PPT-Non-experimental methods for transport impact evaluation Kevin Croke

Nonexperimental methods for transport impact evaluation Kevin Croke ieConnect impact evaluation workshop Lisbon Portugal July 17 2017 overview In this sessions we will discuss the logic of impact evaluation. Youth. . Experimentation. . Fund. (Fonds d’Expérimentation pour la Jeunesse – FEJ) . Mathieu . Valdenaire. (DJEPVA - FEJ). International Workshop “Evidence-based Innovation: the Role of Evaluation and Social Experiments” . s Impact Evaluation No. 8 Quasi - Experimental Design and Methods Howard White and Shagun Sabarwal UNICEF OFFICE OF RESEARCH The Office of Research is UNICEF’s dedicated research arm. Its pr Markus Goldstein. Africa Region Gender Practice &. Development Research Group. Knowledge is the most democratic source of power . -Alvin Toffler. a world in which there are two types of people. Those who know. Designing Evaluations under Budget, Time, Data and Political Constraints. AEA. . pre-conference professional development workshop. Minneapolis, October 24, 2012. . Facilitated by. Michael Bamberger . [. rapid] evaluations. Michael Woolcock. Lead Social Development Specialist. Development Research Group, World Bank. Santo Domingo. November 14, 2011. Primary source material. Bamberger, Michael, . Vijayendra. Gautam Rao. University of California, Berkeley. * ** Presentation credit: Temina Madon. Impact. Evaluation. The “final” outcomes we care about. - Identify and measure them. . Measuring Impacts. Harun Dogo. Environmental Economist. Environment and Natural Resources, World Bank. July 18, 2017. Transport projects have diverse environmental effects. Effects of transport projects on land resources. This material constitutes supporting material for the "Impact Evaluation in Practice" book. This additional material is made freely but please acknowledge its use as follows: . Gertler. , P. J.; Martinez, S., . Paul Gertler. UC Berkeley. Note: slides by Sebastian Martinez, Christel Vermeersch and Paul Gertler. The content of this presentation reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the World Bank. This version: November 2009.. Learning objectives. By the end of this presentation, you will be able to:. Explain evaluation design . Describe . the differences between types of evaluation . designs. Identify . the key . elements . and . Methods?. Mywish K. Maredia. Michigan State University. Workshop for Managers of Impact Evaluation. May . 13, 2013. InterAction. , 1400 16. th. St. NW, Suite 210. Washington, DC. . IMPACT. Your Role in Explaining the ‘Miracle’. Impact Evaluation: . Pros . & Cons. GMEF FORUM IN KUMASI. 16. TH. March, 2017. By. Mrs.. . Dede. . Bedu-Addo. ,. Coordinator,. (GMEF). Acknowledging . inputs . from: . Tamale, UDS:. Prof. . Seidu. InterAction with 31nancial support from the Rockefeller Foundation The other notes in this series are Introduction to Impact Evaluation Linking Monitoring Evaluation to Impact Evaluation and Use of I monitoring and . evaluation. of . social. . innovations. Authors. : Ing. Dagmar Gombitová, PhD.. Mgr. Juraj Mikuš, PhD.. Bratislava, 27.07.2023. Cieľ. Methodological. and . application. . document.