/
 Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the Accountable Care Organization  Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the Accountable Care Organization

Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the Accountable Care Organization - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
348 views
Uploaded On 2020-04-05

Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the Accountable Care Organization - PPT Presentation

John Windle MD October 18 2013 Professor and Chief of Cardiology University of Nebraska Medical Center Ha ha ha Biff Guess what After we go to the drugstore and the post office ID: 775840

atrial fibrillation patients rhythm atrial fibrillation patients rhythm rate control ablation sinus pulmonary heart trial care study vein cases

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the A..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the Accountable Care Organization

John Windle MD October 18, 2013

Professor and Chief of Cardiology

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Slide2

“Ha

ha

ha

, Biff. Guess what? After we go to the drugstore and the post office,

I’m

going to the vet’s to get tutored.”

Slide3

Conflict of Interest

I have no relevant conflicts. Just lots of opinions

Slide4

Atrial Fibrillation in the Era of the Accountable Care Organization

A Quick Review of the Basics

The importance of Definitions

The importance of atrial transport

The clinical trials that drive the guidelines

Filling in the Gaps

Rate Control versus Rhythm Control issues

Perspectives on bleeding versus stroke but not discussing new therapies.

Musings on how this might work in an ACO model

Slide5

Atrial Fibrillation

Most common sustained symptomatic

tachyarrhythmia. Over 3,000,000 Americans suffer from atrial fibrillation.

Incidence

 with age and presence of structural heart disease

Slightly more common in

men than women

15%(75,000 per year) of all strokes occur in AF patients

One of the top causes of

hospitalizations and extension of stays in Hospitals

Bialy et al

. Journal of the American College of Cardiology

1992; 19(3):41A.

Prystowsky

et al.

Circulation.

1996; 93(6):1262-1277.

Wolf et al.

Archives of Internal Medicine.

1987; 147(9):1561-1564.

Slide6

14-

12-

10-

8-

6-

4-

2-

0-

Men

Women

Men

Women

Chronic AF

Paroxysmal AF

14-

12-

10-

8-

6-

4-

2-

0-

2-yr Incidence (per 1000)

2-yr Incidence (per 1000)

12.9

6.7

5.4

2.2

0.9

0.5

4.8

1.5

0.7

0

30-39

40-49

50-59

70-79

60-69

-

-

-

-

30-39

40-49

50-59

70-79

60-69

-

-

-

-

Kannel

et al

. American Heart Journal.

1983;

106

(2):389-396.

Age

Age

12.7

4.8

0.6

0.5

0

0

0.4

0.5

1.9

9.2

Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation (Framingham Study)

Slide7

Consequences of Atrial Fibrillation

Arrhythmia-associated

symptoms, look at

exertional

symptoms of shortness of breath,

exertional

dyspnea and decreased exercise tolerance.

 LV

function: Impact of atrial transport and diastolic function.

Tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy (heart rates over 130 b/m)

2-fold  in cardiac mortality

5-fold  in risk of stroke

Slide8

“Why do I feel like crap?”

Myocardial and Hemodynamic Consequences of Atrial fibrillation

Loss of atrial contraction decreases cardiac output

9% drop in C.O. in canine model

15% drop in C.O. in irregular response vs. same average rate pacing.

Decrease in coronary blood flow with irregular ventricular rhythm.

Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (heart rate >130 for several weeks).

LVH (diastolic dysfunction) accentuates the importance atrial contraction.

Slide9

The impact of atrial contribution by cardiac doppler

Slide10

Atrial Fibrillation-The 3 Ps

Paroxysmal-Self-limited, often occurring in structurally normal hearts

Persistent-Requiring intervention, either chemical (antiarrhythmic drugs) or electrical to restore sinus

rhythm

Long-standing persist-a term created by cardiac electrophysiologists to “not give up”.

Permanent-”

Uncardiovertable

Slide11

Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines

Slide12

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Vasovagal-nocturnal, triggered by stress, meals or alcohol

Self-limited but shortened duration with propafenone or flecainide

Often have pulmonary vein foci

A

menable

to Ablative therapy

Slide13

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Need

an intervention to restore sinus rhythm

More likely to involve structural heart disease: Cardiac effects of hypertension and LVH, prior myocardial damage such as MI

Try to figure out the symptom trigger

: Rate,

regularity or Atrial

synchrony and atrial

transport.

Slide14

Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Un-cardiovertable atrial fibrillation

Duration

Left atrial size

Comorbidities

Absence of Symptoms

Slide15

Conversion to NSR

Maintenance of NSR

Ventricular Rate Control

Prevention of Thromboembolism

Decision Points for Atrial

Fibrillation

NSR = normal sinus rhythm

Short Term

Long Term

Time

Slide16

Rate Control Therapy

A-V Nodal Agents (slow ventricular response)

Digoxin-increases vagal tone, reduces resting heart rate but not exercise rate

Beta

Blockers-underutilized but most effective

Calcium Channel Agents

Diltiazem

and verapamil not

nifedipine

Adenosine

A-V Node Ablation with pacemaker placement

Single versus Bi-V device

Slide17

Rhythm Control Therapy

Atrial Muscle Agents (restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm)

Procainamide and Quinidine-What we learned about in School but of limited use and availability now

Propafenone

, Flecainide-Good for acute conversion and normal

hearts (Pill-in-the Pocket)

Disopyramide

-Still in good option for some, decreases vagal tone

Sotalol

and Dofetilide-

Torsades

de

Pointes but otherwise great agents

Dronederone

-very limited use.

Amiodarone*

*The Vaughn-Williams Classification system is easy but wrong.

Slide18

The Affirmed Trial

The Affirmed Trial-Rate Control versus Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Critical Study: Randomized Control Trial

Rhythm Control no better than Rate Control

Rate control less costly

Slide19

The Affirmed Trial: Part II

Short follow-up on “elderly”, asymptomatic patients

Based

on an “intention to treat”

“Failure” based on first

recurrence versus time spent in desired rhythm

Very high overlap in assigned patients in their actual rhythm (sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation).

Not a comparison of atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm

(The sinus rhythm patients did significantly better)

Slide20

Atrial Fibrillation; now what?!

No significant improvement in quality of life with “rhythm control” strategy in multiple trials above. STAF and HOT CAFÉ showed increase in exercise tolerance.

Slide21

It’s just AF; it won’t KILL ME.

HF promotes AF, AF exacerbates HF, and patients with either who develop the other, share a poor prognosis.

Stroke in AF averages 5% per year!1.5% annual in 50-59y to 23% annual in 80-89 yrs.

Framingham Heart Study (1983);The Regional Heart Study Whitehall StudyManitoba Study (1995)

Framingham Data.

Excess mortality in AF patients compared to matched (non-AF).

Slide22

My Take Home Messages:

Yep-Sinus rhythm and rate controlled atrial fibrillation equivalent in asymptomatic, elderly patients followed over 3-5 years.

Yep-Lower utilization of resources with rate control strategy

But,

Didn’t answer sinus versus rate control

Most of my patients are not truly asymptomatic

Atrial fibrillation causes a 5-10% drop in EF in most patients, what do you think will happen over time?

Slide23

Anticoagulation

Anticoagulation is recommended for ALL patients with atrial fibrillation, except those with “LONE AF” or contraindications.Anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist is recommended for patients with more than 1 moderate risk factorAspirin 81-325 mg for low-risk patients, or those with CI to oral anticoagulationAnticoagulation for atrial flutter is recommended as per AF.Long term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist is NOT recommended for primary strike prevention in patients <60 yrs of age without heart disease.

CHADS

2

Score

EF <35%

Slide24

Circulation. 2006;114:e257-e357.

Slide25

Why anticoagulation to a target of 2.0 to 3.0?

Why not everyone with AF?

Warfarin

vs. Aspirin

Slide26

Atrial Fibrillation: Interventions

Cardioversion: Medical versus Electrical

Dual Chamber

Pacing (

Bradycardic

-dependent arrhythmias)

AV Node Ablation and Ventricular

Pacing

EF <45%

Pacing over 40%

Pulmonary Vein Isolation Ablation

Surgical MAZE Procedure

Slide27

Dilbert

Dilbert

Slide28

All roads lead to catheter ablation!

Slide29

Catheter Ablation for AF

Rationale:

Triggers within the pulmonary veins and other sites (SVC, LM, CS, CT)

Isolation of the pulmonary veins eliminates AF in many patients with PAF.

Alteration of substrate in Persistent AF patients dramatically reduces symptoms of AF, and frequently reduces or eliminates the need for antiarrhythmic medications to control the rhythm.

Slide30

History of AF Ablation

Initial procedure mimicked the surgical maze procedure. Success rate was 40-50% and complication rate high. (Prior to 1998).Automaticity within the pulmonary veins was then the target…

Slide31

Pulmonary Vein Isolation

~95% of the triggers for AF are suspected to be in the pulmonary veins.

Additional triggers at sites of “Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms” (CFAEs)

In PAROXYSMAL atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation is effective in 80-85% of cases at “CURING” atrial fibrillation.

Currently, “Symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to or intolerant of medical therapy” is the primary indication for PVAI.

Slide32

Ultrasound

Reconstruction of

The Left Atrium with CartoSound/ICE

WHAT FOR:

Mapping veins, appendage

Mitral annulus/valve

Velocities, evaluate for PFO

Map coronary arteries

CONTINUOUSLY EVALUATE

FOR PERICARDIAL

EFFUSION

Slide33

CT scan merged with ultrasound image (right).

Slide34

Slide35

Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF

Slide36

Atrial fibrillation persists within the RSPV, but sinus rhythm is present elsewhere

Slide37

What about “Non-Paroxysmal” AF?

More complex disease entity from an ablation standpoint.

PVAI is not sufficient for elimination of atrial fibrillation in many patients.

Additional lesions include approximation of the maze lesion set with ablation at the roof, mitral annulus, cavotricuspid isthmus, and svc.

The addition of CFAE ablation is of unclear benefit and remains controversial.

Slide38

Complications:

Perforation with pericardial tamponade

~1% of cases of PVAI (up to 5% depending on series)

Usually self-limiting, requiring a drain

Rarely can require surgical drainage/repair.

Cerebrovascular accidents

0.5 to 2.5% of cases

Dramatically reduced with higher ACT

Phrenic Nerve Injury

0.1 to 0.48% of cases

Recovery in 66% of cases, can be permanent

Radiation related

Fluoroscopy times can be prolonged.

Pulmonary vein stenosis

1 to 2% with current techniques

(15-20% historically)

Atrio

-Esophageal fistula

Slide39

New Ablation Tools and Techniques

CryoBalloon (Arctic Front)Ablation Frontiers CatheterHigh-Intensity Focused UltrasoundLaser ablation And more…. Just around the corner.

Slide40

Where Do We Go From Here?

3,000,000 patients how do we divide up the work?

Base-rate theory: EP>Cardiology>Primary Care

Team-based Care

Decision-making

Rate versus rhythm control

Antithrombotic Care

Slide41

Where do we go from here: the ACO

In my “perfect-world”

EP physicians would consult (either actual or virtually) on all patients at presentation of their atrial fibrillation

The EP physician, the primary care provider and the patient would develop a consensus treatment plan with all three holding accountability for the outcome.

If anti-thrombotic therapy was initiated it would be managed by a non-physician team member under protocol.

Cardiologists would be involved in atrial

fibrillation management.

Slide42

Questions?

Slide43

New Drugs

Dronedarone

: a non-iodinated amiodarone analog.

Trials have compared the medication to placebo and amiodarone.

Euridis

and Adonis (European and American) trials showed efficacy relative to placebo.

ANDROMEDA study showed higher death rate in NYHA Class IV patients.

ATHENA trial demonstrated stroke risk reduction.

Currently, approval is for “treatment of patients with a history of, or recurrent atrial fibrillation to reduce their risk of cardiovascular hospitalization due to this condition.”

Slide44

Azmilide

Not yet approved

Potassium blocker similar to dofetilide or sotalol, but blocks both

iKr

and

iKs

.

Does not perform as a beta-blocker.

LONG HALF-LIFE of up to 4 days.

In a trial to assess its efficacy in MI patients with EF 15-35%, (ALIVE), a higher proportion of patients in the treatment arm were in sinus rhythm at the end of the study…

Placebo-controlled trial is in the works.