/
Laplace Transforms:  Special Cases Laplace Transforms:  Special Cases

Laplace Transforms: Special Cases - PowerPoint Presentation

min-jolicoeur
min-jolicoeur . @min-jolicoeur
Follow
349 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-29

Laplace Transforms: Special Cases - PPT Presentation

Derivative Rule Shift Rule Gamma Function amp f ct Rule MAT 275 Derivative Rule If then Proof Using the definition of the Laplace Transform we have Differentiate both sides with respect to ID: 701790

asu surgent report solution surgent asu solution report errors scott somss find rule shift gamma function negative laplace start proof units calculator

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Laplace Transforms: Special Cases" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Laplace Transforms: Special CasesDerivative Rule, Shift Rule, Gamma Function & f(ct) Rule

MAT 275Slide2

Derivative Rule: If

, then

.Proof: Using the definition of the Laplace Transform, we have .Differentiate both sides with respect to : The integrand can be differentiated “in place” with respect to . In this step, acts as a constant multiplier. Note that :Thus, .Corollary: . In general, .

 

(c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu

2Slide3

Example: Find

.

Solution: First, find , which is . Thus, .Differentiating , we have .Since , then moving the negative, we have .Therefore, (c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu3Slide4

Example: Find

and

.Solution: Start with . Differentiate twice, so that and .So we have or equivalently, .Similarly, we have .Example: Find .Solution: Integrate twice, so we have , and . Thus, . Since , we have

.

 

(c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu

4Slide5

Example: Use Laplace Transforms to solve

.

Solution: We haveThus, . Using partial fractions, we have . The denominator has a linear factor multiplicity 2. Solving for and , we get  (c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu5Slide6

The solution is

.

The first term’s inversion is For the second, recognize that is the derivative of . Using the rule , we have , so that . Remember to attach a negative because of the leading negative in .The solution of is (c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu6Slide7

Shift Rule: If

, then

.Proof: We have , so thatExample: Find and .Solution: Start with and .The presence of suggest to shift both results by 2 units. Thus, (c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu7Slide8

Example: Find

.

Solution: We have . Now, shift the result by units:Example: Find .Solution: Start with . Differentiate , so we get . Since , we have . (The negative was moved to the right side and distributed into the numerator).Then, the suggests to shift the result 3 units: . (c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu8Slide9

(c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu9

The Gamma Function:

If , where , then , where represents the gamma function.Proof: Using the Laplace Transform, we have . Using integration by parts where and , we have and . Thus,The term after evaluation. Simplified, we get . This is the same as . This can be extended, e.g.

, or

, and so on.

 Slide10

(c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu10

From the last slide, we showed that

and so on. If n is an integer such that , then this formula is the same as (Try it for n = 3, for example).If n is not an integer such that , then the numerator is given by the gamma function , where . The gamma function has the property that when n is a non-negative integer, then , but it “extends” the notion of factorial to include non-integers greater that –1. The integral is usually evaluated using numerical methods (e.g. a calculator).Example: Find .Solution: We have . Using the relationship , then , which is found by evaluating . A calculator shows that this is about 0.88623. Using substitutions and integrating in polar coordinates, it can be shown that . Try it on your calculator!

 Slide11

(c) ASU - SoMSS Scott Surgent. Report errors to surgent@asu.edu11

The

Rule: If , then .Proof: Start with . Let so that and . Make the substitutions:Example: Find using the above property.Solution: Starting with and observing that , we have