/
Fig. 1. Distribution of nest boxes for this study.), and to contrast t Fig. 1. Distribution of nest boxes for this study.), and to contrast t

Fig. 1. Distribution of nest boxes for this study.), and to contrast t - PDF document

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
414 views
Uploaded On 2016-08-24

Fig. 1. Distribution of nest boxes for this study.), and to contrast t - PPT Presentation

number of American Kestrels and the data for them are also included The Tsquare method was used to determine the distribution of trees stribution of trees 50 cm Twenty trees were haphazardly c ID: 455649

number American Kestrels (and

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Fig. 1. Distribution of nest boxes for t..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Fig. 1. Distribution of nest boxes for this study.), and to contrast these with those of its close relative, the Northern Saw-whet Owl (A. acadicusNest boxes were first erected in were, with minor exception, placed in forests. Forests were always old enough to have laricina), to those dominated by American Fagus grandifoliabox sites that hosted nests of the number of American Kestrels (and the data for them are also included. The T-square method was used to determine the distribution of trees stribution of trees � 5.0 cm). Twenty trees were haphazardly chosen for this, with twenty other nearest neighbours also used. This technique generates the statistic t’, where t’ ≤1.96 signifies an aggregated forest structure; a t’ falling between -1.96 and +1.96 signifies a random forest structure, and a t’ ≥1.96 implies a than once by the same species istics for this study. The data for sites that had more than one species calculating the statistics for both species. Additionally, all forty trees were Results and Discussion:should not be taken to imply The sample size for Boreal therefore has low statistical power; this should be borne in mind when interpreting the Table 1. The number of sites measured for this study.site number unused sites 32 N Saw-whet Owl 11 Boreal Owl 4 American Kestrel 4 0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5UnusedNorthern Saw-whet OwlBoreal OwlAmerican KestrelSpecies Fig. 2. Forest structure (tree distribution) at unused sites, as well as sites with occupied boxes. A t’ signifies an aggregated forest structure; a t’ falling between -1.96 and +1.96 signifies a random forest structure, and a t’ 1.96 implies a regular structure. species richness and composition of the dominant trees. Boreal Owls consistently choose nest boxes in sites with low richness; 95% up of Balsam Fir and White species are needed to make up 95% of the trees (Fig. 6). Although one also finds Balsam Fir at Saw-whet nest sites, the rate is half that found at Boreal trees at Boreal Owl nest Working with a rare species presents problems in getting sufficient numbers for rigorous statistical analysis. I anticipate working on this project for many more years, and with this in mind, hope to produce a Fig. 5. The composition of trees at Boreal Owl nest sites.