NoiseLand Use Compatibility Study Teterboro Users Group Meeting July 19 2017 Teterboro Airport Agenda Introductions Part 150 Overview Noise Exposure Map NEM Noise Compatibility Program NCP Discussion ID: 757117
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Teterboro Airport Part 150" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Teterboro Airport Part 150 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Study
Teterboro Users Group Meeting
July 19, 2017
Teterboro AirportSlide2
AgendaIntroductions
Part
150
Overview
Noise Exposure Map (NEM)
Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) Discussion
Study ScheduleSlide3
Generalized Part 150 Study Process / ScheduleSlide4
Final TEB Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs)Slide5
Final NEM Dwelling Unit and Population Counts
Year
Metric
Dwelling Units within DNL Contour Interval
Population within DNL Contour Interval
65-70
70-75
Total
65-70
70-75
Total
2016Single Family880882130213Multi-Family510511230123Mobile Home4485210619125Total1838191442194612021Single Family8358820112213Multi-Family492511195124Mobile Home14895711622138Total1801619643639475Note: Population = 2.42 people times number of residential units Slide6
Noise Compatibility Program Development Process
Analysis and Selection Process Applied in Steps 2 - 4
Evaluate effectiveness of each measure in addressing
objectives
Evaluate feasibility (operational, safety, economic, etc.)
Select preferred “package” of measures
Identify implementation schedule, responsibilities, budget, funding sources, etc.
If not recommended, document reasonsSlide7
Major NCP Strategy Options within Each Category
Programmatic Strategies
Implementation tools (rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.)
Promotion, education, signage, etc.
Monitoring
Reporting
NEM updating
NCP
revision
Other actions proposed by
stakeholders
Land Use StrategiesfffMitigationLand acquisitionSound insulationAvigation easementsPreventionLand use controlsZoningBuilding codesComprehensive plansReal estate disclosuresOther actions proposed by stakeholdersNoise Abatement StrategiessNoise abatement flight tracks Preferential runway useArrival/departure proceduresAirport layout modificationsNoise barriers (presented today)Runup enclosuresUse restrictions (will be addressed at TAC 13)Other actions proposed by stakeholdersSlide8
“Partial
” DNL
Contributors
by
Operational Category
Jet Operations
Departure Operations
Night Departure Operations
Day Departure Operations
Most Effective Noise Abatement Alternatives
Results:
Jet operations dominate total DNLDepartures contribute more to total DNL than arrivalsDaytime operations contribute slightly more than nighttimeSlide9
NCP Operational Noise Abatement Proposals
Category
Measure
Noise Benefit
Preferential runway use
Shift Runway 6 night arrivals to Runway 1 – Existing Program
Small benefit (reduction of 8 homes with
a 25% shift
)
Shift Runway 24 night departures to Runway 19 – Existing Program
Small benefit for
a small increase (10%), no benefit at a higher increase (25%)Shift Runway 1 night departures to Runway 6No Benefit as increased dwelling units north of Runway 24Combination of Increased arrivals to Runway 1 and departures from Runway 19Little benefit as increases in units in the mobile home park offset reductions of units along Route 17Noise abatement flight paths, arrival procedures, and departure proceduresRunway 19 Quiet Visual approachFAA discontinued procedure for use after publication due to the complexity of flying itRunway 24 noise abatement departure to 230 heading at nightReduction of 15 dwelling units in total, 6 of which are within the 70 DNL contourNoise abatement departure procedures - NBAA high-density NADPReduction of 19 dwelling units if used for 88% of of jet departures not held down at or below 3,000 ft.Airport layoutRunway 1 jet departures starting at Taxiway K intersectionReduction of 28 dwelling units in the mobile home parkRelocation of maintenance run-ups to center of airfield along Taxiway QReduction of 5 dwelling units in the mobile home parkSlide10
Preferential Runway Use
Shift 25% of
Rwy
6
Night
Arrivals
to Runway 1
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.
Shift 25% of
Rwy
24 Night Departures to Rwy 19Slide11
Preferential Runway Use (cont’d)
Shift 25% of
Rwy
1
Night
Departures
to
Rwy
6
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.
Shift 25% of
Rwy 6 Night Arrivals to Rwy 1 and 25% of Rwy 24 Night Departures to Rwy 19Slide12
Preferential Runway Use (cont’d)
We looked at increasing use of the Preferential Runway Use at night
TRACON does not expect the airspace situation to change to allow for more Runway 19 departures at night
Overall the existing program has a benefit and should remain in placeSlide13
Noise Abatement Flight Track: 90% of
Night
Jet Departures on Runway 24
Assigned 230°
Heading
Moderate reduction in residential
land within the 65 DNL
contour
Slight reduction in residential land within the 70 DNL contour
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.
Existing track shown is the jet backbone track with the highest usageThe new 230o departure heading track turns after the end of the runway Slide14
NBAA High-Density NADPSlide15
Departure Procedure: Use of NBAA High-Density
NADP to Jet
Departures
Not
Held at
or Below 3,000’
Limiting application to departures not held at 3,000’ results in approximately 52% of all jet departures using high-density NADP
Pulls the 70 DNL contour onto airport property
Reduces residential land within 65 DNL under Runway 24 departures
North Jersey Vineyard Church to the north of Runway 1/19 is removed from 65 DNL
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only. Slide16
Taxiway K intersection
Normal, full-length start-of-takeoff-roll location
Airport Layout:
Shift the start-of-takeoff-roll
point
to the Taxiway K intersection for
all
of
Runway 1 jet departures at night
Would lose approximately 550’ of takeoff distance, but takeoff distance is still longer than Runway 6
Voluntary procedure would permit aircraft to use full runway length if needed
Noticeable reduction of contour extent over mobile home park – reduction of 28 dwelling unitsThese figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only. Slide17
Airport Layout: Location of All Maintenance Runups in the Center of the Airfield along Taxiway Q
Provides reduction of the 70 DNL contour south of Route 46
Proposed
runup
location along Taxiway Q north of Taxiway G
Using 60
o
and 240
o
headings – with the same split as the existing locations
There is a slight benefit to the mobile home park (reduction of five homes)
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only. Slide18
Dwelling Unit and Population Analyses
Category
Scenario
65 – 70 DNL
70+ DNL
Total
Dwelling Unit
Change from Baseline
Population Change from Baseline
Units
Pop’nUnitsPop’nUnitsPop’n65-7070+Total65-7070+TotalBaseline2021 Baseline Operations1804361639196475------Runway UseShift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arr.s to Rwy 1179433922188455-1-7-8-3-17-20Shift 25% Rwy 24 Night Dep.s to Rwy 1918945710241994819-6321-156Shift 25% of Rwy 1 Night Dep.s to Rwy 618143812291934671-4-32-10-8Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arr.s to Rwy 1 and 25% of Rwy 1 Night Dep.s to Rwy 1918344310241934673-6-37-15-8Flight Tracks90% Night Rwy 24 Jet Dep.s Turn to 230°1714141024181438-9-6-15-22-15-37Layout100% of RW 1 Night Departures Start at Twy K161390717168407-19-9-28-46-22-68All maintenance runups use central location1794331229191462-1-4-5-3-10-13NBAA High-Density NADPUse by 88% of Jet Departures Not Held Down at or Below 3,000 ft.168407922177429-12-7-19-29-17-46Green highlight is net reductionRed highlight is net increaseNote: Noise abatement procedures must be studied and approved by the FAA for safety and efficiency before any proposed procedure can be implemented.Slide19
Sensitive Receptors within 65 DNL
Category
Scenario
Learning Tree Academy Daycare
Bergen County Technical School
(Sound insulated,
so compatible)
Catalyst Agape Church
(formerly
North Jersey Vineyard Church)
Jersey College
School of Nursing (Sound insulation status unknown)Baseline2021 Baseline OperationsRunway UseShift 25% of RW 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1Shift 25% RW 24 Night Departures to Runway 19Shift 25% of RW 1 Night Departures to Runway 6Shift 25% of RW 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1 and25% of Runway 1 Night Departures to Runway 19Flight Tracks90% Night Rwy 24 Jet Dep.s Turn to 230°Layout100% of RW 1 Night Departures Start at Twy KNBAA High-Density NADPUse by 88% of Jet Departures Not Held Down at or Below 3,000 ft.Removed from contoursBlue checkmark indicates site is wholly or largely within DNL 65Note: Noise abatement procedures must be studied and approved by the FAA for safety and efficiency before any proposed procedure can be implemented.Slide20
Next StepsFinalize operational recommendationsDevelop land use/mitigation recommendations
Develop programmatic recommendations
Draft NCP will be submitted to FAA in August of 2018