/
Status of GEMS Status of GEMS

Status of GEMS - PowerPoint Presentation

lindy-dunigan
lindy-dunigan . @lindy-dunigan
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-26

Status of GEMS - PPT Presentation

Jhoon Kim Mijin Kim Ukkyo Jeong GEMS Team Yonsei University GEMS Science Team Myung Hwan Ahn Yong Sang Choi Myeongjae Jeong Jae Hwan Kim Young Joon Kim Hanlim Lee Kwang Mog Lee Rokjin Park ID: 293970

snr gems aod radiance gems snr radiance aod cloud time nominal amp hcho 100 data 300 quality operation algorithm

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Status of GEMS" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Status of GEMS

Jhoon Kim,

Mijin Kim, Ukkyo JeongGEMS TeamYonsei UniversitySlide2

GEMS Science Team

Myung Hwan Ahn

Yong Sang ChoiMyeongjae JeongJae Hwan KimYoung Joon KimHanlim Lee Kwang Mog LeeRokjin Park

Seon Ki Park

Chul Han Song

Jung Hun Woo

Jung-Moon Yoo

Changwoo AhnJay Al-SaadiP.K. BhartiaKevin BowmanGreg CarmichaelKelly ChanceYunsoo ChoiRon CohenRuss Dickerson David EdwardsAnnmarie ElderingErnest HilsenrathDaneil JacobScott JanzThomas KurosuQinbin Li

Heinrich BovensmannJohn BurrowsJoerg LangenPieternel LeveltUlrich PlattPiet StamnesPepijn Veefkind Ben VeihelmannThomas Wagner

Hajime Akimoto Sachiko HayashidaHitoshi Irie Yasko Kasai Kawakami Shuji Charles Wong

Xiong LiuRandall MartinSteve MassieJack McConnel*Tom McElroy Jessica NeuMike NewchurchStan SanderJochen StutzOmar TorresDong WuLiang XuPing YangDusanka ZupanskiMilija Zupanski

Jin Seok HanChang Keun SongSang Deog LeeM.H. LeeH.W. SeoSukjo LeeYoudeog HongJ.S. Kim

Seung Hoon LeeSang Soon YongD.G. LeeJ.P GongDai Ho KoS.H. KimJ.H. YeonY.C. Youk…

Sangseo Park, Mijin Kim, Ukkyo Jeong, M.J. Choi; Ju Seon Bak, Kanghyun Baek;

Hyeong-Ahn Kwon, H.J. Cho; K.M. Han, Jihyo Chong, Kwanchul Kim; J.H. Park, Y.J. Lee;

Bo-Ram Kim, M.A. Kang J.H. Yang, Sujeong Lim, S.W. Jeong ; Slide3

Outline

GEMS Program

StatusBaseline ProductsSpecification

Issues

Nominal radiance vs. SNR

Predicted Performance

SummarySlide4

Air Quality Forecast in Operation

- by Korean Ministry of Environment - O3

, NO

2

, PM …

http://www.kaq.or.krSlide5

Status of GEMS Mission

Budget & Review

Budget request proposal was approved on Dec. 2010 by the Government Budget Review Committee led by the Ministry of Planning and FinanceGEMS Program passed Mid-term review on Dec. 4, 2013, and now is

in Final Phase till launch

.

* Launch : Dec., 2018

Prime Contractor

Selection of main contractor for the Joint Development with KARI on May 13th , 2013 (International Contractor: Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.)

Changes in EnvironmentDomesticGEMS, included as one of the 140 New National Agenda(2013

)Air quality forecast in operation since 2013 by NIER (data assimilation of model with sat. data)International

Increased attention on SLCFInternational CollaborationRecognized as a part of Geostationary AQ Constellation by CEOS ACCToR for NASA-NIER/ME collaboration endorsed by NASA HQ and NIER/MEBilateral agreement between Korea MEST and U.S. NASAMOU between KARI and NSO

MOU with NCAR(2010), Harvard CfA (2011), UCLA(2012); Agreement with NASA(2011)Slide6

Product

Impor

-tance

Min

(cm

-2

)

Max

(cm-2)Nominal

(cm-2)

AccuracySpectral window (nm)

Spatial Resolution(km

2)@ Seoul

SZA

(

deg

)

Retriev

-al

NO

2

Ozone precursor

3x10131x10171x10141x1015425-45056< 70BOAS/ DOASSO2Aerosol precursor6x1081x10176x10141x1016310-33056x 4 pixels< 50(60*)HCHOProxy for VOCs1x10153x10163x10151x1016327-35756x 4 pixels< 50(60*)O3Oxidant, pollutant4x10172x10181x10183%(TOz)5%(Strat)20%(Trop)300-34056< 70TOMS,OEAOD (AI, SSA,AOCH)Air quality,Climate0 (AOD)5 (AOD)0.2 (AOD)20% or 0.1@ 400nm300-50056< 70Multi-spectralO2-O2CloudsData quality,climate0 (COD)50 (COD)17 (COD)300-50056Raman,O2-O2SurfacePropertyEnviron-ment01-300-50056Multi-spectral

Baseline productsSlide7

CTM

RTM

Radiance spectrum

Sim

GEMS_Lv1b

Radiance spectrum

MET. field

Emission

R

λ

(Sat.)SurfaceRad Cloud fractionCloud height

Aerosol

Surface refl.AI, AOD, SSA, AOCH

NO

2

SO

2

HCHO

O

3

Trop. NO

2

VCDTrop. SO2 VCDHCHO VCDTrop. O3 VCDTotal O3 VCDData AssimilationBefore LaunchAfter LaunchAQ ForecastClimate Change PolicyGEMSInstrumentRequirementDynamic rangeSpectral rangeSpectral resolutionSpatial resolutionSNRMTFOperation ScenarioCloudCloud detectionYESNOPublic ServiceHourly AMFStratospheric CompAMFCAL/VALSlide8

1. Design an integrated algorithm

2. Make standardizing conventions

3. Make algorithm developers be familiar with

the standardizing rules

4. Develop each algorithm and common modules based on the standardizing rules

5. Assemble the algorithms and common modules to be an integrated one

6. Optimize an integrated one including parallelization and porting

7. Test the system

8. Repeat the processes, if needed

Finish

On-going20142015

GEMS Unified algorithm development scheduleSlide9

Projected FOV & GSD - NS GSD @ Seoul : 7.0km

Projected FOV

Region of interest

For clear sector method

Normal operationSlide10

Operation mode

Operation mode

Observation Freq. (min)E-W Scan coverage(@lat. of Seoul)Normal

60*

75 E – 145 E (70

deg

wide)

SpecialEA(East Asia)60*110 E – 140 E (30 deg wide)EEA(Enhanced East Asia)60*115 E – 130 E (15 deg wide)

LA(Local Area)< 30In emergencyby ground commandImaging time 30 minutes + Transmission 30 minutes

to avoid mechanical disturbance with GOCI-2Slide11

Comparison of Specification

GEMS

GEOCAPE

[TEMPO]

Sentinel-4

Spectral range(nm)

300 – 500 nm

[290 – 690 nm]

305-500 / 750-775

Spectral

resol

(nm)

0.6 (3 samples)

[0.6]

0.5 / 0.12

Spatial

resol

7 km NS x 8 km EW @ Seoul

3.5 km NS x 8 km EW for aerosol

[2.0 km NS x 4.5 km EW]

8 km @ 45 N

Spatial coverage5 S – 45 N75 E – 145 E30 N - 65 N40 W – 60 E20 N – 60 N30 W – 150 WObs. time30 min[1 hour]1 hourDetector @ TCCD @ 278 K[CCD @ ~255 K]CCD @ 230 KOnboard calibrationSolar, cal light source[Solar]Solar, cal light sourceVolume (m3)1.1 x 1.2 x 0.9[1 x 1.1 x 1]~1.1 x 1.2 x 0.9Mass (Kg)110[100]150

Power (W)

200 (on orbit) / 100 (transfer)

[100]

180

Data rate (Mbps)

20 (up to 40)

[9]

25 Mbps

SNR

&

Nominal Radiance

[Wm

-2

sr

-1

m

m

-1

]

Wave-

length

Nominal radiance

SNR

@

l

[nm]

Wave-

length

Nominal

radiance

SNR

Wave-

length

Nominal

radiance

SNR

Goal

Threshold

300-315

4.93

7.98

252

@300

 

305-330

 

33.5

305

310

315

1.10

2.90

18.0

160

320

630

315

-325

30.4

43.4

720

@320

720

[1290]

320

30.9

900

325-335

63.8

86.6

1273

@325

1504

@357

320-329

54.3

[480]

335-357

65.2

91.4

327-356

53.3

350

70.9

1000

357-423

71.6

108.7

 

 

400

91.4

1200

423-451

86.4

130.8

1500

@430

423-451

67.3

[1230]

450

101

1400

451-500

103.7

145.5

1459

@500

 

 

500

73.1

1400

Ref.

Kelly Chance

Ben

Veihelmann

,

Cathy

ClerbauxSlide12

Comparison of Baseline Products

GEMS

GEOCAPE

[TEMPO]

Sentinel-4

Operation

2018-2027

2019-2021

2019-2028

Products

O3, NO

2, O4, SO2, HCHO,

AI, AOD, SSA, Cloud

O

3

,(UV, Vis), NO

2

, SO

2

, H

2

CO, H2C2O2, AOD, AI, CloudO3, SO2, (BrO), HCHO, Ring , NO2, O4, (IO CHOCHO), AAI, AOD, CloudTypical rangePrecisionTypical valuePrecisionTypical valuePrecisionO3Troposp4x1017 ~ 2x1018 cm-220 %40 ppb10%10-25%50 ppb10%Strato-sphere230-360 DU5 %8 x 1035%Total250-400 DU3 %9 x 1033%NO23x 1013 ~3x 1017cm-21x1015 cm-261.0015-25%SO26x108 ~ 1x1017 cm-21x1016 cm-21010.020-50%HCHO1x1015~3x1016 cm-21x1016 cm-21010.020-50%AOD0.20.10.1-10.05

AAOD

0-0.05

0.03

AI

-1 ~ +5

0.2

-1 - +5

0.2

Cloud Fraction

0 ~ 1

0.05

0-1

0.05

Cloud Top Height

200-900

hPa

200-900

hPa

100

hPa

CHOCHO

0.2

0.4

BrO

Ref.

Kelly Chance

Ben

Veihelmann

,

Cathy

ClerbauxSlide13

- Performance prediction -

Error analysis using the optimal estimation method

TOMS climatology 388nm surface albedo

CMAQ model results in East Asia domain

GEMS viewing geometries

VLIDORT

Radiances, Jacobians, …

SNR

Calculate the solution error

(retrieval noise + smoothing error) by optimal estimation method (Rodgers; Liu and Chance

et al.)GEMS specificationSlide14

Calculation domain & conditions

Temporal domain

0 – 7 UTC (every hours) X 12 month

Spatial domain

75 – 145 longitude X 5 – 45 latitude (2 degree

resol

.)

~ 70,000 runsAtmosphere profilesCMAQ calculation results in East Asia (~70,000 profiles)

6 gases (O3, NO

2, H2CO, SO2

, C2H2O2, H2

O), BrO, OClO, O4

and AerosolActual viewing geometry for a geostationary satellite at 128.2° E

No cloud (under consideration)

RTM calculation and sensitivity calculation (VLIDORT)

300-500

nm at 0.6 nm FWHM, every 0.2

nm

GEMS SNR

Climatology surface reflectance from TOMS at 388nmSlide15

NO2 100.0%

SO2 99.8%

HCHO 100.0%

Tropo. O3 99.9%

1.

환경탑재체 규격에 근거한 사용자 요구사항 만족도

(3/4)

15

SZA

Solution error

User Req.Slide16

Strat. O3 100.0%

Total O3 100.0%

1.

환경탑재체 규격에 근거한 사용자 요구사항 만족도

(4/4)

Species

Required precision

# of spatial

co-adding

Meet requirments (%)

NO

2

0.1×10

16

2

100.0

SO

2

1.0×10

16

4*

99.8

HCHO1.0×10164100.0Trop. O320%499.9Strat. O35%1100.0Total O33%1100.016* 3 hours co-addingSlide17

Overestimation of nominal radiance

 decrease of SNR

Near 300 nm  Important for ozone retrieval (wavelength coverage extension issue)GOCI most probable measured radiance (all pixels including cloud)

(one daily cycle per month for 1 year (2012),

Lat = 25N~48N, Long = 115E~145E)Nominal radiance and SNRSlide18

1X integration time

4/3X integration time

5/3X integration time

2X integration time

Predicted SNR @ nominal radiance with different integration time

Increase of Integration Time

Issues: 1) signal saturation, 2) pointing stability

*

SNR requirementSlide19

Data Quality Harmonization

with GEO Constellation

CEOS ACCHarmonizing data qualitySharing basic requirementsComparing algorithm performanceCommon algorithm standardCross participating in science & review meetingsCalibrationPre-flight cal.

Collaborate with TEMPO, Sentinel-4 and TROPOMI team

Post flight ground-based Cal/Val

AERONET, Pandora, SAOZ …

GSICS UV-VISSlide20

Summary

GEMS is now in main phase, after SDR in 2013 and

PDR this week, and is planned to be launched in Dec., 2018.

GEMS is

expected to provide information on trace gas and aerosol with their precursors in high spatial and temporal

resolution

O

3 NO2 HCHO SO2 AOD/AI, (possibly CHOCHO, BrO)

Clouds, surface reflectance, UV radiation.The predicted performance of trace gases from the initial design of GEMS satisfies the product accuracy requirements of NO

2, HCHO, O3. Meanwhile, the estimated accuracy of SO2

product seems to be questionable, thus requires the increase of SNR by spatial coadding (lowering resolution), longer observation time, or more frequent operation (reduced E-W scan range).The data assimilation between CTM and GEMS data is important with the air quality forecast in operation.

Collaboration with Team of TROPOMI, Sentinel-4 & TEMPO is desirable in calibration, algorithm development and applicationSlide21

Acknowledgement

GEMS Science

TeamMinistry of Environment (MoE), Rep. of KoreaNIER,

MoE

KEITI,

MoE

Ministry of Science, ICT & future Planning (MSIP)

KARI