RPO 2734 and OCC 2073during imitation Further there was a significant difference F725 pin error ratesbetween imitation 2804 and control 1984 task in LPO Likewise there was a s ID: 938338
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "6BrainResearch Institute David Geffen Sc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
6BrainResearch Institute, David Geff
en School of Medicine at UCLA, Los A
ngeles, CA, USA7UCSF School of Medic
ine, San Francisco, CA, USA RPO (27.
34%) and OCC (20.73%)during imitatio
n. Further, there was a significant
difference (F=7.25, p)in error rates
between imitation (28.04%) and contr
ol (19.84%) task in LPO. Likewise, t
here was a significantdifference (F=
10.14, p)in error rates between imit
ation (27.34%) and control (17.66%)
taskin RPO. No differences 11.2522.
5556.748.733.32018.7518.7567.5102.56
.257.5 412, 319-341.Aziz-Zadeh, L.,
Maeda, F., Zaidel, E., Mazziotta, J.
& Iacoboni, M. (2002) Lateralizatio
n inmotor facilitation during action
observation: a TMS study. Ishikura
, T. & Inomata, K. (1995) Effects of
angle of model demonstration on lea
rning of motorskill. Percept Mot Ski