PPT-A Problem At the Patent-Regulatory-Antitrust Interface: Set

Fordham Intellectual Property Law Institute 19 th Annual Conference Fordham University School of Law April 2011 Gerald Sobel Kaye Scholer LLP Copyright Gerald Sobel 2011 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 20. Meiners, Ringleb & Edwards. The Legal Environment of Business, 12. th. Edition. Antitrust Law. Antitrust law addresses prohibitions on attempts by competitors to . restrain competition . (Not an Oxymoron. ). Plug . and Play. . Chris . Compton. Feb. 12, 2014. At the Beginning: The Sherman Act. 1890. Concentrations of power must be controlled.. Mr. Gorbachev,. take down. that trust!. A. Antitrust (anti-monopoly) laws . 1. Sherman Act of 1890. 2. Clayton Act of 1914. 3. Federal Trade Commission Act. -- . Monopolists . tend to produce less and charge more.. -- Regulatory Agencies control economic behavior (Dept of Justice, Fed Trade . the «. antitrustization. » of FRAND: a multi-. sided. . reappraisal. ?. Professor Nicolas Petit, University of Liege. LIEN, Nanterre, 18 . June 2015. Goals of the . presentation. Patent hold-up. The . April 11, 2013. Laura A. Wilkinson. Weil, . Gotshal. & . Manges. LLP. Background. Most trade associations, . standard-setting . organizations . (. SSOs) and other forums where competitors interact . Patent Colloquium:. Nancy Gallini. Vancouver School of Economics, UBC. November 21, . 2014. Illustration of Sequential Innovation Processes. Application . 1. Application . 2. Application. 4. . Application. Part I: Conduct Cases and Enforcement. 1. 2011 – 2012 Antitrust Update. Conduct Cases. Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits agreements and conspiracies that restrain trade. 15 U.S.C. § 1.. Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization.  15 U.S.C. § 2. Compliance . Bootcamp. (5/15). This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made as part of the presentation are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the speaker. This presentation is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. If you have specific questions as to the application of law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.. Randal C. Picker. 1945. 1955. 1965. 1975. 1985. 1995. 2005. 2015. James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law. Ludwig & Hilde Wolf Teaching Scholar. The Law School, The University of Chicago. Rebecca Nelson . Robert Bell. 18 May 2017. 1. Robert Bell. Robert Bell is head of the EU & UK competition team at Bryan Cave with over 20 years of experience advising on complex competition and regulatory matters involving some of the leading cases before . M&A and Antitrust — Top Tips to Help Antitrust Clearance Rebecca Nelson Robert Bell 18 May 2017 1 Robert Bell Robert Bell is head of the EU & UK competition team at Bryan Cave with over 20 years of experience advising on complex competition and regulatory matters involving some of the leading cases before Standards and Certification Training. ASME S&C Training Module C2 Antitrust . 0. ASME S&C Training Module C2 Antitrust . 1. MODULE C COURSE OUTLINE. C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics. C2. Antitrust. Laura Pedraza-Fariña. Professor of Law. Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. Incentivizing Vaccine R&D. Patent Law Basics . Single drug or biologic .  family of patents (a.k.a. “patent portfolios”). Nancy Gallini. Vancouver School of Economics, UBC. November 21, . 2014. Illustration of Sequential Innovation Processes. Application . 1. Application . 2. Application. 4. . Application. 5. Application.