/
Grade Recovery and Value Determination recovered from each sample 
... Grade Recovery and Value Determination recovered from each sample 
...

Grade Recovery and Value Determination recovered from each sample ... - PDF document

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
392 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-16

Grade Recovery and Value Determination recovered from each sample ... - PPT Presentation

Lumber Mill Production and livesawed were Cost Determination standardize computations in ber volume M ft airdry classes Saw recovered for time per ft by applying log sawing 1970 ID: 162777

Lumber Mill Production and live-sawed

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Grade Recovery and Value Determination r..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Lumber Grade Recovery and Value Determination recovered from each sample Mill Production and live-sawed were Cost Determination standardize computations (in ber volume (M ft.) air-dry classes. Saw- recovered for time per ft. by applying log sawing 1970), yield for Delay time ence between air-dry lum- being sawed, delay her then subtracted recovered from rates and recovery for grade-sawing yield from mill disclosed lumber grade U.S. for logs similar size. could be lumber produced in sawing was McCauley and Mendel for live- for grade-sawing relative lumber-production two sawing cost per bd. time required one M bd. ft. hourly cost values pertaining excluded from raw-material cost (log cost M bd. ft. Scrib- ner decimal C scale, was ing cost The lumber-production cost current market 1 was used because index values developed from lumber grade estimates in Lumber Grade Recovery of the different There was no significant difference (j-per- grades of lumber recovered were computed for cent level) in the yields of First and Second each log diameter for the live-sawing method. (FAS) or First One Face (FIF) lumber compared with live-sawing and that predicted for percentage yields predicted for similar logs in effect on FAS or 1). determine whether in lumber 1 yield between were live-sawed highly significant Table I.-Air-dry lumber yield for grade 3 red oak sawlogs, by sawing method Lumber grade Sawing Method Logs FAS FIF lCOM 2COM 3ACOM 3BCOM Volume No. ------ Percent yield------ dd. 14.0 22.2 15.4 .5 .9 41.8 34.5 13.8 4,814 " yields predicted from FPL-63. " Actual lumber yield from live-sawing. adiusted log cost" for grade 3 sawlogs, by diameter classes Overrun Overrun Log mill tally - Percent 16.1 13.9 11.7 9.5 7.3 5.1 2.9 .7 2.0 44.12 " Assumed log cost of $45/M at the point of use. percent No. I common lumber as c-,mpared to edges of the middle boards, therefore upgrad- percent predicted yield for grade-saw- logs be- upgrade boards pro- from small by ripping with larger Sawing method a significant 19 percent less No. for grade-sawing. yields a high percentage common lumber. resulted in a 7.3-percent overrun based on live-sawing is less volume is log is overrun for declined for logs were sawed (fig. Figure 3.-Percent overrun for grade 3 red oak sawlogs, by diameter. Lum ber-Production Rates GRADE-SAWING '\ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LOG DIAMETER, INCHES Figure 4.-Volume of factory-grade 3 saw- logs sawed per hour, by diameter: grade-saw- Lumber production in board feet hour (mill for grade-sawing Headsaw for live-sawing minutes per M for grade-sawing. for live-sawing is logs were only once; sawcuts in diameter turn and rninutes per sawcut for conversion 4/4 Grade-sawing required turns and whereas live-sawing 9 sawcuts. for conversion mill opera- can increase his profit: (I) lower sawing by increasing volume yield or increasing lumber grades; (3) and some combination of (1) and (2). fully judge live-sawing affects lumber values and the lumber produc- Sawing cost bd. decreased for length in- creased. However, sawing by live-sawing live-sawing reduced sawing cost M 12 percent lumber-production cost, i 1 lumber-production cost for live-sawing [ , , j average $71.96 per M bd. ft. as compared 8 9 10 11 17 13 14 I with $78.71 M bd. ft. for grade-sawing and total ~roducfion cost per M feet for grade-sawing (bottom) factory-grade saw- logs, by diameter. 110 LIVE-SAWING 70 /- t I I t TOTAL COST i BREAK-EVEN DIAMETER 9~1 INCHES 60 I I I 1 t I I I I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LOG DIAMETER, INCHES 110 GRADE-SAWING i BREAK-EVEN DIAMETER These factors 1 by grade-sawing. reduced lumber-production increased value M ft. is overall gain for live-sawing M mill, which a production ft. could increase mill logs were live-sawed average lumber value by log break-even or live-sawing is compared with 12.0 inches for grade-sawing live- sawing actually permits the profitable manu- facture of smaller diameter grade 3 red oak logs than does the more conventional grade- for live-sawing increases above break-even point 6). CONCLUSIONS In this study, factory-grade 3 red significant gains over lumber, more overrun, (7.8 percent), and a re- less No. 1 and the 3B high-grade lumber. without major changes in mill increase in Although these operat-