MNDHS Child Safety and Permanency Division Minnesota One States Journey March 6 2014 Overview Minnesota Context Influence of Child Welfare Reform Development process Integration of Components ID: 790507
Download The PPT/PDF document "Carole Wilcox Child Safety and Preventio..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Carole WilcoxChild Safety and Prevention ManagerMNDHS Child Safety and Permanency Division
Minnesota: One State’s Journey
March 6, 2014
Slide2OverviewMinnesota Context
Influence of Child Welfare Reform
Development process
Integration of Components
Successes and Challenges
Slide3Minnesota Public Child Welfare System
State-supervised, locally-administered structure; 87 counties
Eleven federally recognized Tribes – 2 American Indian Child Welfare Initiative Tribes
State with highest share of local property taxes for child welfare
Differential
Response continuum responding flexibly and proportionately to the severity of safety concernStatewide Structured Decision Making and MN CW Training systemDisproportionately involves children of color and American Indian children
Slide4Minnesota Child Poverty
Based on 3-year averages from the American Community Survey (ACS)
Federal poverty level developed in 1960’s set out $17,170 for a family of 3. Currently approximately $19,000 yet
i
gnores cost of child care, housing, and changing family structure
Slide5American Indian Children
African American Children
Almost 6 times more likely to be reported as abused or neglected
14 times more likely to experience out-of-home care
5 times more likely to be state wards who were adopted from guardianship
Over 3 times more likely to be reported as abused or neglected 4 times more likely to experience out-of-home care 3 times more likely to be state wards who were adopted from guardianshipMinnesota Comparisons of DisproportionalityComparisons to White Children - 2012
Slide6Previous Current
Expert
based system that sought to diagnose, repair and monitor families using sanctions when necessary to achieve compliance to a
model
Safety
focused system maximizing partnership with families - respects and employs the strengths and resources available in families and their communitiesSignificant Practice Shift
Slide7What We Believe About FamiliesFamilies are more than the problem being
presented
Families are the experts and community connections matter
All
behavior is purposeful
so listen to understandMany families have challenges that are atypical, temporary, or transitionalHaving problems is normal and the family can find another way with helpThe past cannot be changed but building on strengths and protective factors will leverage a better futureResponding to trauma early through relationship-building and supports is key
Slide8Lessons Learned - Child Welfare Reform Research
Decrease in re-reports of child maltreatment
Improved family satisfaction
Increase in protective factors
Increased utilization of services
Positive worker attitudesDecrease in the rate of foster care placement
Slide9Children in Out-of-home Care per 1,000 in Child Population by Race, 2003–2012
In
2012, 11,453
children spent some time in out-of-home care. The total number of children who experienced out-of-home care has decreased
25
percent since
2003.
Slide10Influences on Development of Practice ModelBy 2009, Differential Response was fully implemented and early intervention pilot was complete
Learned that resources
+ strength based solution focused interventions = improved outcomes
legislation passed 2005
Integrated in MN CW training system
Developed funding mechanism and formulaIdentified data to track on public dashboardMinnesota institutionalized these changes into a formal practice modelShared publically as the touchstone for practice and policy decisions
Slide11Outside Facilitation Key
Pursued guidance
from the
National Resource Center on Organizational Improvement
concerning restructuring
MN child welfare training and quality assurance systemsPositioning Public Child Welfare Initiative (PPCWI) guidance from American Public Human Services AssociationExternal facilitationBrought knowledge of other practice modelsKnowledge of effective group processFreed all parties to be full participants
Minimized misperception of one entity controlling process or outcome
Resulted in ease in reaching agreement on principles and values
Slide12Partners Involved
Primary
partners in implementing the practice model
MN
DHS (child services director, program managers and supervisors and training & quality assurance consultants
)County administratorsTribal social service directorsRepresentatives from several Universities and CollegesParent leaders as past service consumersOmbudspersons for African American, Hispanic and Native American families. Multiple participants vs. manageable group size
D
ay
time meeting logistics made it difficult for
youth to participate
Slide13Preparation
Facilitator
provided information on
practice model significant
elements, values & principles, necessary skills and
desired outcomesState staffexamined other state practice models to give context and background for the groupdeveloped a draft to start discussioncovered practice values, principles and skills representing the practice orientation that had been developed over the past 10 yearsPaid special attention to
values & principles, skills, administrative practices, and service
array variation
Slide14MN Practice ModelPolicy statement sets the tone for strength-based focus
Sets out how families are best served in Minnesota
Engaging their protective capacities
Recognizing and employing strengths
Maintaining important connections – cultural and community
Addressing immediate safety and ongoing risks to the child
Slide15MN Practice ModelViewed as a roadmap created from lessons learned
Outlines desired outcomes for families
Sets out values, principles and skills that direct practice in the public child welfare system
Slide16Identified SkillsEngaging
Assessing
Partnering
Planning
Implementing
EvaluatingAdvocacyCommunicationCultural Competence
Slide17Foundational Skill of Engaging
Trust – to have the firm belief in the reliability of someone
Empathy - to understand and share the feelings of another
Listening – to give one's full attention
Curiosity – to remain open to other possibilities
Foundational Skill of Engaging
Be honest and genuine when interacting
Help
the family to understand the
social worker role
Provide full disclosure and use self-disclosure as fittingBe transparent regarding the process and protocolListen and remain curiousBe solution focusedBuild on exceptions and help to re-create the circumstances that supported competenceWorries vs. ProblemsCommunicate hope and expectancyBe active in recognizing strengths
appreciate
what they are coping with and a
cknowledge what they have already
done
note the positives at the earliest point of the continuum
Slide19Protective Factors Across Continuum
Concrete Supports in Times of Need
Social Connections
Parental Resilience
Knowledge of Parenting and Child Development
Children’s Social and Emotional CompetenceNurturing and Attachment
https://
www.childwelfare.gov/preventing/preventionmonth/guide2013/index.cfm
ACYF 2013 Resource Guide, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Slide20Practice Model Cross Walk with Disparity Reduction Strategies
Legislation, Policy Change, Finance Reform
Human Service Workforce Development
Practice Change
Public Will and
CommunicationYouth, Parent, and Community Partnerships Research, Evaluation, and Data-informed Decision-makingPolicy Action to Reduce Racial Disproportionality and Disparities in Child Welfare: A Scan of Eleven States; Alliance for Racial Equity in Child Welfare; 2008
Slide21Systemic Benefits of Practice Model
Provided a clear understanding of the Child Welfare System’s mission and the practices that support it
Eased further integration of components in training and quality assurance efforts to prepare child welfare staff and their agencies to carry out that mission
Formalized lessons learned to
encourage transparency about changes made
clearly articulate these changes for internal and external stakeholders and the publicSet clear standards to assess related outcomes and integrate with continuous quality improvement
Slide22Successful IntegrationChallenges Looking Back
Included in Parent Leadership for Child Safety and Permanency Team orientation and training
Constituent communication in various forms
Foundational to social worker and resource family training
Developed public website and communications materials
Printable brochure; website; wall postersIncluded in coursework with university partnersOmitted the key skill of screening to identify developmental and health needs for childrenSustaining knowledge requires continual reminders, attentiveness and refresher trainingMissed out on the voice of youthTrauma-informed lens was overlookedtrauma experienced by all family members should be addressedsocial and emotional needs for children
Building Upon MN Successes and Challenges
Slide23J
Carole Wilcox
Interim Manager
Child Safety and Prevention
651.431.4701
carole.wilcox@state.mn.us
MN Child Welfare Practice Model
http://edocs.dhs.state.mn.us/lfserver/Legacy/DHS-5881-ENG