PPT-A Program Logic for Concurrent Objects under Fair Scheduling

Hongjin Liang and Xinyu Feng University of Science and Technology of China USTC push7 x pop push6 Client code C java util concurrent void push. Tony Hoare. Lausanne 20 June 2011. Historical Survey. Discovery. deductive logic. constructive logic. temporal . logic. algebraic logic. Application Attribution. philosophy . Aristotle. geometry . Hanan . Rofe. . Haim. 6/1/15. Outline. Concurrent Copying. . . - Reminder. - Baker’s algorithm. . - Brook’s indirection barrier. . - Replication copying . - Multi-version copying. . - Sapphire algorithm- basics. Main-Memory Workloads. Iraklis. . Psaroudakis. (EPFL). , Tobias Scheuer (SAP AG), Norman May (SAP AG), Anastasia Ailamaki (EPFL). 1. Scheduling for high concurrency. 2. Queries >> H/W contexts. Presented by Eyal Dushkin. GC Seminar, Tel-Aviv University. 30.12.14. Outline of talk. Introduction. Tricolour Invariants (Reminder). Mostly Concurrent Mark & Sweep. Concurrent Marking and Sweeping. Use . WalkSAT. Use min-Conflict heuristic. Similar to hill climbing and simulated annealing. Pick unsatisfied clause then pick a symbol to flip to satisfy the clause by. Use Min Conflict. Or Random. Downside. Paolo . Baldan. . and. Silvia . Crafa. Universita. ’ . di. . Padova. Models of Concurrency. a | b = . a.b. + . b.a. a. a. b. b. Different . causal. properties. Different . distribution. properties. t. o Programming Language Semantics,. to Program Verification. Grigore . Rosu. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. 1. How it all started. 1996: Started PhD with Joseph . Goguen. Discovered Maude as “fast OBJ”, then rewriting logic. Tony Hoare. Lausanne 20 June 2011. Historical Survey. Discovery. deductive logic. constructive logic. temporal . logic. algebraic logic. Application Attribution. philosophy . Aristotle. geometry . Presented by Roman . Kecher. GC Seminar, Tel-Aviv University. 23-Dec-14. 1. Outline. General concurrent GC concepts. Incremental, mostly concurrent, “on-the-fly” collections. The lost object problem. Yvonne Watson. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. Purpose of Today’s Session. Overview of Logic Models. Logic Modeling Exercise. Wrap Up. 2. Why are we here?. Correct . Concurrent . Programs: . Fight Complexity Systematically and Efficiently. Moonzoo Kim. Computer Science, KAIST. Motivation for Concurrency Analysis. Most of my subjects . (. interviewee. ). Solution to a problem.. How can my customer purchase products from the Internet?. Most do 3 things. Input data. Process data. Output data. Writing a Computer Program. Determining what the problem is. Session I: Learning about Logic Models. Hosted by the [insert alliance here]. Moderator:. Presenter:. Date. Time. 1. Introductions. Workshop facilitator:. Participants:. Name and affiliation. 2. Agenda.  . Client-Server Software.  .  .  .  .  .  . Dr. M . Dakshayini. ,. Professor, Dept. of ISE, BMSCE, Bangalore. . 3.1 Introduction. The term . concurrency . refers . - real or apparent ....