/
Getting Published Getting Published

Getting Published - PowerPoint Presentation

natalia-silvester
natalia-silvester . @natalia-silvester
Follow
374 views
Uploaded On 2016-12-16

Getting Published - PPT Presentation

By Becky Gardner Lucy Monigle Tinus van Wyk TJ White Steps for a Scientific Paper Research 1 st author writes the draft Edited by coauthors Coauthors make comments Drafts are revised ID: 502246

journal reviewers peer published reviewers journal published peer process anonymous scientific paper paid rejection scooping choosing common scientist honor

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Getting Published" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Getting Published

By: Becky Gardner, Lucy Monigle, Tinus van Wyk, T.J. WhiteSlide2

Steps for a Scientific Paper

Research!

1

st author writes the draftEdited by coauthorsCoauthors make commentsDrafts are revisedManuscript ready for submissionProcess can take months but, the shorter the better!Slide3

Things to consider when choosing a Scientific JournalQuality PopularityReputation

Reviews

PrestigeWe like to think of choosing a journal like applying to college, the better the journal, the more it benefits your reputation. Slide4

Submit ManuscriptJournal editor sends manuscript to 2 anonymous peer reviewers. (extremely critical readers)There are 3 options:Accept (Rare)

Accept with Revision (Common)

Rejection (Some)Slide5

Peer Reviewers and Anonymous ReviewersAnonymous reviews are important for both social and professional reasons.

Good science is inevitable when anonymity is imposed and reviewers can be as honest and critical as need be without having to worry about being disliked.

Peer reviewers are chosen by the editors based on their credentials and qualifications. “Peers”, are usually scientist who have ample experience and expertise. Slide6

Justifications

for Rejection

Bad Science

Bad WritingDuplicationsDullNot what the Journals’ customers want to readSlide7

“Scooping

Scooping is a common phrase used in the scientific journal editorial process. Scooping occurs when the competition beats you to the chase. Slide8

How much does this process cost?

While it seems as though this would be an expensive process it actually does not involve money.

Having a paper published is strictly to get ones name and ideas publicized. Being published is an honor that comes with both respect and resignation. So despite the fact you do not get paid it is important to broadcast your work.

Peer reviewers are also not paid. It is an honor to review someone’s paper because it means you yourself have been recognized as a creditable, trusted scientist. Your job is to make sure “bad science” is not published and that in itself is admirable.Slide9

Recommended

Questions

1 What does one consider when choosing a scientific journal?

2 What is the importance of an anonymous review?

3. How is someone chosen to be a peer reviewer?

4. What is scooping?

5. How much do reviewers get paid?

6. Up to how long can the whole process take?

7. What are reasons for rejection?

8. Why is the importance of getting published?