PPT-Deliberative Policy Analysis and Critique

John Dryzek CRICOS 00212K Context CRICOS 00212K Deliberative democracys standards communication should Be noncoercive Induce reflection listening and respect Connect particular interests to more general principles. The critique is based mainly on C&H (2004), which extends and revises their earlier work, and on Collier (2000a), which provides a more elaborate theoretical exposition. John Maynard Keynes, Why are we here?. Sensemaking & Framing. Explore the “insert here” problem space. Ideation (not the suicidal kind). Walk away with some decent designs. Outline. Your mission. Your challenge is to design the RallyWho dashboard & event planning experience for . T. he . reflection, critique and further development of a case study.. Learning Team B. EDD/581– Action Research and Evaluation . March . 02. , . 2015. Jamie Jenkins . Case Study Analysis. Learning team . and the . PINet. Project. John Gastil. Dept. of Comm. Arts & Sciences. The Pennsylvania State University . February 24, 2013. Articles on Deliberative Democracy. Number of peer-reviewed articles with search terms in record fields. Terms = (Deliberation OR Deliberative) AND (Civic . is Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto, Canada.. Publications:. Reasonable Democracy, . Jürgen. . Habermas. and the Politics of Discourse. , Cornell University Press 1996.. & . A . Topoi. Catalogue of Journalistic Questions That Disrupt Democratic Debate. Jonas . Gabrielsen. , Christina Pontoppidan & Heidi . Jønch. -Clausen. Situating our research question. Dominant focus: In evaluating the (missing) deliberative quality of modern political discourse, we need to understand and . Looking. in: . What. do Global . University. . Rakers. do?. Miguel Lim. mili@au.edu.dk. Aarhus University. ”The Experts”. Alexandre-Gabriel . Descamps. (1837). Presentation. Research . Context. • an attempt to reconnect a strong (demanding) conception of . the moral ideal of democracy. with the problem of . political outcome. •. democracy as process. - neither just an institutional system of government . Complete abstract critiques.... A comment on grades.... Where does your grade for this class come from?. From the syllabus.... Pretty simple. A comment on grades.... Where does your grade for this class come from?. . Hannah . Hickman . Senior Research Fellow, UWE . . Kat Salter. . & . Prof Gavin Parker . University of Reading. . September 2017. Presentation Structure . Neighbourhood Plan Examination . Why are we interested in examiners? What is their role within a new deliberative practice space? . Critique comes in many flavors. Deep or shallow. Broad-based or narrowly focused. Directed toward production/content/social effects. Qualitative v. quantitative (Butler calls this ‘empirical’). Professional v. amateur v. scholarly. Student Disability Services. Greenville Technical College. The Americans with Disabilities Act : ADA. Post Amendments. ADA Evolution. 1990: Signed into Law. 1992: Beginning implementation begins. 2000: Reauthorized: . Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected GainFunction Research Involving Influenza MERS and SARS VirusesOctober172014US Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research A counter-interpretation sees unrestricted market ordering as a threat to political arrangements carefully crafted earlier in this century to provide goods collectively that will not be provided indiv