PPT-Hearsay

Keaton Transcript FACTS Civil Action for assault and battery brought by plaintiff Mia Keaton against defendant Woody Brooks Keaton claims that Brooks struck her numerous times with a windshield cleaning tool at a Jet selfservice station Brooks denies striking Keaton and in the alternative contends that any action he may have taken with regard to Keaton was in selfdefense Testifying on plaintiff Keatons behalf is Ann Hall who was present at the gas station at the time of the incident. Key Concepts: Hearsay Statement Is Admissible If Declarant Makes the Statement While Perceiving : Hearsay Statement Is Admissible If  Both Exceptions Assume that Declarant Is Less  492  Learning E v. Federal . Rules of Evidence. Randy J. Cox. F.R.E. 301 is short and vague, with no definition of “presumption.” . Note . F.R.E. 302 provides that state law governs the effect of presumptions regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision.. University. of Helsinki). What. . do. . different. . methods. of data . collection. . reveal. . about. . evidentiality. ?. 1. Outline. Background. Grammars. Corpora. Field. . methods. Questionnaires. The author is a partner with Clifford Law Offices, Chicago. Illustration by Richard Allen Published in Litigation, Volume 39, Number 2, Spring 2013. Less Objectionable. Igor Ellyn, . QC, CS, FCIArb. and . Belinda E. Schubert. Business Litigation & Arbitration Lawyers. Avocats en litiges et arbitrages commerciaux . 20 Queen Street West, Suite 3000. Hearsay Exceptions. Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), . R. ules 801 – 807. California Evidence Code (CEC). §1200 - 1390. Governing Statutes. Rachel was assaulted by Jim, a wealthy entrepreneur. She suffered skin abrasions, bruises, and a black eye. . The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.. Questions calling for a Narrative answer/Narrating. Questions that are vague and allow for a long, drawn out answer are inappropriate. Session Agenda. What is hearsay?. Why is hearsay important?. Hearsay exceptions commonly used in child abuse cases. The impact of . Crawford v. Washington. on hearsay. Impact of . Crawford. on forensic interviews. Evidence Crash Course. Prof. Robert T. Sherwin. September 2, 2014. 1L Mock Trial. For 1L Mock, the rules provided that all evidentiary exhibits were pre-admitted.. The rules also limited the types of objections you could make.. P. JANICKE. 2012. 2012. Chap. 13 -- Authentication. 2. AUTHENTICATION. A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE. AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS. NEEDED BEFORE DOCUMENTS AND TANGIBLE THINGS ARE RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE. NOT NEEDED FOR TESTIMONY. P. JANICKE. 2018. ONLY “STATEMENTS. ” . CAN . BE . HEARSAY EVIDENCE – . CAN’T BE REVEALED IN COURT. MUCH HUMAN DISCOURSE IS NON-STATEMENT. 3. statements. UTTERANCES. MEANINGS. UTTERANCE = ANYTHING WE SAY OR WRITE. Prof. JANICKE. 2018. 2018. Chap. 4, part 2. 2. RULE 802 EXCLUDES MOST HEARSAY. BUT THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS. CONTEXT: THE EVIDENCE . IS . HEARSAY, BUT IS ALLOWED IN ANYWAY. 2018. Chap. 4, part 2. 3. TWO GROUPS OF EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE THAT HEARSAY EVIDENCE IS INADMISSIBLE. Evidence Rules Outside of Trials Thomas M. Hruz Overview What are the applicable rules? Scope of the Rules of Evidence. Administrative P roceedings. Arbitration. Why disparate treatment of evidentiary rules in trial vs. non-trial contexts? CHAPTER 4, PART C: EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE THAT HEARSAY IS INADMISSIBLE Prof. JANICKE 2019 2019 Chap. 4, part C 2 RULE 802 EXCLUDES MOST HEARSAY BUT THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS CONTEXT: THE EVIDENCE IS HEARSAY, BUT IS ALLOWED IN ANYWAY