PPT-Implicature

Implicate Grice introduces a new word implicate to describe a certain phenomenon Example S1 How is X doing in his new job at the bank S2 Hes doing well he likes his colleagues and he hasnt been to prison yet . Implicature:Maximsobserved?Clashing?Flouted?Howdothemaximscreatetheimplicature?4.A:Wherearemykeys?B:Onthecoeetable.B':Intheliving-room,onthecoee-table,17.5centimetersfromtheedge,nexttotheashtray. -value. In effect Davidson Elisabet Titik Murtisari. Monash University, Australia. etmurtisari@yahoo.com.au . Introduction. The concept of explicitation itself, which is generally understood as ‘the spelling out of information which is otherwise implicit in the source text’, has been of special interest in translation studies because of its elusiveness. Different methods have been applied in the study, e.g. by the use of the discourse based concept of explicitness and the traditional encoded/inferred distinction. The studies, however, are somewhat difficult to compare since every study seems to have its own concept of explicitation. Besides, there is also a issue with the combination of the two notions of explicitness, which is often done in explicitation research. . implicature. We assume that speakers and listeners involved in conversation are generally cooperating with each other.. [1] A hamburger is a hamburger.. Tautologies .  have no communicative value. Pragmatics. So far in class we’ve been concerned with . literal meaning. . . But people mean more things when they use words than just what those words literally mean.. Presupposition. “Who stole the money?”. assumed to make a contribution that is adequately but not overly informative (quantity maxim), the speaker does not believe to be false and for which adequate evidence is had (quality maxim), is relev Spoken Language Processing. Prof. Andrew Rosenberg. Overview. Conversational Agents. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Natural Language Understanding (NLU). Generation. Cooperative Question-Answering. Learning. Angelina Van Dyke and . Lorin. Friesen. TESL . Interiors: Landscapes of . Literacies. and . Language. TESL Canada Conference . TRU Kamloops 2012. Sorry . . . It. . G. R. E. W!. Learning . Cognitive Modeling for Critical Cross-Cultural Learning Angelina Van Dyke and Lorin Friesen TESL Interiors: Landscapes of Literacies and Language TESL Canada Conference TRU Kamloops 2012 Sorry Implicature. and . Explicature. A Follow-up from Previous Presentation and Discussion by Students. The Remnants from the Discussion:. The distinctions between Semantics and Pragmatics Studies. Implicatures. 78 transparency of the components of these conjunctions According to our corpus-based analysis on three perifavor a causal interpretation temporal markers in S2 and verbs of communication in S1 Erhou