/
Group A Group B Group F AQA A Level History Unit 1C: Group A Group B Group F AQA A Level History Unit 1C:

Group A Group B Group F AQA A Level History Unit 1C: - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
374 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-30

Group A Group B Group F AQA A Level History Unit 1C: - PPT Presentation

The Tudors England 14851603 Mary I Administration and economy The aim of this and next lesson is to assess these interpretations of Mary Is reign Positive achievements there were none ID: 703971

mary

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Group A Group B Group F AQA A Level Hist..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Group AGroup BGroup FSlide2

AQA A Level History Unit 1C: The Tudors: England, 1485–1603

Mary I:

Administration and economySlide3

The aim of this and next lesson is to assess these interpretations of Mary I’s reign:

“Positive achievements there were none.”

G.R. Elton

“Sterility was the keynote of Mary’s reign.” A.F. Pollard

…in order to help us answer this question:

To what extent did Mary’s reign contribute to

a

Mid-Tudor crisis?Slide4

Mary I balance sheet On a piece of A4 paper write the question:

To

what extent did Mary’s reign contribute to a Mid-Tudor crisis? Divide the paper into two columns with these headings:Crisis?What crisis?Slide5

Mary and ParliamentMary remodelled Parliament, replacing radical bishops in the House of Lords and creating 19

new seats in the Commons.

Nevertheless she met with opposition from Parliament. Slide6

Mary and Parliament Use info from the paragraph inTillbrook

pp.44-5 and your own knowledge to assess the validity of this statement:

Mary’s relationship with Parliament was one of conflict rather than co-operation. Tip: identify examples of conflict and co-operation/compromise, and use them to agree or disagree with the statement.

10

Slide7

Conflict

Co-operation/compromise

Mary and Parliament

Parliament sent a delegation (Nov.1553) to persuade Mary not to marry Philip of Spain.

Mary went ahead but negotiated a marriage treaty which dealt with Parliament’s concerns.

80 (=20% of ) MPs opposed the repeal of Edward VI’s religious legislation (Nov. 1553).

Mary allowed the owners of ex-Church land to keep it, in return for repealing the Act of Supremacy and introduction of new heresy laws (Dec 1553-Jan 1554).Parliament rejected a bill to confiscate the property of Protestant exiles (1555).Parliament rejected a bill to protect Philip against treason (1554) and prevented his coronation (1554).

Parliament refused to exclude Princess Elizabeth from the succession after Wyatt’s Rebellion (1554).Mary didn’t pressure Parliament over these issues or use her prerogative to dissolve it. It was in the interests of Mary and Parliament to co-operate in order to prevent rebellion.Slide8

Mary I balance sheet Under the appropriate heading, summarise Mary’s relationship with Parliament.

Crisis?

(if you think it was characterised mainly by conflict)

What crisis? (if you think it was mainly characterised by co-operation/compromise)Slide9

Which of the following is true of Mary’s Privy Council?It was only made up of religious conservatives

None of the councillors had previous experience of

government

Supporters of Northumberland were not includedMary didn’t consult it about her marriageIts large size made it inefficientSlide10

Mary’s Privy CouncilIncluded

Stephen Gardiner - Lord Chancellor (conservative)

Duke of Norfolk (senior conservative noble)

William Paulet – Lord Treasurer (reformer, had supported Northumberland)William Paget – Lord Privy Seal (reformer, had supported Northumberland) In practice only 8-12 of its 50 members attended meetings - Gardiner, Paulet and Paget were key players.

Its efficiency was enhanced by the establishment of 12 subcommittees with specific administrative responsibilities, e.g. developing the navy.Slide11

Mary I balance sheet Under the appropriate heading, comment on Mary’s management of the Privy Council.

Crisis?

(if you think that it was generally

poorly managed)What crisis? (if you think that it was generally well managed)Slide12

Mary’s chief advisersAt the start of her reign: Simon Renard (Imperial Envoy), especially for advice on her marriage.

Philip of Spain (advised her to develop the navy and not to escalate religious persecution).

After his return from exile (Nov.1555): Cardinal Reginald Pole (Papal Envoy), especially on religious policy.Slide13

According to Richard Rex, why was Mary unable to appoint a chief minister as effective as Wolsey or Cromwell?

“…with none of these men [in her government] could she ever enjoy that degree of trust essential to the relationship between monarch and chief minister… If they had not played a leading part in destroying the world of her childhood in the 1530s… then they had browbeaten her over religion around 1550. She might appreciate political realities enough to understand that she could never govern without these men, the Gardiners,

Pagets

and Paulets. But she never liked them… and she shared enough of the prejudices of the old nobility to think rather little of men who had clawed their way up the greasy pole. The two men she did trust, King Philip and Cardinal Pole, though both talented, could never fit the bill. Neither the foreigner nor the exile had the close ties among the English political elite vital to success in such a role. Besides this, Philip was mostly out of the country, while Pole was too idealistic and unworldly to act effectively as a chief minister, and in any case had no desire to do so.”Slide14

According to Richard Rex, why was Mary unable to appoint an effective chief minister?

“…with none of these men [in her government] could she ever enjoy that degree of

trust

essential to the relationship between monarch and chief minister… If they had not played a leading part in destroying the world of her childhood in the 1530s… then they had browbeaten her over religion around 1550. She might appreciate political realities enough to understand that she could never govern without these men, the Gardiners, Pagets and Paulets. But she never liked them… and she shared enough of the prejudices of the old nobility to think rather little of men who had clawed their way up the greasy pole.

The two men she did trust,

King Philip and Cardinal Pole

, though both talented, could never fit the bill. Neither the foreigner nor the exile had the close ties among the English political elite vital to success in such a role. Besides this, Philip was mostly out of the country, while Pole was too idealistic and unworldly to act effectively as a chief minister, and in any case had no desire to do so.”Slide15

Mary I balance sheet Under the appropriate heading, comment on Mary’s choice of chief advisers.

Crisis?

(if you think that overall, it contributed to her failure as a monarch)

What crisis? (if you think that overall, there were advantages to her choices)Slide16

Economic problemsDebts of £185,000, increased to £300,000 by war with France.Rising inflation and base coinage – the buying power of an agricultural worker’s wages in 1559 was 59% of what it had been in 1509.

Heavy rain (1555-6) caused worst harvest failures of the century, resulting in rising grain prices and famine.

Typhus and influenza epidemics doubled the death rate and killed c.1 in 10 of the population (1556-8).

Unemployment and vagrancy.However, economic problems did not lead to rebellion.Slide17

The search for overseas markets

Mary continued the policy of Northumberland, who sent Richard Chancellor and Sir Hugh Willoughby to discover a north-eastern sea route to the Far East (1553).

Chancellor reached the White Sea and travelled by land to Muscovy, where he established links with Ivan IV.

In 1555, a royal charter was issued to the Muscovy Company giving it exclusive trading rights in the region. Slide18

Administrative and economic changesUsing your notes and the handout, create a diagram which ranks changes in the areas below in order of success.

Add notes explaining the changes and their significance.

Overseas markets

Revenue collectionCustoms dutiesCrown landsCoinageNavyMilitia

Towns

15

Slide19

Admin/economy

Change

Revenue collection

Customs duties

Crown lands

Coinage

Navy

Militia

Towns

Improved by increasing the responsibility and efficiency of the

Exchequer

(as recommended by 1552 commission).

A new

Book of Rates

(the first since 1507)

was introduced in 1558.

Customs duties increased from £29,000 to £83,000

, but it was Elizabeth I who benefitted from this.

A survey of crown lands led to a

review of rents and fines

which brought Mary another

£40,000 p.a

.

However, she had to sell lands worth £5,000 p.a. (1554) and £8,000 p.a. (1557) to help pay off Crown debts. She also returned Crown lands worth £60,000 p.a. to the Church.

Mary made

plans to reissue the coinage

, but these were not carried out until 1560-61.

Six new ships

built;

14,000 p.a. funds

allocated to navy.

Militia Act (1558)

made the method of raising troops in wartime more efficient;

Arms Act (1558)

improved supply and quality of weapons.

Charters

were issued confirming the rights of towns;

Acts of Parliament protected urban

clothmaking

and trades

against rural competition by restricting the migration of workers to the countryside.

However, encouraging the growth of a variety of industries in town and country would have provided more jobs for the unemployed.Slide20

Mary I balance sheet Under the appropriate headings, list Mary’s administrative and economic successes and failures.

Crisis?

What crisis? Add any other achievements or failures of her reign (marriage, foreign policy, religion, succession, rebellion).Slide21

Write a paragraph assessing these interpretations of Mary I’s reign:

“Positive achievements there were none.”

G.R. Elton

“Sterility was the keynote of Mary’s reign.” A.F. Pollard

Tip: argue for and against the idea that Mary’s reign was a failure, supporting your arguments with relevant examples. 10 Slide22

Structure

and content

Marks out of 10

Opening sentence refers to the interpretations

1

Arguments for

and against the interpretations are used2Relevant supporting examples are used6Final sentence gives a clear judgement 1Marking Grid

A = 8-10 B = 7 C = 6

D = 5

E = 4

U = 1-3Slide23

Mid-Tudor crisis key factors

Factionalism

Weakness of leadership and succession

Religious upheavalEconomic problemsForeign policy failuresRebellionsWhat can you add to your MTC tree for Mary’s reign?

5