Shakespeares Sexuality amp The Pseudonym This presentation based my collaboration with John Hamill on a forthcoming book will explore the evidence for Edward de Veres bisexuality as it relates to the pseudonym Shakespeare ID: 162642
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Reason for the Alias - Oxford's Bise..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Reason for the Alias - Oxford's Bisexuality and Elizabethan TheaterSlide2
Shake-speare’s Sexuality & The Pseudonym
This presentation, based my collaboration with John Hamill on a forthcoming book, will explore the evidence for Edward de Vere's bisexuality as it relates to the pseudonym "Shakespeare."
The presentation also explores the history of Elizabethan and late twentieth-century theater in the context of social mores about gender identity and sexuality in each time period. Slide3
What’s in a name?
Many gay and bisexual writers have used pseudonyms to protect their identities, including several prominent poets and playwrights.
The use of pen names by writers including George Sand and Tennessee Williams will be reviewed to gain new insight into the motivation of the author of Shakespeare's works in adopting the name, as well as the possible motives of his heirs in preserving the alias. Slide4
Writing as Impersonation
In Nom de Plume, Carmela
Ciuraru
writes “To a certain extent, all writing involves impersonation – the act of summoning an impersonal ‘I’ to create the speaker of a poem or the characters in a novel.”
She quotes French journalist Francoise
Nourissier
, who contends that a nom-de-plume provides a space in which “obstacles fall away, and one’s reserve dissipates.”
Ciuraru
concludes, “The erasure of a primary name can reveal what appears to be a truer, better, more authentic self. Or it can attain the opposite, by allowing a writer to take flight from a self that is ‘true’ yet shameful or despised. “ Slide5
The Talented Ms. Morgan
Patricia
Highsmith
is most famous for her "Talented Mister Ripley" novels, but what many people don't know is that in 1952, she wrote a novel called "The Price of Salt."
Published under the name "Carol Morgan," it was not her usual material.
Highsmith
--who was almost pathologically secretive, even in her personal life--felt that she could not publish a novel that depicted fulfilling lesbian love under her own name.
For one thing,
Highsmith
worried about what her 84-year-old grandmother would think; and for another, she hated labels and didn't want to ruin her reputation by being marked as a "lesbian writer." It wasn't until the 1990 UK edition that
Highsmith
wrote an afterword to the book, admitting her authorship. Slide6
The Talented Ms. Morgan
Patricia
Highsmith
is most famous for her "Talented Mister Ripley" novels, but what many people don't know is that in 1952, she wrote a novel called "The Price of Salt."
Published under the name "Carol Morgan," it was not her usual material.
Highsmith
--who was almost pathologically secretive, even in her personal life--felt that she could not publish a novel that depicted fulfilling lesbian love under her own name.
For one thing,
Highsmith
worried about what her 84-year-old grandmother would think; and for another, she hated labels and didn't want to ruin her reputation by being marked as a "lesbian writer." It wasn't until the 1990 UK edition that
Highsmith
wrote an afterword to the book, admitting her authorship. Slide7Slide8
Monsieur Sand
Born in Paris in 1804,
Aurore
Dupin
would grow up to become one of the greatest rebels in literary history. She loved stories and began writing at the young age of 8.
Her grandmother was so concerned about her rebellious and unladylike behavior that she sent her to a convent. By the age of 19, she was married (unhappily) and pregnant with her first child, but knew that a conventional life was not for her.
She had affairs with both men and women, and the young Parisian writer Jules
Sandeau
would provide part of her nom de plume: George Sand. Slide9Slide10
Clothes Make the Woman
Not only did Sand violate decorum with her bold proclamations--once suggesting that monogamy was unnatural and abnormal--but she smoked cigars and walked the streets of Paris in an ankle-length military coat, a cravat, a waistcoat, and men's boots (sometimes wearing a hat and tie as well). "My clothing made me fearless," she said.
Nothing made her happier than when strangers would call her "monsieur." Today she is remembered more for her
transgressive
lifestyle than for her books, but she nonetheless inspired countless women. "What a brave man she was," Turgenev once said of her, "and what a good woman."Slide11
The Kindness of Strangers
“He was born Thomas Lanier Williams in 1911 in Columbus Missouri. He didn’t become Tennessee until he was twenty-seven, a name he chose for himself when he applied for a grant from the famous Group Theater.
“He changed more than just his name in age in 1938. “Tom” had been a shy, outwardly conventional fellow, a frat man in college, a regular guy at the shoe factory where he briefly worked. The stories and plays he produced were fairly conventional, too, and he pretended to be conventional sexually, yet he was a virgin with both genders. Slide12Slide13
The Rebellious Puritan
“Then he moved to New Orleans…and found himself living contentedly among prostitutes, gamblers, drug addicts and homosexuals.
“He went to bed with his first man, feel in love with a friend, discovered alcohol, went to bed with another man, and another, and soon learned that he was happiest when he had sex every night.
“He later described himself as a “rebellious puritan” but the rebellion was never complete. The conforming, conventional “Tom” remained hidden inside “Tennessee” to the end of his life.” Slide14
Ambivalence & Autobiography
Williams never wrote direct autobiography – he wrote about feelings and famously said that there were bits of him in all of his characters.
But his first two successful plays, The Glass Menagerie and A Streetcar Named Desire, both hint at the homosexuality of the main characters.
Tennessee was writing during a period of American history when it was dangerous to be “out” both on stage and off. Slide15
Three Players of a Summer Game
Williams’ mixed feelings about his own sexuality are most strikingly rendered in
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof
in the character of Brick.
Several reviewers wondered about Brick’s sexuality, and one, Walter Kerr, implied that the accusation that the character was gay was true. Tennessee went into a panic – actually adding a long stage direction to try and explain Brick’s sexuality.
The 1927 New York City statute known as “Wales Padlock Law” stated that “a theater found guilty of showing an immoral play – which included any presentation of homosexuality, good or bad – could be shut down for a year.” Slide16
Double Standards on Broadway
The law was used to shut down Dorothy Baker’s
Trio
in 1945, but Danny Kay starred as a flamboyant fashion photographer in
Lady in the Dark
in 1944, and John Houston staged Sartre’s
No Exit
with its predatory lesbian in 1946.
One devise used by playwrights in the 1950s to circumvent the law was to write about a character accused of being homosexual, as in Robert Anderson’s
Tea and Sympathy
, Arthur Miller’s
The View from the Bridge
, and Lillian Hellman’s
The Children’s Hour. Slide17
The Great Homosexual Theater Scare
On November 6, 1961, Tennessee Williams did an interview for the Sunday New York Times about his newest play then in rehearsals,
Night of the Iguana
.
Next to the interview was a “think piece” by the new drama critic Harold
Taubman
, entitled “Not What it Seems.”
It began, “It is time to speak openly and candidly about the increasing incident and influence of homosexuality on New York stages.” Slide18
Not What it Seems
Fearing that there were too many gay writers who wrote about only about gay men disguised as straight men and women, he warned that “Characters represent something different from what they purport to be.”
Taubman
concludes, “It’s no wonder they seem sicker than necessary.”
Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
by Edward Albee opened on Broadway less than a year later in October 1962.
Taubman
praised the play and called the writer “a major figure of our stage.” Slide19
Who’s Afraid of Edward Albee?
Reviewers compared the play to the works of Eugene O’Neil. Tennessee Williams attended the opening night performance.
Virginia Woolf
ran for 2 years and won the Tony Award and the New York Drama Critics Circle Award for best play in 1963.
In January 1966, Stanley Kauffmann, lead drama critic for the Times, wrote his now famous article, “Homosexual Drama and Its Disguises,” an attack on the three leading playwrights of the day, Albee, Williams, and William
Inge
, author of
Bus Stop
and
Picnic. Slide20Slide21
More Drama
“The principal charge against homosexual dramatists is well known. Because three of the most successful playwrights of the last twenty years are (reputed) homosexuals, and because their plays often treat of women and marriage, therefore, it is said, postwar American drama presents a badly distorted picture of American women, marriage, and society in general.”
“We have all had much more than enough of the materials presented by these three writers in question: the viciousness toward women, the lurid violence that seems a sublimation of social hatreds, the transvestite sexual exhibitionism that has the same sneering exploitation of its audience that every club stripper has behind her smile.”Slide22
These People…
“Homosexuals with writing ability are likely to go on being drawn to the theater. It is quite the logical consequence of the defiant and/or protective
histrionism
they must employ in their daily lives…
But how can we blame these people? Conventions and Puritanism have in the Western world have forced them to wear masks for generations, to hate themselves and thus to hate those that have made them hate themselves.
Now that they have a certain freedom, they vent their feelings in camouflaged forms.”Slide23
Group Think
Time Magazine printed an essay that same week titled “The Homosexual in America:”
“Great artists so often cited as evidence of the homosexual’s creativity – the
Leonardos
and
Michelangelos
– are probably the exceptions of genius. For the most part…homosexuals are failed artists and their special creative gift a myth.”
Both Albee and Williams responded to the attacks on their work: Albee said he most certainly was not not writing about two male couples, but that, ‘There’s not much difference between gay and straight couples in their fights.”
And Tennessee declared, “If I am writing a female character,
goddammit
, I’m going to write a female character, not a drag queen. If I want to write a drag queen, I’ll write a drag queen.”Slide24
Theater as a subversive act
The reputation of Elizabethan theater in particular, based on the purported sexual behavior of actors and audience members, supports the argument that Oxford’s sexuality was a primary reason for the pseudonym.
In his article
Carnival and the Institutions of Theater in Elizabethan England,
Michael Bristol argues that the participatory nature of Carnival and its parody of established social order finds it way onto the stage in Shakespeare’s day.
“The Elizabethan theater is an institution that is, in the first instance, a creation of the plebeian culture of the Renaissance…and institutionalized and professionalized form of Carnival.” Slide25
Elizabethan Theatre
“The festive liberty of physical involvement in the street pageantry of Carnival transforms and deconstructs the ‘truth already established’ by official ideology.
The chaotic disarray produced by this arrangement is symbolically subversive of harmonious order; it is also pragmatically threatening and potentially mutinous.”
Bristol quotes Mikhail
Bahktin
on “the synthesis that results from
carnivalization
as the incorporation into traditional literary language of ‘
extraliterary
heteroglossia
.’”
“The structures of verbal art that result from this saturation with the informal language and expressions of the everyday life of the public squares and marketplaces acknowledge the struggle between variant forms of language, as between the communities they represent.” Slide26
Carnival as Parody & Travesty
Mikhail
Bakhtin
concludes that these structures “become
dialogized
, permeated with laughter, irony, humor, elements of self-parody, and.. most important.,. [Carnival] inserts into these structures
an indeterminacy, a certain semantic open-endedness, a living contact with unfinished, still-evolving contemporary reality.”
Michael Bristol writes “Central to the Carnival experience is a particular use of symbols, costumes, and masks, in which the ordinary relationship between signifier and signified is disrupted and conventional meaning is parodied. Parody and travesty, the rude, foolish, sometimes abusive mimicry of everyday categories, create the topsy-turvy world of
carnivalesque
misrule.”Slide27
Role Playing
Bristol reminds us that aristocratic and court entertainments were based on allegory and idealized versions of the established social hierarchy.
Carnival, in contrast, “allows the participants to put on new social roles, to borrow the clothing and the identity of someone else, and to adopt the language and manners – even the social position – of another.”
“Misrule is much more than a disruptive negation of the established ideological forms…it substitutes participation for detached observation.” Slide28
Theater as Carnival
“Disguise, mistaken identity, acting for another, all of which are defining characteristics of Carnival as well as of the actor’s profession, enter in most of not all the stories in the dramatic texts themselves.
The most complex focus of identity switching is in the multiple transvestitism of boy actors portraying characters like Rosalind or Viola. Gender switching.
Like the various inversions of social status, [this] undermines closed and finished individuality, and like the experience of Carnival itself, it reinserts the individual into a continuous and dynamic social process.” Slide29
Shakespeare & Identity
Bakhtin
has suggested that in Shakespeare’s drama we are shown
“the possibility of a complete exit from the present order of life.”
“This pathos of radical changes and renewals is the essence of
Shakespeare’s world consciousness.”
Bristol concludes that “the theatre, like Carnival itself, is a fundamentally subversive process.”Slide30
Boy Actors in Elizabethan Theater
In his article “When I Acted Young Antonius: Boy Actors and the
Erotics
of
Jonsonian
Theater,” Richmond Barbour provides a detailed analysis of sexuality and Elizabethan Theater.
“The theaters of early modern London were recognized by both patrons and opponents to be houses of erotic display, of compelling allurements on stage and off.”
“The erotic economy of what was in effect a male transvestite theater challenges the modern assumption that sexuality is normatively or “naturally” hetero and genital and optimally monogamous.”Slide31
The effeminizing influences of theater
“Recent studies of
antitheatricalism
and gender report that Jacobean culture held deep anxieties about the effeminizing influences of theater.”
“While disguise promotes transgression, role playing also diffuses eroticism, elaborates foreplay, and may replace coition.”
“Playhouses, it was feared, fostered social incoherence because they induced and exploited prolific lusts of transformation…boy players embodied the attractions of metamorphosis and minimized its threats – for both men and women.” Slide32
Theater as Prostitution
The boys suspended the audience’s defensiveness against the gender confusion they performed, and were far less threatening than assertive women.
In his article “Base Trade: Theater as Prostitution,” Joseph Lenz explores the basis for the metaphor.
He notes the proximity to brothels and the presence of prostitutes, male and female, on stage and off.
Stephen
Gosson
wrote in 1579, “Poets in theater wound the conscience, they arrange comforts of melody, to tickle the ear; costly apparel, to flatter the sight; effeminate gesture, to ravish the sense; and wanton speech, to whet desire to inordinate lust.”Slide33
Lewd and Lascivious
The theaters and brothels were both outside the city limits, in the Liberties, where the threat of coming into contact with disease, then associated with leprosy and now attributed to plague and syphilis, was very real.
The analogy of patrons and audiences becoming “infected” with the “lascivious matters” and “lewd demeanors” was the subject of the Lord Mayor’s several appeals to Lord Burghley in the 1590s.
Lenz states that “Without a doubt, the London theater and the plays performed in them were populated by whores and their bawds, in fiction and in fact.” Slide34
All the world’s a brothel
In 1584/85 Philip Henslowe acquired the lease for the Little Rose, an “inn” with extensive grounds in
Southwark
, one of the original “
Bankside
stewes
” licensed by Henry II in 1161.
In 1597 Henslowe acquired the Unicorn, another reputed brothel.
For
Gossen
, the spectacle of a player strutting his stuff on the stage was virtually the same as a prostitute strutting hers or his upon the street: both lure citizens and whet appetites.
Even the university stage, far removed from the
Bankside
stews, was seen as a place where
crossdressed
actors adorned with silk and feathers “doe it with
lewde
intent of committing
whoredome
, beguiling and deceiving.” Slide35
Likely Lads
In Shakespeare Unbound
, Rene Weis describes Shakespeare’s early days in
Shoreditch
, where “theaters and ‘stews’ – brothels - stood cheek by jowl,” and supposes that Shakespeare would have met Marlowe living in this neighborhood.
He states unequivocally, “There is little doubt of Marlowe’s homosexuality,” then continues, “it is this same, homosexual, brilliant, dangerous Kit Marlowe whom Shakespeare…came to admire and perhaps even love, if the glowing tribute he wrote seven years after Marlowe’s death can be trusted.”
“Marlowe and Shakespeare must have been aware of each other, they both wrote for The Strange Men and
Pembrokes
, they lived in the same part of town, one was gay, the other bisexual. They shared a passion for Ovid.” Slide36
Shake-speare’s Sexuality
In his book
A History of Gay Literature
, Gregory Woods devotes an entire chapter to Shakespeare. He quotes John
Clum
, who writes “In Shakespeare, bisexuality, hinted at, seems to be happily, if cautiously absorbed by society.”
He then looks at the relationships in the plays, including that between Romeo and Mercutio, and Hal’s with Falstaff and the others in Henry IV Parts I and II. Slide37
An Epidemic of Theatricality
In
Troilus & Cressida
, he notes that by imitating and ridiculing their superiors, and thus inciting the other officers to do the same, “the older heroes’ authority is being threatened by an
epidemic of satirical theatricality.”
“There are connotation here of both contemporary Puritan objections to the theater itself, and of course, distrust of make love. Achilles and Patroclus are, at the very least, seeing too much of each other –
homoerotically
foresaking
their
homosocial
obligations.” Slide38
Shake-speare’s Sonnets
Woods states that “The Sonnets are either deeply emotional expressions of love or subtle imitations of such – either private love poems or flamboyant public exercises in literary expression.”
“They either constitute the greatest of the gay texts in the English language – or they do not.”
He notes Simon
Shepard’s
warning that “the manhood of Englishness is at stake.” Slide39
The Reputation of the so-called Bard
Woods cites the example of Michelangelo’s sonnets, addressed to a young man, but subsequently changed “as in Michelangelo the Younger’s 1623 edition of his great-uncle’s
Rime
, certain radical editorial changes could be made to render the love poetry safe.”
He concludes that “the bottom line is always the sexual orientation of the so-called Bard…the reputation of the sonneteer.”
“For centuries the sequence has been testing the extent to which canonical English literature will ever be allowed to be ‘gay literature’ at all.” Slide40
The Unanswerable Question
“issues of the homoerotic in Shakespeare are hopelessly entwined in academic controversy. Everything seems to come back to the
unanswerable question
of Shakespeare’s own sexual orientation.”
“ ... by calling attention to the large amount of homoerotic material, they raise
serious questions
about the nature of love in his works.” – Maurice
Charney
Slide41
Sex & Shakespeare
“From the beginnings of Shakespeare’s career,
Two Gentlemen of Verona
to the end of it,
Two Noble Kinsmen
, his plays are full of close, loving, even passionate male friendships.” - Stanley Wells
“
Again and again, the plots in Shakespeare's plays turn on the intimate relationship of two male friends driven apart by a woman.” – Bruce R. SmithSlide42
Stratfordians
and Oxfordians Agree!
Peter Holland,
in the
New Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
(2004), states that
“
the explicit homoeroticism [of the Sonnets] suggests that Shakespeare’s sexuality was
consciously bisexual
in its desires.”
Harold Bloom:
“The human endowment, Shakespeare keeps intimating, is
bisexual
.”
J.T. Looney:
Identified the “doubtful and somewhat conflicted attitude to women,” as one of the characteristics of the author, and that this ‘one characteristic' might afford an explanation for the very existence of the Shakespeare mystery.”
Charlton
Ogburn
Jr.
was repelled by the idea of Oxford being bisexual.Slide43
Edward de Vere’s Sexuality
Evidence for Oxford’s bisexuality would most likely be found in seven areas:
His relationship with his two wives and other women.
His relationship with Orazio
Coquo
.
The charges launched at him by his cousin Henry Howard and Charles Arundel.
The charges launched against him by Gabriel Harvey. Slide44
Edward de Vere’s Sexuality
5.
Barnabe
Rich's 1581 description.
6. His homosexual poetry under his own name.
7. His involvement in the theater from 1582 – 1604.
Gilbert:
“That Oxford may well have been bisexual, seems plausible on several counts, including internal evidence from the plays”.Slide45
Gabriel Harvey
In 1580, Gabriel Harvey described Oxford in his
Speculum
Tuscanismi
, as:
“vain, frivolous, womanish, no man but a minion” (which, if used derogatorily, meant sodomite) ‘in deed most frivolous’... “Delicate in speech, quaint in array, conceited in all points, In courtly guiles a passing singular odd man...”.
Oxford was furious and Harvey had to apologize and seek the protection of Robert Dudley, the Queen's favorite. Slide46
Further Attacks on Oxford and Lyly
Harvey attacked Oxford again in 1589, saying Lyly was his “minion secretary” and “his stale” (prostitute).
And in 1593 calling Lyly the vice-master of Paul's (Oxford's boys acting company)... “ sometime the fiddlestick of Oxford, now the very bauble (slang for penis) of London.”
In effect, Harvey was accusing both Oxford and Lyly of being sodomites. Slide47
King or Queen?
Barnabe
Rich's description in 1581 “of a London gentleman extremely attracted to French fashions in dress, makes it practically certain that he is caricaturing Lord Oxford” (Ward).
The gentleman was encountered in the Strand going toward Westminster - - near the home of William Cecil.
“The gentleman rode a footcloth nag,
apparelled
in a French ruff, a French cloak, a French hose, and in his hand a great fan of feathers, bearing them up (very womanly) against the side of his face.” Slide48
Clothes Make the Man
“Whatever the function of Oxford's forest of feathers, there can be no denying that he strove with all his fortune to set the pattern of costume for his country. His expense accounts tell us in part of his sartorial aspiration and caprice.
From the time of his adventures in Italy and France, and the return to England with his innovation of perfumed gloves, he tried to become for his country, “the glass of fashion and the mold of form.” (Feldman)Slide49
Edward de Vere’s Poetry and Patronage
Oxford wrote a poem in his own name that was clearly homosexual in tone – “
The
Lyvely
Lark
stretcht
forth her
wynge
”, about a chance meeting with a knight in the “
meades
,” whose name is “
Desyre
.”
Oxford was patron of two boy acting companies – the Children of Paul’s, and Children of the Chapel – during a time when puritans were complaining about homosexual behavior in the acting companies.
Boy actors were notorious for their reputation as prostitutes.
Slide50
Social Stigma, Sexuality and Pseudonyms
The link between an artist's sexuality, and the family's desire to cover that up is very strong.
Wilde – Sent to prison
Verlaine – Sent to prison
Rimbaud –Many sonnets destroyed by family
Michelangelo– Sonnets suppressed by family
Forster – Published
Maurice
posthumously
Federico Garcia Lorca – Executed
Tchaikovsky – Committed suicideSlide51
Oxford’s involvement with the theater
Oxford’s associates in these companies would likely also be considered bisexual or homosexual today – both John Lyly, his secretary and playwright, and Sebastian Westcott, Master of the Children’s Chapel. Westcott never married, and his closest relations were with charges, to whom he left his estate when he died.
As we have heard previously at this conference, there seems to be a direct correlation between Oxford’s involvement in the theater and the introduction of the pseudonym.
We contend that the continued use of the pseudonym after Oxford’s death, and the resistance to unmasking the true author to this day, is inexorably linked to his sexuality. Slide52
Sources
Woods, Gregory
A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition
, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998
Ciuraru
, Carmela
Nom de Plume: A (Secret) History of Pseudonyms,
HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2011
Weis, Rene
Shakespeare Unbound: Decoding A Hidden Life,
Henry Holt & Company LLC, New York, 2007
Bram, Christopher
Eminent Outlaws: The Gay Writers Who Changed America,
Hachette Book Group, New York, 2012
Lenz, Joseph
Base Trade: Theater as Prostitution
, The John Hopkins University Press, ELH Volume 60, No. 4, (Winter 1993) pp. 833-855Slide53
Sources
Bristol, Michael D.
Carnival and The Institutions of Theater in Elizabethan England,
The John Hopkins University Press, ELH,
Vol
, 50 No. 4 (Winter 1983) pp. 637-654
Barbour, Richmond,
“When I acted Young
Antonious
”: Boy Actors and the
Erotics
of
Jonsonian
Theater,
Modern Language Association, PMLA,
Vol
110 No. 5 (Oct. 1995) pp. 1006-1022