3TilburgUniversityDepartmentofEconometricsandOperationsResearchAddressTilburgUniversityPOBox901535000LETilburgTheNetherlandsEmailacmouratilburguniversityeduIamthankfultoJanBooneandM ID: 937469
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Doeslongtermcareprovisionreducehospitalb..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Doeslong-termcareprovisionreducehospitalbed-blocking?EvidencefromapolicyreforminPortugal(Preliminaryandincomplete,pleasedonotcirculateorcitewithoutpermission)AnaMouraAbstractExcessivelengthsofhospitalstayareamongtheleadingsourcesofineciencyinhealthcare.Onereasonforexcessivelengthsofhospitalstaycanbebed-blocking.Istudywhetherlong-termcare(LTC)provisionreduceshospitalbed-blocking.Usingindividualdata
onemergencyinpatientadmissionsatPortuguesehospitalsduring2000-2015,Iimplementatriple-dierencesdesign.ThisdesignexploitsvariationinthetimingofentryofLTCprovidersacrossregionsoriginatingfromthestaggeredintroductionofthepublicLTCNetwork.Italsoexploitsvariationinlengthsofstaybetweenregularpatientsandpatientsexhibitingsocialfactorsthatputthematriskofbed-blocking,suchaslivingalone,havingnofamilytocare,andha
vinginadequatehousing.Indthattheentryofthersthome-careteaminaregionreducesthelengthofstayofindividualslivingaloneandthosewithinadequatehousingby4daysrelativetoregularpatients.Thesereductionsinlengthofstaydonotaectthetreatmentreceivedwhileatthehospital.Reductionsinlengthofstayupontheentryoftherstnursinghomeoccuronlyforpatientswithhighcareneeds.Thebedsfreedupbybed-blockersareusedtoadmitmo
reelectivepatients.Keywords:Long-termcare;hospitalbed-blocking;delayeddischarges.JELcodes:H51;I10;I18;J14. TilburgUniversity,DepartmentofEconometricsandOperationsResearch.Address:TilburgUniversity,P.O.Box90153,5000LETilburg,TheNetherlands.E-mail:a.c.moura@tilburguniversity.edu.IamthankfultoJanBooneandMartinSalmforextensiveadviceandsupport.Accesstotheindividualhospitaldataispossibleunderthedata-sharinga
greementbetweenAdministrac~aoCentraldoSistemadeSaude,I.P.(ACSS)andtheHealthEconomics&ManagementKnowledgeCenteratNovaSchoolofBusinessandEconomics,withwhichIamaliated.IthankHugoLopesforprovidingmethedataontheroll-outofthepubliclong-termcarenetwork.1 1IntroductionWhilethereisageneralconsensusamongeconomistsandpolicy-makersthathealthcaresystemsarewastefulandinecient(GarberandSkinner,2008),p
ointingoutspecicsourcesofineciencycanbechallenging(Einavetal.,2019).TheWorldHealthOrganizationconsidersexcessivelengthsofhospitalstayasoneoftheleadingsourcesofineciencyinhealthcare(WHO,2010).Onereasonforexcessivelengthsofhospitalstaycanbebed-blocking.Bed-blockingoccurswhenapatientisclinicallyttobedischargedbutrequiressomeformofsupportoutsidethehospital,suchasashortstayatanursinghomefaci
lityorhome-help,whichisnotreadilyavailable.Ifnosafedischargearrangementscanbemade,thepatientremainsinthehospitaluntilasafetransitiontothenextstageofcareprovisionispossible,resultinginlongerlengthsofhospitalstay.Thesearenotinconsequential.Theyimplyhigherhospitalcosts,havepotentiallydetrimentalimpactsonpatients'healthoriginatingfromincreasedrisksofmobilityloss,nosocomialinfections,andloneliness,andcancreated
elaysforpatientsawaitingelectivecare(Mur-VeemanandGovers,2011).Bed-blockingisagrowingpolicyconcernindevelopedcountries.Thisismotivatedbyseveraltrends.Duringthelastdecades,thereweresignicantincreasesinlifeexpectancyandconsequentlyrisingshareoftheelderlyinthepopulation.Moreover,chronicdiseasesbecametheleadingcauseofillness,disability,anddeath.Whilelargelymanageableoutsidethehospital,chronicdiseaseslimit
patients'abilitytoliveindependently.Thesedemographictrendsputpressureonexistinginstitutionalarrangementswithinthehealthsystemandcallforareorganizationofcaredelivery(Harper,2014).Socialtrends,suchastheriseinfemalelaborforceparticipationandthedeclineofinter-generationalhouseholds,inturn,threatenexistinginformallong-termcarearrangements(LakdawallaandPhilipson,2002).Inthisstudy,Iexaminewhethertheprovisionoflon
g-termcare(LTC)reduceshospitalbed-blocking.IfocusonthePortuguesecase.InPortugal,onarandomdayin2019,4.7%ofbedsinpublichospitalswereoccupiedwithpatientswhowereclinicallyreadytobedischargedbutlackedlong-termcaresupport,amountingtoover80,000delayedbed-days.1,2Iexploitplausiblyexogenousvariationintheavailabilityoflong-termcareoriginatingfromtheintroductionofthepublicLTCNetworkbythePortuguesegovernment.Before200
6,LTCserviceswerenotwithinthescopeofthePortugueseNationalHealthSystemandindividuals 1Resultsfromasnapshot-censuscarriedoutbythePortugueseAssociationofHospitalManagers(APAH).Seehttps://apah.pt/portfolio/barometro-de-internamentos-sociais/.2Figuresconveyingthemagnitudeofbed-blockingindierentcountriesarenoteasilyavailable.InSweden,theshareofbed-blockerswasabout7%in1992(StyrbornandThorslund,1993).In2006,6
.1%ofallhospital-daysintheNetherlandswerebed-blockingdays(Mur-VeemanandGovers,2011).InEngland,duringDecember2019alone,thenumberofdelayedbed-daysreached148,000,a15%increasecomparingtothesamemonthofthepreviousyear(https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/feb/23/bed-blocking-highest-since-2017-hospitals-nhs).2 reliedheavilyoninformalcareprovidedbyfamilymembers.ThepublicLTCNetworkwasintroducedin2006,withtheaim
ofllinginthisgapinservicecoverage.Itcompriseshighlysubsidizednursinghomefacilities(NH)andteamsprovidinghome-care(HC),whichoperateincoordinationwithhospitals,aimingateasingthetransitionofpatientsacrossdierentsettingsofcareprovision.TheLTCNetworkwasintroducedinastaggeredfashion,meaningthatdierentregionsexperiencedtheentryofLTCprovidersatdierentpointsintime.Usingindividualdataontheuniverse
ofemergencyinpatientadmissionsatpublichospitalsinPortugalbetweentheyears2000and2015,Irstshowthatthereisagroupofpatientsexhibitingacomplexcombinationofhealthandsocialneeds.Thisgroupincludesindividualswholivealone,havenofamilytocareforthem,andhaveinadequatehousingconditionsorotherunfortunateeconomiccircumstancesthatmighthinderatimelydischarge.Thedierencesinlengthofstaybetweenthesepatientsandpatient
swhodonotexhibitsocialneedsaresizable.Forexample,individualswithnofamilytocarehavelengthsofstaythatare,onaverage,over20dayslongerthanregularpatientsaftercontrollingfordemographics,comorbidities,andmedicaldiagnoses.Throughoutthepaper,Irefertopatientswhoexhibitbothhealthandsocialneedsasbed-blockers,asopposedtoregularpatients,whoexhibitnosocialneeds.Intheempiricalanalysis,Iuseatriple-dierencesdesigntocom
parethelengthofstayofbed-blockersandthelengthofstayofregularpatientsbeforeandaftertheentryoftherstNHandtherstHCteaminaregion.ThisidenticationstrategyexploitsvariationinLTCavailabilityacrossregionsandtimeoriginatingfromthestaggeredintroductionoftheLTCNetwork.Italsoexploitsvariationinlengthsofstaybetweenregularpatientsandbed-blockers.Indevidenceofreductionsinthelengthofstayofbed-blockersr
elativetoregularpatientsfollowingtheentryofthersthome-careteaminaregion.Thesereductionsamountto4days,onaverage,forindividualslivingaloneandthosewithinadequatehousingandothereconomicissues.Indnosignicantreductionsinthelengthofstayofbed-blockersrelativetoregularpatientsfollowingtheentryoftherstnursinghomeinaregion.Sinceadmissiontoanursinghomerequireshigherlevelsofdisabilityanddependency,t
heaveragebed-blockermightnotbeatriskofbeingadmittedtoanursinghome.Consistentwiththishypothesis,Indreductionsinthelengthofstayofbed-blockersrelativetoregularpatientsfollowingtheentryoftherstnursinghomeinaregiononlywhenrestrictingthesampletopatientswithhighcareneeds,suchasthosewithastrokediagnosis.Finally,theentryoftherstnursinghomeandhome-careproviderinaregionhasaprecisezeroimpactonthelengtho
fstayofregularpatients,meaningthatreductionsinthelengthsofstayofbed-blockersrelativetoregularpatientsoriginateonlyfromreductionsinthelengthofstayofbed-blockers.Theseresultsarerobusttoalternativemodelspecications,outcomevariables,relevant3 regions,andtreatmentdenitions.Anevent-studydesignconveysthattheresultsarenottypicallydrivenbydierencesinunderlyingpre-treatmenttrends.Ialsoshowthattheentry
ofLTCprovidersinaregionisnotassociatedwithchangesinthecodingfrequencyofthesocialfactorsusedtoidentifybed-blockers.Consistentwiththelongerlengthofstayofbed-blockersbeingunnecessary,Indnoreductionsintheintensityofcarereceivedbybed-blockersduringtheirhospitalstayaftertheentryofLTCprovidersinaregion.Finally,thebedsfreedupbybed-blockersdonotremainunoccupied:Indevidenceofincreasesinprogrammedactivityfo
llowingtheentryofthersthome-careteaminaregion.WhiletheseresultsshowthatLTCprovisioncanreducehospitalbed-blocking,theresultingreductionsinlengthofstaytakesometimetomaterializeanddonotfullyclosethegapbetweenbed-blockersandregularpatients.Iinvestigatetheroleoftheaccumulationofrelationship-specicexperiencebetweenahospital-regionpairinexplainingtheseresults.Thendingsfromthisanalysisconveythatalar
genumberofinteractionsbetweenahospital-regionpairisneededtogeneratemeaningfulreductionsinthelengthofstayofbed-blockers.RelatedLiterature.Thispaperrelatestoseveralstrandsoftheliterature.3ItspeaksmostdirectlytoasmallbutgrowingliteraturestudyingtheimpactsofLTCavailabilityonhospitalbed-blocking(Forder,2009;Gaughanetal.,2015,2017a,b).Unlikeexistingstudies,IexploitvariationintheavailabilityofLTCinducedbyapolicyr
eformandassessitsimpactsonbed-blocking.Duetothenatureofthereform,IamabletoseparatetheeectsofdistincttypesofLTCproviders,namelynursinghomesandhome-careteams.Additionally,Iproposetheuseofinformationonsocialneedstoidentifypatientsatincreasedriskofbed-blockingandcircumventthefactthattheexactlengthofthedelayistypicallyunobserved(withHolmasetal.(2013)anotableexception).Thesesocialneedsincludetheavailab
ilityoffamilysupportandhousingconditions,whichhavebeenshowntoaectbothLTCuse(Diepstratenetal.,2020;Lopesetal.,2018)andhospitalbed-blocking(Costaetal.,2012;Bryanetal.,2006;McDonaghetal.,2000).ArelatedliteraturefocusesonthesubstitutabilityofLTCandacutehospitalcare.ThisliteraturendslittletonosubstitutionbetweenLTCandhospitallengthofstay(McKnight,2006;Forder,2009;Gaughanetal.,2015,2017a;Bakxetal.,2020
;Costa-Fontetal.,2018;Kumpel,2019).IdeviatefromexistingstudiesinthatIassessthesubstitutabilityofLTCandacutecareusingindividualdataonpatientswhoarehospitalized.Givenmyresearchdesign,Ianalyzesubstitutionofacutecarewithrespecttobothhome-careandnursinghome 3Thereisalsoanextensiveliteratureonbed-blockingoutsideeconomics.Scholarsinmedicineandhealthpolicyhaveelaboratedonthecausesofbed-blocking,characterizedthea&
#11;ectedpopulation,andquantiedtheassociatedmonetarylosses(see,forexample,Bryanetal.,2006;Hendyetal.,2012;Costaetal.,2012).Withinoperationsresearchandhealthcaremanagement,theoptimizationofpatient owshasbeenwellstudied(McCleanandP.,2006;El-Darzietal.,1998;Katsaliakietal.,2005;OsorioandBierlaire,2007andmanyothers).4 care,separatelyforregularpatientsandbed-blockers.Indnoevidenceofsubstitutionbetween
LTCandacutecareforregularpatients.Forbed-blockers,Iestimatetheelasticityofdelayedlengthofstaywithrespecttoboththesupplyofnursinghomebedsandofplacesinhome-careteamsbetween-0.2and-0.3.Myndingthatreductionsinbed-blockingleadtoincreasesinprogrammedactivityrelatestoadiscussionontheinternalallocationofresourceswithinahospital,whichgoesbacktoHarris(1977).Thespeciccaseofinteractionsbetweenemergencyandele
ctiveactivitieswasrecentlystudiedbyJoharetal.(2013).Thispaperalsoprovidesnewinsightsonthefactorscontributingtoperpetuatebed-blocking.FernandezandForder(2008)studytheimportanceofnancialresourcesallocatedtotheLTCsector.Holmasetal.(2010)showthatmonetaryincentivestoreducebed-blockingcancrowd-outagents'intrinsicmotivationandendupbeingcounterproductive.BecausetheacuteandLTCsettingsareorganizedandfunded
separatelyinmanycountries(Siciliani,2014),coordinationdicultiesacrossthetwosettingsarelikelytooccur(Cebuletal.,2008).Theroleofcoordinationdicultiesinperpetuatingbed-blockinghasbeenstudiedbyFernandezetal.(2018).Drawingon(Kellogg,2011),Iproposeanalternative,albeitcomplementarymechanismbasedontheaccumulationofrelationship-specicexperiencebetweenpairsofhospitalsandteamsresponsibleforndingva
canciesintheLTCNetwork,whicharebasedinthepatient'sregionofresidence.Myndingssuggestthatonlythepairswiththelargestnumberofinteractionsareabletoaccumulatealevelofexperiencethatallowsformeaningfulreductionsinthelengthofstayofbed-blockers.Thiscanexplainwhypreviousliteraturehasfoundthatlargerhospitals,withahighnumberofadmissions,seemtomanagedischargesmoreecientlyandthushavelessdelayeddischarges(DeVold
eretal.,2020).Finally,andmorebroadly,thispaperrelatestorecentworkzoominginonspecicaspectsofthehealthcaresectortoidentifysourcesofwasteandineciency.AlargepartofthisliteraturehasfocusedoninteractionsbetweentheacutecareandLTCsettings(DoyleJretal.,2017;Einavetal.,2018;Eliasonetal.,2018;Jinetal.,2018;Einavetal.,2019;Kumpel,2019,andmanyothers).Byandlarge,thisliteraturepointstotheLTCandpost-acutesector
sasasourceofineciencyinthehealthcaresystem.Mypapertakesadiametricallyopposedstand,suggestingthatLTCprovisionmightbeawaytoreduceinecienciesassociatedwithbed-blockingintheacute-caresetting.Inparticular,mybaselineestimatessuggestthatLTCprovisiongeneratesa30%reductioninannualbed-blockingcostsincurredbyhospitals.Theremainderofthispaperisorganizedasfollows.Section2providesinstitutionalbackgroundonthePo
rtuguesehospitalandLTCsettings.Section3describesthedatausedintheanalysis.Section4describesmyempiricalapproach.Section5presentstheresultsandSection6elaboratesonpotentialmechanisms.Finally,section7concludes.5 2InstitutionalSetting2.1InpatientcareInPortugal,mostinpatientcareisprovidedbypublichospitalsbelongingtotheNationalHealthSystem(SNS).TheSNSispredominantlynancedthroughgeneraltaxationandcharacterized
byuniversalcoverageandaccesstocarethatismostlyfreeatthepointofuse(Sim~oesetal.,2017).InpatientcareprovidedbyhospitalsbelongingtotheSNSispaidviaDiagnosis-RelatedGroups(DRGs).ADRGgroupspatientswhohavesimilarconsumptionofresourcesbasedontheirmedicaldiagnosis,treatmentreceived,anddemographicprole.Thereareover600distinctgroupsinthecurrentDRGsystemandeachhasanassociatedprice.DRGsareusedtosetanannualprospect
iveglobalbudgetforinpatientcareprovidedbyeachhospital,whichamountsto75-85%oftotalinpatientrevenuesofSNShospitals(Mateus,2011).Overall,hospitalshavenonancialincentivestokeeppatientsforlongerthannecessary.SincehospitalsarepaidaccordingtothenumberandtheDRGofpatientstheyreceive,DRG-basedfundingprovidesincentivesforhospitalstotreatmorepatientsandtocutcosts,possiblybyreducinglengthsofstay.Toaccountforcompli
catedpatientswhoselengthofstaymightbeextraordinarilylong,hospitalsgetanadditionaldailypaymentforeachdayinexcessofanuppertrim-pointdenedbylawforthepatient'sDRGuntildischarge.Whilethetrim-pointisDRG-specic,thedailyamountforthedaysinexcessofthetrimpointisnot.Trim-pointsanddailyamountswereupdatedbythegovernmentatseveralpointsduringmystudy-period.Formostofthestudy-period,thedailyamountwasbetweene80and
e90.2.2Long-termcareLong-termcareiscareneededbyindividualswithsomedegreeofdependency.Itincludeshealthcare(i.e.rehabilitationafteranacutecareepisode),personalcare(i.e.personalhygiene),helpwithactivitiesofdailyliving(i.e.housework,meals),andaccommodationforindividualswhocannotliveindependently(Siciliani,2014;Norton,2000).Itcanbeprovidedeitherformallyorinformally.Formallong-termcareisprovidedbytrainedpersonne
latthepatient'shomeoratinstitutionssuchasnursinghomes.Informalcareisprovidedbyrelatives,friends,orneighbors.Before2006,formalLTCserviceswerenotwithinthescopeoftheSNSandindividualsreliedheavilyoninformalcare.WhileLTCservicescouldbepurchasedfromprivateproviders,namelynon-protreligiousinstitutions(Misericordias)(Sim~oesetal.,2017),theircostshadtobepaidforoutofpocket,whichtookanancialtollonmanyu
sers(Santana,2010).6 Table1:OverviewoftheorganizationbytheLTCNetwork Nursinghome(NH)Home-care(HC) Startofroll-out20062008ProvidersPrivatePublicFundingPublicPublicSet-upGovernmentcontractswithex-istingprovidersTeamscreatedinprimarycarecentersPriceHighlysubsidized(means-tested)co-paymentsFreeServices24-hourmedicalcare,rehabil-itation,food,hygiene,accom-modation,etc.Preventivecare,helpwithADLs,food,hygiene,me
dica-tion,etc. In2006thePortuguesegovernmentestablishedtheNationalNetworkforLong-TermIntegratedCare(RNCCI,henceforththeNetwork),asajointeortoftheMinistryofHealthandtheMinistryofLaborandSocialSecurity(Decree-Law101/2006).Thiswasmotivatedbyconcernsregardingdemographic,social,andepidemiologicaltrendsthatputpressureonexistingcarearrangements,includingincreasinglifeexpectancyandconsequentrisingshareofelder
lyinthepopulation,thedeclineofinter-generationalhouseholds,andtheincreasingshareofindividualslivingwithmultiplecomorbidities.Importantly,theNetworkwasnotaimedofreducingbed-blocking,whichisarecenttopicinthepublicdebate.TheNetworkcomprisestwodistinctsettingsofcareprovision:homeandcommunity-basedservices(HC)andnursinghomes(NH).Table1providesanoverviewofthesetwosettings.Theyareorganizedverydierently.TheNH
settingoperatesinamodelofpublicfundingandprivateprovisioninwhichthegovernmentcontractswithexistingproviders,namelytheMisericordias,whowerealreadyactiveincareprovisionforseveraldecades.4Theservicescontractedincludearound-the-clockmedicalcare,rehabilitation,accommodation,catering,personalhygiene,etc.TherearedierenttypesofNHfacilitiesthatcatertopatientswithdierentcareneeds.Sometargetindividuals
whonolongerneedacutehospitalcarebutstillrequireintensivemedical,nursing,andrehabilitationcareforarelativelyshortperiodoftime|thesecanbethoughtofasprovidingpost-acutecare.OtherNHfacilitieshavelessintensivemedical,nursing,andrehabilitationcomponents,mainlycateringtoindividuals 4Morerecentlythegovernmentstartedcontractswithprivate,for-protprovidersandalsoestablishedsomepublic-ownedfacilities.Theseamounte
dto16%and2%ofNHproviderscontractedasof2015,theendofmystudy-period.7 withchronicillnessesandhighfunctionaldependency,whomightneedlongerstays.UndertheNHcontractsthegovernmentpaysprovidersanadministrativelysetdailypriceforthecareprovidedtoindividualswhoareintheNetwork.In2015,dailypricesweresetbetweene60ande105,dependingontheintensityofcareprovidedbytheNHfacility.Thedailypriceiseitherfullypaidorhighly-subsidiz
edbythegovernment.TheHCsettingoperatesinamodelofpublicprovisionandpublicfunding.Thegovernmentestablishedspecializedteamsinprimarycarecentersthatvisitpatientsintheirhomes.HCteamsprovideservicessuchaspreventivecare,helpwithactivitiesofdailyliving,medication,personalhygiene,etc.Theycatertoindividualswithdependencywhoneedalowerfrequencyofmedicalandrehabilitationcareandarestillabletoliveinthecommunity.BecauseHC
teamsbelongtoprimarycarecenters,theyfallundertheSNSandarefreeofchargetousers.ThecontractingofNHteamsstartedin2006andtherstHCteamsstartedoperatingonlyin2008.Figure1showstheyearofentryoftherstnursinghomefacility(ontheleftpanel)andthersthome-careteam(ontherightpanel)acrossACESregions.ACESisthePortugueseacronymforPrimaryCareCenterGroupsandtheseareasarerelevantfororganizingprimarycaredelivery.5Th
emajorityofACESregionsexperiencedtheentryoftherstNHin2006and2007andtheentryoftherstHCteaminbetween2008and2010. Figure1:EntryyearoftherstNHunitandtherstHCteamacrossACESregions 5Thereare55ACESregionsinPortugal.ThedensemunicipalitiesofLisbon,Porto,andVilaNovadeGaiahavemorethanoneACES.Becausepatientlocationsarerecordedatthemunicipalitylevelintheinpatientdata,IcollapsetheseACESatthemunicipal