Below you will find the 10 mostcommon majormode chord progressions in the music of composer X along with the percentage of all progressions belonging to that category In making this table I have grouped together root position and firstinversion ID: 531181
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "POP QUIZ: QUESTION 1" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
POP QUIZ: QUESTION 1
Below you will find the 10 most-common major-mode chord progressions in the music of composer X, along with the percentage of all progressions belonging to that category. In making this table, I have grouped together root position and first-inversion triads and all sevenths, so V6–I, V7–I, V–I6 (etc.) all count as “V–I progressions.” However, 6/4 chords are their own category.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
Today's first quiz
question is:
who
is the composer?
Don’t dither, just answer off the top of your head.Slide2
POP QUIZ: QUESTION 1I
In the Bach chorales, the most common destination for V2 is I6. What is the second most common destination?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide3
Tonal Functionalities(within-key harmonic patterns)
Dmitri TymoczkoPrinceton University
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide4
Answers to the Quiz
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
Josquin
PalestrinaSlide5
Syntax
Classical music has at least two features that might deserve the name “syntactical.”Harmonic principles governing chord-to-chord successionsRameau, Riemann, Piston, McHose, Kostka & PayneLargely an American enterprise, at least recently
Contrapuntal syntax governing “harmonic” and “nonharmonic” tonesNeighbor tones, passing tones, suspensions, etc.Schenker
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide6
Exploring these Syntaxes
Constructing large databases, with two parts:Roman Numeral analyses of musicThe score as an XML or KRN fileAnalysis using python and Myke Cuthbert’s music21.
Provides unprecedented access to syntactical detail:What note gets doubled in a first-inversion triad?
Does the tritone typically resolve in vii°6
–I?
Do nonharmonic tones ever license parallel fifths?How did tonal harmony develop?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide7
Examples
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comAnalysis file
XML
Labeled choraleNonharmonic tones removedSome simple calculations
all V
2–I progressions in the choralesSlide8
Example
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide9
The Corpus: a snapshot
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comTo do: frottola
, Chopin, Brahms, ?
107,902 chordsSlide10
Methodological Question
What does it mean to use Roman Numerals with modal music?“V6” and “V” are uninterpreted labels, with no necessary relation between them.“V6” means “the 6/3 chord on the leading tone”Label almost all consonances, except where harmonic rhythm suggests otherwise.Incomplete root-third is a root position triad, except when it is contained within the previous sonority (ex. C-E followed by E-G).
Can reanalyze the data from other perspectives.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide11
Sample topics
How accurate is standard harmonic theory?How did tonal harmony develop?Are nonharmonic tones “merely decorative” or do they serve a structural function?Is Roman Numeral Analysis justified?More general show and tell
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide12
Topic I
: AccuracyFour grammars
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide13
Topic
I: Accuracy
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
majorSlide14
Topic
I: Accuracy
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
minorSlide15
Topic
I: Accuracy
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
bothSlide16
Three Grades of Modal Involvement
http://
dmitri.tymoczko.comTrue modality (~65%)Slide17
Three Grades of Modal Involvement
http://
dmitri.tymoczko.com“Tonally tinged modality” (~75%)Slide18
Three Grades of Modal Involvement
http://
dmitri.tymoczko.com“Modally tinged tonality” (~85%)Slide19
Three Grades of Modal Involvement
http://
dmitri.tymoczko.com“True tonality” (> 90%)Slide20
Topic
II: Development
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide21
Topic
II: Development
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide22
Topic II
: DevelopmentThe rule of the octave
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
( )Slide23
Topic II
: DevelopmentThe rule of the octave: degrees 1, 5, 7.Strong preference evident in Josquin.Grows even stronger over the 16
th century.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
5
3
5
363
( )Slide24
Topic II
: DevelopmentThe rule of the octave: degree 3.Mild preference for I6 in Palestrina, grows strong in Morley, and even stronger after that.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
5
3
5
3
6363
( )
Amazing fact!Slide25
Topic II
: DevelopmentGiven these basic preferences, many tonal routines appear naturally.3 up to 5, 5 up to 8, 8 down to 5.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
5
3
53
63
63
( )Slide26
Topic II
: DevelopmentOthers still remain.1 up to 3, 3 down to 1, and 5 down to 3 are seventeenth-century developments.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
5
3
53
63
63
( )Slide27
Topic II
: DevelopmentWhat about the idea that 4–1 should be harmonized with root position triads, rather than as ii6–I?In Josquin and Palestrina, fourth and fifth motion in the bass almost
always involves root position.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide28
Mutiple Tonalities
“Riemannian Tonality”I, IV, and V are primary triads, with I-IV-I counterbalancing I-V-IDeveloped firstPresent in Palestrina (and Encina, the Carter Family, Ramones, etc.)
“Schenkerian Tonality”I and V are primary triadsii displaces IV, and serves primarily as a connector between I and V.
Classical tonality.Jazz?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide29
Topic
II: Development
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide30
Topic
II: Development
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide31
Topic
II: Development
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide32
Topic III
: Nonharmonic tonesDo nonharmonic tones “embellish” an underlying, structural “harmonic skeleton”?First answer (16th century):For passing tones, neighboring tones, anticipations, and incomplete neighbors: yes.
For suspensions: no.Two reasons:Suspensions are not
removable.Suspensions license parallels, unlike the others.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide33
Topic III
: Nonharmonic tones
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide34
Topic III
: Nonharmonic tones
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comA-G
D-CSlide35
Topic III
: Nonharmonic tonesSecond answer (Bach):Again, only suspensions license parallels.They occur at almost exactly the same rate in Bach and Palestrina.
Bach almost never suspends the fifth!They almost never involve the bass.In Bach, a number of progressions seem to require passing tones:
IV6–IV
2–I
Contrapuntal schemas
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide36
So …
Suspensions do NOT “represent” their underlying consonances.But …It sometimes happens that a chord changes before a suspension resolves.In Bach, this occurs most often over a changing bass, like i–i
6.In Palestrina, this occurs most often over a fixed
bass, like I-vi6.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide37
Topic IV:
JustificationThe harmonic syntax applies only to “real” chords.How can we separate “truly harmonic” chords from “merely contrapuntal” chords in a principled way?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
R F R R F R RSlide38
Topic IV: Justification
What is the best (C major) analysis?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
C: IV I6
PT
C: ii vii°
6 I6
PT
C: I vii°
6
I
6
“the ii-vii°
6
idiom”
C: V V
2
I
6
PTSlide39
Topic IV:
JustificationNote that all analyses suppress a (fake) ii-I!
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
C: IV ii6 I6
C: ii I
6
C: I vii°6 ii6
I
6
“the ii-vii°
6
idiom”
C: V ii
6
I
6
PTSlide40
Topic IV:
JustificationSo what is the force of “ii-I is rare”?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
C: IV ii6 I
6
C: ii I
6
C: I vii°6 ii
6
I
6
“the ii-vii°
6
idiom”
C: V ii
6
I
6
PTSlide41
Topic IV:
Justificationhttp://dmitri.tymoczko.com
g: i V
6 i V6–5/III III
F: I V
6 I vii°6 I6
PT
M2 b3 interpreteddifferently!!!Slide42
Topic IV:
JustificationEven the pros make mistakes:This is off by more than an order of magnitude; in Bach, Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven ii–I progressions (excluding cadential
@) account for less than 2% of the destinations from ii.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide43
RN analysis as generalization
Write a computer program to:Stage 1: create a raw analysis of the chorales, identifying keys with scales, and considering every triad and seventh chord to be a harmony.Stage 2: gather statistics on the Stage 1 analyses
Stage 3: use these statistics to “prune” the Stage 1 analysis, removing fake or “merely contrapuntal” chords.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
– Stage 1b. Improve key finding with various
rules (e.g. dorian scale regions). Slide44
RN analysis as generalization
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
Correct key 81.1%, correct chord 90.5%
This music is largely unambiguous!Slide45
RN analysis as generalization
Using only the 4/4 chorales, gather rhythmicized data on the harmonic progressions.For each quarter, gather a 4-tuple:(prev. harmony, strong eighth harmony, weak eighth harmony, next harmony)
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
I V
6 vii° i
V i i vii°6Slide46
RN analysis as generalization
When we find a quarter note containing a pair of eighth-note harmonies, ask:Could the first be the product of nonharmonic tones (according to standard contrapuntal theory).Could the second?Could they represent a motion from a triad to an incomplete seventh chord on the same root?Using the preliminary statistics choose the most likely of the available readings.Penalize accented passing and neighboring tones.
These are rare in the raw data!
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide47
RN analysis as generalization
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
1: I – IV
6 – vi – V62: I – IV6 – IV6 – V63: I –
vi – vi
– V64: I – IV6 – IVmaj# – V
6
0*650#1 is 0 because we don’t count the progression itself (and because we gather our initial stats using 4/4 chorales); since #3 requires an accented neighbor, it is penalized; #4 is 0 by convention.Slide48
RN analysis as generalization
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
1: I – iii
6 – V – vi2: I – iii6 – iii6 – vi3:
I – V– V –
vi4: I – iii6 – iii# –
vi
0090Slide49
RN analysis as generalization
This brings the within-key accuracy from 90.5% to ~92.5%, fixing ~21% of the errors.In practice, 95% is probably about as close as we can get to perfection, since expert humans don’t agree at that level; also, higher-level complexities, etc.We’re really close!This method deals with all the problematic cases mentioned earlier.
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide50
What is the best (C major) analysis?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
C: IV I6
PT
C: ii vii°
6 I6
PT
C: I vii°6 I
6
C: V V
2
I
6
5.8:1
7.8:1
10:1
43:1
PT
RN analysis as generalizationSlide51
Ratio of my preferred analysis to the
best alternative.http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
C: IV ii6
I6
C: ii I
6
C: I vii°
6 ii6 I6
C: V ii
6
I
6
PT
RN analysis as generalization
5.8:1
7.8:1
10:1
43:1Slide52
RN analysis as generalization
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
g: i V6 i
V6/III IIIF: I V
6 I vii°6
I67:1 (NB: no V
# )
4.3:1Slide53
Conclusions
Combining analyses and scores gives us a lot of powerChords really do follow a local grammarTonality evolved very slowly, in many different genres simultaneously16th-century harmony resembles rock harmony in some interesting ways
RN analysis exploits intuitive knowledge of statistical probabilities
I’m just getting started thinking of questions to askMaybe you can help?
http://dmitri.tymoczko.comSlide54
Thank you!
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
for more
stuff like this …Slide55
Thank you!
http://dmitri.tymoczko.com
for more
stuff like this …