From Dark Matter Annihilation Jason Kumar University of H a w a i i collaborators Jin In Carsten Rott Pearl Sandick Jennifer Gaskins David Yaylali 1502 02091 15xxxxxxx dark matter and monoenergetic neutrinos ID: 209758
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Searching for Monoenergetic Neutrinos Ar..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Searching for Monoenergetic Neutrinos Arising From Dark Matter Annihilation
Jason Kumar
University of
H
a
w
a
i
iSlide2
collaborators
Jin In
Carsten
Rott
Pearl Sandick
Jennifer Gaskins
David Yaylali
1502. 02091, 15xx.xxxxxSlide3
dark matter and monoenergetic neutrinossearches for dark matter using
neutrino detectors
dark matter collects in the
core of the sun
after
scattering
off solar nuclei
annihilates
to Standard Model products, and the
neutrinos
get out
reach
neutrino detector
on earth
focus is typically on a
smooth
distribution of events above background
why?
often assumed
no direct annihilation to neutrinos
neutrinos arise from decay of other SM states
mostly have studied detection strategies in which
neutrino energy can’t be fully reconstructed
anyway
see a smooth distribution of charged leptons
I’ll focus on a different possibility
models in which dark matter can produce
monoenergetic neutrinos
detectors and strategies which can
resolve a line signalSlide4
basic pointsexperiment
electron neutrinos
undergoing charged-current interaction will
deposit almost all energy in the detector
some neutrino detectors, like
liquid scintillation
detectors or
liquid argon TPCs
, can
reconstruct energy
and
direction
of incoming neutrino
can determine if neutrino emanates from the
sun
sensitive to a
line signal
theory
in the absence of
minimal flavor violation
, or with
non-Majorana dark matter
, can easily have dark matter annihilate to
monoenergetic neutrinos
dark matter models which annihilate to u, d, s quarks produce plenty of
π
+
,
K
+
stop before they decay
(producing more
π
+
)
produce
monoenergetic neutrino Slide5
neutrinos from the sunbasic ideaDM scatters off solar nuclei, loses energy through
elastic scattering
falls below
v
esc
captured
orbits, eventually collects in coreDM annihilates to SM matterSM decay yields neutrinos seen at detectorDM in equilibrium GC = 2GAso neutrino event rate probes DM capture rate (∝ sSI ,sSD)usually look for hard neutrinoslight hadrons stop before decaying soft neutrinos
Dawn Williams
A.
Zentner
, arXiv:0907.3448Slide6
why (not) χχν̅ν?
can understand just from
angular momentum
for Majorana fermion, wavefunction is
anti-symmetric
L=0
,
S=0
or L=1, S=1if outgoing fermions on z-axisLz=0 ( Ylm(q=0,f)≠0 only if m=0 )Sz = Jzif Sz=0 need f, f̄ with
same helicitynot CP-conjugateneed
Weyl spinor mixing
in MFV, mixing scales with mass
if
S
z=±1 need f, f̄ with opp. helicityno mixing needed
J=0, L
Z
=0
S
Z=0
J
z
=1, LZ=0 SZ=1
f
L
f
R
f̅R
f
̅
RSlide7
monoenergetic neutrinosthis argument underlies the theoretical prejudice
towards searches for the b
̅
b,
τ̅
τ
and W
+
W- channels but the chirality suppression arises from the assumption of Majorana fermion dark matter and minimal flavor violationcertainly true for the CMSSM, but need not be true in generalWIMPs need not be Majorana, and MFV can fail even in the general MSSMif dark matter is a Dirac fermion, then the initial state can be L=0, S=1, J=1, so s-wave annihilation, but no mixing neededif we drop minimal flavor violation, then mixing need not scale with masseither way, χχν̅ν branching fraction could be O(1)or χχ q̅q
for q = u, d, s worth studying these annihilation channelsSlide8
why not light hadrons?usually ignore
χχ
q
̅
q
for q=
u,d,s
why? another reason....u, d, s light hadrons which stop in the sun before decaycare about pions, kaonsresulting ν spectrum is very softlarge background, small detector effective areabut the stopping process produces a large number of pions
trade a hard spectrum for a softer one, but with
larger fluxBeacom,
Rott, Siegal-Gaskins (1208.0827)
π
+
π
-
π
0
K
+
q
̅
qSlide9
spectrum care about π
+
and
K
+
π
0
γγ π- Coulomb-captured by nuclei, and absorbeddoesn’t produce a lot of neutrinosmain relevant decay is π+, K+ νμ μ+ monoenergetic neutrino with E = 29.8
MeV (pion) or
235.5 MeV
(kaon)
oscillates into
monoenergetic
νe , and can produce a line signalmuon stops in sun before decay
μ+ e+
νe
ν̅μ also get continuum ν
e, ν̅μ from
μ+ decay, but less distinctivejust need the fraction of DM energy which goes into stopped
π+, K
+r ≡
fraction of center-of-mass energy which goes into π+, K+ determine r in Pythia/GEANT
rπ ~ 0.1 Slide10
resolving a line signalessentially need two things
full energy
containment
directionality of charged lepton
track (for high energy)
need
ν
e
charged current interaction produces e± produces short-range cascade which is fully-contained in detectorat high Eν, muon is long-rangereduces the effective volumeat Eν = 30 MeV, can’t produce muon
ν
θ
f
≡
fraction of events in θcone f
ν ~ 0.4fν̅ ~
0.8reduces bgd at large Eν but at Eν≈30
MeV, no direction Slide11
LS detectorscintillator produces a spherical burst of light
essentially a
calorimeter
easy
to get
total energy
harder
to get
direction
from a spherical burst of lightbut timing of when PMTs are illuminated can be used to reconstruct charged lepton trackessentially, Huygen’s principleanalysis of KamLAND data is on the way....we’ll treat it as our benchmark detector ....figures courtesy of John LearnedSlide12
what we need....we have the neutrino fluxes from the sun arising from DM
....
we have
estimates of the
ν
e
background
at E > GeV (for
χχν̅ν)at E ~ 30-300 MeV (for meson decay)charged current neutrino-nucleus scattering cross sectionfor E > GeV, get σ E (DIS)for E ~ 30-300 MeV, more complicatedcross sections smaller at low EνHonda
Battistoni, Ferrari, Montaruli, SalaSlide13
sensitivity at high energybenchmark = KamLAND
V = 500 m
3
T = 3600 days
ε
~
few % (5 %)
beats current DD limits
no big suppression at low mass, unlike direct detectionSuper-K winslarger exposure due to sizeSK has larger bgd., but KamLAND is signal limitedcan’t fully benefit from low background yet LBNE DUNE? ε ~ 3 %, 10× exp.flavor-indep, 90% CLSlide14
sensitivity for charged meson decayat low energy, take
ε
~
1 %
for
LS
KamLAND is
signal limited
viable models produce < 1 event in
KamLANDs exposureproblem σνA small at low Eν DUNE could do much better (34 kT LAr TPC, 1 year)
still negligible background
1 year, ε
~ 10 %
competitive with direct detection
at
~ 5 GeV other neutrino searches not sensitive (focused on high-energy neutrinos)
90% CLSlide15
signal limitedlook at π
+
decay, 10 GeV,
LArTPC
if
ε
≲
0.1, would need ~ 10 years to get a single bgd. event in a binS/B doesn’t depend on exposure or target, just on fluxes and energy resolutionif S = B, then σSDp ≈ 0.07 pb ⨯ ε Ecrit exposure needed to get a single signal event at S = B (= 1)
exposure = (M/kT) (T/yr)
to fully realize potential at 5% energy resolution, need
625 kT yr
LArTPC
detectorLS factor 8× largerSlide16
signal limitedconsider monoenergetic neutrino signal at m = 10 GeV
again at
LArTPC
,
ε
~
5%
compare to analysis of
monoenergetic neutrinos from π+ decaybackground neutrino rate is about ~ 4900 smaller signal neutrino rate about ~ 13 times smaller (fixed σSDp)no enhancement arising from multiple pionseffective area ~ 104 ⨯ largerenergy dependence of scattering cross section
at S/B = 1 limit, would have σSD
p
≈ 10-5
pb
need a
~ 270 kT yr detector exposure to get ~ 1 signal eventχχ
ν̅ν channel has better sensitivity, smaller exposure, ... if it’s there
but to fully exploit either strategy, one would need an exposure similar to a
34 kT DUNE running for 10 – 20 yearsSlide17
dark matter annihilation in the sun can produce
monoenergetic
neutrinos
need non-Majorana, or non-MFV, for direct annihilation
to neutrinos
or decays of numerous stopped
π
+
LS or LArTPC neutrino detectors can reconstruct energy and directionneed electron neutrinos for fully-contained shower
reduced backgrounds
but current detectors are signal-limited, so need bigger detectors and larger run-times
.... (DUNE?
THEIA?)
c
onclusion
M
a
halo
!Slide18
Back-up slides