/
Activation in Ireland: Are we on the Right Path? Activation in Ireland: Are we on the Right Path?

Activation in Ireland: Are we on the Right Path? - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
396 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-14

Activation in Ireland: Are we on the Right Path? - PPT Presentation

Elish Kelly ESRI Seamus McGuinness ESRI Philip OConnell UCD Geary Institute Conference on Irish Economic Policy Programme 1 st February 2013 Outline Background Objectives Data Descriptives ID: 160249

2006 employment unemployed market employment 2006 market unemployed 2011 unemployment training programmes education labour activation job search strong inactivity

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Activation in Ireland: Are we on the Rig..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Activation in Ireland: Are we on the Right Path?

Elish Kelly (ESRI)Seamus McGuinness (ESRI) Philip O’Connell (UCD Geary Institute)Conference on Irish Economic Policy Programme1st February 2013Slide2

Outline

Background ObjectivesDataDescriptivesEconometricsActive Labour Market Policy: What Works?Impact of Pathways to WorkSlide3

Background

Ireland’s unemployment rate has increased from 4.4% in 2006 to 14.8% today.Long-term unemployment is a growing problem, and currently accounts for almost 60% of total unemployment.Many of the long-term unemployed are also structurally unemployed having been previously engaged in industries, such as construction, with limited growth potential.The composition of unemployed has changed since the recession e.g. growth in unemployed males with post-leaving cert qualifications and females with third-level.Slide4

Objectives

We use new data to examine the nature and rates of labour market transitions among the unemployed in 2006 and 2011.We consider the extent to which unemployed persons transition to employment and inactivity, and the degree to which the factors determining the transition to employment have changed.We consider the implications of our evidence for activation policy in Ireland.Slide5

Data

Quarterly National Household Survey (QNHS) Longitudinal DataPre-Recession: Q2 2006 – Q2 2007Post-Recession: Q2 2011- Q2 2012Balanced Panel: Focus on individuals unemployed on entering the panel who are present in the panel for five consecutive quarters (e.g. Q2 2006 through to Q2 2007)Eradicate the impacts of migration from using balanced panelWe examine the impacts of age, gender, nationality, education and unemployment duration on escaping to employmentSlide6

Transition Rates

Continuously UnemployedInto EmploymentInto Inactivity

Into/Out of Employment/Inactivity

2006

21.3

33.9

29.3

15.5

2011

49.0

19.9

26.6

4.6Slide7

Gender Profile

Continuously UnemployedInto Employment

Into

Inactivity

Into/Out of Employment/Inactivity

Males

2006

29.2

2011

64.2

2006

40.5

2011

18.9

2006

23.5

2011

14.9

2006

6.8

2011

2.1

Females

2006

10.9

2011

27.6

2006

25.2

2011

21.3

2006

36.9

2011

43.1

2006

27.0

2011

8.1Slide8

Age ProfileSlide9

Educational AttainmentSlide10

Unemployment DurationSlide11

Escape to Employment: Personal Characteristics

2006

2011

Male

0.034*

0.004

Age

(Ref: 55Plus)

:

15-19

0.020

0.016

20-24

0.012

0.046**

25-34

-0.029

0.029

35-44

0.000

0.024

45-54

-0.033

0.039**

Irish

0.115***

0.021Slide12

Escape to Employment:Educational Attainment

2006

2011

Educational Attainment

(Ref: Primary or Less)

:

Junior Certificate

0.015

-0.006

Leaving

Certificate

0.045

0.005

Post-leaving

Certificate

0.033

0.016

Third-level

Non-degree

0.086**

0.001

Third-level

Degree and Higher

0.098**

0.036Slide13

Escape to Employment:Unemployment Duration

2006

2011

Unemployment Duration

(Ref: Up

to 3 Months

)

:

3 Up to 6 Months

-0.046

-0.020

6 up to 12 Months

-0.029

-0.031*

12 Months Plus

-0.045*

-0.039***Slide14

Summary I

The proportion of respondents remaining unemployed for at least 12 months has increased from 21% in 2006 to 49% in 2011.Consequently the proportion entering employment has fallen from 34% to 20%.Movements into inactivity appear stable.There has been a substantial fall in marginal attachment over the period.Slide15

Summary II

The econometric analysis reveals that education has become less relevant in determining a successful transition to employment over the period.Location is not an important factor, and gender is not significant in current economic climate either.Unemployment duration emerges as being the main driver in explaining the degree to which people exit unemploymentThose with shorter unemployment durations (up to 6 months) are more likely to escape from unemployment, while the longer a person remains unemployed the less likely he/she is to leave unemployment, especially since the most recent recession.Slide16

Long-term Unemployment has risen steadily during crisis.

It now stands at 60% of total unemploymentReducing LTU remians be a key objective of labour market policy

Source:

Constructed from the

Quarterly National Household Survey

, Central Statistics OfficeSlide17

Active Labour Market Programmes

Supply sideJob Search Assistance/EncouragementInterviews/counselling, job placement services, etcIncrease effectiveness of job search + monitoring & sanctionsTrainingEnhance skills and employment prospectsDemand Side

Public-sector Employment schemes

Retain contact with labour market

Incentives to employers or self-employment

Encourage employers to create new jobs or retain existing jobsSlide18

Key Principles for effective labour market activation

Labour market activation to assist and encourage the individual to return to work should be initiated as soon as he or she makes a claimEffective job search advice and assistance should be delivered to all non-employedJob search activity should be monitored on a regular and ongoing basis An effective activation strategy needs to be backed up with appropriate sanctions for non-compliance with job search and activation requirements.

18Slide19

Research Findings: The Impact of Job Search Assistance

Job Search Assistance – International evidenceEffective for many groupsLow cost

More effective

with regular

monitoring and

sanctions

Irish research (OECD and ESRI):

Ireland has had a poor record in the past

Lack of regular monitoring, assistance or sanctions

Impact of reforms?Slide20

Research Findings:Programmes

with strong market linkages show strong positive effects on employment (1990s, 2006-8)Slide21

Research Findings:Programmes

with strong market linkages show strong positive effects on employment (1990s, 2006-8)Slide22

Research Findings:Programmes

with strong market linkages show strong positive effects on employment (1990s, 2006-8)Slide23

Rough Estimate of Spend on ALMPs for Unemployed c. 2011-12

2/3rds on programmes with weak market links1/3rd on direct employment schemes

 

Market Orientation

 

Labour Market Leverage

Weak

Strong

 

 

Supply –

Training

 

General

Education

and Training

 

c. €430 (33%)

Skills Training

 

c. €220 (17%)

 

 

€650

(50%)

 

Demand –

Employment

 

Direct Employment

 

c

. €440 (34%)

Employment Supports

c

. €200 (16%)

 

 

€640

(50%)

Total

€870 (67%)

€420 (33%)

€1,290

Sources: Mainly DPER Comprehensive Expenditure Review dataSlide24

Content and quality of education & training is vital

Education and training programmes should be demand leddriven by the needs of growth sectorsstrongly connected with real jobs Content of training should be driven by needs of enterprisesneed to develop up-to-date intelligence of skill needs.Training initiatives should broadly reflect the education profile of the unemployed. In the current crisis, the educational and skills profile of the unemployed has increased: training programmes should reflect that.Training providers should be chosen on the basis of their ability to deliver high quality effective and relevant training.

24Slide25

Pathways to Work/Intreo

Many positive features:Battle against unemployment as top priority Commitment to reducing Long-term UnemploymentIntegration of income support with activationOne-stop-shop in Intreo officesAdditional training placesStatistical profiling to target those most at risk

Extension of employer PRSI scheme

25Slide26

Moving in the right direction, but:

Pace of change – the crisis started 5 years ago:Intreo roll out over 2 yearsClient profiling still incompleteNeeds to be adapted to new clients and new conditionsImmediate activation for all clients?

New unemployed

Only in

Intreo

offices - Non-

Intreo

, wait 3 months

Current unemployed

Too little too late – insufficient activation

Others not economically active

Capacity?

OECD: insufficient staff to implement activation system before crisis

Live Register has grown from 290,000 in 2009, to 440,000 in 2012

Skills?

Outsource activation role?

26Slide27

The Way Forward: Demand and Supply

DemandPathways recognises the importance of programmes to match labour market needsCan Expert Group on Future Skill Needs + FAS Skills and Labour Market Research Unit meet that challenge?Need for ongoing and up-to-date information

Specific sector skills councils

Ensure nature and content of education and skills are market relevant

Training programmes should include job placement component

Supply

Respond to upward shift in educational profile of unemployed

Provide intensive retraining to tackle structural unemployment among former construction workers

27Slide28

The Way Forward: Providers

Education and Training is excessively provider drivenNot designed to meet training needs of unemployed or skill needs of employersNeed to evaluate impact of 2nd chance educationCan SOLAS + Local Education and Training Boards meet training needs?

Experience, expertise, priority focus?

DSP as broker/coordinator of training?

Providers should be chosen on basis of ability to deliver quality training

Provision could be incentivised according to results (job placements)

Does the academic

calender

meet the need of the unemployed?

Ensure progression from programmes with weak to strong market links

All education, training and employment schemes should be subject to rigorous evaluation:

identify effective interventions

timely restructuring/closure of ineffective interventions

0.04% of the ALMP budget = €500,000 for evaluation….

28