/
AHSPPR FY 2013/14 highlights AHSPPR FY 2013/14 highlights

AHSPPR FY 2013/14 highlights - PowerPoint Presentation

lois-ondreau
lois-ondreau . @lois-ondreau
Follow
384 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-11

AHSPPR FY 2013/14 highlights - PPT Presentation

Population denominators NBS has not yet published official projections However we have Census 2012 data for Regions and LGAs Specific age groups U1 U5 WRA We also have official inter censal ID: 474361

data 2013 years 2011 2013 data 2011 years health 100 hmis ruvuma mtwara lindi pwani dodoma morogoro iringa mbeya singida tabora shinyanga

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "AHSPPR FY 2013/14 highlights" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

AHSPPR FY 2013/14 highlightsSlide2

Population denominators

NBS has not yet published official projections

However, we have Census 2012 data for:

Regions and LGAs

Specific age groups (U1, U5, WRA)

We also have official inter-

censal

growth rates for all regions (Census 2012, p2)

We therefore used these to provide “best estimate” denominators pending the publication of official projectionsSlide3

Health status indicatorsSlide4

Indicator

Baseline (2008)

Latest data (source)

Target (2015)

Life expectancy at birth (yrs)

F52 M 51F62 M60 F62 M59 Neonatal mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) 3226 (TDHS 2010)21.4 (UN 2012)19Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) 5845 (Census 2012) 50U5 mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) 9481 (TDHS 2010)54 (UN 2012) 48

Health status indicators Slide5

5

The trend in the Maternal Mortality

per 100,000 Live BirthsSlide6

Indicator

Baseline (2008)

Latest data (source)

Target (2015)

% U5 severely underweight

3.70%TBD 2.00%% U5 severely stunted 38%42% (TDHS 2010)35% (NPS 2011)20%Total Fertility Rate 5.75.2 (Census 2012) TrendHealth status indicators Slide7

Health service indicatorsSlide8

Top five

outpatient (OPD) diagnoses trends 2011 to 2013 using

HMIS and

SPDs

<5 Years

5 and Above Health Management Information System (HMIS)<5 Years 5 and Above Sentinel panel Districts (SPDs)Slide9

Top

five

causes of admission (IPD diagnoses

); HMIS and SPDs 2011

to

2013<5 Years 5 and Above <5 Years 5 and Above Health Management Information System (HMIS)Sentinel panel Districts (SPDs)Slide10

Top FIVE causes of deaths for persons aged

under five and 5

years and above, HMIS (and SPD)

<5 Years

5 and Above

Health Management Information System (HMIS)Sentinel Panel Districts (SPDs)<5 Years 5 and Above Slide11

Conclusion

No

significant

change in the proportions for the top three OPD diagnosis in three consecutive years. SPD data suggest reduction in the proportion of diagnosis of malaria in both under fives and five and years and above

Malaria was consistently the leading cause of admission over the last three years, and by a great margin.

Proportion of malaria among U5 decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 and 2011 (HMIS). Malaria, pneumonia and anaemia accounted for two thirds of reported U5 deaths in 2013 while HIV/AIDS, Malaria and TB account for 45% of deaths among 5 years and aboveSlide12

Per capita OP attendances, 2011 - 13

Target = 1.0Slide13

Mwanza

0.70

Geita

3.6

Simiyu

0.29

Shinyanga 0.57

Tabora

0.45

Singida

0.76

Dodoma 0.42

Iringa

0.71

=

Morogoro

0.91

Manyara

0.27

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

0.86

Lindi

0.74

Mtwara

0.66

Ruvuma 0.43

Njombe

0.66

Mbeya

0.50

Rukwa

0.62

Katavi

0.74

Kigoma

1.54

Kilimanjaro 0.70

Arusha

0.54

Mara 0.76

Kagera

0.48

Tanga

0.90

DSM 0.69

Regional

Per Capita OP

attendances, all ages, 2013

National Average 0.65

0 – 0.39

0.4 – 0. 59

0.6 – 0.79

0.8 – 1.0

> 1.0

KeySlide14

DTP3, Measles and TT2

vaccination coverage, 2011-13Slide15

Mwanza

81%

Geita

68

Simiyu

107%

Shinyanga 96%

Tabora

87%

Singida

70%

Dodoma 59%

Iringa

77%

=

Morogoro

98%

Manyara

71%

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

80%

Lindi

49%

Mtwara

52%

Ruvuma 86%

Njombe

166%

Mbeya

97%

Rukwa

105%

Katavi

53

%

Kigoma

73%

Kilimanjaro 51%

Arusha

78%

Mara 108%

Kagera

103%

Tanga

86%

DSM 74%

Regional TT2 vaccination coverage, 2013

National Average 89%

40 – 59%

60 – 89%

90 – 100%

> 100%

Key

0 – 39%Slide16

ANC early booking, 2011-13

Note: 2011 < 16 weeks; 2012 and 2013 < 12 weeksSlide17

Mwanza

40%

Geita

34

Simiyu

29%

Shinyanga 17%

Tabora

23%

Singida

33%

Dodoma 11%

Iringa

74%

=

Morogoro

107%

Manyara

24%

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

16%

Lindi

15%

Mtwara

22%

Ruvuma 56%

Njombe

38%

Mbeya

49%

Rukwa

60%

Katavi

68%

Kigoma

45%

Kilimanjaro 22%

Arusha

23%

Mara 37%

Kagera

24%

Tanga

40%

DSM 13%

Regional ANC 1

st

visit before 12 weeks, 2013

National Average 35%

0 – 39%

40 – 49%

50 – 78%

80 – 100%

> 100%

KeySlide18

Health facility deliveries, 2011-13Slide19

Mwanza

75%

Geita

57%

Simiyu

46%

Shinyanga 66%

Tabora

71%

Singida

60%

Dodoma 59%

Iringa

74%

=

Morogoro

66%

Manyara

32%

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

85%

Lindi

59%

Mtwara

48%

Ruvuma 78%

Njombe

68%

Mbeya

68%

Rukwa

100%

Katavi

73%

Kigoma

57%

Kilimanjaro 55%

Arusha

57%

Mara 56%

Kagera

45%

Tanga

46%

DSM 55%

Regional facility deliveries, 2013

National Average 61%

0 – 39%

40 – 59%

6

0 – 79%

80 – 100%

> 100%

KeySlide20

Family planning coverage, 2011-13Slide21

Mwanza

31%

Geita

18%

Simiyu

21%

Shinyanga 32%

Tabora

21%

Singida

57%

Dodoma 82%

Iringa

4

4%

=

Morogoro

37%

Manyara

31%

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

69%

Lindi

71%

Mtwara

69%

Ruvuma 78%

Njombe

68%

Mbeya

41%

Rukwa

43%

Katavi

40%

Kigoma

48%

Kilimanjaro 54%

Arusha

40%

Mara 41%

Kagera

38%

Tanga

61%

DSM 38%

Regional FP coverage,

2013

National Average 43%

0 – 39%

40 – 59%

6

0 – 79%

80 – 100%

KeySlide22

ART coverage, 2011-13Slide23

HIV

prevalence.Slide24

TB and leprosy

i

ndicators Slide25

Health systems indicatorsSlide26

Per capita public spending, 2011/12 – 2013/14Slide27

Mwanza

1.8%

Geita

1.6%

Simiyu

1.5%

Shinyanga

2.4%

Tabora

13.2%

Singida

29.8%

Dodoma 12.6%

Iringa

9.3%

=

Morogoro

9.7%

Manyara

3.3%

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

15.8%

Lindi

4.7%

Mtwara

3%

Ruvuma 9.9%

Njombe

9.7%

Mbeya

26.4%

Rukwa

12.2%

Katavi

13.8%

Kigoma

8.1%

Kilimanjaro 20.1%

Arusha

5.2%

Mara 2.7%

Kagera

1.3%

Tanga

14.1%

DSM 0%

Regional CHF coverage, 2013

National Average 8.7%

0 – 19%

20 – 39%

40 – 79%

80 – 100%

> 100%

KeySlide28

Mwanza

7

Geita

3.1%

Simiyu

2.5%

Shinyanga

4,9%

Tabora

2.9%

Singida

5.5

Dodoma 6.9

Iringa

11.3

=

Morogoro

7.9

Manyara

7.3%

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

9

.6

Lindi

8.3%

Mtwara

6.5

Ruvuma 7.2%

Njombe

10.9%

Mbeya

10.1

Rukwa

4.7%

Katavi

2.5%

Kigoma

3.3%

Kilimanjaro 14.8

Arusha

8.6

Mara 6

Kagera

5.2

Tanga

6.7

DSM 13

Human Resource (AMO, MO, Nurses/Nurse Midwife Laboratory staff) Per 10,000 Population by Region 2013

National Average 7.4

0 – 4.9%

5.0 – 6.9%

7.0 - 9.9%

>10

KeySlide29

Percentage of facilities with continuous availability of Tracer medicines, Jan-June 2014Slide30

Mwanza

7.1

Geita

5.8

Simiyu

6.6

Shinyanga

6.7

Tabora

8.1

Singida

8.1

Dodoma 7.2

Iringa

8,1

Morogoro

8.5

Manyara

8.1

DDSM 0.66

Pwani

6.8

Lindi

8.1

Mtwara

7.2

Ruvuma 7.8

Njombe

8.4

Mbeya

8.1

Rukwa

8.5

Katavi

8.2

Kigoma

7.1

Kilimanjaro 7.8

Arusha

8

Mara 7.8

Kagera

8

Tanga

8.4

DSM 7.4

Mean number of tracers available January – June 2013

National Average 7.7 Slide31

Challenges

Unsatisfactory quality of HMIS

data

under-reporting and delayed reporting from health facilities

Insufficient capacity for data analysis/summarization at health facility level

Lack of reliable population denominators Duplication of data collection through use of parallel reporting systemsInadequate data dissemination and useSlide32

Way forward

Strengthening of supportive supervision and mentoring of regions and councils

Quarterly analysis of HMIS data and review by the

M&E TWG

to identify data problems/issues and find out solution

Implement data quality audit activitiesEstablish a way for regular communication with regions to feed back and discuss the identified data quality issuesHarmonization of reporting systems for all programmes to prevent duplications and improve qualityImplement activities that will improve data dissemination and useStrengthen capacity for data collection, compilation at HF level and use of DHIS database