Early Years Foundation Stage Reforms 16 th January 2020 5pm ncborguk Introduction Chair Ellie SuggateFrancis Early Childhood Unit NCB Webinar Overview Brief introduction to the Foundation Years programme ID: 904840
Download The PPT/PDF document "Foundation Years Webinar:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Foundation Years Webinar:
Early Years Foundation Stage Reforms
16
th January 2020, 5pm
ncb.org.uk
Slide2IntroductionChair: Ellie Suggate-Francis, Early Childhood Unit, NCB
Webinar Overview
Brief introduction to the Foundation Years programmeDfE Presentation: EYFS Reforms: Henna Jawaid, EYFS Reforms Team Leader,
DfE Feedback from the reforms Pilot: Hannah Piggott, Senior Researcher, NatCen Opportunities for questionsOther Learn, Explore, Debate opportunities through Foundation Years
ncb.org.uk
Slide3Foundation Years: DfE
Early Years Stakeholder Engagement Partner
Aims: Improve practitioner knowledge and understanding
Improve the confidence of early years settingsFacilitate a
healthy debate
between
DfE
and the early years sector for policy & practice
improvementThrough
:
Foundation Years website
– 57,000 individual users per monthFoundation Years mailing list – 27,000 subscribersWebinars throughout the yearRegional LED Events taking place January 2020
Slide4Early Years Foundation Stage EYFS reforms
4
Slide5EYFSP reform: Context and update
5
Our reforms were announced in June 2018 and they underpin two key objectives:
reducing teacher workload
and
improving outcomes-
particularly in early language for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Revising the Early Learning Goals so that they:
Focus on strengthening language and vocabulary development to help close the ‘word gap’
Strengthen literacy and numeracy outcomes at the end of reception year
Better prepare children for Key Stage 1 – by better aligning with Year 1
Are based on the latest evidence in childhood development – and the strongest predictors of future attainment
Are clearer for teachers to interpret – making the EYFSP assessment more straightforward
Streamlining assessment guidance and reviewing the moderation process to:
Reduce teacher workload and strongly encourage teachers to use their professional judgement and
reduce reliance on recording
unnecessary evidence
Make clear that the ELGs
are not the curriculum
– they are an end point measure of what a child should be demonstrating by the end of the EYFS.
The draft revised ELGs and EYFSP handbook were piloted in 24 schools during academic year 2018/19.
The EEF and
NatCen
published their findings from the evaluation of the pilot in October 2019.
https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/projects/early-years-foundation-stage-profile-pilot/
A full public consultation on our EYFS proposals on the ELGs, educational programmes and assessment process was launched on 24 October 2019 and is due to close on 31 January 2020.
Statutory roll out of the reforms are expected in AY 2021/22, with plans for voluntary opt-in for AY 2020/21.
Slide6The EYFS statutory framework is mandatory in all early years settings. It sets the standards that schools and early years providers must meet to ensure that children are taught and develop well and are kept healthy and safe in all early years settings from birth to age 5.
The EYFS was first introduced in 2008. In 2012, following an independent review of evidence and practice (the Tickell Report, 2011
6
), the learning and development requirements were revised to create three prime areas of learning and four specific areas of learning, rather than the previous six areas of learning. It also introduced three characteristics of effective teaching and learning.
Sections 1 and 2 of the EYFS framework set out the learning and development and assessment requirements and include the educational programmes early years providers are required to follow across the seven areas of learning
7
. All early years practitioners and teachers are required to pursue rich daily activities in supporting each child’s educational development under these areas.
The EYFS framework does not prescribe a particular teaching approach. It recognises that effective teaching in the early years requires skilled use of a teaching practice repertoire which responds appropriately to the age and needs of the children being taught. In recognition of this, the revised EYFS framework will include the definition of teaching currently included in Ofsted’s Early Years Inspection Handbook
.
The EYFS framework: a quick recap
6
Slide7EYFS reforms consultation
7
In Scope
Out of Scope
Prime and Specific Areas of Learning:-
these terms will remain – as will the areas of learning sitting underneath. All the areas of learning are inter-connected and complement one another.
Characteristics of Effective Teaching and Learning
– will remain central to the EYFS, in supporting the workforce to deliver effective practice.
Good Level of Development (GLD) metric
:- all children will continue to be assessed as having reached a ‘good level of development’ by the end of reception year –if they have attained ‘expected’ level of development across the ELGs under the 3 prime areas of learning and ELGs under the maths and literacy areas of learning.
The
progress check at age 2
is not being consulted on.
The
reception baseline assessment
is not in scope of this consultation.
Educational Programmes-
across seven areas of learning- proposals to make them more clear and more detailed- with a focus on communication and language;
Early Learning Goals-
all 17 ELGs have been revised to make them more specific and clear and easier to assess;
EYFSP moderation-
proposals to remove the statutory element to empower teachers to use their professional judgement and reduce workload
Exceeded judgement-
proposals to remove this and allow teachers to focus on supporting all children to achieve ‘expected’ levels of development.
Promotion of oral
health- proposal to include ‘promotion’ as part of wider safeguarding and welfare.
To note- this is not a proposal for mandatory tooth brushing supervision
Slide8Changes to Learning and Development
8
On 24 October 2019, the government launched a consultation to seek views on proposed changes to the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (EYFSP), including:
Proposed revisions to the educational programmes:-
more detail on the kinds of activities practitioners and teachers can deliver in settings and classrooms to support day to day curriculum and practice. Communication and language underpins all seven areas of learning.
Proposed revisions to the Early Learning Goals (ELGs):- includes more clarity and specificity to descriptors and key changes to:
Communication and language:
focus on oral language and vocabulary acquisition
PSED:
new ELG on Self-regulation and inclusion of self-care
Physical Development:
focus on gross and fine motor skills
Literacy:
new ELG on comprehension
Maths
:
focus on depth of number and understanding quantities and continue to focus on space, shapes and measure through the educational
programme
and
curriculum guidance.
Understanding the World:
more defined descriptors as precursors to science, history and geography and remove IT.
Expressive Arts and Design:
clearer descriptors and emphasis on communication and language.
Key Points
The consultation proposals have developed from extensive engagement with the sector and early years experts, alongside the findings of the independent evaluation of the EYFSP pilot, published 24 October 2019
3
.
We expect these proposals to:
Create a clear and specific set of ELGs that drives a greater focus on language and vocabulary development in the early years, which is key to tackling the word gap between disadvantaged children and their peers.
Reduce teacher workload by putting an end to unnecessary evidence gathering, freeing teachers to focus on what is most important – their interactions with the children;
and encouraging teachers to use their professional judgement;
Ease the burden of the moderation process and re-confirm the EYFSP as a low-stakes assessment.
The consultation will run until 31 January 2020.
https://consult.education.gov.uk/early-years-quality-outcomes/early-years-foundation-stage-reform
Slide9Changes to Assessment
9
EYFSP moderation:
EYFSP assessments are currently externally moderated on a statutory basis by Local Authorities in 25% of schools each year.
While moderation is an important part of ensuring that the EYFSP produces trusted assessment outcomes, practitioners have told us that the external moderation process can be burdensome.
We are seeking views on the proposal to remove the statutory requirement for LAs to externally moderate EYFSP judgements. Schools would be expected to continue to moderate internally and with other settings to ensure consistency of judgements and that the EYFSP produces trusted assessment outcomes.
EYFSP judgement criteria:
Currently when teachers make a judgement on children’s attainment against the EYFSP, they will assess whether a child is ‘emerging’, ‘expected’ or ‘exceeding’ across each of the 17 ELGs.
We have heard from experts, practitioners and teachers that the exceeded descriptor is unhelpful in making consistent and accurate judgements, as there are inherent challenges in what level to pitch exceeded descriptors and that judging children as exceeded against descriptors generates additional unnecessary collection of evidence for internal and external moderation events.
There is also broad consensus that our focus as practitioners and government should be on efforts to increase the number of children who achieve expected levels of development by the end of reception.
We are seeking views on the proposal to remove the exceeded criteria from the EYFSP.
Teachers will still be required to stretch more able children and support them to excel and provide a narrative for parents and the year 1 teacher.
Slide10New non- statutory curriculum guidance
10
Improve early years outcomes
Reducing Workload Burdens
Specific Reception Year guidance
In line with wider social mobility ambitions- to improve outcomes for disadvantaged children to narrow development gaps.
Re-casting the focus on curriculum rather than assessment and providing a foundation for helping teachers and practitioners to plan setting/classroom activities
Making reception year count – by supporting teachers with specific curriculum guidance to ensure all children have strong foundations to begin Year 1.
This will be part of the overall guidance document covering the whole EYFS age-range.
Curriculum guidance is currently being developed through an update of the
Development Matters
non-statutory guidance - aims to focus practitioners and teachers on the importance of rich daily activities to
improve outcomes and help reduce workload
Julian Grenier is leading this work with us
We aim to roll out new curriculum guidance alongside the EYFS reforms
Slide11We have taken on board feedback from the pilot evaluation and will continue to engage with the sector, key experts and assess the responses from the consultation to ensure that these important reforms are delivered by a prepared early years workforce. We will:
Develop new exemplification guidance for the new ELGs, to support teachers in making consistent judgements at ‘expected’ level and ease the burden of moderation;
Develop new non-statutory curriculum guidance to support the workforce delivering rich daily activities to improve outcomes in early language development;
Support volunteer early adopter schools and local authorities – particularly in setting out a clear message of the rationale and nature of the changes and ensure the sector is prepared for national roll-out in AY 2021
11
Supporting the workforce and implementation.
Slide12Any Questions
Slide13Evaluation of the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile reforms pilot
January 2020
Hannah Piggott and Fatima Husain
Slide14What we will cover
Understanding of the revised ELGs
Using the revised ELGs
Evidence gatheringAccuracy of assessmentsBest fit judgements
Readiness for KS1
Slide15Understanding of the ELGS
Slide16Overall understanding
Suitability
Too adult-led
More child centred
Easy to use
Structure and style
Precise and clear (in comparison with old ELGs)
Bullet point format considered useful
Supports understanding and ease of use
…We are working around the Early Learning Goal rather than working around the needs of the child
We are now doing more deconstructed role play, so the children can really lead …we'll put objects in, like loads of boxes or implements, and just see what
they do.
Slide17Literacy
Separation of Literacy into Comprehension, Word Reading, and Writing was viewed positively
Comprehension and Word Reading were overall easy to understand
.
But:
Focus on ten diagraphs not considered ambitious enough
Requested clarification/exemplification for Writing ELG.
Some suggested changes:
‘
simple phrases and sentences’
- suggestion to amend this to include “
phonetically plausible” as in the previous ELGs
I love this ELG because I think its what they are lacking
Slide18Mathematics
Numbers
Viewed as clear and specific
Focus on 1-10 would cement children’s understandingConcern it would not meet expectations for Year 1
Lack of clarity about number bonds for 0-5 and 0-10
Numerical patterns
Links well with Numbers
‘automatically recall’
– is this repeating or understanding also?
‘different contexts’
was open to interpretation
Needs more clarity on what patterns to cover in addition to even and odd numbers
Slide19Physical development
Welcomed the separation of gross and fine motor skills
Gross motor skills
Unsure of expectations around ‘demonstrating strength, balance and coordination’
Queried what
‘move energetically’
means
Fine motor skills
‘Tripod grip’
main area of discussion
Those who do not like the use of the term,
‘tripod grip’, suggested using effective / appropriate / comfortable grip instead.
Slide20Using ELGS
Slide21Evidence gathering
Positives
Felt trusted, valued
Freed up time to use on planning lessons and activities with children Focus on quality rather than quantity of evidence
Reasons for continuing with evidence gathering
Aide-memoire: for assessing children’s progress, moderation and planning
Accountability
Sharing progress with parents
We're still observing the children. We're interacting
with
them, … but we're not feeling the pressure to record every little thing
.
Slide22Accuracy of assessments
New ELGs are more specific and precise
Improvements in assessing EAL children
But …
Lack of supporting materials may damage the accuracy of assessments
Echoed concerns about phrasing and meaning
It's a far easier document to understand
Slide23Best fit judgements
Approach to best fit has remained the same
Looking at whole ELG vs each bullet point
ImprovementsSpecificity of ELGs and breaking ELGs into bullet points has made this easier
Challenges
Recalling number bonds: too subjective and easy to misinterpret
Difficult to determine what exceeding looks like
…I’m aware that its not a tick sheet…I still take it into the three bullet points
Slide24Readiness for KS1
Increased clarity improves the handover process
The new ELGS are better aligned with Yr. 1 in some areas
Increased focus on basic skills – means children are going into Yr. 1 with firmer foundationConcerns:
Schools might not teach aspects of the old ELGs that were taken out
Lack of supporting materials
Slide25Conclusion
Slide26Overall
Generally clear – teachers have taken it in their stride and planned around it
Some areas where clarification is needed around phrasing and what needs to be observed to meet the ELG
However, the ELGs by themselves are not sufficient. Teachers want the supporting materials that go along with the ELGs, for exampleExemplification materials
Criteria for ‘exceeding’
Revised Development Matters
…if we went to another school … they might have interpreted it slightly differently because there's no exemplification or anything at the minute.
Slide27Thank you
hannah.piggott@natcen.ac.uk
fatima.husain@natcen.ac.uk
Slide28Any Questions
Slide29Coming up…
Further webinarsReception Baseline Assessment
Learn Explore Debate EventsNationwide, January 2020, details available via websiteFoundation Years WebsiteRefreshed – more accessibleNewslettersMonthly relevant research and policy direct to your inbox
ncb.org.uk
Slide30Final Word
Thank you for your time and contributions.
Sign up to the Foundation Years mailing list at: www.foundationyears.org.ukWatch this space for details of upcoming webinars and events.
Please keep talking to us, we will listen:Please email CPergolizzi@ncb.org.uk with questions or comments.
ncb.org.uk