidies transfer resources away from the government.

Example of fixed producer price policy (higher than the international prices)

: gain for producers; loss for consumers; increase in budget outlay that should be compensated by higher taxes

.

Again, these transfers will appear as an output of the PE analysisSlide5

Price stabilization policies

Such policies are adopted because of the high production variation causing market prices to fluctuate substantially from one production cycle to the next.

Policies adopted for this purpose, include trade restrictions, price fixing, rationing, and storage schemes.

Crop insurance and futures and options markets are institutions that reduce the uncertainty of prices and income but these institutions are not adopted by most developing countries

.

These needs to be clarified in the policy reviewSlide6

International trade restrictions

Taxes (tariffs)

or quotas that limit either imports or exports changes domestic price levels and has impacts on both producers and consumers depending on the policy.

Import restrictions, for example, raise domestic prices above relative to world prices, while export restrictions lower domestic prices compare to world price

.

These needs to emerge from the policy reviewSlide7

Factor price policies: traded and non-traded

These policies directly affect agricultural costs of production. The case of traded inputs such as fertilizer use is straight forward i.e. domestic prices are compared with international prices to estimate taxes/subsidies.

The non-traded inputs include land, labor, and capital. Land and labor costs, in general, account for a large share of the production costs of most agricultural commodities.

Policies that can influence such costs include:

land rental rates, minimum wage,

interest rates, control of land use, and

water use/cost policies

.

These are especially relevant for the analysis of non-

tradeables

and needs to be described in the policy review.Slide8

Question and discussion

Question: what are the key policy goals in Kenya?

Question: what are the key constraints in agricultural production in Kenya?

Question: what are the key recent agricultural policy initiatives in Kenya?

Question: what are the main policy tradeoffs? Slide9

Macro-economic Policies

Three categories of macro-economic policies affect agriculture:

Monetary policies

Fiscal policies

Exchange rate policiesSlide10

Monetary and fiscal policies

These policies influence all sectors of the economy. The key is their impacts on the rate of price inflation (consumer or producer prices).

Monetary policies leading to increase supply of money leads to faster demand growth for goods thus puts pressure on inflation.

Similarly, inflation increases when government deficits are covered by expanding supply of money

.

These policies, when directed to agriculture, appear clearly from the PE analysis as increased spending in the sector for certain expenditure and also in the performance and development indicators. Slide11

Exchange rate policies

Exchange rates affect agricultural prices and costs of tradable goods (imports and exports) and

in the estimations of price incentives, exchange rate misalignment needs to be estimated.

The exchange rate influences the price of an agricultural commodity because the domestic price (in local currency) of a tradable commodity is equal to the world price (in foreign currency) times the exchange rate (the ratio of domestic to foreign currency).

If relevant to the incentive/disincentive analysis, this needs to be included in the policy review and development and performance indicators.

May result in higher cost of imported inputs subsidies and thus reflected in PE analysis if these inputs are subsidizedSlide12

Public Expenditure Policies Influencing Agriculture

Government budgetary resources can be spent on agriculture

directly

or

indirectly

to improve incomes, increase productivity and to reduce transaction costs.

The most common direct expenditures include production and input subsidies, direct payments, investments in infrastructure (on and off farm), investment in human capital (agricultural education and training, etc.), and in agriculture research and technology (and extension) while indirect expenditures include rural development measures (rural infrastructure, education, health).Slide13

Public expenditures on input subsidies

Input subsidies are implemented to enable farmers to use inputs and technologies that are known to be effective and intend to address in relatively simple manner otherwise difficult problems of developing input markets and associated financial services to small farmers.

But inputs subsidies treat the symptoms rather than origins of market failures, distort resource allocation and are often costly and difficult to sustain without cutting expenditures on important public goods.Slide14

Such

investments benefit both producers and

consumers (reflected in the PE analysis).

These investments are very important for production

growth shifting the supply curve rightward

T

hey

tend to have strong long-term impacts although difficult to

measure in terms of return to specific commodity in a given year

.

L

ower marginal factor costs resulting from technological change leads to low domestic prices.

Therefore, some commodities may become cheaper than the price parity

Public investments in research and technology (R&D)Slide15

Public investments in infrastructure

Infrastructure investment improves returns to producers or lowers costs of production.

Infrastructure investment includes investment in roads, ports, and irrigation networks (and can be on and off farm). Such investments tend to be targeted and benefit mostly the producers and consumers who live in those regions

.

While clearly reflected in the PE analysis and supported by development indicators, these are taken into account in incentive/disincentive analysis through access costs at various points in the value chain.Slide16

These include wide variations of policies and include investment to improve the skill levels and health of producers and consumers.

Investments in formal schools, training and extension centers, public health facilities, and clinics and hospitals are examples of such investment.

These investments are very important for long-term development, but their short-terms impacts on prices difficult to measure.

These expenditures are taken into account in the PE analysis and many development indicators including the UNDP human capital index.

Public investments in human capitalSlide17

Discussion on Policy Tradeoffs

Often gains for one policy goal result in losses for another (example of price subsidy and budget deficit or consumer and producer price subsidy).

Assigning weights to objectives of government policies are value judgments but the goal of analysis is to identify the appropriate tradeoffs between policies.

Quantitative analyses are critical for policymakers to examine the impacts of their policies (producers, consumers, budget, efficiency, equity, etc.).Slide18

18

Part 1: Background

Description of the economy, and the agricultural economy

F&A policy environment & political economy

Part 2: Findings based on in-depth analysis of agricultural and food policies and public investment in agriculture

Analysis of price incentives and disincentives in agriculture and degree of market development.

Analysis of public expenditures and aid directed to agriculture

Analysis of development and performance indicators and linkages

Part 4: Specific policy issues of interest to the country

Conclusions

Policy implications and elements for an evidence-based policy dialogue

Lessons learned and way forward

Outlines of the country reportSlide19

The Steps aheadSlide20

Update and examine the data in the list with data from national data

sources

(particularly diet

composition

) for the 2006-2010.

Are the

lists

the same? How can we explain differences

?

Repeat the methodology for the commodity selection

Does the country want to include a specific commodity? why

?

Add the commodities of national interests to the list and classify the commodities according to tradability

Finalizing commodity selection

OUTPUT:

Final product list

Estimated time: 2 weeks.Slide21

Data Management

For the import substitutes and exports, review value chains (marketing channels) from available studies or ad hoc surveys including estimates of access costs and determine the relevant point of competition

For each commodity, determine the relevant markets or production region when multiple markets/production regions exist for the commodity.

Using the data template, collect and document the data required for the estimation of the price incentive/disincentive.

Determine whether there are quality/quantity differences between domestic and foreign commodities and determine conversion factors (literature).Slide22

Incentive/disincentive analysis

Using the data template provided estimate the first layer indicators.

Consulting the literature, determine and document if adjustments needs to be performed on:

Exchange rate during the period of analysis

Access costs

If so, determine the alternative relevant adjustments and perform the second layer analysis.Slide23

Let’s Begin