PPT-Propensity scores and causal inference using machine learning methods
Author : myesha-ticknor | Published Date : 2018-09-25
Austin Nichols Abt amp Linden McBride Cornell July 27 2017 Stata Conference Baltimore MD Overview Machine learning methods dominant for classificationprediction
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Propensity scores and causal inference u..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Propensity scores and causal inference using machine learning methods: Transcript
Austin Nichols Abt amp Linden McBride Cornell July 27 2017 Stata Conference Baltimore MD Overview Machine learning methods dominant for classificationprediction problems Prediction is useful for causal inference if one is trying to predict propensity scores probability of treatment conditional on observables. 1093panmpr013 Causal Inference without Balance Checking Coarsened Exact Matching Stefano M Iacus Department of Economics Business and Statistics University of Milan Via Conservatorio 7 I20124 Mila Overview:. What . do we use a propensity score for?. How do we construct the . propensity . score?. How do we implement propensity score estimation in STATA?. Joke (kind of…). Two heart surgeons (Jack and Jill) walk into a bar.. Making Sense of Non-Randomized Observational Data. Atul Sharma MD, MSc, FRCPC(ret). Biostatistical Consulting Unit. April 2014. Propensity score 1996 - 2013. RCT – the gold standard. R.A. Fisher: . Susan Athey, Stanford GSB. Based on joint work with Guido Imbens, Stefan Wager. References outside CS literature. Imbens and Rubin Causal Inference book (2015): synthesis of literature prior to big data/ML. Ling . Ning. &. . Mayte. . Frias. . Senior Research Associates. Neil . Huefner. . Associate Director. Timo. Rico. Executive Director. Outline. Understanding causal effects. Methods for estimating causal effects. Kenneth A. Frank . Guan Saw, UT San Antonio. AERA workshop April 4, 2014 (. AERA on-line video – cost is $95. ). Motivation . Statistical inferences are often challenged because of uncontrolled bias. There may be bias due to uncontrolled confounding . Sciences: QUICK EXAMPLES. #. konfoundit. Kenneth A. . Frank. Ran . Xu; Zixi . Chen. ; I-Chien Chen, Guan Saw. 2018. (. AERA on-line video – cost is . $105. ). Motivation . Statistical inferences are often challenged because of uncontrolled bias. There may be bias due to uncontrolled confounding . Gregory M Duncan. Amazon.com. University of Washington. and. All that stuff. Introduction. Vast data available today. hundreds . of billions of observations and millions of . features. A 100,000,000,000 x 1,500,000 dimensional . Dec 1. , 2016. Learn how to efficiently identify customers most likely to respond to marketing campaigns. 1. PRESENTERS. David Royal, . Client Success Manager. Keaton . Baughan. , . Product Manager. 2. Sciences: QUICK EXAMPLES. #. konfoundit. Kenneth A. . Frank. Ran . Xu; Zixi . Chen. ; I-Chien Chen, Guan Saw. 2018. (. AERA on-line video – cost is . $105. ). Motivation . Statistical inferences are often challenged because of uncontrolled bias. There may be bias due to uncontrolled confounding . CIMPOD 2017. “Putting the Methods into Practice”. 2. Days. 11. Speakers. 18. Workshops. Workshop presentation and materials will be available at . cimpod2017.org. For CIMPOD 2016, go to cimpod2016.org. Studies show early diagnosis may save USD 10-12K per patient. Study 1 – University of Wisconsin. Stage. Highest benefits at early stages (MMSE* 28). Costs. Drug therapy (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor). UNC Collaborative Core Center for Clinical Research Speaker Series. August 14, 2020. Jamie E. Collins, PhD. Orthopaedic. and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Department of . Nicolas . Borisov. . 1,. *, Victor . Tkachev. . 2,3. , Maxim Sorokin . 2,3. , and Anton . Buzdin. . 2,3,4. . 1. Moscow . Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Moscow Oblast, Russia. 2. OmicsWayCorp.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Propensity scores and causal inference using machine learning methods"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents
