PDF-Progressives: there are two profoundly condescending assumptions that

undermine all at tempts to build an independent social movement that reaches ordinary Americans Democracy Corps new methodology points the way to a superior approach By Andrew Levison Recent event. P    




  



 
 


  



   

 
 


 
 
 
 
! "

 
Best day ever-. List 4. Prudent. Adj. using wisdom and good judgment. One mark of maturity is making . prudent. decisions; the wisest thing to do isn’t always the most fun and exciting.. Pallor. N. Unhealthy pale appearance. calm which only apparently precedes. The . and prophesies of the storm is perhaps more awful. than the storm itself.. Moby Dick . --Herman Melville. profound. The stillness was so. animal twittering somewhere nearby under the snow.. What were the attitudes of Progressive social reformers towards immigrants?. Read Document A…Textbook excerpts on the Social Gospel & settlement houses at the turn of the century.. What was the Social Gospel movement?. INTRODUCTION. Add Your Title Here. If . we can only encounter each other rather than stay with each . other,then. I wish we had never encountered. .. Remember what should be remembered, and forget what should be . INTRODUCTION. The Presentation Title. Add Your Title Here. If we can only encounter each other rather than stay with each other,then I wish we had never encountered.. Remember what should be remembered, and forget what should be forgotten.Alter what is changeable, and accept what is unchangeable.. The Roots of Progressivism . Learning targets. By the end of this lesson you will. :. . ● . Define Progressivism, muckrakers, direct primary, the temperance movement, socialism. . ● . Discuss how Progressives believed they could improve society. The Progressive Movement. 18.1 The Roots of Progressivism. 18.2 Roosevelt in Office. 18.3 The Taft Administration. 18.4 The Wilson Years. 18.1 The Roots of Progressivism.  . The Rise of Progressivism. Chapter 16 – The Progressives. Main idea: Progressives focused on three areas of reform: easing the suffering of the urban poor, improving unfair and dangerous working conditions, and reforming government at the national, state, and local levels.. Loving Sweet Compassionate Excited Optimistic Sympathetic Complimentary Fanciful Peaceful Whimsical Negative Tone/Attitude Words Accusing Choleric Furious Quarrelsome Aggrava Shameful Agitated Col 147Human defectives should nolonger be allowed to propagate the race148151 Charles Van HiseUW president from 1903-14618 and a founder of the Wisconsin IdeaBy Thomas C LeonardWisconsin progressives had symptoms. Schizophrenia is the most common psychotic illness and characterised by two sets of symptoms; symptoms present during the acute phase; and those present when the illness is well established (chronic).. EU Office/. IdeaSquare. CERN. … yes, but how?. The most difficult to achieve is to…. Challenge Assumptions. Generate new possibilities. A useful technique. LATERAL . THINKING . is . a method of thinking concerned with changing concepts and perception. . In this book, Norman Cantor analyzes the legal and moral status of people with profound mental disabilities—those with extreme cognitive impairments that prevent their exercise of medical self-determination. He proposes a legal and moral framework for surrogate medical decision making on their behalf. The issues Cantor explores will be of interest to professionals in law, medicine, psychology, philosophy, and ethics, as well as to parents, guardians, and health care providers who face perplexing issues in the context of surrogate medical decision making. The profoundly mentally disabled are thought by some moral philosophers to lack the minimum cognitive ability for personhood. Countering this position, Cantor advances both theoretical and practical arguments for according them full legal and moral status. He also argues that the concept of intrinsic human dignity should have an integral role in shaping the bounds of surrogate decision making. Thus, he claims, while profoundly mentally disabled persons are not entitled to make their own medical decisions, respect for intrinsic human dignity dictates their right to have a conscientious surrogate make medical decisions on their behalf. Cantor discusses the criteria that bind such surrogates. He asserts, contrary to popular wisdom, that the best interests of the disabled person are not always the determinative standard: the interests of family or others can sometimes be considered. Surrogates may even, consistent with the intrinsic human dignity standard, sometimes authorize tissue donation or participation in nontherapeutic medical research by profoundly disabled persons. Intrinsic human dignity limits the occasions for such decisions and dictates close attention to the preferences and feelings of the profoundly disabled persons themselves. Cantor also analyzes the underlying philosophical rationale that makes these decision-making criteria consistent with law and morals. Basic Bioethics series