Antenatal - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Antenatal clinic,a missed opportunity for hypertension education??

Helen

Naa

Oyoo

Akaba

FWACS,09/16Slide2

Introduction/BackgroundCase presentation

24 years .

P 1.Had emergency caesarean section at 33 weeks in previous pregnancy on account of PIH.

Made a total of 6 antenatal visits 12/3/15 BP 140/100 mmHg at 31 weeks , urine protein one plus.From notes,no documentation of danger signs,managed as outpatient on antihypertensives,asked to do some investigations ,to report in 2 weeks.After a week she complained of headaches to her mother at about 8 :00 pm and relatives gave her paracetamol and put in bed.She was found fitting in bed the next morning and rushed to a facility where she died shortly.  

2Slide3

Introduction/BackgroundGlobally,Hypertension

in pregnancy is the second major cause of maternal mortality after

haemorrhage

. Leads in Nigeria,Latin America ,Carribean,Institutional maternal deaths(Ghana),Greater Accra.Diagnosis: Elevated blood pressure above or equal to 140/90 mmHg. Disease spectrum, Complications Pathognomic signs of imminent eclampsia: DEATH THREATS given to patient first.Effective interventions.Late reporting.80% of deaths community or 24 hrs stayAntenatal coverage 96.4% (1visit);76.7%(4 visits)

3Slide4

OBJECTIVES GENERAL:To determine if the Korle bu Teaching Hospital(KBTH) is seizing the opportunity of the antenatal clinic to educate attendants on the prodromal danger signs of hypertension in pregnancy

SPECIFIC: Compared knowledge of danger signs

Expectant mothers who have not received antenatal care in KBTH, in that index pregnancy

[ booking]Expectant mothers who have received antenatal care in KBTH in the index pregnancy,4 visits,34+ wks, continuingk4Slide5

MethodsStudy design & area

Cross-sectional study on pregnant women attending antenatal clinic of KBTH

Two groups :Booking and Continuing.

Simple random sampling to select the first patient followed by systematic random sampling. Total of 260,130 from each group. Exposure and Outcome variable.Exposure-age,referral staus,parity,highest education,occupation,residence,historyTools An interviewer –administered questionnaire was used.Data analysisAnalysis Stata 13.Means,SD and frequencies,chi-squareStatistical significance at 5%,p value <0.05

5Slide6

RESULTS (1)

Background Characteristics

Total 260, Six excluded from each group, Final 248

Booking (no antenatal )Continuing(4 visits ,34weeks +)No statistical difference in background characteristics except gestational ageAge: Booking 29.8 yrs+/- 6.1 SD. Cont 30.8 yrs +/-5.3SDBooking: gestational age 19-42 w.70(56.4%)34w+Majority were referred B:110(88.7%) .C 102(82.3%)History of Hyp in Pregnancy B:25(20.2%)C:18(14.5)Awareness Hyp B:95.2%.C:100% p value 0.013.Hyp in Preg B:8/10 C:9/10 p value 0.002

6Slide7

RESULTS (1)

Awareness of hypertension

Awareness Hypertension B:95.2%.C:100% p value 0.013.

Awareness of hypertension in pregnancy B:8/10 C:9/10 p value 0.0027Slide8

RESULTS (1)

Headache was the most mentioned sign

Blurred vision 2-BOOKING 9 –CONTINUING

Light flashes 1 from each groupNausea 1 –BOOKING Epigastric pain 2- CONTINUINGVomitting 08Slide9

Results(2)Knowledge of danger signs.

At least one danger sign

No sign known

Sign known

P value

Group

n(%)

0.327

Booking

104(83.9)

20(16.1

)

Continuing

98(79.0

)

26(21.0)

9Slide10

Results(3)

Determinants of knowledge:

Respondents who had attained tertiary level of education were more aware compared to other educational

stata, p value 0.037More respondents from the hospital, KBTH knew more signs than referred cases, p value 0.045No significant difference in knowledge between respondents who had a history(high risk patients) and those with no history.10Slide11

Results(3)Developed countries-

Melbourne ,Florida :Pre education 40 %

Post education[6 years] 70 %

(Wallis, Tsigas 2013)Chicago: 14% .Multiparity, past history, educational status,health education (You et al 2012)11Slide12

Results(3)

Developing countries-

Gambia 24.6 % (Anya et al 2008)

Uganda 19%12Slide13

Conclusion

An opportunity to educate clients through the antenatal clinic on the danger signs of a leading cause of maternal mortality is being missed by many health facilities

Women despite the fact that they have made the recommended number of antenatal visits lack the knowledge on the danger signs of hypertension in pregnancy, a topic of such immense public health importance

13Slide14

DISCUSSIONTennessee

Reduction in eclampsia during antenatal period

Continous

education of clients and providers on danger signals, and seeking attention in response to cardinal signs (Chames et al 2002)Even in high literacy places people do not like to read (Mac Gilivray et al,2006)14Slide15

DiscussionHealth literacy is defined by WHO as follows

:

Health literacy represents the cognitive and social skills which determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, and understand, and use the information in ways which promote and maintain good health. Health literacy means more than being able to read pamphlets and successfully make appointments. By improving peoples access to health information and their capacity to use it effectively, health literacy is critical to empowerment (WHO 1998).

 15Slide16

Recommendations

An urgent need to restructure the antenatal education given at the antenatal clinic in KBTH and especially other facilities.

High risk patients must be given special education. Audience segmentation may be useful

Female education beyond JSS levelFurther research to assess health workers knowledge on danger signs16Slide17

Walk about Zion,and go all around her.Count her towers;Mark well her bulwarks;

Consider her palaces;

That you may tell it to the generation following.

FOR THIS IS GOD ,OUR GOD FOREVER AND EVER;HE WILL BE Our GUIDE EVEN UNTO DEATH .ps 48:12-14  

17