/
Financing Urban Services and Investment: Need to Ensure a Fair Share from Multinational Financing Urban Services and Investment: Need to Ensure a Fair Share from Multinational

Financing Urban Services and Investment: Need to Ensure a Fair Share from Multinational - PowerPoint Presentation

nersonvisa
nersonvisa . @nersonvisa
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-15

Financing Urban Services and Investment: Need to Ensure a Fair Share from Multinational - PPT Presentation

M Govinda Rao Member Independent Commission for the reform of International Corporate Taxation Presentation Scheme Urban areas Engines of Development Critical role of urban services and infrastructure in development Critical role in developing countries ID: 777997

urban tax taxes services tax urban services taxes property multinationals infrastructure developing countries sources charges traditional resources critical development

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Financing Urban Services and Investment:..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Financing Urban Services and Investment: Need to Ensure a Fair Share from Multinational Corporations

M. Govinda Rao

Member, Independent Commission for the reform of International Corporate Taxation

Slide2

Presentation Scheme

Urban areas: Engines of Development. Critical role of urban services and infrastructure in development. Critical role in developing countries.

Who should pay for urban services and infrastructure? Theory

Traditional sources of financing urban services and infrastructure: user charges, property taxes, developmental charges.

Constraints in generating required resources from traditional sources;

Free riding by multinationals: Base erosion and profit shifting. Use if urban infrastructure for business development without paying taxes.

ICRICT Recommendations to enforce tax payment by multinationals

Slide3

Urban Areas: Engines of Development

Three important reasons for focusing on urban finance:

Innovation -key to prosperity; most innovations occur in large cities - interaction and exchange of ideas. Cities provide a critical mass to support high degree of division of

labour

, knowledge, business services, infrastructure, institutions and media.

Globally competitive cities should provide a wide range of services to attract human capital: transportation, water, sewers garbage collection and disposal, police, fire protection, parks, recreation and culture, affordable housing and social assistance.

All these require significant resources: Raising resources to finance these urban services holds the key to making urban centres a leading edge of economic dynamism.

Most developing countries suffer from acute infrastructure and services deficit in urban areas.

Slide4

Principles of Local Finance

Revenue Assignment According to comparative advantage: Broad based taxes with the Centre; provision of Services at Local level.

Transfers are inevitable – but it is important to link

revenue–expenditure decisions

at the margin. This requires

assignment of independent revenue sources.

Local taxes should satisfy the criteria of:

Sufficiently productive and buoyant;

Put the burden on the beneficiaries.

Least distorting: Should mainly tax immobile bases. Should not create impediments for the smooth flow of commodities and people.

Visible for accountability.

Slide5

Inadequacy of Traditional Sources

Traditional sources of financing urban services are user charges, property taxes. Urban infrastructure is financed through developmental charges and municipal bonds.

The levy of property taxes un developing countries is abysmal. Difficulties in assessing market values. Municipal bond markets undeveloped. Transfers are inadequate as the tax/GDP ratios are low.

Free-riding by multinational corporations. Reduce their payment for services, property taxes and BEPS.

While these corporations use public services intensively to make large profits, they do not make commensurate payments in terms of user charges, property taxes and even the income taxes by creating branches in low tax jurisdictions and evading the tax.

Slide6

Evasion and Avoidance of Taxes by Multinationals

Tax evasion and wilful avoidance by multinational is a matter of concern in DCs. Robs them off critical resources.

Tax avoidance is done by creating a web of complex subsidiaries located in tax havens by:

Artificially allocating profits

taking advantage of tax treaties;

Manipulating prices in related party transactions;

Intangibles- (goodwill, brand recognition, intellectual property right, patents

etc

) difficult to apply TP rules.

Loans and interest payments.

Slide7

Examples of Base Erosion

UN Public Accounts Committee, 2011:

Starbucks - £ 8.6 million since 1998

Amazon - £ 1.8 million in £ 207 million – 1%.

Google - $ 18 billion in revenues paid $.16 million during 2006-11.

US Senate Committee:

Microsoft avoided U. S Corporate tax on 47% of its US sales transferring intellectual property rights to Puerto

Rico. Similar findings on Hewlett –

P

ackard, Apple and Caterpillar

India- Corporation tax paid by multinationals were much lower

t

han domestic companies. Vodafone case.

Flipcart

and other e-commerce companies.

In the Southeast Asian region – Singapore and Hong Kong are low tax jurisdictions

Slide8

Measures to Tackle Base Erosion

G-20: BEWPS programme – 15 point recommendation relating to harmonizing the tax systems to avoid competition, international cooperation, information exchange etc.

Many developing countries feel that the measures should go beyond. Initiative should be more inclusive.

Coalition of Civil Society Organizations for tax justice -ActionAid

, Alliance-

Sud

, CCFD-Terre

Solidaire

, Christian Aid, the Council for Global Unions, the Global Alliance for Tax Justice, Oxfam, Public Services International, Tax Justice Network and the World Council of

Churches – has appointed ICRICT which has important recommendations.

34 recommendations:

http://www.icrict.org/declaration/

Slide9

ICRICT Recommendations

T

he

multinationals

to

be taxed as a single

unit.

M

odel

bilateral and multilateral agreement

to apportion revenues

and costs attributable to each

subsidiary, even when they are taxed as unified entities;

Ownership based on objective factors such as sales or employment to attribute

intellectual property

revenues.

Avoid race to the bottom; declare tax preferences transparently.

Strengthen administration and enforcement and make abusive tax practices a criminal offence.

Evolve a model withholding system

Force multinationals too file country by country reports on the businesses and advance pricing agreements – greater transparency.

Reform tax

treaties to avoid

restrictions

on tax withholding, measures to prevent double non-taxation, and include general anti avoidance rules the model tax

treaties.

Slide10

Concluding Remarks

Abusive tax practices is a matter of great concern for developing countries.

Technological advances and emergence of e-commerce has posed severe challenges to tax administration.

Developing countries are handicapped with poor tax administration and can not match the multinationals.

Collective action need of the hour.

Upgrade UN

Committee of Experts

into

an international commission to oversee

compliance – We need a World Tax Authority.

Slide11

THANK YOU