PDF-Serializability Summary Murat Kantarcioglu Scheduling
Author : lindy-dunigan | Published Date : 2015-04-21
Equivalent schedules For any database state the effect on the set of objects in the database of executing the first schedule is identical to the effect of executing
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Serializability Summary Murat Kantarciog..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Serializability Summary Murat Kantarcioglu Scheduling: Transcript
Equivalent schedules For any database state the effect on the set of objects in the database of executing the first schedule is identical to the effect of executing the second schedule Serializable schedule A schedule that is equivalent to some se. se Abstract Global 64257xedpriority scheduling of constrained deadline sporadic tasks systems is important not only for CPU scheduling but also in other domains for example scheduling realtime 64258ows in WirelessHART networks designed for industrial Department University at Buffalo SUNY 14260 Buffalo NY USA cgakcora mbayir demirbascsebuffaloedu Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu Computer Science Eng Department The Ohio State University Columbus OH 43210 USA hakancseohiostateedu ABSTRACT While polls are tra Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling. Basic Concepts. Scheduling Criteria . Scheduling Algorithms. Thread Scheduling. Multiple-Processor Scheduling. Operating Systems Examples. Algorithm Evaluation. Objectives. Shouling. . Ji. and . Raheem. . Beyah. CAP group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Georgia Institute of Technology. Zhipeng. . Cai. . Department of Computer Science. Georgia State . By. Dr. Amin Danial Asham. References. Real-time Systems Theory and Practice. . By . Rajib. mall. Task Scheduling. Real-Time task scheduling essentially refers to determining the order in which the various tasks are to be taken up for execution by the operating system. Every operating system relies on one or more task schedulers to prepare the schedule of execution of various tasks it needs to run. Each task scheduler is characterized by the scheduling algorithm it employs. A large number of algorithms for scheduling real-Time tasks have so far been developed. Real-Time task scheduling on uniprocessors is a mature discipline now with most of the important results having been worked out in the early 1970's. The research results available at present in the literature are very extensive and it would indeed be grueling to study them exhaustively. In this text, we therefore classify the available scheduling algorithms into a few broad classes and study the characteristics of a few important ones in each class. . 2. 18.2 Conflict-Serializability. 18.2.1: Conflicts. 18.2.2: Precedence Graphs & a Test for Conflict-Serializability. 18.2.3: Why the Precedence-Graph Test Works. 3. 18.2 Conflict-Serializability. -Ashish Singh. Introduction. History and Background. Linux Scheduling. Modification in Linux Scheduling. Results. Conclusion. References. Questions. History and Background. In 1991 Linus Torvalds took a college computer science course that used the Minix operating system. Suli Yang, Tyler Harter, . Nishant. . Agrawal. , . Samer. Al-. Kiswany. , . Salini. . Selvaraj. . Kowsalya. ,. . Anand. Krishnamurthy, . Rini. T . Kaushik. , . Andrea C. . Arpaci-Dusseau. , . Remzi. 1. 5.1 Basic Concepts. The . goal of multi-programming is to maximize the utilization of the CPU as a system resource by having a process running on it at all . times. Supporting multi-programming means encoding the ability in the O/S to switch between currently running jobs. T. Rogers, M O’Conner, and T. . Aamodt. MICRO 2012. Goal. Understand the relationship between schedulers (warp/wavefront) and locality behaviors . Distinguish between inter-wavefront and intra-wavefront locality. By. Dr. Amin Danial Asham. References. Real-time Systems Theory and Practice. . By . Rajib. mall. Task Scheduling. Real-Time task scheduling essentially refers to determining the order in which the various tasks are to be taken up for execution by the operating system. Every operating system relies on one or more task schedulers to prepare the schedule of execution of various tasks it needs to run. Each task scheduler is characterized by the scheduling algorithm it employs. A large number of algorithms for scheduling real-Time tasks have so far been developed. Real-Time task scheduling on uniprocessors is a mature discipline now with most of the important results having been worked out in the early 1970's. The research results available at present in the literature are very extensive and it would indeed be grueling to study them exhaustively. In this text, we therefore classify the available scheduling algorithms into a few broad classes and study the characteristics of a few important ones in each class. . Aritra Sengupta. Man Cao. Michael D. Bond. and. Milind Kulkarni. 1. Programming Language Semantics? . Data Races. C++ no guarantee of semantics – “catch-fire” semantics . Java provides weak semantics. 2. 18.2 Conflict-Serializability. 18.2.1: Conflicts. 18.2.2: Precedence Graphs & a Test for Conflict-Serializability. 18.2.3: Why the Precedence-Graph Test Works. 3. 18.2 Conflict-Serializability. Jeffrey Helt. ◊. Matthew Burke. ○. , Amit Levy. ◊. , Wyatt Lloyd. ◊. ◊. Princeton University. . ○. Cornell University. Distributed Applications and Services. Web. Database. Service. App.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Serializability Summary Murat Kantarcioglu Scheduling"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents