Advantages and disadvantages of the rules of interpretation Advantages of the literal rule Parliamentary supremacy is respected Judges given a restricted role Law making left to those who are elected for law making ID: 431545
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Statutory Interpretation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Statutory Interpretation
Advantages and disadvantages of
the rules of interpretationSlide2
Advantages of the literal rule
Parliamentary supremacy is respected
Judges given a restricted role
Law making left to those who are elected for law making
Application of literal rule can highlight to parliament problems with an act – Fisher v Bell – invitation to treat now treated in the same way as offers for saleSlide3
Disadvantages of the literal rule
Absurd results
Unjust results – LNER v Berriman (1946)
Does not always give effect to the intention of parliament – they would not want absurd results
Where a dictionary definition gives two meanings, the literal rule will not work
Requires the assumption that draftsmen will always do their job perfectlySlide4
Advantages of the golden rule
Prevents absurd and unjust results – Re Sigsworth
More likely than the literal rule to have produced a result intended by parliamantSlide5
Disadvantages of the golden rule
No clear definition of what amounts to an absurd result – therefore unpredictable
Makes it difficult for lawyers to advise clients whether or not to pursue a case
Too much power given to judges
Michael Zander calls it a ‘feeble parachute’Slide6
Advantages of the mischief rule
Avoids absurd and unjust outcomes – McMonagle
Promotes flexibility
How parliament intended it – smith v hughes
Law Commission calls it a ‘rather more satisfactory approach’ – preferred approachSlide7
Disadvantages of the mischief rule
Too much power to an unelected judiciary
Is it the job of a judge to update legislation? – Abortion Act 1967
Can be hard to discover the original mischief – search old law
Difficult to identify precise intention of parliament
Out of date – 16
th
centurySlide8
Advantages of the purposive approach
Consistent with EU approach
Gives effect to parliament’s intentions
Denning states that it is “preferable to destructive analysis”
Avoids absurd and unjust results
Flexible
Parliament's intentionSlide9
Disadvantages of the purposive approach
Too much power to unelected jury
Judicial decisions based on policy – Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationSlide10
Advantages of the
ejusdem
generis rule
No requirement for draftsmen to write an exhaustive list of everything included
Adadpt to changes in societySlide11
Disadvantages of
the
ejusdem
generis rule
Not always predictable what judges will consider to be of the same category as the specific words – Kensington and Chelsea LBC ex p Kihara (1996)
Allows for judicial law makingSlide12
Advantages of the
noscitur
sociis
rule
No need for draftsmen to foresee every particular circumstance
Adapt to unforeseen circumstancesSlide13
Disadvantages of
the
noscitur
sociis
rule
Offends the separation of powers – judicial law making
Unpredictable outcomes due to scope for judicial discretionSlide14
Advantages of the
exclusio
alterius
rule
A finite list is provided
More predictable
Lawyers can advise due to this
Respects separation of powersSlide15
Disadvantages of
the
exclusio
alterius
rule
Rigidity
No scope for future changes
Possible unfair and unjust outcomesSlide16
Advantages of the intrinsic aids
Long title can remind judges of what they are trying to achieve – mischief/purposive approach – Black-Cawson (1975)
Preamble, objectives or puposes sections help when applying mischief/purposive approach
Schedules help understand the provisions of an act – easy to reference
Definition section helps with interpreting wordsSlide17
Disadvantages of the intrinsic aids
Doubt as to whether punctuation should be taken into account – wasn’t used prior to 1850Slide18
Advantages of the extrinsic aids
Dictionaries help when using literal approach
Referring to acts can help with interpreting mischief
Commission reports help when applying mischief/purposive approach
Hansard is a very useful tool – Davis v Johnson
Explanatory notes use more accessible languageSlide19
Disadvantages of the extrinsic aids
Dictionaries do not help when looking at parliament’s intention
Interpretation Act is limited in scope and not very technical or specialised
Commission reports can be erroneous – Anderton v RyanSlide20
Activity Page 53