Ronald W Hepburn Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature Defending Outstanding natural beauty against depredation Value of nature vs values of industry aesthetic appreciation of nature ID: 158450
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Trivial and serious in aesthetic appreci..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Trivial and serious in aesthetic appreciation of nature
Ronald W. HepburnSlide2
Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature
Defending “Outstanding natural beauty” against depredation
Value of nature vs. values of industry
“aesthetic appreciation of nature”?
“Beauty” narrow vs. wide senseSlide3
Duality in Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature
s
ensuous component:
Thought-component:
-implicit comparison -analogies to bear on the concrete particulars -modification of awareness, in which feeling, thought, and perception all interactEx). The fall of an autumn leaf
sense of immediacy, in the purest case one is taken aback by nature.
-the sky color-effect, or the rolling away of cloud or mist from a landscapeSlide4
Perception-and-reflection
Perception:
attentive, inattentive, discriminating, or undiscriminating, lively or lazy
Reflective-component:
feeble or stereotypical, original, individual, or exploratoryTrivial: to the extent that it distorts, ignores, suppresses truth about its objects, feels and thinks about them in ways that falsify how nature really is. “Detached viewer”Deepening of seriousness: “realization that I am myself one with, part of, the nature over against me”Serious approach is a self-explorationSlide5
Superficial and “Seriousness”
Superficial reading of nature:
Objects will tend to have an invariable univocal expressive quality
Bland unawareness of potential variability and endless modification of qualities
“Seriousness” or “depth” not simply correlated to intensity or fullness of thought-content-may neutralize or trivialize when fail to fuse thought with perceptual contentSlide6
Another important duality
Considering and contemplating nature in its own terms
-Respecting natures own forms, structures, and sequences
Problems with serious goal of considering and contemplating nature in its own terms:
“in-its-own-terms” might prompt us to supply a scientific thought component U-valley exampleSlide7
Problem with “respect”
Natures limited respect for its individuals
Vulnerability and brevity of individual life
Disturbing thought-content
Working with a scale“Between the extremes, we might find an acceptable ideal for serious aesthetic perception in encouraging ourselves to enhance the thought-load almost to the point, but not beyond the point, at which begins to overwhelm the vivacity of particular perception” Slide8
2
nd
approach to the forms of nature:
The forms of nature are annexed in imagination, interiorized, the external made internal
-range: universally intersubjective (shareable, though not universal), to individual and personalMetaphor“Invisible world”“Messages”Dreamlike element of nature *any discrediting in each case is the work of literalism. Naively serious, and thus trivial.Slide9
“Is it possible, however, to be moved by skeptical thoughts which suggest that the
whole
of this area of experience is nothing other than trivial, that aesthetic experience of nature—being founded on a variety of illusions—
can never really be serious
?”Aesthetic experiences of nature because they are dependent on anthropocentric factors such as scale, viewpoint, and perspective may be fleeting and unstable.Mountain Viewpoint
-view from a cliff vs. view from aircraftSlide10
Creative role in fashioning aesthetic object: “The appreciators of nature have to find their viewpoint, decide on the boundaries of attention, generate the thought content”
Assumptions about “authority”
Readiness to conform, factor of trivialization
Failure to realize how deeply dependent our aesthetic appreciation of nature is on scale and individual viewpoint is to trivializeSlide11
Concluding thoughts
Objectivizing and
antiobjectivizing
movements of the mind
-on the one hand he wants objective truth pursued by science (provided it does not carry us beyond what can be incorporated in perceptual experience) -on the other hand, it has no stronger or more serious claim to aesthetic attention than has the illusory.What exactly is Hepburn's position in the end?
“We are free to respect, or to ignore, the objectivizing option. To feel bound to always pursue it is not really to show commitment to so-called seriousness, but rather to show a profound misunderstanding of the aesthetic. Or would that be simply and shockingly, at the very end, to capitulate to the trivializers?”