/
Werner Werner

Werner - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
412 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-29

Werner - PPT Presentation

Schmutz PMOD WRC Switzerland TOSCA Workshop Berlin May 14 2012 Measurements of TSI and SSI Overview Werner Schmutz 2 14 May 2012 Total Solar Irradiance Absolute calibration first light PREMOS ID: 424602

2012 werner schmutz tsi werner 2012 tsi schmutz premos spm solar irradiance variations virgo time degradation calibration trf ssi backup uncertainty instrumental

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Werner" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Werner SchmutzPMOD/WRC, SwitzerlandTOSCA WorkshopBerlin, May 14, 2012

Measurements of TSI and SSISlide2

OverviewWerner Schmutz214. May 2012Total Solar Irradiance

Absolute calibration (first light PREMOS)

Composites (relative calibration)

Spectral Solar Irradiance (SSI)

SIM/SORCE

VIRGO/SOHOSlide3

PICARDPREMOS – SOVAP – SODISMWerner Schmutz314. May 2012

Total Solar Irradiance

Filter RadiometersSlide4

TSI calibrationWerner Schmutz414. May 2012PREMOS A is the first and only radiometer in space with a SI-traceable irradiance calibration in vacuum

Traceable to the irradiance calibration facility at LASP in Boulder (TRF)Slide5

Traceability of PREMOS-TSIWerner Schmutz514. May 2012PREMOS B

Comparison to cryogenic rad.

(power in vacuum)

NPL

Comparison to cryogenic rad.

(power and irradiance in vacuum)

TRF @ LASP

PREMOS A

3Slide6

Uncertainty of the calibrationWerner Schmutz614. May 2012+ absolute uncertainty of TRF facility (70 ppm)

= uncertainty of TRF comparison (220 ppm)

PREMOS A

TRF

radiometerSlide7

Calibration uncertainty budgetWerner Schmutz714. May 2012Traceable via TRF, LASP, Boulder 

to NIST

Irradiance in vacuum

PREMOS A uncertainty: ±

280 ppm (± 0.4 W/m2)

Table compiled by Greg Kopp for an ISSI workshop March 2012

Flight-spare recalibrationsSlide8

Werner Schmutz814. May 2012Comparison PREMOS – TIMSlide9

Status of PREMOS-TSIWerner Schmutz914. May 2012„PREMOS is in excellent health“PREMOS-TSI is the most accurate absolute measurement; ±0.4 W/m2 or ±290 ppm

After 2 years, PREMOS-TSI has at most 50

ppm

relative deviation to

TIM/SORCE.Slide10

The Future of TSI observations:

Are relative observations sufficient?

Werner Schmutz

10

14. May 2012Slide11

There are three TSI compositesWerner Schmutz1120.12.2011Slide12

TSI-composites normalizedWerner Schmutz1220.12.2011

!

normalized 2004-2005

DIARAD

PMOD, ACRIMSlide13

Composite 1996-2010Werner Schmutz1314. May 2012

!

0.2 W/m

2

± 0.2 W/m

2

/ 10

-yearsSlide14

Is there a long-term trend?Werner Schmutz1414. May 2012Fröhlich 2009, A&AL 501, L27-L30Slide15

Could we detect a long-term trend with a composite?Werner Schmutz1514. May 2012Slide16

Requirements for a TSI monitoringWerner Schmutz1614. May 2012„Any plan to rely on an unbroken chain of measurements is broken“Not only because of a potential gap;But mainly because of the uncertainty is continuously

increasing with time

!

 Accurate

absolute

measurements are required

!Slide17

Requirements for a TSI monitoringWerner Schmutz1714. May 2012Accurate absolute measurements are required: Nowadays possible !

But we certainly also want to assess the variations of TSI and therefore,

we still need to aim for continues and overlapping data !Slide18

TSI monitoring today …Werner Schmutz1814. May 2012Presently, 4 operational space experiments observing TSI:VIRGO (launched 1995)

ACRIM III (launched 2000)

TIM (launched 2003)

PREMOS (launched 2010)Slide19

Part II:

Spectral Solar Irradiance

Werner Schmutz

19

14. May 2012Slide20

Werner Schmutz2014. May 2012The open question !

Is

the

SIM

observation

really correct?Or is it rather a degradation problem?The bands 410-470 and 480-730 nm are anti-correlated to TSI variations

Compensated by larger (than TSI) UV variations Slide21

Werner Schmutz2114. May 2012Anti-correlation in models

Contrast between active and quite Sun (SSN 150

vs

SSN 0)

Black:

Bright+Dark

Red: bright componentsBlue: dark componentsSlide22

Werner Schmutz2214. May 2012VIRGO and PREMOS bandsSlide23

Werner Schmutz215 nm PREMOS vs SOLSTICE2314.05.2012

Independant

correction

of PREMOS

Strong correlation of

13.5 and 27 days modulation

PREMOS sampling is faster

Rotational modulation more accurate

PREMOS

SOLSTICE

PREMOSSlide24

VIRGO SSI time series 1996 - now Christoph Wehrli & VIRGO TeamPMOD/WRC DavosAn attempt to assess instrument degradation in a self consistent way by: referring operational measurements to occasional backup operations correcting the backup channel by initial ageing of operational channelSlide25

VIRGO Sun PhotometersInterference filter radiometer with 3 channels centered at 862nm, 500nm and 402nm (R,G,B); FWHM bandwidths 5nm; silicon PD detectors; rad-hard windows.Active (SPM-A) and Backup (SPM-B) instrumentsSPM-A: exposed continuously for helioseismology applicationSPM-B: exposed rarely for solar spectral irradiance measurementsCalibrated by EG&G FEL lamps, NBS 1973 traceable Slide26

VIRGO SPM: Level1 dataSPM-B:Number of backups 178Total exposure time 2.6 daysSlide27

Raw variations of SPM-BVIRGO-SPM-B changes are about 5 times larger than the (real) solar variations in TSI.Solar cycle 24 SSI variation is not obvious (smaller), hidden in instrumental ageing.

5*(TSI/<TSI>) - 4Slide28

Initial ageing of SPM-A Steep degradation during first hours! Linear degradation during first month{Commissioning activities until 29.03.1996}

TSI (*100)Slide29

Ageing of SPM-A and SPM-B versus exposure time polynomial fit SPM-ASlide30

SPM-B corrected by operational degradation of SPM-AInstrumental effects dominating over solar cycleSlide31

Empirical ApproachSSI timeseries represent a mixture of Solar Cycle and instrumental effectsActive & Backup SPM degrade differently in time or exposure timeLinear correction accounts for probable decline of SSI, i.e. first order estimation of instrumental effect.Exponential correction eliminates most of solar cycle variation as wellSlide32

Linear vs. Exponential Detrending:  what does it to TSI ?Slide33

Linear Detrending 2000-2012Slide34

SummaryNormalization of SPM-A by SPM-B:Larger than expected variations of Backup channel  “instrumental effects”Rapid initial degradation in Active channelversus‘Early increase’ of Backup (not

observed in

operational channel)

Empirical

correction of SPM-B:

fitting degradation in time with:Linear or exponential detrending yields positive correlation with solar cycle (TSI) in  all 3 visible channels !!!

None of VIRGOS’s wavelength bands 862 nm, 500 nm, 402 nm

is

anti-correlated to TSI

variationsSlide35

Thank you for your attentionWerner Schmutz3514. May 2012

PREMOS PICARDSlide36

Alternative analysis including proxies(C. Fröhlich, EGU 2011)Empiric correction versus Time (double exponential), Temperature (linear + Boltzmann), TSI and Mg-II Index.

SORCE