PPT-Counterexample Generation for Separation-Logic-Based Proofs

Arlen Cox Samin Ishtiaq Josh Berdine Christoph Wintersteiger SLA YER Abstractionbased Static Analyzer Uses Separation Logic Proves Memory Safety of Heap Manipulating Programs Shape Analysis. Please do not alter or modify contents All rights reserved 1FQMFXIFFMMZVDDFGVMJNQMFNFUJHUIJLJMM hy does my child always have an attitude Shes often disruptive disrespectful or picking on other children Shes always the one with a chip on her shoulder Please do not alter or modify contents All rights reserved For more information call 8003384065 or visit wwwloveandlogiccom Love and Logic Institute Inc is located at 2207 Jackson Street Golden CO 80401 57513 1998 Jim Fay 57375e Delayed or Anticipat to. Hardness Amplification. beyond negligible. Yevgeniy. . Dodis. , . Abhishek. Jain, Tal Moran, . Daniel . Wichs. Hardness Amplification. Go from . “weak” security . to. . “strong” security. Logic and Proof. Fall . 2011. Sukumar Ghosh. Predicate Logic. Propositional logic has limitations. Consider this:. Is . x. . > 3. a proposition? No, it is a . predicate. . Call it . P(x. ). . Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs. With Question/Answer Animations. Summary. Valid Arguments and Rules of Inference. Proof Methods. Proof Strategies. Rules of Inference. Section 1.6. Section Summary. Valid Arguments. Madhu Sudan. . MIT CSAIL. 09/23/2009. 1. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs. TexPoint fonts used in EMF. . Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: . A. A. A. A. Can Proofs Be Checked Efficiently?. Dominique Unruh. University of Tartu. Tartu, April 12, 2012. Why quantum ZK?. Zero-knowledge:. Central tool in crypto. Exhibits many issues “in the small case”. Post-quantum crypto:. Classical protocols. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs. With Question/Answer Animations. Summary. Valid Arguments and Rules of Inference. Proof Methods. Proof Strategies. Rules of Inference. Section 1.6. Section Summary. Valid Arguments. DPLL(T)-Based SMT Solvers. Guy . Katz. , Clark Barrett, . Cesare . Tinelli. , Andrew Reynolds, Liana . Hadarean. Stanford . University. The University. of Iowa. Synopsys. Producing Checkable Artifacts. 1. NP-Completeness . Proofs. Presentation for use with the textbook, . Algorithm Design and Applications. , by M. T. Goodrich and R. Tamassia, Wiley, 2015. © 2015 Goodrich and Tamassia . NP-Completeness Proofs. . Iddo Tzameret. Royal Holloway, University of London . Joint work with Fu Li (Tsinghua) and Zhengyu Wang (Harvard). . Sketch. 2. Sketch. : a major open problem in . proof complexity . stems from seemingly weak results. 1.1 Propositional Logic. 1.2 Propositional Equivalences. 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers. 1.4 Nested Quantifiers. 1.5 Rules of Inference. 1.6 Introduction to Proofs. 1.7 Proof Methods and Strategy. To prove an argument is valid or the conclusion follows . Fall . 2011. Sukumar Ghosh. Predicate Logic. Propositional logic has limitations. Consider this:. Is . x. . > 3. a proposition? No, it is a . predicate. . Call it . P(x. ). . P(4) . is true, but . DeLiang. Wang. Perception & Neurodynamics Lab. Ohio State University. . & Northwestern . Polytechnical. University. http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/pnl/. Outline of presentation. Introduction.