Democratic Surveillance or Bureaucratic Suppression of N - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Democratic Surveillance or Bureaucratic Suppression of National Sovereignty in the European Union? Ideas on the Multilateral Surveillance RegulationEuropean Parliament15. September 2010Slide2

2

  I. It’s democracy, stupid! II. Debating competitiveness III. A democratic framework for budget surveillance

 Slide3

3

I. It’s democracy, stupid!Slide4

4

Europe has been built by “enlightened despotism” and present reform proposals for economic governance are more of the sameBut the legitimacy of policy-making behind closed doors is increasingly questionableCompliance with rules and policy agreements is fading: Greece, Germany, SlovakiaLegitimacy by policy-output vanishes, as the Union does not produce the output people wantSlide5

5

Recent EurobarometerBetween spring and autumn 2010, approval of the EU has fallen by 10 points in Germany and 17 points in Greece.At the same time national governments or parliaments inspire even less trust than European institutionsLegitimacy mattersGood governance creates legitimacyLegitimacy creates good governanceSlide6

6

What’s wrong with economic governance?COM: the recent crisis “showed gaps and weaknesses in the current system, underlining the need for stronger and earlier policy co-ordination, additional prevention and correction mechanisms and a crisis resolution facility for euro-area Member States.” Slide7

7

What’s wrong with economic governance?ECB: “The disappointing performance of fiscal policies under the EU framework was due to the weak governance of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), notably (i) a lack of enforcement of fiscal discipline at the EU level and (ii) insufficient national incentives to comply with the EU rules.”Slide8

8

Policy proposals aim at raising the efficiency of policy making, i.e. improving the system’s output, but none talks about the legitimacy of a political system, where policy compromises are negotiated between governments, andthe democratic representatives of citizens,

namely the

European Parliament, have very little to say

.Slide9

9

The fundamental questionsWhy was the governance so weak?What kind of incentives are needed to improve the situation?Who is legitimizing European policy decisions? How is it possible that governments tell each other what to do, when each has been democratically elected to something else?Slide10

10

Most reformers fail to see that democratic member states are responsive to national constituencies, and that this often leads them to ignore the European collective good as long as there is no European authority that can legitimately overrule and stop their uncooperative behaviour.Slide11

11

The answerA democratically legitimate Economic GovernmentRepresentation of and deliberation by all citizens, not a in the faction of nation statesLisbon Treaty: “ordinary legislative process” (art. 294) sets a procedure for the interaction of Commission, Council and European Parliament.Slide12

12

II. Debating competitivenessSlide13

13

Economic competitiveness is a confused notion. Paul Krugman (1994) has famously argued: “Competitiveness is a seductive idea, promising easy answers to complex problems. But the result of this obsession is misallocated resources, trade frictions and bad domestic economic policies.” Slide14

14

What criteria?Current account balances?What is good, what is bad?Engendered by fast or slow growth?Structural positions intra & extra EU tradeSlide15

15

Two conceptsImprove efficiency and productivityLisbon strategy, 2020?Be price-competitive and take market shareULC divergeSlide16

16

Wage negotiations are too nation based and secretiveNeed to open Macroeconomic DialogueOpen debate at EP before meeting with ECBSlide17

17III. A democratic framework for budget surveillanceSlide18

18

The need for more fiscal policy coordination: Defining the aggregate fiscal stance and control implementationVoluntary by sovereign MS?Failure due to collective action problemsNo taxation without representationBureaucratic centralisation?

COM: European semester

ECB: independent expert panels

Ordinary legislation process?

EP as citizens’ representationSlide19

19

A proposal: Borrowing permitsThe Economic Guidelines become a Union legal act that defines the general policy orientations and decides/authorises the optimal borrowing requirement for the Euro Area, i.e. the aggregate budget deficit which is considered consistent with the economic environment (business cycle) and

the structural requirements of the European economy (public investment, aging etc.).Slide20

20

2. The European Parliament will have an active role in the formulation of the desirable aggregate policy stance. Council must decide: political will3. Each member state is allocated a share of the total borrowing authorization.Share of GDPpossibility of horizontal transfers of the borrowing permits

Pollution permitsSlide21

21 Slide22

22

4. Implementation.A European law (directive) could oblige financial institutions to lend only to public entities if they can present borrowing permits for the required amount. Markets as police, not bureaucracyEnsures that no government can violate the budget position, which was considered optimal by the democratic institutions of the European Union. Slide23

23

Thus, contrary to the bureaucratic surveillance proposed by European authorities, the system of borrowing permits would give democratic legitimacy to defining the desirable aggregate budget position for the Euro Area, and decentralize the policy implementationSlide24

24

Crisis managementProviding liquidity to MS governments at reasonable conditionsNot solvency issue which is concern of SGPProblem: distortion by market interventionSolution: Union Bond to generate portfolio effect of euro-liquidity risk.Slide25

25

ConclusionEurope has many common goods that affect all citizensThey must be represented in governance Only the EP can provide this legitimacySlide26

26

Thank you!Vive la République européenne!