Influences on P arliament Parliamentary Law Making Split into 3 parts Influences on Parliament How Parliament makes laws Parliamentary Supremacy Possible Questions Knowledge and Understanding ID: 745469
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Parliamentary Law Making – Part 1" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Parliamentary Law Making – Part 1
Influences on
P
arliament Slide2
Parliamentary Law Making
Split into 3 parts:
Influences on Parliament
How Parliament makes laws
Parliamentary SupremacySlide3
Possible Questions
Knowledge and Understanding:
Describe the influence of pressure groups on Parliament (10 marks)
Describe the influence of the media on Parliament (10 marks)
Describe the influence of the Law Commission on Parliament (10 marks)
Evaluation:
Briefly discuss advantages and disadvantages of the influence of pressure groups on Parliament (10 marks)
Briefly discuss advantages and disadvantages of the influence of the media on Parliament (10 marks)
Briefly discuss advantages and disadvantages of the influence of the Law Commission on Parliament (10 marks)Slide4
Questions
Knowledge - All 3 of these points for sound:
General description and meaning (incl. different types)
How, when and whom they can influence (differences of different types)
Examples of successful and unsuccessful campaigns
Evaluation Question
If asks for advantage and disadvantage – 2 of each, supported by examplesSlide5
Pressure Groups - general
Groups of people with a shared interest in getting the government to change the law in certain areas
Sectional/Interest Pressure Groups
–
further the interests of their own particular
section of society.
T
rade unions (e.g. National Union of Teachers) and professional associations (e.g. British Medical Association)
Cause Groups
–
promote a particular
idea or belief
. E.g. Greenpeace, Amnesty International
Insider Groups
–
have direct contact with government ministers and MPs (a lot of sectional groups)
Outsider Groups
–
don’t have access to decision makers and have to resort to direct action to promote their cause (e.g. Fathers4Justice)Slide6
How, When and Whom they can influence
Sectional
Major sectional groups like professional associations can be very influential as they
represent large or powerful groups
whose support the government needs to gain or retain.
Often
wealthy
and can afford to employ research staff and mount extensive publicity campaigns.
Likely to be
consulted
before Government introduces a bill affecting their interests.
Insider
Likely to be involved in drafting of a bill and may be consulted by ministers
Methods used by Pressure Groups:
Lobbying MPs which may result in consultations (insider)
Direct action - marches, demonstrations and strikes (outsider/cause)
P
etitions, publicity campaigns with adverts in the media, promotional literature,Slide7
Examples of how they can influence Parliament
Sectional:
E.g.
–
ban on smoking in public places
in July 2007 partly the result of lobbying by the British Medical Association
Cause:
E.g.
– RSPCA – a long established charity that has considerable support amongst British public – has campaigned for animal welfare legislation for many years using methods such as leafleting and multimedia advertising – promoted the Animal Welfare Bill which was passed as an Act in 2006 which requires owners to provide their pets with food, water, shelter, veterinary care and freedom to move about
E.g.
- Stonewall (outsider group) – successful campaign resulted in Parliament passing the Civil Partnerships Act in 2004 and legalising gay marriage in 2012
Individuals:
E.g.
Mary Whitehouse headed a campaign against child pornography which led to government introducing the
Protection of Children Act 1984
E.g.
Jamie Oliver was successful in promoting healthier meals in schools – TV series devoted to the cause which gained him support from many sectional groups e.g. National Union of Teachers and British Medical Association – in 2006 the Department for Education issued The Education (Nutritional Standards for School Food) Regulations containing similar provision to those suggested by Jamie Oliver.
In Response to Specific Events:
S
ometimes set up as a result of a tragic event.
E.g.
The Snowdrop Campaign – set up after the
Dunblane
massacre in 1996 – resulted in Parliament banning the private ownership of most types of handgunsSlide8
Advantages and Disadvantages of Pressure Groups
Advantages
Give the public and minorities a voice. Act as a safety valve for frustrations
e.g.
pro-hunting and anti-Iraq war protests
Help MPs keep in touch with what people think –
e.g.
pressure from environmental groups persuaded government to change car tax regulations to favour smaller more fuel-efficient cars and pressure from anti-smoking group ASH and doctors’ groups led to ban on smoking in public places in 2007
Raise public awareness of issues –
e.g.
Fathers4Justice successful through a variety of stunts in raising awareness of plight of fathers denied access to children after a divorce
Members have considerable expertise and can suggest detailed and well-thought-out law changes. Many groups have draft Bills ready for backbench MPs to introduce
Disadvantages
They are inevitably biased in favour of their interest or cause - campaigns may not represent an objective, balanced argument -
e.g.
Fathers4Justice rarely recognise that courts are genuinely attempting to achieve the best outcome for the children
Some large groups which represent powerful organisations are very influential and it is difficult for smaller groups to match their influence –
e.g.
Environmental groups claim the strength of the road lobby and airline industry means new roads and airport extensions are difficult to fight
Methods some groups use can be a problem –
e.g.
strikes and protests can cause disruption. Tactics of Fathers4Justice have been criticised. Methods can be criminal
e.g
. - members of Countryside Alliance broke into House of Commons as part of campaign in favour of fox hunting. Animal activists who damage scientific laboratories that experiment on animals
Groups may only represent a minority view when they are successful at changing the law –
e.g
. this was argued when the death penalty was abolished in 1966Slide9
Questions on Media
Knowledge - All 3 of the following:
What is the media?
How the media influences Parliament
Examples of the media influencing
Parliament
Evaluation Question
If asks for advantage and disadvantage – 2 of each, supported by examplesSlide10
What is the Media?
Television
Radio
Newspapers
Internet
Can represent public opinion and influence public opinion
All play a powerful role in bringing issues to the attention of the government
Media can also be used by pressure groups to highlight their interest or causeSlide11
How Media can influence Parliament
C
ampaigns, regular articles, features,
E.g. Daily Mail – often run headlines on immigration or asylum issues to try and achieve tighter controls
E.g. The Sun – consistently campaigns against what it sees as the growing influence of the EU on British life
Investigative Journalism
Panorama (TV programme) – often draws attention to abuses or scandalsSlide12
Examples of how Media has Influenced Parliament
News of the World - Name and Shame Campaign
– following the murder of Sarah Payne by a paedophile, it published details of known paedophiles. This forced the government to take action because the population was becoming increasingly alarmed by the revelations and there was also the worry of people being harmed by the public led to
Child Sex offender Disclosure Scheme
– People can apply to police to find out if an identified person who has contact with children is on Sex Offenders Register (police can refuse)
Daily Telegraph – Politicians Expenses Exposure
- played an important part in bringing about reform of the MPs expenses rules when it published details in 2009 showing what expenses some MPs were claiming. Led to
Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
which limits what Politicians can claim expenses for and oversees their claims. Also led to several resignations of worst offenders.Slide13
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages
Plays a powerful role in
brining issues to the attention of Parliament or government
and can force it to act – e.g. Daily Telegraph and MP expenses and News of the World and register of sex offenders
Coverage in newspapers and television/radio can
raise the public profile of an issue and add weight to public opinion
– this makes the government feel pressured to make legislative reforms – government is ultimately answerable to the electorate and fears losing favour with the public as this could lead to defeat in an election
Can
help the success of pressure groups
– e.g. Snowdrop campaign was publicised in the Daily Mail and television channels which helped them share their concerns with the government and the public
Disadvantages
Ownership
of British newspapers and other branches of the media is in the hands of a relatively small number of individuals
Newspapers often adopt views that reflect those of their owners
– e.g. Rupert Murdoch who owns The Sun, The Times, the Sunday Times and Sky television – has used these to project his own views, particularly his strong opposition to the EU
Concern about
the link between the media and politicians
– e.g. the appointment of Andy Coulson, former News of the World editor, as David Cameron’s director of communications in 2007 and the social contacts between David Cameron and Rebekah Brooks when she was editor of News of the World
Newspapers are in business to make a profit and will
publish material that will sell copies
- have a tendency to create panics by drawing attention to and often exaggerating issues, such as activities of paedophiles. Media may sometimes whip up public opinion, which can result in unwise legislation – arguably the case with the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991Slide14
Questions
Knowledge - Any 3 of:
What the Law Commission is and its aims
Codification (including example)
Consolidation (including example)
Repeal (including example)
Process of Law Commission
investigations
Evaluation Question
If asks for advantage and disadvantage – 2 of each, supported by examplesSlide15
What is the Law Commission and what is its aim?
Established by the
Law Commission Act 1965
Permanent
and
independent
A full-time staff headed up by
five Commissioners
Chairperson is a High Court Judge – responsible for promoting the work of the Commission and is its public face and voice
Other four members are from the legal professions and academic lawyers
All staff are legally trained
Aims - S3(1) Law Commission Act 1965
– role of Commission is to “keep under review all the law” – includes codification and consolidation, repealing obsolete law, simplification and modernisation of lawSlide16
How the Law Commission Influences Parliament –
Codification
Codification is
bringing together all of the law (both statutory and judgement)
on a particular topic into a single Act of Parliament
Draft Criminal Code was published in 1989
but has never become law
Commission has gradually accepted that its initial plans were over-ambitious and that codification of smaller areas is preferable
More recently, the Commission has selected areas of law and clarified them hoping to codify them at a later date
E.g.
The Land Registration Act 2002
and the
Fraud Act 2006
have been reformed in this waySlide17
How the Law Commission Influences Parliament –
Consolidation
Drawing together all the statutory provisions
relating to a particular area into one Act
About 5 Consolidation Bills produced each year
E.g. –
Education Act 1996
and
The Powers of Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000Slide18
How the Law Commission Influences Parliament –
Repeal
Recommends the
repeal of obsolete statutes
– removing laws that have no further use
Important to remove these Acts as they make research of the law more time-consuming and cause confusion
Statute Law (Repeals) Bill in 2012
recommended the repeal of nearly 800 old lawsSlide19
The
Process
of Law Commission Investigations
Commission has topics
referred to it by government departments
, or
may select a topic of its own
, which will be considered after the government has
approved
Pressure
to investigate an area of law may also come from other sources – e.g.
Criminal Attempts Act 1981
was a result of a Law Commission report prompted by academic pressure
Process:
Research
of the issue
Produce a working paper setting out the current law, the problems, and suggestions for reformConsultations with anyone interested in commenting on the issueProduce a report including a
draft BillGovernment decides whether to introduce the draft Bill into Parliament and implement the recommendationsE.g. – legislation which has resulted from this process includes the
Law Reform (Year and a Day Rule) Act
1996Slide20
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages
A
permanent non-political full-time body
and can investigate any area of law it believes to be in need of reform –
independent of the Government
Produces
draft Bills
ready for Parliament to introduce –
reduces the workload for ministers
Responsible for many
sensible changes to the law
– e.g.
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
, the
Fraud Act 2006
and the abolition of the
‘Year and a Day’ ruleCan undertake extensive research and engage in wide consultation
so its recommendations for law reform are well informed and this
helps avoid problems with the application of the law
Disadvantages
Parliament has often ignored the Commission’s proposals
- only about two thirds of its proposals have been implemented – often because governments cannot find time in the legislative programme for non-urgent law reform – e.g.
reform of the law on non-fatal offences
– recommended by the Law Commission in a report in 1993 and accepted by the Labour government of 1997 who produced a draft Bill in 1998 but they never implemented it
Further
lack of power
shown by the fact that
Government does not need to consult with the Commission on any new laws
Investigates as many as 20-30 areas at the same time
– may mean that each investigation is not as thorough as one carried out by a Royal Commission or a Commission of Inquiry