PDF-1 EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON PORE PRESSURE ATTENUATION IN RUBBLE-MOUND B

r r 1 where is the pressure gradient is the discharge velocity is the porosity 50 is the mean grain diameter and the kinematic fluid viscosity The coefficients and often re. FR4 Atten 0780386167042000 C 2004 IEEE brPage 2br 0780386167042000 C 2004 IEEE brPage 3br 0780386167042000 C 2004 IEEE brPage 4br 0780386167042000 C 2004 IEEE Douglas Wiens. Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences. Washington University in Saint Louis. Gung & . Romanowicz. . [2004]. Pozgay. , Wiens, et al. . [2009]. Outline . What is seismic attenuation?. Repointing Rubble Stonework When traditional rubble stone masonry walls were originally constructed it was common practice to use a variety of small stones, called pinnings, to make the larger st Dan Britt. University of Central Florida. What Do We Need to Know About NEA Physical Properties?. Asteroid Structure. Rubble pile?. Coherent object?. Material Strength. Tough? Weak?. Mineralogy. Thermal Properties. MEMBRANE. SEPARATION. TRANSPORT MODELS. Membrane s. elective : . Ability . to control the rate of permeation of different species. Permeation mechanism model. Solution-diffusion model. Permeants. . dissolve in the membrane material and then diffuse through the membrane down a concentration gradient. Converting Syngas to Ethanol With . Mesoporous. Materials. Julia Fisher. 1. , Nathalia Backeljauw. 2. Ephraim Sheerin. 2. , Dr. . Panagiotis. Smirniotis. 2. , Dr. Krishna Reddy. 2. 1. Arizona State University, . Aly . Badran. C-2. E. Benet, A. . Badran. , J. Pellegrino and F. . Vernerey. . . The porous media's effect on the permeation of elastic (soft) particles. , Journal of Membrane Science, Volume 535, August 2017, Pages 10-19 . Stack before free surface multiple removal. Multiple attenuation. Free surface multiple attenuation. Stack after free surface multiple removal. Multiple attenuation. Internal multiple attenuation results . Arthur B. . Weglein. . M-OSRP/UH. Monday, September 23, 2013. Recent Advances and the Road Ahead. (1) Recent progress. (2) current outstanding challenges. (3) a proposed road ahead with the potential to address these challenges. Jason Bini. 1,2. , Jesus Mateo. 1,3. , Josef Machac. 4. , . Jagat. Narula. 5. , . Valentin. Fuster. 3,5. , . Zahi. Fayad. 1,5,6. , David Izquierdo-Garcia. 1. 1 Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. En cyclop ed ia o f So ils in t h e En vi ro nm ent : Lo nd o n , El se vi er, v. 3 , p. 2 9 5 - 30 3. J. R. Nimmo, U.S. Geological Survey, Figure 1. Cross section of a typical soil with pore model . 2. closed pore 293K. model . 3. very narrow pore 623K. m. odel . 4. intermediate. m. odel . 5. intermediate. m. odel . 6. narrow pore. m. odel . 7. narrow pore. m. odel . 8. large pore. m. odel . Norihiro. Matsuda. 1. , Yosuke Iwamoto. 1. , . Tatsuhiko. Sato. 1. , . Shintaro. Hashimoto. 1. , . Tatsuhiko. Ogawa. 1. , Takuya Furuta. 1. , Shinichiro Abe. 1. , Takeshi Kai. 1. , . Ryuji . Hosoyamada. Yu Chen, . Zhaoyun. . Zong. and . Hejun. Zhu. Comparison between BISQ and BISSQ model. 2. BISQ model. BISSQ model. Fluid pressure in the BISSQ model. 3. The average of the fluid pressure. BISSQ model.