/
Inside Zoological Collections: Perspectives of the Academic Inside Zoological Collections: Perspectives of the Academic

Inside Zoological Collections: Perspectives of the Academic - PowerPoint Presentation

natalia-silvester
natalia-silvester . @natalia-silvester
Follow
419 views
Uploaded On 2016-08-14

Inside Zoological Collections: Perspectives of the Academic - PPT Presentation

The Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections June 17 22 2013 Rapid City South Dakota Ixchel M Faniel PhD OCLC Research fanielioclcorg Institute for Museum and Library Services IMLS funded project led by Drs Ixchel Faniel PI amp Elizabeth Yakel c ID: 446731

reuse data information specimen data reuse specimen information museum research faniel consumers voucher digital winter oclc 2012 based collections

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Inside Zoological Collections: Perspecti..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Inside Zoological Collections: Perspectives of the Academic (Re)user

The Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections, June 17- 22, 2013, Rapid City, South Dakota

Ixchel M. Faniel, Ph.D.

OCLC Research

fanieli@oclc.orgSlide2

Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) funded project led by Drs. Ixchel Faniel (PI) & Elizabeth Yakel (co-PI)

Studying the intersection between data reuse and digital preservation in three academic disciplines to identify how contextual information about the data that supports reuse can best be created and preserved. Focuses on research data produced and used by quantitative social scientists, archaeologists, and zoologists.

The intended audiences of this project are researchers who use secondary data and the digital curators, digital repository managers, data center staff, and others who collect, manage, and store digital information.

For more information, please visit

http://www.dipir.org

Slide3

Research Motivations & Questions

What are the significant properties of quantitative social science, archaeological, and zoological data that facilitate reuse?

2. How can these significant properties be expressed as representation information to ensure the preservation of meaning and enable data reuse?

Faniel & Yakel 2011Slide4

The Research TeamSlide5

Methods Overview

ICPSR

Open Context

UMMZ

Phase 1: Project Start up

Interviews

Staff

10

Winter 2011

4

Winter 2011

10

Spring 2011

Phase 2: Collecting and analyzing user

data

Interviews

data

consumers

44

Winter 2012

22

Winter 2012

27

Fall 2012

Survey

data consumers

Over 1,600

Summer 2012

Web analytics

data

consumers

Server

logs

On

going

Observations

data consumers

10

Ongoing

Phase 3: Mapping significant properties as representation

informationSlide6

A Snapshot of the 27 Data Reusers

63%

96%

93%

reuse data

from colleagues

26%

reuse data from other

repositories and websites

reuse data from

museums and archives

37%

are systematists

study ecological trends

reuse data from

journal articles

26%Slide7

The Data Discovery Process

I knew from prior experience which museums had large collections of material from the part of the world I was

interested in (CAU19).

… we started from that [author] paper and then added to it from

other people’s work…So

mostly from…reading other people’s

papers

(CAU22).

I’m at the point now where people know that this is kind of

one of those things that I do. And so,

people say “Oh, I have this dataset”

or

“I know someone who has this dataset...

(CAU11).

…that

[aggregator repository]

targets

so many

different collections

that once you have access you know pretty much…You

can identify very quickly what you need

(CAU13).Slide8

Data Selection Criteria

Data coverage

Geographic precision

Matches another dataset

Availability of voucher specimen

Time period specimen collected

Condition of specimen

Sequence has been published

Results of pre-analysis

Identification or location errors

Relevant taxonomicallySlide9

Data selection based on research objectives

For things like measurement, you want a well-preserved specimen

that’s relatively straight and intact. (CAU01)

…often when it doesn’t meet my needs the most

obvious reasons would be there’s just not enough data or it doesn’t cover…Like

geographically it doesn’t cover the area I’m interested in well enough

(CAU03).

…that’s the first filter…looking for specific species. And then for me, yeah, it’s been mostly about the

geographic precision

of the data, to say whether or not I can use that record for something.

(CAU26).Slide10

Data selection based on other datasets

…we decide, okay, these georeferences have an error that is probably higher than, let’s say, five kilometers but our climate data is the resolution, the pixel size,…is may be 4.5 kilometers. So,

anything that is above that size of pixel that we have,

we actually cannot use

.

(CAU14)

I include it [the sequence] in my dataset, do the analyses

I’m going to do and then based on the results of those

analysis look to

see how those data match with the

data that I’ve collected

.

(CAU05)Slide11

Trusting the data

I can sort of qualitatively assess what the quality of taxonomicdata might be just by it being, having some mention of the

museum record. I know [a] …museum worker

who is often... I don't know about an expert in say, my group, but at least

has access to the relevant literature to make good

taxonomic decisions

about those fishes from which they took the tissue.

(CAU02)

I would go back to the literature to

look at the paper it came from

. I guess there is also to some degree the particular

researchers’

that actually produced that sequence; I might actually know their

reputations

or what they kind of work on and trust it more or less.

(CAU12)

Slide12

Trusting the data

A lot of times, it's just a matter of looking at what the Latin name is that they supply because I can't really make a decision based on the information that I'm given. If I had a picture, I could use that

when I'm taking into account their ability to identify something. But the main way that I do it is by looking at the geography

of where

they claim a specimen is located

.

(CAU17)

Well, if there's

a voucher specimen

available then I can request that specimen from the museum where it's housed,

re-examine it, confirm or deny that it is that particular species. If the voucher's there and it's the right species, then I have to go with it.

If the voucher is not there, and I really question the identification

…Because it's unreliable in my mind.

(CAU20)Slide13

Acknowledgements

Institute of Museum and Library Services Elizabeth Yakel, Co-PIPartners: Nancy McGovern, Ph.D. (MIT), Eric Kansa, Ph.D. (Open Context), William Fink, Ph.D. (University of Michigan Museum of Zoology)

OCLC Fellow: Julianna Barrera-GomezStudents: Adam Kriesberg, Morgan

Daniels, Rebecca

Frank, Jessica Schaengold, Gavin Strassel, Michele DeLia, Kathleen Fear, Mallory Hood,

Molly Haig, Annelise

Doll, Monique LoweSlide14

Questions?

Ixchel Faniel fanieli@oclc.org