HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary RecommendationsDebrief

Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair

George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co-Chair

August 1, 2012

Washington Marriott, 1221 22nd Street, NW, DC 20037Slide2

HITPC Stage 3 MU TimelineAug, 2012 – present draft preliminary stage 3 recsOct, 2012 – present pre-RFC preliminary stage 3 recsNov, 2012 – RFC distributedDec 21, 2012 – RFC deadlineJan, 2013 – ONC synthesizes RFC comments for WGs reviewFeb, 2013 – WGs reconcile RFC commentsMar, 2013 – present revised draft stage 3 recsApr, 2013 – approve final stage 3 recsMay, 2013 – transmit final stage 3 recommendations to HHSHITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations2Slide3

Guiding PrinciplesMU ObjectivesSupports new model of care (e.g., team-based, outcomes-oriented, population management)Addresses national health priorities (e.g., NQS, Million Hearts) Broad applicability (since MU is a floor)Provider specialties (e.g., primary care, specialty care)

Patient health needs

Areas of the country

Promotes

advancement

-- Not "topped out" or not already driven by market forces

Achievable

-- mature standards widely adopted or could be widely adopted by 2016Reasonableness/feasibility of products or organizational capacityPrefer to have standards available if not widely adoptedDon’t want standards to be an excuse for not moving forward

HITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations

3Slide4

HITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations4IDStage 2 NPRMStage 3 Recommendations

Stage 4

Placeholder

HITSC Feedback

HITPC

Comments

SGRP301

Removed for an actual use case

Eliminate for Stage 3 in favor of use cases.

N/A

No changes suggested.

SGRP302

EP Objective: The EP who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation.EP Measure: The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 65% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital’s or CAH’s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23)EH Objective: The eligible hospital or CAH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliationEH Measure: The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 65% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital’s or CAH’s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23)EP / EH / CAH Objective: The EP, eligible hospital or CAH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform reconciliation for: - medications- medication allergies- problems EP / EH / CAH Measure: The EP, EH, or CAH performs reconciliation for medications for more than 50% of transitions of care, and it performs reconciliation for medication allergies, and problems for more than10% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital’s or CAH’s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23).Reconciliation of contraindications (any medical reason for not performing a particular therapy; any condition, clinical symptom, or circumstance indicating that the use of an otherwise advisable intervention in some particular line of treatment is improper, undesirable, or inappropriate)No changes suggested.

Improve Care Coordination Slide5

HITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations5IDStage 2 NPRMStage 3 Recommendations

Stage 4

Placeholder

HITSC Feedback

HITPC

Comments

SGRP303

EP Objective: The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral.

EH Objective:

The eligible hospital or CAH who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral.

EP/EH

/CAH

Measure: Refer to matrixEP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another setting of care or refers their patient to another provider of care - Provide a summary of care record for each site transition or referral when transition or referral occurs with available informationMeasure: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that site transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care (including home) or provider of care provides a summary of care record for 65% of transitions of care and referrals (and at least 30% electronically).Certification Criteria: EHR is able to set aside a concise narrative section in the summary of care document that allows the provider to prioritize clinically relevant information such as reason for transition and/or referral. Must include the following four for transitions of site of care, and the first for referrals (with the others as clinically relevant): 1. Concise narrative in support of care transitions (free text that captures reason for referral or transition)2. Setting-specific goals3. Instructions for care during transition and for 48 hours afterwards4. Care team members, including primary care provider and caregiver name, role and contact info (using DECAF)What can we do to make sure the capability is there ? Make sure vendors use available standards to transmit summary of care (fields need to accommodate). Is it better to look at the communication between MU clinical trading partners? MU to MU, 80% should be electronic. MU to non-MU 30%.Is it possible with right technical capability built into the record, identify fellow MUers? Easy way to know that trading partners are MUers.How much to force on provider side?

Improve Care Coordination Slide6

6IDStage 2 NPRMStage 3 RecommendationsStage 4

Placeholder

HITSC

HITPC

Comments

SGRP304

New for Stage 3

EP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/ EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another site of care or refers their patient to another provider of careFor each transition of site of care, provide the care plan information, including the following elements as

applicable:

•

Medical diagnoses and stages

•Functional status, including ADLs

•Relevant social and financial information (free text)•Relevant environmental factors impacting patient’s health (free text)•Most likely course of illness or condition, in broad terms (free text)•Cross-setting care team member list, including the primary contact from each active provider setting, including primary care, relevant specialists, and caregiver•The patient’s long-term goal(s) for care, including time frame (not specific to setting) and initial steps toward meeting these goals•Specific advance care plan (POLST) and the care setting in which it was executedFor each referral, provide a care plan if one existsMeasure: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another site of care or provider of care provides the electronic care plan information for 10% of transitions of care to receiving provider and patient/caregiver..STANDARDS: What counts as a transition? Definition of a transition?STANDARDS: We need a definitional statement about what the care plan refers toTiming concern: When provider is getting together information, if the discharge is the trigger to pull in information, it’s too late for the patient (difficult for the patient to leave with the care plan at time of discharge)No changes suggested.SGRP305 New for Stage 3EP / EH / CAH Objective (new): EP/EH/CAH to whom a patient is referred acknowledges receipt of external information and provides referral results to the requesting provider, thereby closing the loop on information exchange. Measure: For 10% of patients referred during an EHR reporting period, referral results generated from the EHR are returned to the requestor (e.g. via scan, printout, fax, electronic CDA Care Summary and Consult Report).

No changes suggested.

Improve Care Coordination

HITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 RecommendationsSlide7

7IDStage 2 NPRMStage 3 RecommendationsStage 4

Placeholder

HITSC Feedback

HITPC

Comments

SGRP127

Placeholder for Stage 4Placeholder for Stage 4Ability to maintain an up-to-date interdisciplinary problem list inclusive of versioning in support of collaborative care

No changes suggested.

SGRP125

Placeholder for Stage 4

Placeholder for Stage 4

Medication reconciliation: create ability to accept data feed from PBM (Retrieve external medication fill history for medication adherence monitoring)Deferred to IE workgroup for more information.No changes suggested.HITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 RecommendationsImprove Care CoordinationSlide8

8IDStage 2 NPRMStage 3 RecommendationsStage 4

Placeholder

HITSC Feedback

HITPC

Comments

SGRP306

Objective/Measure: Record health care team members (including at a minimum PCP, if available) for more than 10 percent of all patients seen during the reporting period; this information can be unstructured. We believe that this requirement is better incorporated with other objectives that require summary of care documents and is not necessary as a standalone objective.

Added into care summary

No changes suggested.

SGRP307

Objective/Measure: Record care plan goals and patient instructions in the care plan for more than 10 percent of patients seen during the reporting period. We believe that this requirement is better incorporated with other objectives that require summary of care documents and is not necessary as a standalone objective.Added into care summaryNo changes suggested.Objectives Not Included - Improve Care CoordinationHITPC: MU Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations