PPT-Presentation on Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum

10212014 1 UMESH CHAVAN amp DBKulkarni Walchand college of engineering Sangli Vishrambag Sangli416415Maharashtra An Autonomous Institute 60 years of . Parallel programming 5 - 2 arallel Version 1. Our first parallel version simply splits the outer loop: id := process_fork (p); for (i=id; in ; i=i+p) { y [i] = 0; for (j=0; jn A plan for moving every child. toward expertise. Our Advance Organizer. Define curriculum. Review curriculum components . Define curriculum models. Overview of PCM goals and purposes. Definitions, goals, and purposes of each parallel . Pro .Net Programming in C#, Adam Freeman. Parallel C# . Task Parallel Library (TPL). TPL tasks vs. Threads. Benefits & Pitfalls of Parallel Programming. Overhead. Coordinating fata. Scaling Applications. Time for Hardware Upgrade. Uzi Vishkin. . . The pompous version. After 40 years of “wandering in the desert”, general-purpose parallelism is very close to capturing the “promised land” of mainstream computing. Anthony Waterman. Topics to Discuss. Are online games . c. onceptually. . p. arallel?. What portions of a game benefit from parallelization?. Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) . General-Purpose . C. omputing . Going Beyond Serial MATLAB Applications. MATLAB . Desktop (Client). Worker. Worker. Worker. Worker. Worker. Worker. Programming Parallel Applications (CPU). Built-in support. with t. oolboxes. Ease of Use. Vijay . Pai. (PI), Deborah Bennett, . Cordelia. Brown, Yung Lu, . Sam . Midkiff. smidkiff@purdue.edu. Let’s start off pessimistically. I’ve been involved in two or three of these workshops, and the comment I’ve heard from industrial . 6/16/2010. Parallel Programming Abstractions. 1. Tasks . vs. Threads. Similar but not the same.. 6/16/2010. Parallel Programming Abstractions. 2. h/w processors. Operating System. T. hreads. Task Scheduler. Async. . and . Await. ”. Joe Hummel, PhD. joe@joehummel.net. Technical Staff: . Pluralsight. Adjunct Professor: UIC, LUC. http://www.joehummel.net/downloads.html. Motivation. Execution model. Parallel programming with Tasks. Async. . and . Await. ”. Joe Hummel, PhD. joe@joehummel.net. Technical Staff: . Pluralsight. Adjunct Professor: UIC, LUC. http://www.joehummel.net/downloads.html. Motivation. Execution model. Parallel programming with Tasks. :. Teaching and Training for . the Parallel Future. Dick Brown. St. Olaf College. SPLASH Educators’ and Trainers Symposium. October 24, 2011. Overview. Review of the need for parallelism. Strategies we need. The Tyranny of. the Storage Hierarchy. Henry Neeman, University of Oklahoma. Charlie Peck, Earlham College. Tuesday October 11 2011. Parallel Programming: . Storage . Hierarchy. OK Supercomputing Symposium, Tue Oct 11 2011. modelS. CS 5802 . Monica Borra. Overview. Types of parallel programming models. Shared memory Model. OpenMP. POSIX Threads. Cilk. /. Cilk. Plus/. Cilk. Plus . Plus. Thread Building Blocks. Types of Parallel Programming Models:. Fall 2015. Lars Ailo Bongo (larsab@cs.uit.no). Course topics. Parallel programming. The parallelization process. Optimization of parallel programs. Performance analysis. Data-intensive computing. Parallel programs.