PDF-RACTITIONER UIDE O 2 Assessing the Probative Value of DNA Evidence Gui

1 Contents0 Introduction to Communicating and Interpreting Statistical Evidence in the Administration of Criminal Justice Membership of the RSS Working Group on Statistics and the Law 2 11 1 DNA E. 4ECHNICAL'UIDE 7OUND 6OLUME 7OUND 6OLUME 7(!4 3+).'2!&43!.$$/./23)4%7/5.$3 0AULINE"ELDONIS4ISSUE6IABILITY.URSE#ONSULTANT%PSOMAND3T(ELIER5NIVERSITY(OSPITALS.( )&-1
'6/%
(6*%&
%0(
1611:
53"*/*/(
#:
-07*/(
"
-*55&3 ,17(51$7,21$/*8,'('2*'$< (ELP'UIDE$OGS.37!#4CELEBRATE)NTERNATIONAL'UIDE$OG$AYONTH!PRIL Cross-examination. Ian Barker QC. . The Uniform Evidence Act in Practice– some recent and not so recent cases . Alistair Wyvill SC. . Documents - UEA. Adducing evidence (chap.2)/ admission of evidence (UEA chap.3). Page 1 January 2014 A Quic uide: EntitŽing Users to L0ST LeveŽ 0 istoricaŽ Student View/Update Page 2 A Quic uide: EntitŽing Users to L0ST Leve&#x Functional Neuroimaging in the Courtroom…So . F. ar. Establish competence to waive Miranda rights. Subjective experience of pain in tort cases. Custody determinations. Mens. . rea. defenses for fraud, kidnapping, burglary, and murder . THAT IS THE QUESTION. RELEVANCE OF AN ITEM MAY DERIVE FROM ITS:. Factual Connection to a Legal . E. lement (the . intent . or. act caused. the law to be broken).. (2) Relationship to the Credibility of a Witness. Evidence. States that when a person comes into contact with an object or another person, a cross-transfer of physical evidence can occur. The material transferred is referred to as . trace evidence. Locard’s. 0 2. Assessing the probative value of DNA evidence Guidance for Judges, Lawyers, Forensic Scientists and Expert Witnesses Roberto Puch-Solis Paul Roberts Susan Pope Colin Aitken 1 RACTITIONER UIDE Bruce VanSledright. University of North Carolina, Charlotte. NCSS Investigation 2015. Principles for Assessment?. So let’s begin…. We need to start with . assessment-design principles. One excellent source:. J. Max Wawrik. Nancy Rosado Colon. Law 16. Spring 2017. Law of Evidence. . . Key Terms. Adversary System (U.S.). A system of justice where the parties work in opposition to each . other, and each party tries to win a favorable result for itself. The . . A Practitioner’s . Perspective – Carolyn Gilchrist. Statement of Standards in the Unit Specification . ie. Mandatory requirements. Graded Unit Purpose. Assessment Conditions. Evidence Requirements. 2018. Chap. 2 -- Relevance. 2. DIRECT vs. CIRCUMSTANTIAL: DOES IT MATTER ??. DIRECT. . EYEWITNESS TO A FACT IN ISSUE. CIRCUMSTANTIAL. EVERYTHING ELSE . Chap. 2 -- Relevance. 3. WHICH IS MORE PERSUASIVE?. iiacross all agencies and organisations working with education systems in developing countries Robust research and evaluation generates the evidence required to form judgements deliberate options and of options. What resources are needed?. What evidence is there regarding resource use? . How much confidence can be placed in that evidence?. How much will the necessary resources cost?. Is the option cost-effective?.