/
Understanding Hydro-geochemical Process Coupling at the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Understanding Hydro-geochemical Process Coupling at the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical

Understanding Hydro-geochemical Process Coupling at the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical - PowerPoint Presentation

mindeeli
mindeeli . @mindeeli
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-06

Understanding Hydro-geochemical Process Coupling at the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical - PPT Presentation

Using RTFluxPIHM an integrated hydrologicalreactive transport model at the watershed scale Chen Bao cub200psuedu Li Li lili emepsuedu Yuning Shi Pamela Sullivan Christopher ID: 801107

chlorite water pihm flux water chlorite flux pihm dissolution surface height watershed transport 2009 zone scale stream figure geochemical

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Understanding Hydro-geochemical Process ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Understanding Hydro-geochemical Process Coupling at the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory (SSHCZO

) Using RT-Flux-PIHM: an integrated hydrological-reactive transport model at the watershed scale

Chen Bao (cub200@psu.edu), Li Li (

lili@

eme.psu.edu), Yuning Shi, Pamela Sullivan, Christopher Duffy, Susan Brantley. The Pennsylvania State University

d

Conclusions

Results

Despite recent advances,

interpreting complex

hydro-

meteo

-geochemical interactions

remains

challenging.

How

does the coupling of

meteorological, hydrological, and (bio)geochemical processes control

dissolution and stream chemistry at a variety of temporal and spatial scales? How to make use of process scale knowledge to understand watershed scale geochemical processes?

Motivation

RT-Flux

-

PIHM

is a reactive transport module that

has been developed on the Flux - Penn State Integrated Hydrologic Model (Flux-PIHM) (Kumar et al., 2008, Shi et al., 2013), a fully coupled simulator for interactions among land surface, surface water, and groundwater. RT-Flux-PIHM simulates solute transport and water-rock interactions.

RT-Flux-PIHM

Acknowledgement

RT-Flux-PIHM

offers a unique interface to explore hydrologic

and

geochemical interactions at the watershed scale.

Dissolution of chlorite was strongly correlated to the averaged equivalent water height (AEWH) in

2009. Faster dissolution of chlorite occurred in locations of elevated moisture content. Temporal evolution of chloride in stream water was closely simulated using real rainwater chemistry while that of magnesium was matched by tuning the specific surface area of chlorite to be smaller than the BET surface area measured in laboratory.

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Shale Hills-Susquehanna Critical Zone Observatory project through Grant EAR 0725019. Data were provided by the NSF funded Shale Hill Susquehanna Critical Zone Observatory.

Discussion

Land surface + Watershed hydrology Models

Reactive Transport Model

Coupled

Hydro-

Reactive Transport Model

Figure 2.

Temporal and spatial profiles of conservative tracer Cl

-

in 2009.

Figure 3.

Temporal and spatial profiles of Mg(II)

in 2009.

Figure 4. Temporal (right) and spatial (left: watershed averaged rate ) profiles of Chlorite dissolution rates (major source of Mg(II) in 2009).

Figure 5

. Correlations between dissolution rates, stream magnesium and averaged equivalent water height (AEWH), which is the average of total water height in meter in grid blocks.

Pore water and stream water chemistry was strongly affected by the hydrological dynamics.

Figure 6. Average chlorite dissolution rate in 2009 (μ mol/g/d) as a functions of hydrological and topographic condition in each location (A: Groundwater height; B: Water saturation; C: Elevation; D: Soil depth). Generally on ridgetops, soil moisture and groundwater levels were low and soil were thin. This combination often led to slower chlorite dissolution rate. Conversely, chlorite dissolved faster in locations with an elevated soil moisture content, e.g. valley floor. Faster dissolution of chlorite also occurred at swales (Fig 5).

Chlorite dissolves faster in swales

Stream water sampling point

Notations:

V

i

= volume of control volume

N_block

= number of grid blocks;

C

n

mineral_j

,

i

= concentration of mineral species

MW

j

=

molar weight of mineral species

A

i

=

the area of the triangular element

h

u

= the equivalent water height in unsaturated zone

h

g

= groundwater water height.

*: The major source of chloride is from rain water (

rain

chemistry from NADP, PA42

).

*

: Prescribed chlorite specific surface area of 0.15 m2/g, which is smaller than laboratory derived values (~1m2/g)

Figure1

. RT-Flux-PIHM uses an unstructured mesh where hydrogeochemical processes are realized within each grid.

RT-Flux-PIHM

was

implemented and tested at the Shale Hill Critical Zone Observatory (SSHCZO) in central Pennsylvania (0.08 km

2), a small-scale site with an array of land-surface and subsurface sensors. The simulated field is discretized into 535 grids and 20 river segments.

Reaction list and notations:

i: grid cell?j: mineral species n: times step