/
EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoAdissertation EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoAdissertation

EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoAdissertation - PDF document

okelly
okelly . @okelly
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2021-09-01

EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoAdissertation - PPT Presentation

EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomyCopyright2020byChristopherMLako1AbstractEssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoDoctorofPhilosophyinBusinessAdministrationUniversityofCalifornia ID: 874578

ects xede 2018 12m xede ects 12m 2018 chapter1 thelong disjointperiodoftime foreachmergednon 2016 2014 3yrhpii tstatisticsinparentheses rms chapter2 chapter3

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomyb..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomyb
EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoAdissertationsubmittedinpartialsatisfactionoftherequirementsforthedegreeofDoctorofPhilosophyinBusinessAdministrationintheGraduateDivisionoftheUniversityofCalifornia,BerkeleyCommitteeincharge:ProfessorNancyWallace,ChairProfessorMartinLettauProfessorEmiNakamuraProfessorDavidSraerSpring2020 EssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomyCopyright2020byChristopherMLako 1AbstractEssaysinHousingMarketsandtheRealEconomybyChristopherMLakoDoctorofPhilosophyinBusinessAdministrationUniversityofCalifornia,BerkeleyProfessorNancyWallace,ChairThisdissertationconsistsofthreechaptersonthee ectsthathousingmarketshaveontherealeconomy.IntheUnitedStates,personalrealestatehadanaggregatemarketvalueof$30trillionin2019.1Additionally,dataonrealestatetransactionsandtheunderlyingloansandpropertiesareextremelyhighquality,therebymakingrealestateanidealempiricallaboratory.The rstchaptershowsthatmortgagecreditaccessisvitalforsmallbusiness nancingandalleviatingcreditconstraints.Todothis,Irelyonmicro-datafromamergeofthepersonalhomeequityextractionactivityofbusinessownerstothecon dentialIRStaxrecordsoftheirbusinesses.Withdirectmeasurement,I ndthatoneoutoffoursmallbusinessescreatedduringthemid-2000swerefundedbypersonalhomeequity,doubletheratepreviouslythoughtbasedonevidencefromsurveydata.Entrepreneursusetheirpersonalhomeequitytoalleviatecreditconstraints,whichthischapter ndshasalong-rune ectonboththesurvivalandemploymentlevelsofsmallbusinesses.Notonlyarenewbusinessescreditconstrained,butexistingsmallbusinessesalsofacecreditconstraintsthathaveapersistente ect.FollowingtheGreatRecession,restrictionstomortgagecreditaccesshavecausedone-thirdofthedeclinein rmentryratesinthepost-crisisperiod.Inthesecondchapter,Ishowhowvariationsinpersonalhousingwealthfeedsintoprofes-sionalbehaviorthroughstudyingmutualfundmanagers.Theliteratureonovercon dencein nancialmarketsh

2 asprimarilyfocusedonretailinvestors.Usin
asprimarilyfocusedonretailinvestors.Usingnoveldatathatiden-ti esthepersonalrealestateholdingsoffundmanagers,thischapterstudiesthedegreetowhichovercon dencea ectsthereturnsandinvestmentbehaviorofinstitutionalinvestors.Positiveshockstothepersonalrealestateofmutualfundmanagersshouldnota ecttheirprofessionalbehavior.However,thischapter ndsthataonestandarddeviationpositivehomepriceshockleadstoadeclinein4-factoralphaof37bpsperyear.Thisisduetofundmanagersbecomingovercon dentintheirunderperformingtradingpositions,makingworsesellingchoices,andtradingmorefrequently.Fundmanagerswhoaremorelikelytobea ectedbyovercon dence,suchaslesseducatedandlessexperiencedfundmanagers, 1Source:FederalReserveFlowofFunds 2showamuchstrongerresponse.Thischapterprovidesevidencethatovercon denceistimevaryingandshowshowinstitutionalinvestorsrespondtobehavioralshocksthatshouldbeorthogonaltotheirprofessionalduties.Inthethirdchapter,I,alongwithmyco-authors,AyaBellicha,RichardStanton,andNancyWallace,studyhowthevastoutstandingstockofmortgagedebta ectsU.S.Treasurybondyields.WeproposeanempiricaldurationmeasureforthestockofU.S.AgencyMBSthatappearstobelesspronetomodelriskthanmeasuressuchastheBarclaysE ectiveDurationmeasure.We ndthatthismeasuredoesnotappeartohaveastronge ectonthe12-monthexcessreturnsoften-yearTreasuriesaswouldbeexpectedifshockstoMBSdurationleadtocommensurateshockstothequantityofinterestrateriskbornebyprofessionalbondinvestors(Hanson,2014;Malkhozov,Mueller,Vedolin,andVenter,2016).Giventhisnegativereducedformresult,wethenexplorethemortgageandtreasuryhedgingactivitiesoftheprimaryMBSinvestorssuchascommercialbanks,insurancecompanies,theagencies,theFederalReserveBank,mutualfunds,andforeigninvestors.We ndthattheonlyinvestorsthatmayfollowthemodelsofHanson(2014)andMalkhozovetal.(2016)arelifeinsurance rms.Wealso ndarelationwithbankshoweverwecannotruleoutthatthisismerelycorrelation.Li

3 feinsurance rmmarketsharehasdeclined
feinsurance rmmarketsharehasdeclinedovertheperiod,droppingbelow10%since1996andreaching4%in2016.Oftheinvestorswearenotabletostudy,hedgefundsandpensions/retirementfundsarethetwoinvestorgroupsthatmaytradealongtheHanson(2014)andMalkhozovetal.(2016)models.However,althoughthesetwoinvestorgroupsheldalmost25%oftheAgencyMBSmarket(includinghouseholdsandnonpro torganizations)inthelate1990s,postcrisistheirsharehasfallenbelow10%. iTomyfather iiContentsContentsiiListofFiguresivListofTablesvi1TheLong-RunE ectsofMortgageCreditAccessonEntrepreneurship11.1Introduction....................................11.2DataandtheFundingofSmallBusinessesByHousingEquity........41.3IntensiveMarginImpactofCreditConstraints.................71.4DeclineinRe nancingActivityandBusinessFormation............211.5Conclusion.....................................261.6FiguresandTables................................282PersonalWealthShocksandInvestmentManagerOvercon dence542.1Introduction....................................542.2HomePriceVariation...............................562.3Data........................................582.4EmpiricalResultsonPerformance........................602.5TradingBehavior.................................642.6AttentiontoHomePriceGrowth........................682.7Conclusion.....................................692.8FiguresandTables................................713DurationMeasurementandHedgingChannelsforGSEInsuredMort-gageBackedSecurities893.1Introduction....................................893.2Duration......................................913.3EvidenceforMBSInvestorHedging.......................973.4Conclusions....................................1033.5FiguresandTables................................104Bibliography124 iiiAAppendixtoChapter1132A.1Merges.......................................132A.2HomeEquityExtractionDatafromATTOM..................135A.3AppendixFiguresforChapter1.........................137BAp

4 pendixtoChapter2139B.1AdditionalRobustne
pendixtoChapter2139B.1AdditionalRobustnessTests...........................139B.2AppendixTablesforChapter2.........................141 ivListofFigures1.1HomeEquityExtractionandFirmEntryRates..................281.2ShareofSmallBusinessesFoundedwithHomeEquityFundingByRegion...291.3Identi cationSetup..................................301.4Identi cationIllustration...............................311.5Di erenceinDistancefromHometoFirmBetweenTreatedandControl....321.6Di erenceinPropensitytoRe nanceWithaTraditionalBankBetweenTreatedandControl......................................331.7HomePriceGrowthExample............................341.8LoanTerminationRates...............................352.1ComparisonofAverageSalaryandHomeValuesforInvestmentManagers...712.2BostonMetroAreaZipCodeLevelHomePriceGrowth..............722.3Comparisonof3-yearHomePriceGrowthforNeighboringZipCodes......722.4NumberandShareofFundManagersMerged...................732.5HeterogeneousE ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha:1..........742.6HeterogeneousE ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha:2..........752.7HeterogeneousE ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha:3..........762.8Distributionof1-yearChangesin3-yearHomePriceGrowth...........772.9ShareofFundManagersExtractingHomeEquityandAmountofHomeEquityExtracted.......................................783.1ComparisonofBarclaysE ectiveDurationandEmpiricalDuration.......1043.2ComparisonofDurationMeasures(EmpiricalandBarclayse ective)AgainstTerminationMeasure.................................1053.3DistributionofAgencyandGSEBackedSecuritiesHoldingsbyInvestorGroup1063.4DistributionofUSTreasuryHoldingsbyInvestorGroup.............1073.5FannieMaeandFreddieMacDerivativesPortfolios................1083.6ComparisonofGSERetainedPortfolioReportingtoCongressvsFederalReserveFlowofFunds.....................................1093.7BankMBSPass-ThroughHoldings.........................1093.8BankRatioofTreasuri

5 estoAssets.........................1103.
estoAssets.........................1103.9ShareofUSTreasuryDebtHeldbyChinaandJapan...............111 vA.1ShareofSmallBusinessesFoundedwithHomeEquityFundingByFirmSize..137A.2ShareofEntrantSmallBusinessWithFewerThan10Employees........138A.3ShareofMortgageOriginationbyIndependentMortgageBanks.........138 viListofTables1.1SummaryStatisticsforLBD.............................361.2SummaryStatisticsofEntrantBusinessFinancingSources............371.3SummaryStatisticsBetweenTreatedandControlMembersforEntrantBusinessMatching.......................................381.4SummaryStatisticsofEntrantBusinessMatchedSample.............391.5E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessSurvival...............401.6E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessEmployment.............411.7E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessEmploymentGrowthRates.....421.8E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessPayroll................431.9SummaryStatisticsComparingEntrantBusinessesbyInitialFundingSource..441.10ComparingDi erencesinBusinessesandEntrepreneursByInitialFundingSource451.11ComparingDi erencesinPersonalForeclosureOutcomeByInitialFundingSource461.12SummaryStatisticsofContinuingBusinessMatchedSample...........471.13SummaryStatisticsBetweenTreatedandControlMembersforContinuingBusi-nessMatching.....................................481.14E ectofCreditAccessonContinuingBusinessSurvival..............491.15E ectofCreditAccessonContinuingBusinessEmployment...........501.16E ectofCreditAccessonContinuingBusinessPayroll..............511.17ExtensiveMarginE ectsofRe nancingActivityonBusinessFormation....521.18RobustnessTestsforExtensiveMarginInstrument................532.1SummaryStatisticsComparingtheMergedandNotMergedPopulations....792.2E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha....................802.3E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundFlow....................812.4E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlphaforIndexandPassiveFunds...822.5E ectof

6 HomePriceGrowthonFundAlphabySecondHomeOw
HomePriceGrowthonFundAlphabySecondHomeOwnershipStatus832.6E ectofHomePriceGrowthonReturnsforBuyandSellTrades:1.......842.7E ectofHomePriceGrowthonReturnsforBuyandSellTrades:2.......852.8E ectofChangesinHomePriceGrowthonActiveTradingPerformance....862.9E ectofHomePriceGrowthonRiskTaking....................872.10E ectofHomeEquityExtractiononFundPerformance.............883.1E ectofMBSDurationonTreasuryExcessBondReturns............112 vii3.2E ectofMortgageTerminationsonTreasuryExcessBondReturns.......1133.3E ectofGSEHedgingPortfoliosonTreasuryExcessBondReturns.......1143.4E ectofChangeinGSEHedgingPortfoliosonChangeinTreasuryExcessBondReturns........................................1153.5E ectofMBSDurationonBankTreasuryBondHoldingsforBanksWithMBSHoldings........................................1163.6E ectofMBSDurationonBankTreasuryBondHoldingsforBanksWithoutMBSHoldings.....................................1173.7E ectofChangeinBarclaysE ectiveMBSDurationonChangeinForeignTrea-suryBondHoldings..................................1183.8E ectofChangeinEmpiricalMBSDurationonChangeinForeignTreasuryBondHoldings....................................1193.9E ectofMBSDurationonMutualFundTreasuryBondHoldings........1203.10E ectofChangeinMBSDurationonChangeinMutualFundTreasuryBondHoldings........................................1213.11E ectofBarclaysE ectiveMBSDurationonLifeInsuranceCompanyTreasuryBondPurchases....................................1223.12E ectofEmpiricalMBSDurationonLifeInsuranceCompanyTreasuryBondPurchases.......................................123B.1E ectWithinCommutingZonebyTimeofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha142B.2E ectofHomePriceGrowthonVariousFundReturnMeasures.........143B.3E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha,UsingEx-AnteInformation....144B.4E ectof2and4-YearHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha............145B.5E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFu

7 ndAlphaforFundManagersWhoSurvivedAtLeast
ndAlphaforFundManagersWhoSurvivedAtLeast12(36)Months...............................146 viiiAcknowledgmentsIamdeeplygratefultothemanypeoplewhohaveassistedandguidedmeinmydoctoralstudies.First,IwouldliketothankNancyWallace,mydissertationchair,forherguidance,support,andimmensewealthofknowledge.Icannotimagineamoresupportive,helpful,andencouragingadvisor.Iamalsogratefultomyothercommitteemembers,MartinLettau,EmiNakamura,andDavidSraer,whoseinputandguidancehelpedshapedmyresearch.IalsooweaspecialthankyoutoAmirKermaniandChristopherPalmerwhoprovidedearlymentoringandtrainingwhileIwastheirResearchAssistant.Icouldnothavecompletedmythirdchapterwithoutmyco-authors,AyaBellicha,RichardStanton,andNancyWallace,whospentlonghoursdiscussingourresearch,whichhelpedtrainmeasaneconomist.Inadditiontothefacultymentioned,IamgratefulforallofthefacultyinboththeHaasSchoolofBusinessandtheEconomicsdepartmentwhotaughtme,attendedmyseminars,andwerealwayswillingtomeetoneononetodiscussmyresearch.Ithankmyparentswhoraisedmeandalwayspushedmetofocusonmyeducation.IamespeciallygratefultomylatefatherwhoencouragedandsupportedmydesiretopursueaPhD.Ialsothankmyhusband,whomovedtoCaliforniaafterhispost-doc,forhelpingprovideasourceofsupportthroughmyPhD.Iapologizeforthelonghoursandforoftenbeingdistracted.MyfriendsoutsidethePhDprogramwereimmenselyhelpfulinprovidinganoutletoutsideacademiaanddistractionfromresearch.Priortomydoctoralstudies,IworkedinindustryatFreddieMac.Thisperiodhelpedmegainthetechnicalexpertiseandinstitutionalknowledgethatassistedmeinmydoctoralwork.IwouldliketothanktheeconomiststhatIworkedwith,ZhengLiu,JanLuytjes,FrankNothaft,andHanqingZhou,aswellasmydirectorCharlesMcKinney,whoencouragedmetopursuemyPhD.Iamalsoverythankfultomyfellowclassmates.IamluckytohavehadmycohortasastudygroupduringthecourseworkphaseofthePhDandforthefriendshipsthatweforged.Fromfeedbackinpre-seminar,totalkingcasuallyintheoceoroverco ee,todinnerconversations,andeverythinge

8 lseinbetween,myfellowclassmateshavebeeni
lseinbetween,myfellowclassmateshavebeeninvaluable.Lastly,IamgratefulforhavingaccesstoboththePhDoceatHaasandtheFisherCenterforRealEstateandUrbanEconomics.LindaAlgazalli,ThomasChappelear,MelissaHacker,CharlesMontague,andLisaVillalbaprovidedexceptionalsupportnavigatingtheadministrativeissuesduringmyPhD.Additionally,ThomasChappelearprovidedexcep-tionaleditingservicesformythesis,aswellasbeingagreatresourceoverall.PauloIsslerhasbuiltanamazingresearchlabanddatainfrastructure,withoutwhichIwouldnothavebeenabletocompletemyresearch,andwasalwayswillingtodiscussmyresearch.Lastly,IwouldliketothankAngelaAndruswhoprovidedguidancewiththeapprovalprocessforCensusdataandassistanceworkingwiththedata. 1Chapter1TheLong-RunE ectsofMortgageCreditAccessonEntrepreneurship1.1IntroductionFormosthouseholds,personalhousingequityisthelargestsourceofsavings(Campbell,2006).Incorporate nance,pledgingdurableassetssuchasrealestateisacommonwaytoalleviatecreditconstraints(KiyotakiandMoore,1997),makingthelinkbetweenmortgagecreditaccessandsmallbusiness nancinganaturalone.Thispapershowsthatthepersonalhomeequityofentrepreneurswasusedtofundoneoutoffoursmallbusinessescreatedduringthemid-2000s,highlightingthevitalroleofmortgagecreditasafundingsourceforsmallbusinesses.Thisrolewaspreviouslygreatlyunderestimatedintheliterature.SincetheGreatRecession,theshareofnew(entrant)smallbusinessesfundedwithpersonalhomeequityhasfallentooneoutoftwenty.Variationinthesupplyofmortgagecredita ectstheabilityofsmallbusinessestofundprojects.Ontheintensivemargin,thispaper ndsthatbothentrantsmallbusinesses(thoseintheir rstyearofoperation)andcontinuingsmallbusinesses(thosethathavesurvivedatleastthreeorfouryears)faceseverecreditconstraintsthatleadtoapermanentdisadvantage.1Furthermore,tightermortgagecreditstandardsexplainone-thirdofthedeclinein rmentryratessince2006.Explicitlyshowingthelinkbetweenmortgagecreditandentrepreneurshipisdicultduetoal

9 ackofindividualleveldatathatshowsbothent
ackofindividualleveldatathatshowsbothentrepreneursextractingpersonalhousingequityandalongitudinalpanelofbusinessoutcomes.Thishasledpastresearchtoproxyforentrepreneursextractinghousingequitywithchangesinhousingwealth,andtolargelyfocusontheextensivemarginofentryintoentrepreneurship(CorradinandPopov,2015;Kerr, 1Theintensivemargine ectforentrant rmsshowshowinitialsize,long-runsize,andsurvivalarea ectedbyexogenousrelaxationsincreditconstraintsinthe rstyearofoperation(conditionalonentry).Asopposedtotheextensivemargine ect,whichwouldshowhowthechoicetostartabusinessisa ectedbyexogenousrelaxationsincreditconstraints.Theintensivemargine ectforcontinuing rmsshowshowsize,long-runsize,andsurvivalarea ectedbyexogenousrelaxationsincreditconstraintsinyearthreeorfour(for rmsthathavesurvivedforatleastthreeoffouryears,respectively). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP2Kerr,andNanda,2015;Adelino,Schoar,andSeverino,2015).Consequently,the ndingsofthesepapershavebeenmixedandasaresult,thedegreetowhichsmallbusinessesarecreditconstrainedremainsanopenquestionintheacademicliterature(HurstandLusardi,2004).Thispapercontributestothisliteraturebyconstructinganovelhousehold- rmlinkedpaneldatasetfrommultipleadministrativedatasets,includingtherestricteduseLongitudinalBusinessDatabase(LBD).Withthesedata,thispapermorepreciselyestimatestheresponseofsmallbusinessestorelaxationsintheircreditconstraints,estimateslong-rune ects,andseparatelyshowsthee ectforbothentrant(conditionalonentry)andcontinuingsmallbusinesses.Thispapershowsthatasmallexogenousincreaseinavailablecreditatentrycausessmallbusinessestostartlarger,growfaster,permanentlyremainlarger,andhavehigherhighersurvivalrates(measuredoutto veyears).Initialfundinghasanirreversiblee ectonsmallbusinesses.Forevery$88,000increaseinasmallbusiness'screditaccessatentry,oneadditionaljobiscreated.Similarly,conti

10 nuingsmallbusinessesstronglyandimmediate
nuingsmallbusinessesstronglyandimmediatelyrespondtocreditshocks.Whensmallcontinuingbusinessesreceiveapositivecreditshock,theyimmediatelyexpandandpermanentlyremainlarger.Forcontinuing rms,a$153,000creditshockcreatesoneadditionaljob(implyingthattheyarelessconstrainedthanentrant rms).Schmalz,Sraer,andThesmar(2017)establishthatthereisapersistentimpactofcreditconstraintsatentryforbusinessesregisteredin1998inFrance.Thispapercomple-mentstheirsbyshowingthatthepersistente ectatentryholdsforthemorerecentperiodintheUnitedStates,whichhasaverydi erentbankingmarket,andistrueforcontinuing rmsaswell.2Identi cationisachallengeforstudyingtheseverityofcreditconstraintsgiventhehigh-dimensionalheterogeneityacrossboththeassociatedhouseholdsandtheirbusinesses.Toestablishacausalimpactofcreditshocksonthelong-runoutcomesofbusinesses,thispaperutilizesvariationintheavailabilityofhomeequityviaamatchedpairframework.Atahighlevel,twosimilarbusinessesthatarelocatedinthesamezipcodeandthatareownedbysimilarentrepreneurswholiveindi erentzipcodesfromthebusinessesandfromeachotherarecompared.Thisisolatesexogenousvariationintheavailabilityofcreditstemmingfromdi erentialzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthwithinanarrowgeographicalarea.AsimilarapproachhasbeenusedbyBernstein,McQuade,andTownsend(2018)tostudyinnovationandSto man,Pool,Yonker,andZhang(2018)tostudyassetpricing.Asathirdcontribution,thispaper ndscausalevidencethatthetighteningofmort-gagecreditstandardspost-crisishasbeenanimportantchannelforthelackofrecoveryinbusinessformationrates.Smallbusinessesrelyonhousingwealthtoalleviatetheircreditconstraints.Consequently,whenmortgagesbecomehardertoobtain,businessentryisnega-tivelyimpacted.Despitehomepricesrecoveringbetween2009and2016,cash-outre nancingvolumeremainsdepressedduetoatighteningofmortgagecreditstandards.Fromitspeakin 2InFrance,homeownerswithamortgagecannotextracthousingequity,whileintheUnitedStatestheycan.In

11 addition,mortgagesinFrancegenerallycanno
addition,mortgagesinFrancegenerallycannotbeprepaidandhousingwealthisnotviewedassomethingthatwouldbeborrowedagainst. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP32005,theamountofhomeequityextractedbyhouseholdshasdeclinedmorethan60%,withvolumecurrentlyat2001levels(Figure1.1).Toidentifyacausallink,thispaperconstructsaBartikshiftshareinstrumentthatexploitsaninstitutionaldetailaboutindependentmort-gagebanks(IMBs).IMBs,suchasQuickenLoans(oneofthelargestmortgagelenders),aggressivelytargettheirexistingcustomerstopersuadethemtore nance.Thisprovidesasourceofexogenousvariationinlocalre nancingactivity.RobustnesstestsruleoutthatthepredictedIMBsharedirectlycorrelateswithmeasuresthatdrivebusinessformation,otherthanre nancing.Tofurthershowthatthee ectisdrivenbyalackofmortgagecreditaccessandnotchangesinlocaldemand,thee ectisshowntoholdforindustriesthatarenotreliantonlocaldemand.Pastresearchlargelyfocusedontheimpactsofhousingwealthonbusinessentryduringthehousingbubbleofthemid-2000s.However,theimpactofalackofaccesstohousingwealthonbusinessentryinthedecadesincethe2008 nancialcrisishasnotbeenstudied.Ifmortgagedebtwasasubstituteforotherformsofcreditthenreductionsinaccesstoliquidhousingwealthshouldnothaveanoticeableimpactonbusinessentry.RecentworkbyDavisandHaltiwanger(2019)looksattheimpactthathomepriceshavehadontheshareof rmsthatarelessthan veyearsoldbetween1999and2014.Thispaperdi ersinthatitshowstheimpactsthatatighteninginmortgagecreditsupplyhashadspeci callyon rmentryintheperiodsince2009|aperiodduringwhichhomepricesrosedramaticallyandmortgagere nancingvolumestagnated.Thebene tsofhomeequityextractionfoundinthispaperareinincontrasttotheresultsfortheaveragehouseholdthatextractedhomeequityduringthemid-2000s.Gener-ally,householdsthatextractedhomeequityhadlowercreditscoresandusedtheextractedhomeequitytoincreasetheirconsumption(BhuttaandKeys,2016).However,homeeq

12 uityextractionwasalsousedbyalargesubseto
uityextractionwasalsousedbyalargesubsetofthepopulationwithprimecreditscorestostartandgrowbusinesses,whichledtojobandGDPgrowth.Thiswouldbeirresponsibleifentrepreneurswhousehomeequitystartweakerbusinesses,butthisisnotthecase.Thispaper ndsthathomeequityfundedbusinessesaresimilartoandfacesimilarsurvivalratesastheirnon-homeequityfundedcounterparts.Alleviatingcreditconstraintsviahousingcollateralallowsentrepreneurstostartproductivebusinessesatamoreoptimalsize,whichinrecentyearshasnotbeenpossible.RecentworkbyBahaj,Foulis,andPinter(2017) ndsthatincreasesinpersonalhomevaluesof rmdirectorsintheUnitedKingdomleadstoacontemporaneousincreaseincorporateinvestment(viaapersonalguaranteeforbusinessdebt).Incontrast,thispaperestimatesthelong-runresponsetocreditsupplyshocksbyageforsmall rmsintheUnitedStates(forsurvival,employment,andpayroll).Additionally,thispapershowsmorebroadlytheimpactsthatrestrictionsonmortgagecredithavehadon rmentryanddirectlyshowstheactualratesofhomeequityusebysmallbusinesses.Thispaperbuildsontheimpactsofcreditallocationinthecorporate nanceliterature.Earlyresearchshowedthatcreditmayberationedduetoinformationalasymmetries(StiglitzandWeiss,1981).Onewaytoovercomeasymmetricinformationisthroughlendingonsoftinformation,whichisacquiredviarelationshipsbetweenbusinessownersandbankers(Pe- CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP4tersenandRajan,1994;BergerandUdell,1995).However,acquiringabankingrelationshiptakestimeandasaconsequenceoftenisnotanoptionforentrantsmallbusinesses.Toovercomethis,entrepreneursgenerallyrelyonpersonalassetstofundtheirentrantbusi-nesses(RobbandRobinson,2014).Earlyresearchoncreditconstraintsstudiedwealthandfoundthatentryintoentrepreneurshipincreaseswithwealth(EvansandJovanovic,1989).Theliteratureprogressedtostudyingtransitionsintoentrepreneurshipafterreceivinganinheritance(Blanch owerandOswald,1998;HurstandLusardi,2004).Lately,thefocusofthislite

13 raturehasshiftedtostudyinghousingwealths
raturehasshiftedtostudyinghousingwealthshocks.Morebroadly,inrecentyearsthecorporate nanceandhousehold nanceliteratureshavefocusedontheimpactsthatcreditsupplyshockshaveonbusinessesandhouseholds.3Thispaper tsintotheselitera-turesbyshowingthemacroimplicationsthatdisruptionstomortgagecreditaccesshaveonentrepreneurshipandthelong-runintensivemargine ectsofcreditconstraintsby rmage.Lastly,thispaperbuildsontheliteratureofbusinessdynamismbyidentifyingoneofthechannelsbehindthedeclinein rmentryrates.4Thepaperproceedsasfollows.Section2describesthedataandprovidesnewstylizedfactsontheuseofhomeequitybysmallbusinessowners.Section3providestheempiricalmethodologyandresultsfortheimpactofcreditconstraintsontheintensivemargin.Section4showscausalevidencethatthelackofrecoveryinhomecash-outre nancingactivitysincetheGreatRecessionhasnegativelyimpactedbusinessformationrates.Lastly,Section5concludes.1.2DataandtheFundingofSmallBusinessesByHousingEquity1.2.1Micro-dataOverviewEmpiricalresearchonsmallbusinesseshasbeenhinderedbyalackoftime-seriesdataatthebusinesslevellinkingbusinessoutcomesandthehouseholdbalancesheetoftheentrepreneur.Thisistrueevenforadministrativedatasets.Inthestudyofpersonalhomeequityasafundingsourceforsmallbusinesses,andmorebroadly,thee ectofcreditconstraintsonsmallbusinesses,therehavebeenawiderangeof ndingsduetothislackofdata.Thispaperreliesonnovelmergestocreatea\big"datasetofsmallbusinessadministrativedataintheUnitedStateslinkedtothemortgageandre nancingactivityofthebusinessowner. 3SeeChodorow-Reich(2013),Greenstone,Mas,andNguyen(2014),Krishnan,Nandy,andPuri(2014),LauferandPaciorek(2018),BenmelechandRamcharan(2017),DeFusco,Johnson,andMondragon(2017),Goodman(2017),Bord,Ivashina,andTaliaferro(2018),GeteandReher(2018),Mondragon(2018),Nguyen(2019).4Pastworkhaslargelyidenti edtheissueofthelong-termdeclinein rmentryratesandtherelatedeconomicconsequences.SeeDecker,Haltiwanger,Ja

14 rmin,andMiranda(2014),HathawayandLitan(2
rmin,andMiranda(2014),HathawayandLitan(2014),Gourio,Messer,andSiemer(2016),Siemer(2016).Recentworkhasidenti edimportcompetitionandchangingdemographicsastwochannelscausingthedeclinein rmentryrates(PugsleyandS,ahin,2018;Karahan,Pugsley,andSahin,2019). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP5ThedatasetconstructedinthispaperisauniquemergebetweenadministrativedataonbusinessoutcomesfromtherestricteduseLongitudinalBusinessDatabase(LBD)andadministrativedataforrealestatetransactionsfromATTOM.TheLBDisacon dentialdatasethousedwithinFederalStatisticalResearchDataCentersoftheUSCensusBureau.TheLBDprovidesannualestablishmentleveldataonsurvival,employment,andpayroll.5ThedataareavailableforallbusinesseswithatleastonepaidemployeeintheUnitedStatesandareconstructedfromIRStaxreturndata.AkeyfeatureoftheLBDistheLBDNUMvariable,whichallowsanestablishmenttobelongitudinallytrackedovertime.Inthispaper,smallbusinessesarede nedasbusinesseswithinitialemploymentoftenorfeweremployeesandthatstartedassingle-unit rms.DespitetherichnessoftheLBDdata,itdoesnotcontaininformationoncreditaccess.Forthis,datafromATTOMareutilized.ATTOMisacomprehensivepropertyandtrans-actionleveldatasetonresidential(andcommercial)realestatepurchasesandre nances,thesuccessortoDataquick.IntheUnitedStates,countyrecorderocestrackeveryrealestatetransaction,includingresidentialre nances.ATTOMconsolidatedtheserecordsandcreatedadatasetofthisinformation,fromwhichtheamountofhomeequityextractedfromapropertycanbeconstructed(describedintheOnlineAppendix).Atahighlevel,thispa-perlongitudinallylinksrealestatetransactionsthroughtimeatthepropertybyhomeownerlevel.Usingthepurchasetransactionandpastre nancingrecords(ifany),theoutstand-ingmortgagebalanceisestimatedatthetimeofre nanceandtheamountofhomeequityextractedisconstructedfromthisbasedonthere nanceloanamount.TheLBDdoesnotcontainpersonallyidenti ableinforma

15 tionanddoesnotidentifythebusinessowner.C
tionanddoesnotidentifythebusinessowner.Consequently,ATTOMis rstmergedtoNETS.TheNETSdataarebasedonDunandBradstreet(D&B)data,whichcontaintheuniverseofallbusinesses(includingnon-employerbusinesses)intheUnitedStates.TheadvantageofNETSisthatitliststhebusinessname,alongitudinalpanelofaddresses,andthenameofthebusinessowner(for60%ofbusinesses).6ATTOMislinkedtoNETSbymergingthenameofthehomeownerinATTOMtothenameofthebusinessownerinNETS(describedintheOnlineAppendix).WiththelinkofATTOMtoNETS,anentrantbusinessisclassi edasbeingfundedwithhomeequityifthebusinessownerextractspersonalhousingequityintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Lastly,NETSismergedtotheLBD(describedintheOnlineAppendix)forsmallbusi-nessesfoundedbetween2001and2011.Thisprovidesadirectlinkoflongitudinalhomeequityextractionactivityofbusinessownerstolongitudinaloutcomesoftheirbusinesses.Fromwhichthispapershowsthepersistentimpactthatcreditconstraintshaveonbothentrantandcontinuingbusinesses.Fornotation,entrant rmsare rmsintheir rstyearof 5JarminandMiranda(2002)provideadetailedoverviewoftheLBD(andthecompaniondataset,theSSEL).Revenuemeasuresarenotcurrentlyavailable,butshouldbeavailableoncetherevenueenhancedLBDiscompleted(Haltiwanger,Jarmin,Kulick,andMiranda,2016).6Thedatasetalsocontainsannualemploymentinformation.However,analysisonthereliabilityofthedatahasledtoaviewthatitshouldnotbereliedonforhighfrequencytimeseriesinformationonbusinesses(Neumark,Zhang,andWall,2007;Barnatchez,Crane,andDecker,2017). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP6operation.Whereascontinuing rmsaremature rmsthathavesurvivedforatleastthreeorfouryears.Table1.1comparestheoverallLBDsmallbusinesspopulationtothe nalpopulationutilizedinthispaper.461,000smallentrant rmsaresuccessfullymergedtoalldatasets.Thesmallbusinessesinthemergedsamplearebiasedtowardslargerbusinesseswithhighersurvivalrates.Assuch,thisshouldbiastheresultsfo

16 rthee ectofcreditconstraintstowardsz
rthee ectofcreditconstraintstowardszero(sincestronger rmsshouldbelessimpactedbycreditconstraints).Unfortunately,themicro-dataendwithbusinessesformedin2011.Tostudythee ectofacontractioninmortgagecreditsupplyonbusinessentryratessincethe2008 nancialcrisis,county-leveldatabetween2009and2016areused.ThisisdescribedintheDeclineinRe nancingActivityandBusinessFormationsection.1.2.2TheRoleofHousingEquityinSmallBusinessFinancingPastresearchthatlookedatthefundingstructureofentrantsmallbusinessesreliedonsurveydata.RobbandRobinson(2014)providedthe rstinsightintothefundingofentrantsmallbusinessesbyusingcon dentialsurveydatafromtheKau manFamilySurvey(KFS).7They ndthat16%ofentrantbusinessesin2004werefoundedwithhousingequity.Similarly,Kerretal.(2015)usedthepublicuse2007SurveyofBusinessOwners(SBO)micro-data,whichisbasedonsurveyresultsfrombusinessesaliveasof2007.They ndthat12to14%ofsmallbusinesseswerefundedwithhomeequityatentrybetween2003and2007.Surveydatahasissueswithaccuracy(Hurst,Li,andPugsley,2014)andnon-response(Campbell,2006).Asasolutiontotheseissues,thispaperdirectlyobservesifanentrepreneurextractshousingequityinanarrowperiodaroundwhentheirbusinessisformed.8Table1.2comparesthedegreetowhichsmallbusinessownersfundtheirbusinesswithhousingequitytotheratesfoundinpriorresearch.Theactualuseofhousingequityisalmostdoublewhathasbeenreportedonsurveys.Despitehousingwealthe ectsnotbeingparticularlylargeduringthemid-2000s(Guren,McKay,Nakamura,andSteinsson,2018),thispapershowsthathousingequitywasusedbyroughlyoneoutofeveryfoursmallbusinessstartupsduringthisperiod.Figure1.2showstheuseofhomeequityacrossregionsandtimeforentrantsmallbusinessbytheyeartheyarefounded.9Nationally,oneoutoffoursmallentrant rmswerefundedwiththepersonalhomeequityofthe rm'sownerinthemid-2000s,butsince2008this 7Ballou,Barton,DesRoches,Potter,Zhao,Santos,andSebastian(2007)provideadetailedoverviewoftheKFS.8Whileitisnot

17 observediftheextractedhomeequityisinvest
observediftheextractedhomeequityisinvestedinthebusiness,itisunlikelythatanoticeableamountofthehomeequityextractedwasusedforpurposesotherthanfundingbusinesses.Inlatersections,strongresultsfromtheextractedhousingequityonthebusinessarefound.9Theunderlyingdata(ATTOMmergedtoNETS)isrestrictedtobusinessownerswhoalsoownahome,whichwouldbiasupwardsthestatisticsonthepercentofbusinessownerswhousepersonalhomeequity.Tocorrectforthis,thestatisticsareadjustedbythepercentageofthetotalpopulationofbusinessownerswhoownahomewithinthesamecohortthatthestatisticiscalculatedfor.HomeownershipratesarecalculatedfromtheAmericanCommunitySurvey(ACS)micro-data. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP7hasfallentooneoutoftwenty.10Between2001and2003theuseofhomeequitybysmallbusinessownersrosesharplyinallregions.After2003,therewerestrongregionaldi erencesinthepatternsofhomeequityuse.OntheWestCoast,homeequityusewasfairlyuniformbetween2003to2006,whileintheMidwesttheuseofhomeequitypeaksin2003.ThepatternfortheMidwestissimilartotheoverallnationalpatternofhomeequityextractions,whichalsopeakedin2003.BhuttaandKeys(2016)attributethedeclineinhomeequityextractionratesafter2003totheriseininterestrates,highlightingtherolethatfundingcostshaveinthedecisiontoextracthomeequity.Followingthe2008crisis,homeequitysharplydeclinedasasourceofcreditforentrantsmallbusinesses.Whilethedatainthispaperendin2011,itisunlikelythattheuseofhousingequityhasrecoveredgiventheaggregatelackofrecoveryincash-outre nancingvolume(Figure1.1).Additionally,comparingwithinsurveydatafromtheCensus,theuseofhomeequityhasfallenbyalmosttwo-thirdsto5%in2016from15%in2005(Table1.2).Thisnew ndinghighlightstheimportanceofunderstandinghowmortgagecreditaccesspropagatesthroughtheeconomy.1.3IntensiveMarginImpactofCreditConstraintsTounderstandwhysmallbusinessownersrelysoheavilyontheirpersonalhousingcollateral,itisnecessarytounderstandthedegreetowhichtheyarecreditconstr

18 ained.Thissectionestimatestheintensivema
ained.Thissectionestimatestheintensivemarginlong-runimpactofcreditconstraintsonsmallbusinesses.Section3.1explainsthegeneralempiricalmethodologytoisolateexogenousvariationincreditaccess.Sections3.2and3.4explainthespeci capproachtostudyingentrantandcontinuingbusinesses,respectively.Sections3.3and3.5presenttheresults.1.3.1GeneralEmpiricalMethodologyAkeychallengeinstudyinghowsmallbusinessesrespondtocreditsshockswithmicro-dataisthatbothbusinessownersandtheirbusinessesarehighlyidiosyncratic.Toisolatethelongrunresponseofabusinesstoexogenouscreditshocks,variationsinboththebusinessownerandthebusinesshavetobecontrolledfor.Simplecontrolsand xede ectsareunlikelytobesucientincontrollingforthehigh-dimensionalidiosyncraticdi erences.Thispaperusesvariationintheamountofhomeequityextractedfromidiosyncratichomepricegrowthasacreditshock.Toisolateidiosyncratichomepricegrowth,businessownerswholiveinsimilarzipcodesarestudied.Simplycomparingtheamountofhomeequityextractedwouldleadtoestimatingaregressionacrossheterogeneouspopulations,astheamountofhomeequityextractedbyahomeownerisstronglycorrelatedtotheirhomevalue.Thisinturnisassociatedwiththeirwealth,amongothercovariates.Ahomeownerwhoextracts$250,000 10TheNETSdataincludednon-employer rms.Toshowthatthis ndingholdsforemployer rmsaswell,thetimeseriesareshownforsmall rmsofvariousinitialsizes.Inallcases,theratiosof rmsfundedwithhomeequityatentryarethesameacrosstime(Figure1intheOnlineAppendix). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP8ofhomeequitywillvaryonobservablequalitiesbetweenahomeownerwhoextracts$100,000ofhomeequity.Forexample,linearornon-parametriccontrolsforhomepriceswouldnotcontrolfordi erencesinbusinessownerswiththesamehomevalueacrossdi erentcommutingzones.Abusinessownerwhoownsa$200,000homeinSanFranciscoisdistinctfromabusinessownerwitha$200,000homeinCleveland.EvenwithinSanFrancisco,abusinessownerwitha$200

19 ,000homein2001wouldbeverydi erentfro
,000homein2001wouldbeverydi erentfromabusinessownerwitha$200,000homein2007.Unlesshomevaluesareinteractedwithcontrolsforlocationandtime,theestimatedresponsetocreditshockswouldcapturedi erencesinex-antewealthacrossbusinessowners.Additionally,businesscharacteristicsexhibitstrongheterogeneityaswell.Abusinessownerwhostartsarestaurantin2002inthe02120zipcodeofBostonisverydi erentfromabusinessownerwhostartsarestaurantinthatsamezipcodein2006.Withoutcontrollingfortheinteractionofzipcode,yearofcreation,andindustry,theestimatede ectofcreditshockswouldpickupdi erencesinendogenouswealth,riskaversion,skill,etc.Basedonthesedimensionsalone,controlsforhomevaluesatthesamepointintimewithinthesameregionamongbusinessownerswhostartabusinessinthesameindustryinthesameyearandwithinthesamezipcodewouldneedtobeincludedintheregressionmodel.Thisstrongheterogeneityacrossmanydimensionslendsitselfnaturallytoacoarsenedexactmatchingapproach.Matchingnon-parametricallyisolatesthecausale ectofcreditconstraintsfromidiosyn-craticvariationintheamountofhomeequityextractedamongaheterogeneouspopulationinobservationaldata.AssumebusinessYihadcreditaccessof$Xattimet.Ideally,businessoutcomesforYicouldalsobeobservedifYiinsteadhadcreditaccessof$X+attimet.However,itisnotpossibletoobserveYiinbothcases.Thecausale ectofcreditconstraintscanbedirectlyestimatediftheamountofhousingequityextractedwasrandomlyassigned.Inreality,betweentwobusinessowners,theonewhoextractedgreaterhomeequitywillbecorrelatedwithvariouscovariates,suchas rmindustry, rmlocation,yearof rmen-try,homevalue,housingleverage(combinedloantovalueratio),etc.Di erencesinthesecovariateswilldirectlya ectbusinessoutcomes.Controllingforthesedi erenceswithmatchingwillallowforacausalinterpretationtobeuncovered(CardandSullivan,1988;Angrist,1998).11However,exactmatchingwillnotbefeasiblesincemanyofthecovariatesarecontinuousandthecovariatevectorishigh-dimensi

20 onal.Instead,acoarsened-exactmatchingapp
onal.Instead,acoarsened-exactmatchingapproachisutilized(seerecentworkbySarsons,2017;Iacus,King,andPorro,2019).Atahighlevel,thematchingprocedureutilizedinthispaperselectspairsofbusinesseswherebothbusinessownersandtheircorrespondingbusinessesaresimilaracrossasetofcharacteristics.Thematchedpairsarerestrictedtobusinessesthatarelocatedinthesamezipcode(z1).However,thebusinessownersliveindi erentzipcodesfromeachotherandfromtheir rms(z2andz3),wherez16=z26=z3andthethreezipcodesarealllocatedwithinthesamecommutingzone.Thisallowsforthetwo 11Forearlyworkonmatchingsee:Rubin(1973),Rubin(1974),Rubin(1977),andRosenbaumandRubin(1983). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP9businessownersinthepairtoexperiencethesamelocalshockstotheirbusinessesinzipcodez1.Figure1.3visualizesthisapproach.Thepairmemberthatexperiencesgreater(less)lagged3-yearzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthislabeledasthetreated(control)member.12Fornotation,thetreatedbusinessowner(A)istheonewholivesinz2andthecontrolbusinessowner(B)istheonewholivesinz3.BusinessownersAandBaresimilarandliveinsimilarzipcodes,butbusinessownerAreceivesadditionalhomepricegrowthgrowthbecauseofthezipcodeinwhichtheylive.Zipcodelevelhomepricegrowthexhibitsstrongcross-sectionalandtime-seriesvariationwithinacommutingzone.Acrosssimilarzipcodes,variationinhomepricegrowthisnotlarge,buteven5%di erential3-yearhomepricegrowthwouldtranslateintoa$15,000creditshockforahomeworth$300,000.Itistestableifzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthdoesnotexhibitstrongvariation,asthiswillleadtoaweak rststage.Itmaybepossibletopredictthatfuturehomepricegrowthwillbehigherforsomezipcodes,forexampleagentrifyingzipcodethatattractsyoungerpeople.However,afterconstructingasampleofsimilartreatedandcontrolbusinessowners,thisisunlikelytobethecase.Asaresult,di erentialhomepricegrowthbetweenthetreatedandcontrolmembersofthepaircanbeusedasanexogenoussourceofcreditthatisorthogonaltobusinessoutcomes.A

21 similaridenti cationapproachhasbeenu
similaridenti cationapproachhasbeenusedbyBernsteinetal.(2018)andSto manetal.(2018).Thispaperstudieshowbothentrantandcontinuingsmallbusinessesrespondtocreditshocks.Forbothanalyses,thepairsareexactmatchedon:yearofbusinesscreation,industry(SICdivision),zipcodeofthebusiness,andthezipcodesofthehomesbeingdi erentfromoneanotherandthebusinesses(thoughthehomesarelocatedwithinthesamecommutingzone).13Giventhestrongandpersistente ectsthatwillbeshownfortheinitialconditionsofentrant rms,continuing rmsarealsoexactmatchedoninitialemployment.Theexactmatchingcriteriacreatesasampleofsimilar rms,whilethecoarselymatchedvariableswillcreateasamplewherethebusinessownersaresimilaraswell.Thecoarsenedsectionofthematchingprocedureisadaptedfortheentrantandcontinuinganalysesandisexplainedbelow.1.3.2EmpiricalMethodologyforEntrantBusinessesThissectionstudiesexogenousvariationintheamountofhomeequityextractedforentrantsmall rms.Thesampleisrestrictedtobusinessesfundedwithhomeequityatentrytocontrolforthefactthata rmnotfundedwithhomeequitylikelyhasdi erentialaccesstootherformsoffunding,suchasfamilyorpersonalsavings.Figure1.4agraphicallyillustratestheidenti cationset-up.Asanexample,AandBaretwosimilarbusinessownerswhobothstartrestaurantsinzipcode94610inyeartandusedpersonalhomeequitytofundthe 12ZipcodelevelhomepricegrowthdataisprovidedbyZillow.13SICdivisionsarebroadindustrycategoriesof:agriculture/forestry/ shing,mining,construction,man-ufacturing,transportation/communications/electric/gas/sanitaryservices,wholesaletrade,retailtrade, -nance/insurance/realestate,andservices.2-digitSICindustry xede ectsareincludedintheregressionstocontrolfordi erencesacrosstheindustrieswithineachSICdivision. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP10business.Threeyearsearlier,AandBbothownedhomesofsimilarvalueinneighboringzipcodes94611and94612.Overthesubsequentthreeyears,Areceiv

22 ed10%additionalhomepricegrowth,whichallo
ed10%additionalhomepricegrowth,whichallowedAtoextract$30,000ofadditionalhomeequity.Ifcreditconstraintshavealong-terme ectonentrant rms,Ashouldstarttheirbusinessatalargersize(threeinsteadoftwoemployees)andsubsequentlygrowatafasterratecomparedtoB.Forthisanalysis,anentrantbusinessisde nedasbeingfundedwithhomeequityiftheentrepreneurextracts�$10,000(or�5%ofhomevalueforlessvaluablehomes)intheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Thisrestrictionremovesbusinessownerswhoarenotextractingasizableamountofhomeequityandassucharebothunlikelytorespondtosmallvariationsinhomepricegrowthandaremorelikelytohaveotherlargersourcesoffundingsecured.Whiletheuseoftheextractedhomeequityisnotobserved,itcanbeassumedthatthemajorityofthefundsareputtowardsthebusinessgiventhestrengthoftheresultsandthesizablecostofstartingabusiness.Thisintroducesmeasurementerrorintotheresult,whichwilldownwardsbiasthecoecientstowardszeroinOLS.Businessesfundedwithhomeequitylikelyuseothersourcesoffundsaswell(i.e.,savings,creditcards,businessloans,etc.),whichwillintroduceasecondsourceofmeasurementerrorthatwillalsodownwardsbiastheresultsinOLS.Toformmatchedpairs,businessownersandtheirbusinessesareexactmatchedonthecriterialistedintheGeneralEmpiricalMethodologysection.Inaddition,thepairsarecoarsenedmatchedtocaseswherethehomevalues(measuredthreeyearspriortobusinesscreationyear)arewithin20%or$100k(forlessvaluablehomes)ofeachotherandthecombinedloantovalueratios(CLTV)atpurchasearewithin20bpsofeachother.14Thecoarsenedmatchcriteriarestrictstosimilar rmowners,afterhavingalreadybeenrestrictedtosimilar rmswiththeexactmatchcriteria.Thetreated rmowneristheownerwithineachpairwhoexperiencedgreaterhomepricegrowthinthe3-yearperiodpriortothebusinessbeingformed.Tomakesurethattheentrepreneurspersonallyexperiencethehomepricegrowth,theentrepreneursmusthaveboughttheirhomesatleastthreeyearspriortostartingthebusinesses.Lastly,forcaseswheremore

23 thanonecontrol rmismatchedtoatreated
thanonecontrol rmismatchedtoatreated rm,thecontrol rmthathasthemostsimilarhomevalueasthetreated rmisselected.Abusinesscanbeacontrol rmmultipletimes(andcanbebothacontrolandtreated rmindi erentpairs)butcanonlybeatreated rmonce(themajorityof rmsareonlyinonepair).Thematchingalgorithmformsasampleof5,100 rms(basedon4,600distinct rms).Matched rmstendtobeslightlylargerandtheirownershavehigherCLTVratiosandlowerhomevaluescomparedtotheoverallpopulationofhomeequityfunded rms(Tables1.4andTables1.9).Thestartingsampleis124,000homeequityfunded rms,approximately60%ofwhichareownedbyentrepreneurswholiveindi erentzipcodesfromtheir rms,and45%ofwhichareownedbyentrepreneurswhoboughttheirhomeatleastthreeyearspriorto 14CLTVatpurchaseistheratioofthesumofallliensattimeofhomepurchaserelativetopurchaseprice.LTVonlyaccountsforthe1stlien,howeverduringthehousingbubblemanyhouseholdsincludedsecondaryliens(socalled"piggyback"secondliens,LeeandTracy,2012). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP11startingtheirbusinesses.15Alargenumberofobservationsarenotincludedintheanalysisinordertocreateasamplewhereboththetreatedandcontrol rmownersaresimilaronobservables,exceptforthedi erentialhomepriceshock.Forhomepricegrowthtobeexogenouswithinapair,thetreatedandcontrolownersmustonaveragebesimilaronobservablecharacteristicsandliveinsimilarzipcodesaseachother.Thisisthegoalofmatching.Table1.3providessummarystatisticsforthedi erenceinvaluesbetweenthetreatedandcontrolowners.Onaverage,di erencesacrossthevariablesareclosetozero.Covariatesforhomezipcodesarenotmatched,butarealsosimilarforboththetreatedandcontrol rmowners.Forrobustness,amatchedpairsampleisconstructedfromtheATTOMtoNETSmergedsamplewiththesamecriteriathatisusedtoformtheentrantmatchedpairswiththeLBDdata.Withthisdataitisshownthatthetreatedandcontrol rmownersbothlivethesamedistancefromtheir&#

24 12;rmsonaverage(Figure1.5).Thisisnotshow
12;rmsonaverage(Figure1.5).ThisisnotshownusingthesampleformedfromtheLBDdataduetodisclosurerestrictions.Oneconcernisthatifthehomezipcodesofeitherthetreatedorcontrolownersareconsistentlymorecorrelatedtoshockstothe rmzipcode,thenbusinessoutcomescouldbecorrelatedtotheidiosyncratichomepricegrowth.Sincethehomezipcodesaresimilarandthe rmownerslivesimilardistancesfromtheir rms,thisisunlikelytobethecase.Despitethetreatedandcontrolownersbeingfromsimilarzipcodes,thetreatedownersreceive,onaverage,6.5%greaterhomepricegrowth.Theaveragehomevalueforthepopulationis$206,000,whichleadstoanaverageincreaseof$13,000inavailablecreditforthetreatedownersrelativetothecontrolowners.Withthismatchedpairsample,thee ectofcreditshockson rmoutcomesisestimatedusingtwo-stageleastsquares:Yi;j;t+k= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+k(1.1) rmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,andthepairthat rmsbelongstobyj.Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.Yi;j;t+karetheoutcomevariables:survivalinyears1,3,and5(estimatedasalinearprobabilitymodel),employmentandemploymentgrowthinyears1through5,andpayrollinyears1through5.Employmentgrowthiscalculatedusingthestandardapproachintheentrepreneurshipliterature16:Ei;t�Ei;t�1 :5(Eit+Ei;t�1)(1.2)\ln($AmountExtractedi;t)istheinstrumentedamountofhomeequitythatanentrepreneurextractsintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Evenwithpair xedef-fects,theamountofhomeequityextractedisendogenous.Toisolateexogenousvariationintheamountofhomeequityextracted,thefollowing rststageisestimated: 15ThesestatisticsarecompiledfromtheATTOMtoNETSmergedsampleduetodisclosurerestrictions.16SeeTornqvist,Vartia,andVartia(1985),Davis,Haltiwanger,andSchuh(1996),andHaltiwanger,Jarmin,andMiranda(2013). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP12ln($AmountExtractedi;t)=c+3ln(ZipCodeHomePricei;t)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;t(1.3)The rststag

25 einstrumentstheamountofpersonalhomeequit
einstrumentstheamountofpersonalhomeequityextractedwiththelogofzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthforthe3-yearperiodpriortobusinessentryyeart.Xjpartialsoutthecommontrendinhomepricegrowthwithineachpair,leavingidiosyncratichomepricegrowthbetweentwosimilarandgeographicallyclosezipcodes.Ifgreaterlaggedhomepricegrowthleadstomorehomeequitybeingextracted,then�0.StandarderrorsareclusteredattheSICdivisionby rmzipcodelevel,whichistheprimaryexactmatchcriteriaofthepairs.Theclusteringleveldoesnotinclude rmcreationyeartoallowforarbitrarycorrelationacross rmcreationyearsamong rmslocatedwithinthesamezipcodeandbroadindustrycategory.Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.17Thecontrolvariablesattempttocorrectforanyheterogeneitywithinthepairthatisnotaccountedforbythecoarsenedexactmatchingalgorithm.The rsttwocontrols,homevalueandCLTV,arecoarselymatched,howevertheyareincludedascontrolsincaseanyheterogeneityremains.Likewise,2-digitSICindustry xede ectsareincludedincasehet-erogeneitywithinSICdivisionremains.Thenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseand rmcreationyeartisincludedtocontrolfordi erencesbetweenhowlongabusinessownerwaitstostartabusinessafterbuyingahome.LFO xede ectscontrolfordi erencesamongincorporationtypesofbusinesses.Lastly,thehomezipcodecharacteristiccontrolsremovevariationfromthechoiceofhomezipcodewithinacommutingzone,ifanyremainaftermatching.1.3.3EntrantBusinessEmpiricalResultsIfanewbusinessiscreditconstrainedandreceivesanexogenousrelaxationintheircreditlimit,howarethebusiness'ssurvival,size,andgrowtha ected?Ifthebusinessisex-antecreditco

26 nstrainedandtheadditionalcreditisspentpr
nstrainedandtheadditionalcreditisspentproductively,thenlooseningthecreditconstraintsshouldresultinthebusinessstartinglarger,growingfaster,andsurvivinglonger.Second,itisimportanttounderstandifbusinessesthathavelessaccesstocreditatentryareabletocatchupfromtheirinitialdisadvantage.Thee ectonbusinesssurvivalisshown rst.Table1.5column1showstherawOLSe ectonthe5-yearsurvivalratewhenonlythepair xede ectsareincluded.Havingadditional 17Zipcodelevelcontrolvariablesarefromthe2000DecennialCensus. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP13accesstocreditleadstoanincreasedsurvivalrate.Theresultsurvivesandremainsstablewhenthevectorofadditionalcontrolsareincluded,implyingthatthesecontrolsarenotasourceofheterogeneitybetweenthetreatedandcontrolpairmembers.Column3teststhe rststageandshowsthatwithinthepair,thebusinessthatreceivesadditionalpersonalhomepricegrowthinthe3-yearperiodbeforethebusinessisfoundedextractsadditionalhousingequity.Theinstrumentisstronglysigni cantandtheF-statisticisabove10,indicatingthattheinstrumentisnotweak.Thecoecientof0.88onlaggedhomepricegrowthmeansthatthetreatedmemberextracts88%oftheadditionalhomeequitythattheyhaveaccesstofromvariationinhomepricegrowth.Themeandi erenceinhomepricegrowthbetweenthetreatedandcontrol rmsis6.5%,implyingthattheaveragetreated rmhas5.7%ofadditionalrealizedfundingatcreationrelativetothecontrol rm.Sincethetreated rmownerextractsmostoftheadditionalhomeequitythattheyhaveaccessto,thisispreliminaryevidencethat rmsarecreditconstrained.Otherwise,therewouldnotbeasstrongofaresponsetoexogenousvariationinhomepricegrowth.Incolumn4,theregressionmodelisestimatedwiththeamountofhomeequityextractedinstrumentedwith3-yearlaggedhomepricegrowth.Thecoecientshowsastrongpositivecausale ect.18A10%increaseincreditincreasesa rm's5-yearsurvivalrateby5.1%.Forthesampleusedintheseregressions,theaverageamountofhomeeq

27 uityextractedis$100,000,whichmeansa10%cr
uityextractedis$100,000,whichmeansa10%creditshocktranslatesinto$10,000ofadditionalcredit.The5.1%increaseinthe5-yearsurvivalratefromthissmallcreditshockwouldleadtothesurvivalrateincreasingfrom67%to71%,onaverage.Thisresultshowsthatthereisalongterme ectonsurvivalfromapositiveexogenouscreditshock.Therefore,theinitialcreditaccessofabusinessisstronglyimportantandsmallbusinessesarecreditconstrainedatentry.Schmalzetal.(2017)alsofoundapersistentimpactofinitialhousingwealthonsmallbusinessesforsmallbusinessesfoundedin1998inFrance.However,thisisthe rsttimeithasbeenconclusivelyshownforsmallentrantbusinessesintheUnitedStates.Duetostrongdi erencesinthebankingandloanmarketsandentrepreneurialdemand/preferencesbetweenthetwocountries,itisnotobviousthattheresultsshouldapplytotheUnitedStates.Anaturalquestioniswhetherthee ectonsurvivalisapparentimmediatelyorifitslowlyaccumulates.Columns7and8showthee ectinyears1and3,respectively.Thee ectispresenteveninthe rm'sinitialyear,withthesurvivalrateincreasingfromhavingaccesstoadditionalcredit.Thee ectinyear3islargerthaninyear5,implyingaconcaverelationship.Afteryear3,thecontrol rmstartstocatchupbutremainsatadisadvantageinyear5.Unfortunately,survivalbeyondthe5thyearcannotbetestedduetorestrictionsonCensusRDCdisclosure.However,a5-yearsurvivalratee ectimpliesthatthee ectispermanent.E ectsonotherbusinessoutcomesareestimatedtounderstandwhybusinesssurvivalincreaseswithadditionalcredit,andtoshowrobustnessthatthee ectisnotcon nedto 18Asarobustnesscheck,ifthestandarderrorsareclusteredattheSICdivisionby rmzipcodebycreationyearlevel,theresultremains(column6). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP14survival.InTable1.6,theregressionisestimatedforthee ectofcreditconstraintsonem-ployment.Columns1-5showthatemploymentincreasesinyears1through5fromhavingaccesstoadditionalcreditatentry.Similartothee ectonsurvival,th

28 ee ectforemploy-mentispersistentandr
ee ectforemploy-mentispersistentandremainsthroughyear5.Thesamplesizedeclinesfortheresultsonemploymentafteryear1,duetobusinessesbeingomittedfordisclosurereasonsiftheyhavemissingdataaftertheirinitialyear.19A10%increaseincreditleadstoa4.9%increaseinemploymentatcreation.IntheLBD,5.6millionsmallentrant rmswerefoundedbetween2001and2011andcreated13.5millionjobsatentry.Approximately22%ofthese rmswerefundedwithhomeequityatentry,leadingto2.9millionjobscreatedatentrybyhomeequityfunded rms.20Forevery10%increaseinhousingcollateral,abackoftheenvelopecalculationshowsthat140,000additionaljobswouldbecreated.Additionally,the0.49coecientforthee ectoninitialemploymenttranslatestooneadditionaljobbeingcreatedfromevery$88,000positivecreditshockasmallentrantbusinessreceives.Inadditiontostartinglargerinyear1,thetreatedbusinessesgrowfasterbetweenyears1and2(Table1.7).A10%increaseininitialcreditincreasesinitial rmgrowthratesby18%betweenyears1and2.Afteryear2,growthratesbetweenthetreatedandcontrolbusinessesstabilizeandthisallowsthetreatedbusinessestoremainlargerthroughyear5.Thee ectsonemploymentshowthatsmallincreasesininitialcredithaveanimportante ectona rm'sabilitytostartatamoreoptimalsize.Inaddition,greaterinitialcreditaccessallowsbusinessestooperatemoreproductively,whichleadstolargerinitialgrowthrates.Businesseswithlessaccesstocreditatentryareneverabletocatchupfromtheirinitialdisadvantage.Asalasttest,thee ectonpayrollisestimated(Table1.8).Initialpayrollisnotsta-tisticallysigni cantlylargerinyear1fromacreditshockatentry.Inlateryears,payrollincreasesfromthecreditshockatentry.Apossiblereasonforthisisthathavingadditionalinitialcreditallowsbusinessestoattractmorecustomersthroughincreasedadvertisingoramoreattractiveinterior.Thisinturnincreasesrevenueanddemand,whichnecessitatesaneedtohiremoreworkers.However,businessesmayhavetodecreasethewagesofworkersinordertohiremoreemployees.Studyinghowwagesa

29 rea ectedbya rm'saccesstocrediti
rea ectedbya rm'saccesstocreditisleftforfutureresearch.Aconcernwiththeempiricalapproachisthatdi erentialhomepricegrowthmighta ectthedecisiontostartabusiness.Ifthisisthecase,di erentialhomepricegrowthbetweenthetwopairmembersmightdirectlya ectbusinessoutcomes.The ndingsarebasedonsmalldi erencesinhomepricegrowthbetweenthetreatedandcontrolentrepreneurs(6.5%onaverage),whichmakesthislessofaconcern.However,ifthetreatedentrepreneursrequired 19Duetorestrictionsondisclosure,afteryear1pairsaredroppedifoneofthebusinessesinapaireverhasmissingemployment/payrolldatainyears2through5.Inaddition,ifa rmisinmultiplepairsandoneofthepairsisexcludedthenalloftheirotherpairsareexcludedaswell.20ThisstatisticisbasedonthemergedsampleofATTOMtoLBD.Itisadjustedbythepercentofsmallbusinessownerswhoarehomeownerstoaccountforthefactthatthemergedsampleonlyincludeshomeowners.ThepercentofsmallbusinessownerswhoarehomeownersiscalculatedfromACSmicro-data. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP15additionalcreditinordertobeconvincedtostartabusinesstheywouldlikelybeofalowerskilltypecomparedtothecontrolentrepreneurs.Thiswouldmakethetreatedentrepreneurslesssuccessful,whichwoulddownwardsbiasthee ect.Second,ifthecontrolentrepreneurswereseverelyconstrained,becausetheyhadlesshomepricegrowth,andstilldecidedtostartabusinessitcouldrevealthattheyareofahigherskilltype.Thiswouldagaindownwardsbiasthee ect.Inbothcasesthebiasfromthispotentialconcernwoulddecreasethee ectthatisfound.Thepopulationofsmallbusinessesisrestrictedtobusinessesthatstartedasasingle-establishmentandwithtenorfeweremployees.Thethresholdoftenwaschosenbecauselargerbusinessesrelylessonhomeequity,duetothegreatercostsinvolvedinstartinglargerbusinesses.Adelinoetal.(2015) ndthat rmswithmorethantenemployeesdonotrespondtohomepricegrowthshocks.Inaddition,Patnaik(2017)showsthat rmswithtenorfeweremployeesrelyonhousingwealt

30 h,while rmswithmorethantenemployeesr
h,while rmswithmorethantenemployeesrelyonbankloans.Additionally,fewerthan10%ofentrantbusinessesbetween2001and2011startedwithmorethantenemployees(Figure2intheOnlineAppendix).Includingthissmallpopulationoflarger rmswouldaddnoisetotheresultssincetheyarelikelynotrelyingonhousingwealthandareinherentlydi erentfromsmaller rms.Anadditionalconcernisiftreated rmownersareconsistentlymoreorlesslikelytooriginatetheircash-outre nancemortgageswithtraditionalbanks,suchasBankofAmer-ica.Traditionalbankscross-sellcustomers,asaresultbankersmightencourage rmownersobtainingbusinessloanstoalsoobtaincash-outre nancemortgagesinordertohaveaddi-tionalcredit.Non-traditionalbanks,suchasQuickenLoans,donotoriginatebusinessloans.Iftreated rmownersarebiasedtowardsorawayfromtraditionalbanks,therecouldbeabiasintheirtotalamountoffundingrelativetocontrol rmowners.UsingthematchedpairsamplethatisconstructedfromtheATTOMtoNETSmergedsample,itisshownthatthetreatedandcontrol rmownershavethesamelikelihoodofhavingoriginatedtheircash-outre nancemortgagesfromtraditionalbanksonaverage(Figure1.6).ThisisnotshownusingthesampleformedfromtheLBDdataduetodisclosurerestrictions.1.3.4HomeEquityFundedBusinessesAkeyassumptiontogeneralizingthe ndingstoallsmallbusinessesisthathomeequityfundedbusinessesaresimilartonon-homeequityfundedbusinesses.Table1.9comparesthepopulationsofhomeequitytonon-homeequityfundedbusinesses.Overall,homeequityfundedbusinesseshavesimilarsurvivalratesandtendtostartslightlylargercomparedtonon-homeequityfundedbusinesses.Theentrepreneursofhomeequityfundedbusinesseshavegreaterhousingleverage(attimeofhomepurchase),largerhomevalues3-yearspriortowhenthebusinessisformed,andboughttheirhomesmorerecently.Theaveragebusinessownerwhouseshomeequityasafundingsourceextracts$100,000ofhomeequity.Aregressionmodelisutilizedtorigorouslytestthedi erencesbetweenthesetwopopulations:Yi= + I(HomeEquityFundedi)

31 +!Controlsi+i(1.4) CHAPTER1.THELONG
+!Controlsi+i(1.4) CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP16whereiindexesabusiness.Asa rsttest,thispaperchecksifhousingcharacteristicsvaryacrossthetwofundingtypes,byincludingtheinteractionofhomezipcodebyhomepurchaseyear xede ectsintheregressionmodel.Additionalcontrolsincludelegalformoforganization(LFO)and2-digitSICindustry xede ects.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthehomezipcodelevel.Table1.10columns1and2rigorouslyshowthathomeequityfunded rmstendtobestartedbyentrepreneurswhoownslightlymoreexpensivehomes(5%greaterhomevalues)andwhohaveslightlygreaterhousingleverage(4pointhigherCLTVratios)withinazipcodeatagivenpointintime.Next,thispapertestsifhomeequityfundedbusinessesdi eroninitialsizeandsurvival,byincludingthetripleinteractionof2-digitSICindustrybycreationyearby rmzipcode xede ectsintheregressionmodel.Additionalcontrolsincludelogpurchasevalue,CLTV,and xede ectsforLFO.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe2-digitSICindustryby rmzipcodelevel.Table1.10columns3and4showthathomeequityfunded rmsstartslightlylargerintermsofemployment,butnotpayroll.Interestingly,thereisnodi erentialoutcomeforsurvival.Togeneralizetheresultsfortheexistenceofcreditconstraints,survivalisthemostimportantvariabletotest,sinceaninsigni cantdi erenceinsurvivalbetweenhomeequityandnon-homeequityfunded rmsimpliesthat rmsfundedwithhomeequityatentryarenotweaker rms.Adelinoetal.(2015)presentssuggestiveevidencethathomeequityfunded rmswerenotmorelikelytoexitduringthe2008 nancialcrisiscomparedto rmsnotfundedwithhomeequity.Theresultsofthissectionshowfurtherproofthatthisisindeedthecase.Inresultsavailableuponrequest,itisfoundthatduringthe2007-2009period,smallbusinessesfundedwithhomeequityatentrywerelesslikelytoclosecomparedtosmallbusinessesnotfundedwithhomeequityatentry.21Lastly,themortgagedefaultratesofsmallbusinessownerswhoextractpersonalhome

32 equitytofundtheirbusinessesareshown.Over
equitytofundtheirbusinessesareshown.Overall,itiswellestablishedthathomeownerswhoextractedhomeequityduringthe2000srealizedlargermortgagedelinquentratescomparedtohomeownerswhodidnot.BhuttaandKeys(2016) ndthathomeownerswithacash-outre nancebetween2001and2003experienced20%greater4-yeardefaultrates.By2006,the4-yeardefaultrateofhomeownerswhoextractedhomeequitywasdoublethedefaultrateofhomeownerswhodidnotextracthomeequity.Toshowmortgagedefaultratesforbusinessowners,Equation4isestimatedasalinearprobabilitymodelwithadependentvariableequaltooneifthebusinessownerexperiencesaforeclosureontheirpersonalhomewithinfouryearsofstartingthebusiness.22Controlsincluderiskcharacteristicsforcombinedloantovalue(CLTV)atpurchase,FICOatpur-chase,andinitialmortgagerate.23Theinteractionofhomepurchaseyear, rmcreation 21Duetodisclosurereasons,thisresultisshownusingsurvivalinformationfromNETSandnottherestricted-useLBD.22ThisanalysisusesthedatafromthemergedATTOM-NETSsamplethatisfurthermergedtoMcDash.ForeclosureisestimatedfromATTOM.FICOandinitialmortgageratearefromMcDash.23Homepurchasevalueandinitial rmemploymentareincludedasadditionalcontrols. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP17year,homezipcode, rmzipcode,and2-digitSICindustryisincludedinordertoestimatethemortgagedefaultprobabilitydi erentialamongsimilarbusinessowners.Itisimportanttocompareamongborrowerswhoboughttheirhomeinthesameyearasmortgagedefaultratesvarysubstantiallyacrosshomepurchaseyears(Palmer,2015).Overall,thereisnodi erentialprobabilityofforeclosureforbusinessownerswhofundtheirbusinesseswithhomeequity(column1,Table1.11).Eventhoughintheoverallpop-ulation,homeownerswhoextracthomeequitydefaultontheirmortgagesatgreaterrates,businessownerswhorelyonhomeequitydonotdefaultathigherratescomparedtosimilarbusinessownerswhodonotextracthomeequitytofundtheirbusiness.Forbusinessownerswhostartedabusinessbetween2005and2007,thereisanelevate

33 dprobabilityofforeclosureifhomeequityise
dprobabilityofforeclosureifhomeequityisextractedtofundthebusiness(column3,Table1.11).Thedefaultraterisesby25.6%,fromthepopulationmeandefaultrateof24.8%to31.2%.Whilethede-faultrateiselevatedduringthisperiod,theincreaseindefaultismuchsmallercomparedtotheincreaseindefaultratesfortheoverallpopulationofhomeownerswhoextractedhomeequityduringthisperiod.BhuttaandKeys(2016)notethatdefaultratesfortheoverallpopulationofhomeownerswhoextractedhomeequityduringthisperiodroseby80-100%ofthepopulationmean.Lastly,businessownerswhofundedtheirbusinesseswithhomeequitysince2008havehadlowermortgagedefaultratescomparedtoallbusinessownerswhostartedabusinessduringthisperiod(column4,Table1.11).Thisisconsistentwiththenotionoftightermortgagecreditstandardsdeterring rmentry,whichisexploredinSection4.Ingeneral,mortgagedefaultratesareelevatedforbusinessowners,withmeandefaultratesonmortgagedebtof19%duringthe2001to2011period(column1,Table1.11).Thisislikelyaresultoftheriskinessofsmallbusinessownership.Ifthebusinessfails,thebusinessownerisatincreasedriskoflosingtheirhome.However,theuseofhomeequitytofundbusinessesdoesnotnoticeablya ectthealreadyhighmortgagedefaultrateofbusinessowners.Thisisadditionalevidence,beyondlowsurvivalrates,totheriskinessofsmallbusinessownership.1.3.5EmpiricalMethodologyforContinuingBusinessesContinuingbusinessesareoftenignoredintheliteratureoncreditconstraints.Entrantbusinesses,intheory,haveamorediculttimeobtainingcreditduetoalackofbothsoftandhardinformationandbusinesscollateral.However,continuingbusinesseshavehardinformation( nancialstatements),theabilitytobuildarelationshipwithabankerforsoftinformation,andpotentiallyhavebusinesscollateral.Additionally,dataonthelong-runresponseofcontinuingbusinessesisdiculttoobtain.Thispaperhastheidealdatasettotestifcontinuingbusinessesarealsocreditconstrained.Toobtainameasureofcreditconstraintsforcontinuingbusinesses,exogenousvariationintheamountofpersonalhomeequit

34 yextracted(ifany)inyears3or4ofa rm's
yextracted(ifany)inyears3or4ofa rm'slifeisstudied.Figure1.4bgraphicallyillustratestheidenti cationset-upandshowstheoutcomeifcontinuingbusinessesarecreditconstrained.AandBaretwosimilarbusinessownerswho CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP18bothstartrestaurantswiththesamenumberofemployeesinzipcode94610inyeart.Inyeart,AandBalsoownedhomesinneighboringzipcodes94611and94612,respectively,withthesamehomevalue.Overthenexttwoyears,their rmsgrewatasimilarrateintermsofemployment.Inyeart+3,Ahasaccumulated10%additionalhomepricegrowthandbecauseofthisextracts$100,000ofhomeequity,whileBdoesnot.(ItcouldalsobethatBextractshomeequityaswell,butextractslessduetoexperiencinglesshomepricegrowth.)Withthisexogenousvariationincreditaccessinyeart+3,Aexpandstheir rmandpermanentlyremainslarger.Theexampleshowsthematchingexerciseforextractioninyear3(referredtoastheeventyear)|however,matchingisalsoperformedfor rmsinyear4.Fora rmtobematched,itmusthavesurvivedthroughtheeventyear.Firmscanbematchedinboththeagethreeandfoureventyearcohortsandtheresponsetocreditshocksisjointlyestimatedwithdatafrombotheventyears,whichassumesthatbusinessesdonotdeferentiallyrespondtocreditshocksatagethreeversusagefour.Itismorediculttoisolateexogenousvariationforcontinuingbusinessescomparedtoentrantbusinessesduetotheadditionaldimensionsofthebusiness'spastrecordthatalsomustbematchedon.Inthesectionforentrantbusinesses,itisshownthatinitialconditionsforabusinessplayapersistentroleinthebusiness'ssuccessandsize.Therefore,abusiness'sinitialconditionsmustbecontrolledforinthecoarsened-exactmatchalgorithmforcontinuingbusinessesbyalsoexactmatchingoninitialemployment.Continuing rmsarecoarselymatchedontwocovariates.First,homevalues(asmeasuredthreeyearspriortotheeventyear)mustbewithin20%or$100k(forlessvaluablehomes)ofeachother.Second,thenumberofemployeesoneyearpriortotheeventyearmustbewithinthreeemployeesofeachother.Thi

35 ssecondconstraintrestrictsto rmsthat
ssecondconstraintrestrictsto rmsthatareonsimilargrowthpaths(afterstartingatthesamesize).Thetreated rmsaretheonesthatexperiencegreaterhomepricegrowthwithinthe3-yearperiodpriortotheeventyear.Tocon rmthattheentrepreneurspersonallyexperiencethehomepricegrowth,theymusthaveboughttheirhomesatleastthreeyearspriortotheeventyear.Lastly,incaseswheremorethanonecontrol rmismatchedtoatreated rmforagiveneventyear,thecontrol rmthathasthemostsimilarhomevalueasthetreated rmisselected.Abusinesscanbeacontrol rmmultipletimes,butcanonlybeatreated rmoncewithineachofthetwoeventyears.Roughlyhalfofthe rmsinthesampleareonlyinonematchedpair.Fromthematchingalgorithm,17,500 rmsarematched(11,500unique rms).Thestartingpopulationforthissampleare rmsthathavesurvivedthroughthematchedeventyear,whichrestrictsthesampletoatmost345,000 rms.Ofthese,approximately60%ofthe rmownersliveindi erentzipcodesfromtheir rmand45%boughttheirhomeatleastthreeyearsbeforetheeventyear.24Alargenumberofobservationsareremovedinordertocreateasampleinwhichboththetreatedandcontrol rmownersaresimilaron 24Duetodisclosurerestrictions,exactnumbersarenotprovidedandthesestatisticsarecompiledfromtheATTOMtoNETSmergedsample. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP19observables,exceptforthedi erentialhomepriceshock.Onaverage,$7,909ofhomeequityisextractedintheeventyear(Table1.12).Theaverageincludeszerosforthebusinessesthatdidnotextracthomeequityintheeventyear.Toensurethatthematchingdoesnotbiasthetreatedorcontrolmemberstowardscertaincharacteristics,averagedi erencesbetweenkeyvariablesarecalculated.Therearenonoticeabledi erencesbetweenthetreatedandcontrolbusinesses/ownersbasedonasetofobservablecharacteristics(Table1.13).Thetreatedownersreceiveanaverage10%ofadditionalhomepricegrowth,sotheaveragehomevalueof$228,000translatesintoacreditshockofroughly$23,000.Toestimatethee ec

36 tofcreditconstraintsoncontinuingbusiness
tofcreditconstraintsoncontinuingbusinesses,aregressionmodelsimilartoequation1.1isutilized:Yi;j;t+p+k= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+p+k(1.5)wherepisthenumberofyearssincefoundingtthathomeequityispotentiallyextractedforexpansion(twoorthree,whichcorrespondsto rmsofeitheragethreeorfour).Thedi erencebetweenequation1.5andequation1.1isthevectorofcontrolvariables,sincecontinuingbusinesseshaveadditionaldimensionsthatneedtobecontrolled.Forcontinuingbusinesses,Controlsialsoincludesa xede ectforifthebusinesswasinitiallyfundedwithhomeequity,anddependingontheregressionalsoincludesnon-parametric xede ectsforinitialpayrollandemploymentandpayrollgrowthbetweenyears1and2.Theselasttwocontrolsattempttocontrolforvariationinex-antebusinesssuccess.Theinitialpayrollcontrolisinadditiontomatchingoninitialemployment.Toisolateexogenousvariationintheamountofhomeequityextracted,thefollowing rststageisestimated:ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)=c+3ln(ZipCodeHomePricei;t+p)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;t+p(1.6)The rststageinstrumentstheamountofpersonalhomeequityextractedwiththelogofzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthforthe3-yearperiodpriortotheeventyeart+p.Xjpartialsoutthecommontrendinhomepricegrowthwithineachpair,leavingidiosyncratichomepricegrowthbetweentwosimilarandgeographicallyclosezipcodes.Ifgreaterlaggedhomepricegrowthleadstomorehomeequitybeingextractedthen�0. measuresthecausalimpactofhowcontinuingbusinessesrespondtoexogenousavail-abilityofhomeequityatagethreeorfour(t+p).Theresponseisthenstudiedforoneyearbeforetothreeyearsafteryeart+p.Ifthetreatedandcontrol rmsaresimilarbeforeyeart+p,thereshouldbenodi erenceintheiroutcomesinyeart+p�1.Ifhomeeq-uityextractedinyeart+p,duetoexogenousvariationinpasthomepricegrowth,relaxesthecreditconstraintsofcontinuing rmsandtheyproductivelyusethecredit,apositive shouldbefoundinyeart+ponward. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSO

37 FMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP2
FMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP201.3.6ContinuingBusinessEmpiricalResultsThissectionstartswithtestingifexogenouscreditshockstocontinuingbusinessesa ect rmsurvival.DuetorestrictionsonRDCdisclosure,onlyonesurvivalperiodisstudied,whichisthreeyearsaftertheeventyear(year6or7ofthebusiness'slifedependingonwhichagetheeventyearcorrespondsto).Firmshadtosurvivetotheeventyear(agethreeorfour)tobeincluded,whichrestrictsthepopulationtoasetofstrongerbusinessesgivenlowinitialsurvivalrates.Table1.14columns1and2estimatetheregressionmodelusingOLS.Noe ectisfoundwhenusingOLSandthecoecientisveryclosetozero.Thisimpliesthatthereisnorawe ect.The rststageshowsaverystrongpositivee ectfrompasthomepricegrowthonhomeequityextractionintheeventyearandtheF-statisticisabove10(column3),indicatingthattheinstrumentisnotweak.Inthesecondstage,nosigni cante ectisfoundforsurvivalandthecoecientisstillroughlyzero(column5).Totestforrobustnessaroundtheclusteringlevel,columns6and7clusterat rmzipcodebySICdivisionby rmcreationyearand rmcommutingzonebySICdivisionlevels,respectively.Thecoecientremainsinsigni cant.Relaxingcreditconstraintsoncontinuingbusinessesdoesnota ecttheircontinuedsurvivallikelihood.Thisislikelytheresultofsurvivalratesbeingconvex,inthatmany rmsclosewithintheir rstfewyears.Followingwhichtherateofsurvivallevelso .Giventhatthese rmshavealreadysurvivedthroughtheirmostvolatileyears,havingadditionalcreditwillnota ecttheirfuturesurvival.Thisdoesnotimplythatcontinuing rmsarenotcreditconstrained.Totestif rmsizeisa ected,theregressionisestimatedwithemploymentasthedependentvariable.First,column1ofTable1.15showsthatinyearpriortotheeventyear,yeart+p�1,thereisnosigni cantdi erenceinemploymentbetweenthetreatedandcontrol rms.Intheeventyear,employmentfortreated rmssigni cantlyexceedtheemploymentofcontrol rms(column2).Thisimpl

38 iesthatbetweenyearst+p�1andt+p,treate
iesthatbetweenyearst+p�1andt+p,treated rmsexpandedmorerapidlythancontrol rms.Column6con rmsthisbyshowingthattheemploymentgrowthrateislargerfortreated rms.Inaddition,treated rmsremainlargerforthefollowingthreeyears,whichiswhenthesampleends(columns3through5).Similarly,Table1.16showsthatpayrollbetweenthetreatedandcontrol rmsissimilarbeforetheeventyearandimmediatelyincreasesforthetreated rmsintheeventyear.Overall,whencontinuingbusinessesreceiveacreditshock,theyimmediatelyexpandandpermanentlyremainlargerasaresult.The ndingsinTable1.15showthatwhencontinuing rmsextractadditionalhomeequitybecauseofexogenousavailabilityofhomeequity,theyimmediatelyexpandandsub-sequentlypermanentlyremainlarger.Theseresultsprovideevidencethatcontinuingbusi-nessesarecreditconstrained.Havingaccessto10%ofadditionalcreditleadstoanincreaseinemploymentof1.1%,withthee ectincreasingto1.6%afterthreeyears.Thecoecientof0.114translatesintoacreditshockof$153,000immediatelycreatingoneadditionaljobatasmallcontinuing rm.Sincecontinuing rmsrequirealargerpositivecreditshocktohireoneadditionalworker, CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP21continuing rmsarelesscreditconstrainedthanentrant rms.Toseewhythisimpliesthatcontinuing rmsarelesscreditconstrained,itishelpfultothinkintermsofa\marginalpropensitytohire(MPH)",similartotheconceptofmarginalpropensitytoconsumeorborrow.Oneworkerhiredfroman$88,000creditshockimpliesthat0.011jobsarecreatedforevery$1,000ofcreditthatisextended,thisistheMPHforentrant rms.Whilecontinuing rmshaveanMPHof0.0065forevery$1,000ofcreditthatisextended.Sincecontinuing rmshavealowerMPH,thisimpliesthattheyhavelessofaneedtohirefromacreditshock.Thesearethe rstresultstotestifcontinuingbusinessesarecreditconstrained.Contin-uingbusinesseshavesurvivedtheirearlyyears,whentheyaremostpronetofailure.Thissegmentsthepopulationtoastrongergroup

39 ofbusinesses.Assuchtheyareoftenignoredin
ofbusinesses.Assuchtheyareoftenignoredinthestudyofcreditconstraintsonsmallbusinessessinceitisassumedtheycanmoreeasilyobtainexternal nancing.However,theresultsinthissectionshowthatbusinessesremaincreditconstrainedastheyage.Whencontinuingbusinessesreceiveanexogenousincreaseincredit,theyimmediatelyexpandandpermanentlyremainatalargersize.1.4DeclineinRe nancingActivityandBusinessFormationAsshownearlier,entrantsmallbusinessesreliedheavilyonhomeequityfor nancingduringthemid-2000s.However,startingin2008,thiscreditchannelwasvirtuallyeliminated(Fig-ure1.2andTable1.2).Mortgagelendinghasbecomeverytightandasaresult,borrowersarehavingadiculttimeobtainingmortgagecredit.Goodman(2017) ndsthatamongallhomebuyers,creditstandardshavebecometwiceasrestrictiveastheywerein2001,whichwaspriortothelooserlendingstandardsofthesubprimebubbleofthemid-2000s.Recentresearchhasshownthatthistighteningofmortgagecreditsupplyhascausedfewermortgageoriginations|particularlyamongyounger,middleincome,andblackbor-rowers|andhigherrentalprices(LauferandPaciorek,2018;GeteandReher,2018).Giventherelianceofsmallbusinessownersonhomeequityandthestrongcreditconstraintsthattheyface,anotherpossiblee ectofatighteningofcreditstandardsisareductioninbusinessformationrates.DuringtheGreatRecession,householdre nancingactivityandbusinessformationratessimultaneouslyfell,andbothhaveremainedpermanentlylowersincetheGreatRecession(Figure1.1).Thisisdespitestronghomepricegrowthoverthepost-crisisperiod|between2009and2018,homepriceshavegenerallyreachedtheirpre-crisislevelsandinmanycasesexceededthem(Figure1.7).Asaresult,householdsarelikelytohavesigni canthomeequity.Correlationsbetweenhomeequityextractionactivityand rmen-tryratesimplythatalackofre nancingactivityofsmallbusinessownersisachannelforthesteepdeclinein rmentryratessincetheGreatRecession.Thissectionwillshowthiscausally.IntheUnitedStates,increasedhousingwealthisrealizedbyentrepre

40 neursthroughex- CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFE
neursthroughex- CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP22tractinghomeequityandthenusingthecashtofundtheirbusinesses.Normally,housingwealthvariationsandhomeequityextractionactivityarehighlycorrelated.Thishasal-lowedpastresearchtoproxyhomeequityextractionactivitywitheitherhomepricegrowthoravailablehousingwealthinstudyingthee ectsonbusinessformation.However,thepe-riodsince2009hasseenarecoveryinhomepricegrowthwithoutaconcurrentrecoveryincash-outre nancingrates,therebybreakingthislink.Instead,thissectionteststhee ectofhomeequityextractionactivityonbusinessentry.Themicro-datathatisutilizedearlierinthispaperdoesnothavedataon rmsthatarecreatedafter2011.Therefore,thissec-tionutilizescounty-levelmeasuresofcash-outre nancingactivitytostudytheimpactsonbusinessformationduringthe2009to2016period.Unlikedataforhomepricegrowth,localmeasuresofcash-outre nancingactivityarenotreadilyavailable.Usingmortgagetrans-actionleveldatafromATTOM,thispaperconstructs1-yeargrowthratesinthenumberofhouseholdsextractinghomeequityatthecounty-levelbetween2009and2016.Totestthehypothesisthatincreasedlocalre nancingactivityleadstoanincreaseinbusinessformation,1-yeargrowthratesincounty-levelhomeequityre nancingratesareregressedonto1-yeargrowthratesincounty-levelbusinessformationrates.However,thiswillsu erfromomittedvariablebiasduetoconfoundingdemandandbankingshocksthata ectbothre nancingactivityandbusinessformationactivity.Inaddition,theexplanatoryvariableofcounty-levelgrowthinre nancingactivitysu ersfrommeasurementerror.Themeasureofre nancingactivityisforallhouseholdsinthecounty,notonlyentrepreneurs.Sincegrowthinre nancingactivityandgrowthinbusinessformationratesareassumedtobepositivelyrelated,thecoecientwillbebiaseddownwardsinOLS.Toisolateacausalrelationshipthatisdrivenbythecollateralchannel,twostepsareun-dertaken.First,aninstrumentthatisolatesexogenousvari

41 ationinre nancingactivitythatdoesnot
ationinre nancingactivitythatdoesnotdirectlya ectbusinessformationisutilized.Theinstrumentwillalsocorrectformeasurementerror.Second,tofurtherisolatethecollateralchannele ectfromthedemandchannele ect,industriesthatarereliantonlocaldemandareremoved.Forrobustness,itisshownthattheresultgeneralizestoallindustries.Toconstructaninstrument,thispaperexploitstheinstitutionaldetailthatindependentmortgagebanks(IMBs,whichincludesmortgageoriginatorssuchasQuickenLoans)arepronetochurningtheiroriginations.ThismeansthatIMBsaggressivelytargettheirpriorcustomerstoencouragethemtore nancetheirexistingmortgage.Consequently,greaterIMBmarketsharewillleadtogreaterre nancingactivity.25Figure1.8showsthise ect 25InaSEC lingfrom2015,EllingtonFinancialnotedtheaggressivetargetingofcustomersbyIMBstore nanceasarisktoMBSholdings:\Asimprovedtechnologyspreadsthroughoutthelendingindustry,webelievethatthelendingindus-trywillchangeinanumberofimportantways...borrowersshouldstarttoprepaymoreeciently,asdemonstratedbythehigherprepayspeedsofmortgageloansservicedbyQuicken,whichreportedlyusesproprietaryalgorithmstotargetborrowerswhoaremorelikelytore nance,andisparticularlyquickatcontactingborrowersaboutre nancingincentives...Atechnology-driven,broad-basedin-creaseinprepaymenteciencymayputpressureonMBSpricesand/orreducetheexcessspreadenjoyedbyMBSinvestors." CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP23graphically.PurchasemortgagesthatwereoriginatedbyQuickenLoansaremuchmorelikelytoterminatewithinoneyearcomparedtopurchasemortgagesoriginatedbythetopthreebanklenders.Thisrelationshiphasbeentruesincethestartofthedatain2001andisnotanewphenomenon.Buchak,Matvos,Piskorski,andSeru(2018)alsonotedtheincreasedprepaymentsofloansoriginatedbytheseIMBs.Basedonthisinstitutionaldetail,thispaperconstructsashift-shareinstrumentinthespiritof(Bartik,1991;Blanchard,Katz,Hall,andEichengreen,1992).Foreachc

42 ountyc,thepredictedannual(t)IMBmarketsha
ountyc,thepredictedannual(t)IMBmarketshareforpurchasemortgagesiscalculatedusingthepre-existingIMBmarketshareforthecountyinteractedwithnationalgrowthratesinIMBshare(excludingcountyc):Avg%IMBc;t�1%IMB�c;t(1.7)Thepre-existingshares(Avg%IMBc;t�1)exhibitstrongcross-sectionalvariation.26Thesesharesareinteractedwith1-yeargrowthratesinnationalIMBshare(excludingcountyc)toconstructaBartikstyleinstrument,whichisbasedonthepremisethatnationalshockstoIMBmarketsharewilla ectagivencountymorewhentheirpre-existingIMBmarketshareislarger.IfagreaterpredictedshareofrecentpurchasemortgagesinacountyareoriginatedbyIMBs,therewillbegreaterre nancingactivitywithinthecountyduetothosehouseholdsreceivingaggressivemarketingtore nance.Therefore,thiswillprovideexogenousvariationinre nancingactivity.Forrobustness,asecondversionofthisinstrumentbasedonmanyexogenousshocksfromeachlargeIMBisalsoimplemented.Additionalrobustnesstestsareshownattheendofthissectiontoruleoutthatwithin-countychangesintheinstrumentstemfromreasonsrelatedtolocalbusinessactivity.Asasecondconcerntoestimatingthecausalimpactofre nancingactivityonbusinessformationrates,increasesinre nancingactivitymayleadtoanincreaseinbusinessformationbecauseofalocaldemandchannel.Householdsinaggregateextracthomeequity,notonlyentrepreneurs,whichmayleadtoaconfoundinglocalconsumptionshock.Anincreaseinlocalconsumptionmightinturnleadtoincreasedbusinessformationinindustriesreliantonlocaldemand.Tofurtherisolateacausallinkdrivenbythecollateralchannel,industriesthatrelyonlocaldemandareremovedfromthecalculationofbusinessformationgrowthrates.First,industriesthatarenon-tradeablebasedonMianandSu (2014)areremoved|retailtradeandaccommodation/foodservices(NAICS44,45,and72).Second, rmsintheconstruction, nance,insurance,andrealestateindustries(NAICS52and53)arealsoremoved(Adelinoetal.,2015).PubliclyavailabledatafromtheCensusStatisticsofUSBusinesses(SUSB)areusedto

43 calculatemeasuresoflocalestablishmentcre
calculatemeasuresoflocalestablishmentcreation.TheSUSBisanannualdatasetthatmeasuresthenumberofnewestablishmentscreatedatthecountyby2-digitNAICSindustry 26Figure3intheOnlineAppendixshowsAvg%IMBc;tforLosAngeles,Broward,andSu olkcounties.Eachcountyexperiencesdi eringgrowthratesinIMBshareovertime. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP24level.Toestimatethecausale ect,weighted2SLSareestimatedasfollows:ln(#NewEstablishmentsc;t+1)= + \ln(#Extractedc;t+1)+!c+t+1+Zc;t+c;t+1(1.8)where!candt+1arecountyandannualtime xede ects,respectively,whichareincludedtoisolatethee ectwithin-countywhilecontrollingforcommonannualshocks.Zc;tisavectoroftime-varyingcounty-levelnon-parametricgrowthratecontrols(betweent�1andt),including:homeprices,numberofhomepurchases,unemploymentrate,smallbusinessloanvolume,andthetotalnumberofestablishments.27Thesamplecovers1,493counties(c)forthe8-yearperiodbetween2009and2016.tstartsin2009inordertofocusonthepost-crisisperiodduringwhichre nancingandbusinessformationrateshavestagnated.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthecounty-levelandtheregressionsareweightedbythecounty'spopulationfromthe2010Census.Resultsincolumns1through7ofTable1.17arebasedongrowthratesofbusinessformationthatexcludeindustriesreliantonlocaldemand.Columns1and2showthatgreaterre nancingactivityisassociatedwithgreaterbusinessentry(column2addsthevectoroftimevaryingcounty-levelcontrolsZc;t)usingWLS.Totestthestrengthoftheinstrument,column3estimatesthe rststage:ln(#Extractedc;t+1)= +Avg%IMBc;t�1%IMB�c;t+!c+t+1+Zc;t+c;t+1(1.9)The rststageisolatesvariationwithincountyforcash-outre nancingactivitybasedonpredictedIMBmarketshare,whilecontrollingfornationalshocks.IfIMBmarketsharepositivelya ectscash-outre nancingactivitywithincounty,willbepositiveandsigni -cant.Column3 ndsthata1pointinc

44 reaseinIMBshareincreasesre nancingac
reaseinIMBshareincreasesre nancingactivityby0.25points.Theinstrumentissigni cantatthe1%levelandproducesanF-statisticover10,indicatingthatitisnotaweakinstrument.Column4estimatesthesecondstage.Thecoecientfromweighted2SLSislargerthanthecoecientestimatedwithWLS,likelyaresultofthemeasurementerrordiscussedearlier.A10%increaseinre nancingactivitycausesanincreaseinbusinessentrygrowthratesof2.5%.Forrobustness,column5showsthatthecoecientissimilarwhentheexplanatoryvariableofgrowthinthenumberofhouseholdsextractinghomeequityisreplacedwithgrowthinthedollaramountofhomeequityextracted.28Ifthedependentvariableisreplacedwithgrowthinestablishmententryrates(theratioofthenumberofenteringestablishmentstothepopulationofestablishments)theresultisuna ected(column6).Toshowthatthe 27County-levelhomepricedataarefromFHFA.VolumeofhomepurchasesdataarecalculatedfromHMDA.UnemploymentratedataarefromBLSLAU.SmallbusinessloanvolumedataarefromtheCRAandrestrictedtoloanamounts$100,000.DataonthetotalnumberofestablishmentsisfromtheCensusSUSB.28Growthinthedollaramountofhomeequityextractedmixese ectsfromchangesinthenumberofhouseholdsextractinghomeequityandtheamounthouseholdsextract. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP25resultgeneralizes,thecoecientisshowntobelargelyuna ectedwhenonlybusinessesinthenon-tradeablesectorsareexcluded(column8)andwhenbusinessfromeveryindustryareincluded(column9).Sincethecoecientisstablewhentheregressionmodelisestimatedforallindustriesandalsoforindustriesthatarenotreliantonlocaldemand,thee ectisfromthecollateralchannel(asopposedtothedemandchannelfromanincreaseindemandforbusinesses).Thecoecient'smagnitudeislarge.Aonestandarddeviationshocktocash-outre -nancingactivity(0.53)wouldcauseanincreaseinbusinessentrygrowthratesof11%.This53%shockwouldincreaseannualcash-outre nancingactivityby$65billion,whichwouldleadtoarecoveryincash-outre

45 ;nancingvolumetolevelsseenin2002,aperiod
;nancingvolumetolevelsseenin2002,aperiodofnormallendingstandardspriortothehousingbubble.Althoughtherecoveryinre nancingactivityismodest,the11%increaseinbusinessentrygrowthratesfromthisshockwouldrecoverone-thirdofthedeclineinbusinessentryratesexperiencedsince2006.Apossibleconcernwiththeinstrumentisthatashifttowardsnon-banksformortgagelendingmightincreasesmallbusinesslendingbybanks.Ifbanksholdtheiroriginatedmort-gagesonbalancesheetanddonotsecuritizethemortgagesthenbankmortgageoriginationscanpotentiallyreducenon-mortgagelending.AsIMBsincreasetheirmarketshareofmort-gages,banksmayasaresulthaveincreasedlendingcapacityfornon-mortgageloansandsubsequentlyoriginatemorebusinessloans.Thisinturnmaystimulatebusinessformationrates.Giventheextenttowhichbankssecuritizetheirmortgageoriginations,thisislikelynotaconcern.Totestthatsmallbusinesslendingisnota ectedbyIMBshare,thee ectoftheinstrumenton1-yeargrowthratesinsmallbusinesslendingisestimatedusingWLS(countyandtime xede ectsandZc;t[excludinglaggedsmallbusinesslendingvolume]areincluded).Theregressionshowsthattheinstrumentisnotcorrelatedwithchangesinsmallbusinesslendingvolume(column1,Table1.18).Anotherconcernisifwithin-countychangesinIMBmarketsharearecorrelatedwithchangesintheunemploymentrate,shareofresidentswhoarewhite,orshareofresidentswithlessthanahighschooleducation.Buchaketal.(2018) ndthatIMBshareishigherinthecross-sectionforcountieswithlargervaluesforthesevariables.Their ndingiscross-sectional,althoughitispossiblethatIMBsharewithinacountyevolveswithchangesinthesevariables,whichwouldsubsequentlya ectbusinessentrygrowthrates.Toshowthatthisisnotaconcern,aWLSregressionisestimatedtotestif1-yearcounty-levelgrowthratesinthesevariablesforecastpredictedIMBshare.Columns2to4,Table1.18showthatthereisnorelationshipbetweenpredictedIMBshareandchangesinthesevariables,therebyalleviatingthisconcern.Therobustnesstestsattemptedtoruleoutpotentialissueswiththein

46 strument.Asanadditionaltest,theinstrumen
strument.Asanadditionaltest,theinstrumentistransformedtoexploitexogenousvariationfromtheshocksincaseendogeneityremainsaconcern.TheinstrumentusesnationalshockstooverallIMBmarketshare,excludingcountyc,sooneexogenousshockisutilizedforeachcountyc.Withmanyexogenousshocks,theestimatede ectfor isconsistentevenifthesharesareendogenous(Borusyak,Hull,andJaravel,2018;Goldsmith-Pinkham,Sorkin,andSwift,2018).Totransformtheinstrumenttomanyexogenousshocks,foreachcountyc,national CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP26growthratesinmarketshareforeachIMB(excludingcountyc)arecalculated.OnlylargeIMBs,thosethatoperateinatleast100counties,areincludedtominimizethechancethatgrowthratesinIMBmarketsharearecorrelatedwithlocaleconomicactivity.29EachIMBmarketsharegrowthrateisweightedbytheIMB'sex-anteshareoftotalpurchasemortgageoriginationvolumeincountycinyeart�1:XjfIMBc;t�1g!c;t�1%j�c;t,where!c;t�1=$PurchaseOriginationjc;t�1 $PurchaseOriginationc;t�1(1.10)wherethesumisindexedoverthesetofalllargeIMBsthatoperateincountycinyeart�1and%j�c;tisthenationalgrowthrateofIMBj'smarketshareexcludingcountycbetweenyearst�1andt.Eveninthepresenceofendogenouslaggedshares,themanyexogenousshockswillallowforaconsistentestimationof .Withthisinstrument,theestimatedcoecientdoesnotnoticeablychange(column7,Table1.17).Inresultsavailableuponrequest,thestandarderrorapproachfromAdao,Kolesar,andMorales(2019),whichaccountsforcorrelationacrosscountieswithsimilarIMBshares,isshowntonotreducethesigni canceoftheresult.1.5ConclusionUsingnoveldata,thispaperprovidesevidencethatbothentrantandcontinuingsmallbusi-nessesarenegativelyimpactedbycreditconstraints.Atentry,positivecreditshockscausesmallbusinessestostartlarger,growfaster,permanentlyremainlarger,andhaveagreaterchanceofsurvival.Similarly,continuingbusinessesimmediatelyrespondwhentheircreditconstraintsareloosenedandperman

47 entlyremainlarger.Creditconstraintshavea
entlyremainlarger.Creditconstraintshaveaper-manente ectonsmallbusinesses,highlightingtheeconomicbene tsofalleviatingcreditconstraintsearlierina rm'slife.Intermsofdirectandimmediateemploymente ects,oneadditionaljobiscreatedfromapositivecreditshockof$88,000toentrant rmsand$153,000tocontinuing rms.Toalleviatethesecreditconstraints,businessesownershavehistoricallyheavilyreliedontheirpersonalhousingequity.Inrecentyears,thischannelofcredithasalmostentirelydisappeared,withonlythemostcreditworthyentrepreneursabletotapintotheirpersonalhomeequity.Atighteningofcreditstandardssince2008hasbeenanimportantreasonforthelackofrecoveryinbusinessformationratessincethe2008 nancialcrisis.Whilehomepriceshaverecovered,personalhomeequityextractionhasnotrecoveredduetomorestringentlendingstandards,whichinturnhasledtofewersmallbusinessesbeingstarted.Theresultsinthispapershedlightonanotheravenuethroughwhichdisruptionsinlendingsincethe2008 nancialcrisishavea ectedtheeconomy.Whilerestrictionsonlending 29Inthesimplestofcases,ifanIMBoperatesinonecountythengrowthratesinthatIMB'ssharewillberelatedtolocaleconomicconditions.AsthenumberofcountiesthattheIMBoperatesinincreases,thesmallertherelationthatgrowthrateswillhavetolocaleconomicconditions. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP27tobusinessesandhouseholdshavebeenstudiedseparately,theyhavenotbeenstudiedjointly.Thestrongandpreviouslyunderappreciatedrolethatmortgagecredithadonsmallbusinessformationpriortothe2008crisishighlightstheneedtounderstandtheimplicationsthatmortgagecreditaccesshasonbusinessformation.Whiletherehasbeenadeclinein rmentryratesfordecades,thedeclinesince2006wasperhapsthesharpestinrecenthistory.Thispapershowsthatatighteningofmortgagecreditavailabilitytopotentialentrepreneursisanimportantreasonforthisdecline.Arecoveryofcash-outre nancingactivitytoitslevelin2002wouldrecoverone-thirdofthedeclinein rmentryr

48 atessince2006.Whiletightermortgagestanda
atessince2006.WhiletightermortgagestandardsintheaftermathoftheGreatRecessionareoftenviewedasnetpositive,thenegativeexternalitythatthiscanhaveonthecreation,size,andstrengthofsmallbusinessesisoverlooked. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP281.6FiguresandTables Figure1.1:HomeEquityExtractionandFirmEntryRatesThesolidlineshowsvolumeofhomeequityextractedbyyearbetween2001and2016,constructedfromATTOM(inbillionsofdollarsadjustedto2016prices).Thedashedlinereports rmentryratesfromtheCensusBusinessDynamicStatisticsdata.Firmentryrateiscalculatedastheratioofthenumberofprivatesector rmscreatedinagivenyeartothenumberofallactiveprivatesector rmsintherespectiveyear(PugsleyandS,ahin,2018). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP29 Figure1.2:ShareofSmallBusinessesFoundedwithHomeEquityFundingByRegionTheshareofentrantsmallbusinessfundedbypersonalhomeequitybyyearofformation.ThedataareconstructedfromamergeofATTOMtoNETS.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Abusinessisclassi edasbeingfundedbyhomeequityiftheownerextractsover$5,000ofhomeequityintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.RegionsfollowtheCensusregionclassi cation.Therawunderlyingdataonlyincludesbusinessownerswhoownahome.Tocorrectforthis,thetimeseriesareadjustedbythehomeownershiprateofbusinessownersbasedonthepopulationofbusinessownersbyregionandyearfromtheAmericanCommunitySurveymicro-data. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP30 Figure1.3:Identi cationSetupIllustrationofidenti cationsetupbasedonlocationmatching. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP31 (a) (b)Figure1.4:Identi cationIllustrationFiguresAandBshowtheidealset-upformeasuringexogenouscreditshockstoentrantandcontinuingbusinesses,respectively. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP32

49 Figure1.5:Di erenceinDistancefromHo
Figure1.5:Di erenceinDistancefromHometoFirmBetweenTreatedandControlDensityplotofthelndi erencebetweenentranttreatedandcontrol rmsforthedistancebetweena rmowner'shomeand rm.TheentrantmatchedpairsforthisplotareconstructedfromtheATTOMtoNETSmergedsamplewiththesamecriteriatoformmatchedpairsfromthesamplemergedtoLBDforentrant rms.Themeandi erenceis-0.0338,withastandarddeviationof1.191. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP33 Figure1.6:Di erenceinPropensitytoRe nanceWithaTraditionalBankBetweenTreatedandControlDensityplotofthedi erencebetweentheentranttreatedandcontrol rmowners'propensitytooriginatetheircash-outre nancemortgagethroughatraditionalbank(=1iftraditionalbank).TheentrantmatchedpairsforthisplotareconstructedfromtheATTOMtoNETSmergedsamplewiththesamecriteriatoformmatchedpairsfromthesamplemergedtoLBDforentrant rms.Themeandi erenceis0.007,withastandarddeviationof0.671. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP34 Figure1.7:HomePriceGrowthExampleQuarterlyalltransaction(purchaseandre nance)homepricegrowthbetweenJanuary2000andDe-cember2018forCalifornia,Florida,Texas,Colorado,andnationally.DataarefromFRED.Valuesarenormalizedto100inJanuary2009. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP35 Figure1.8:LoanTerminationRatesProbabilityofloanterminationwithinoneyearoforigination.DataarefromamergeofloanlevelpublicuseFreddieMacandFannieMaedatatoATTOM.Thedataarerestrictedtopurchasemortgageswithanoriginationbalancebetween$100kand$400k. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP36Table1.1:SummaryStatisticsforLBD SmallBusinessesinLBDAllMergedtoAllDatasetsDidNotMergeNMeanSDNMeanSDNMeanSD InitialEmployment5,656,0002.372.247461,0002.5732.2285,195,0002.3522.248InitialPayroll($000s)5,656,00057.7587.07461,00078.51102.45,195,00055.9185.34SurvivedtoYear55,656,0000.4888-461,0

50 000.6386-5,195,0000.4755- Summarystatist
000.6386-5,195,0000.4755- SummarystatisticsforsmallbusinessesintherestricteduseLongitudinalBusinessDatabase(LBD)thatwerefoundedbetween2001and2011.Note,thisonlyincludesemployerbusinesses.Duetorestrictionsondisclosure,onlyroundedsamplecounts,mean,andstandarddeviationareshownforselectvariables.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Abusinessiscountedasmergedtoalldatasetsifitwassuccessfullymergedto:theSSEL,NETS,ATTOM,andzipcodeleveldatafromZillowandthe2000decennialCensus. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP37 Table1.2:SummaryStatisticsofEntrantBusinessFinancingSources Summarystatisticsonsourcesofstart-up nancingfrom:2007SurveyofBusinessOwners(SBO),the2013-2014,2014-2015,and2015-2016wavesoftheAnnualSurveyofEntrepreneurs(ASE),the2004Kau manFamilySurveybasedonresultsinRobbandRobinson(2014),andtheNETS-ATTOMmergeddatasetutilizedinthispaper.The2007SBOincludesbusinessesthatsurvivedthrough2007.TheASEisbasedonsurveysin2014,2015,and2016andprovidesstatisticsforbusinessesfoundedwithinthetwoyearperiodbeforethesurvey.TheSBOdataarerestrictedto rmswithbetween1and25employees,theamountofstartupcapitalreported,andwithownerswhofoundedthebusiness.Tabulationweightsareused.FortheASE,theserestrictionsarenotpossibleasamicro-datasetisnotavailable.TheKau manFirmSurveyisbasedon rmsofallsizes,butisprimarilycomprisedof rmswithtenorfeweremployees.RobbandRobinson(2014)report16%utilizepersonalbankloans(whichincludeshomeequity)asinitialfundingcapital.Thisstatisticrestrictsto rmsthatdonothavemissingsurveyresultsoverthe2004to2007period(orwereknowntohavegoneoutofbusiness).TheNETS-ATTOMmergeddatasetutilizedinthispaperisrestrictedtobusinesseswithtenorfeweremployeesinitiallyandtobusinessownerswhoownahome.Tocorrectforthislastrestriction,theratiosfromtheNETS-ATTOMpopulationareadjustedbythehomeownershiprateforthepopulationofbusinessownerseachyear

51 between2003and2007usingmicro-datafromthe
between2003and2007usingmicro-datafromtheAmericanCommunitySurvey(ACS). CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP38Table1.3:SummaryStatisticsBetweenTreatedandControlMembersforEntrantBusinessMatching (1)(2)(3)NMeanSD LNDi erenceinHomeValueatFirstYear-32,500-0.015650.261LNDi erenceinCLTVatPurchase2,5000.0019520.05182LNDi erenceinNumberofMonthsfromPurchaseUntilFirstYearofFirm2,5000.0038150.5278LNDi erenceinMedianHomeZipCodeIncome2,500-0.070320.3436Di erenceinHomeZipCodePercentofResidentsWhoAreWhite2,500-0.020460.205Di erenceinHomeZipCodePercentofHouseholdsBelowPovertyLine2,5000.011420.0714Di erenceinHomeZipCodePercentofHouseholdsWhoRent2,5000.027110.2038 RatioofLagged3-YearHomeZipCodeHPIGrowth2,5000.065250.06252 Summarystatisticsatthepairlevelforentrantsmallbusinesspairscreatedbasedontheentrantsmallbusinessmatchingalgorithm.Pairsareformedfromexactmatchesonthezipcodeofthebusiness,thezipcodesofthehomesbeingdi erentfromeachother(andthebusinesses),SICdivision,andyearofbusinesscreation.Thepairsarefurtherrestrictedtocaseswherethehomevalues(asmeasuredthreeyearspriortobusinesscreationyear)arewithin20%or$100k(forlessvaluablehomes)ofeachotherandtheCLTVratiosatpurchasearewithin20bpsofeachother.Thetreated rmistheonethatexperiencedgreaterhomepricegrowth.Foreachtreated rm,acontrol rmthathasthemostsimilarhomevalueasthetreated rmisselectedafterthematchingexercise.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Firmsinthesamplewerefoundedbetween2001and2011.Roundedsamplesize,mean,andstandarddeviationarereportedforthedi erencesinvariablesbetweenthetreatedandcontrolmemberofeachpair. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP39Table1.4:SummaryStatisticsofEntrantBusinessMatchedSample (1)(2)(3)NMeanSD InitialEmployment4,6002.7782.32InitialPayroll($000s)4,600$94.72$125SurvivedtoYear14,6000.9494-

52 SurvivedtoYear34,6000.7899-SurvivedtoYea
SurvivedtoYear34,6000.7899-SurvivedtoYear54,6000.6732-AmountofHomeEquityExtracted4,600$100,800$102,200HomeZipCode2000MedianFamilyIncome4,600$64,33021330HomeZipCodePercentWhite4,6000.74740.1833HomeZipCodePercentBelowPovertyLine4,6000.087520.06056HomeZipCodePercentRenter4,6000.30930.1564CLTVatPurchase4,6000.87160.1648HomeValueatPurchase($000s)4,600$206.8122.13-yearHPIGrowthBeforeFirmCreation4,6001.5070.2728#MonthsBetweenHomePurchaseandFirmCreation4,60076.8734.18 Summarystatisticsatthebusinesslevelforentrantsmallbusinessthatwerematchedtoanotherbusiness.Thematchedentrant rmsampleisconstructedassmallbusinessesthatwerefundedwithhomeequityatentry,wheretheentrepreneurlivesinadi erentzipcodefromthebusiness,andwherethehomewaspurchasedatleastthreeyearspriortothe rmentryyear.Pairsareformedfromexactmatchesonthezipcodeofthebusiness,thezipcodesofthehomesbeingdi erentfromeachother(andthebusinesses),SICdivision,andyearofbusinesscreation.Thepairsarefurtherrestrictedtocaseswherethehomevalues(asmeasuredthreeyearspriortobusinesscreationyear)arewithin20%or$100k(forlessvaluablehomes)ofeachotherandtheCLTVratiosatpurchasearewithin20bpsofeachother.Thetreated rmistheonethatexperiencedgreaterhomepricegrowth.Foreachtreated rm,acontrol rmthathasthemostsimilarhomevalueasthetreated rmisselectedafterthematchingexercise.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Firmsinthesamplewerefoundedbetween2001and2011andeach rmisonlyincludedonceevenifmatchedmultipletimes.Roundedsamplesize,mean,andstandarddeviationarereported. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP40 Table1.5:E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessSurvival (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)Survival5-year5-year5-year5-year5-year5-year1-year3-yearOLS,OnlyPairFEOLS1stStage2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS ln($AmountExtractedi;t)0.05510.05320.5130.5130.5130.20

53 20.712(3.02)(2.89)(2.19)
20.712(3.02)(2.89)(2.19)(1.88)(2.24)(1.73)(2.69)3ln(ZipCodeHomePricei;t)0.882(3.21) #Obs51005100510051005100510051005100R-squared0.5250.5530.6550.30.30.30.332-0.187F-statistic--10.32----- Cluster rmzip*SICdivision?YYYYNNYYClustercommutingzone*SICdivision?NNNNYNNNCluster rmzip*SICdivision* rmentryyear?NNNNNYNN tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifentrantsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialsurvivaloutcomesbasedoninitialcreditaccess:I(Survivedi;j;t+k)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+kFirmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,andthepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj.Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.TheregressionsarealinearprobabilitymodelwithI(Survivedi;j;t+k)equaltooneifthebusinesssurvivedatleastkyears.ln($AmountExtractedi;t)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsareestimatedontheentrantmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatwereinitiallyfundedwithhomeequityandwerefoundedbetween2001and2011.Columns1and2estimatethee ecton5-yearsurvivalrateusingOLS(onlycontrollingforpair xede ectsincolumn1).Column3estimatesthe rststagewiththeinstrumentbeinglaggedlog3-yearhomezipcodelevelhomepricegrowthfromZillow.Columns4through6estimatethecausalimpacton5-yearsurvival.Forrobustness,column5clustersatthecommutingzonebySICdivisionlevelandcolumn6clustersatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionb

54 y rmcreationyearlevel.Columns7and8es
y rmcreationyearlevel.Columns7and8estimatethee ecton1-yearand3-yearsurvival,respectively. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP41 Table1.6:E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessEmployment (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)ln(Employment)Year1Year2Year3Year4Year5Year52SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLSOLS ln($AmountExtractedi;t)0.4881.3801.4581.4211.2410.111(1.84)(2.39)(2.24)(2.21)(2.00)(2.75) #Obs510043004300430043004300R-squared0.4-0.141-0.0790.05610.2230.57 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifentrantsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialemploymentbasedoninitialcreditaccess:ln(Employmenti;j;t+k)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+kFirmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,andthepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj.Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.Theoutcomevariablesarethelogofemploymentinyears1through5.ln($AmountExtractedi;t)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsareestimatedontheentrantmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatwereinitiallyfundedwithhomeequityandwerefoundedbetween2001and2011.Foremploymentinyears2through5(columns2through6)thesampleisrestrictedtopairswherebothmembersneverhadmissingemployment/payrolldataintheLBDwithintheir rst veyears(ifa rmisinmultiplepairsandoneofthepairsisexcludedthenalloftheirotherpairsareexcludedaswell).Columns1through5est

55 imatethee ectonemploymentinyears1thr
imatethee ectonemploymentinyears1through5,respectively,using2SLSwiththesecondstagereported.Column6estimatesthee ectonyear5employmentusingOLS. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP42 Table1.7:E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessEmploymentGrowthRates (1)(2)(3)(4)EmploymentGrowthYears1to2Years2to3Years3to4Years4to5 ln($AmountExtractedi;t)1.8090.9700.2070.231(2.18)(1.45)(0.50)(0.52) #Obs4300430043004300R-squared-0.2990.3980.7020.750 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifentrantsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialemploymentgrowthratesbasedoninitialcreditaccess:Employmenti;j;t+k+1�Employmenti;j;t+k :5(Employmenti;j;t+k+1+Employmenti;j;t+k)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+kFirmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,andthepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj.Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.Theoutcomevariablesare1-yearemploymentgrowthratesforthebusiness's rstfouryears.ln($AmountExtractedi;t)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsareestimatedontheentrantmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatwereinitiallyfundedwithhomeequityandwerefoundedbetween2001and2011.Thesampleisrestrictedtopairswherebothmembersneverhadmissingemployment/payrolldataintheLBDwithintheir rst veyears(ifa rmisinmultiplepairsandoneofthepairsisexcludedthenalloftheirotherpairsareexcludedaswell).C

56 olumns1through4estimatethee ecton1-y
olumns1through4estimatethee ecton1-yearemploymentgrowthinforthebusinesses rstfouryears,respectively,using2SLSwiththesecondstagereported. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP43 Table1.8:E ectofCreditAccessonEntrantBusinessPayroll (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)ln(Payroll)Year1Year2Year3Year4Year5Year52SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLSOLS ln($AmountExtractedi;t)0.5572.6853.6643.3062.9720.296(0.92)(2.13)(2.25)(2.13)(1.96)(2.98) #Obs510043004300430043004300R-squared0.5660.128-0.07520.1500.2780.586 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifentrantsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialpayrollbasedoninitialcreditaccess:ln(Payrolli;j;t+k)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+kFirmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,andthepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj.Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.Theoutcomevariablesarethelogofpayrollinyears1through5.ln($AmountExtractedi;t)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsareestimatedontheentrantmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatwereinitiallyfundedwithhomeequityandwerefoundedbetween2001and2011.Forpayrollinyears2through5(columns2through6)thesampleisrestrictedtopairswherebothmembersneverhadmissingemployment/payrolldataintheLBDwithintheir rst veyears(ifa rmisinmultiplepairsandoneofthepairsisexcludedthenalloftheirotherpairsareexcluded

57 aswell).Columns1through5estimatethee
aswell).Columns1through5estimatethee ectonpayrollinyears1through5,respectively,using2SLSwiththesecondstagereported.Column6estimatesthee ectonyear5payrollusingOLS. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP44Table1.9:SummaryStatisticsComparingEntrantBusinessesbyInitialFundingSource (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)HomeEquityFundedNotHomeEquityFundedNMeanSDNMeanSD InitialEmployment124,0002.6612.264337,0002.5412.213InitialPayroll($000s)124,000$81.04$102.9337,000$77.59$102.2SurvivedtoYear1124,0000.9453-337,0000.9378-SurvivedtoYear3124,0000.7703-337,0000.764-SurvivedtoYear5124,0000.6382-337,0000.6387-AmountofHomeEquityExtracted124,000$100,600$123,70033,7000--forInitialCapitalHomeZipCode2000MedianFamilyIncome124,000$65,470$21,660337,000$63,480$21,900HomeZipCodePercentWhite124,0000.79450.1761337,0000.78930.1871HomeZipCodePercentBelowPovertyLine124,0000.081090.05934337,0000.086640.06415HomeZipCodePercentRenter124,0000.28680.1561337,0000.29560.1621CLTVatPurchase124,0000.77680.3322337,0000.70060.3852HomeValueatPurchase($000s)124,000$277.5$223.7337,000$264.9$230.73-yearHPIGrowthBeforeFirmCreation124,0001.3620.296337,0001.1720.3339#MonthsBetweenHomePurchase124,00052.2141.5337,00059.5847.39andFirmCreation Summarystatisticscomparinghomeequityfundedbusinessestonon-homeequityfundedbusinesseswithinthesampleofsmallbusinessesfoundedbetween2001and2011intheLBDthatweremergedtotheotherdatasets.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Abusinessislabeledashomeequityfundediftheentrepreneurextractedatleast$5,000ofpersonalhomeequityintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.Duetorestrictionsondisclosure,onlyroundedsamplecounts,mean,andstandarddeviationareshownforselectvariables. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP45 Table1.10:ComparingDi erencesinBusinessesandEntrepreneursByInitialFundingSource (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)ln(PurchaseValu

58 e)CLTVln(Employmentt)ln(Payrollt)1-year3
e)CLTVln(Employmentt)ln(Payrollt)1-year3-year5-yearSurvivalSurvivalSurvival I(HomeEquityFundedi)0.05350.03970.01610.009540.00220.00114-0.000473(22.23)(28.1)(2.1)(0.48)(0.64)(0.19)(-0.07)ln(PurchaseValuei)0.02950.1580.004670.009070.0120(5.69)(11.66)(2.01)(2.3)(2.73)CLTVi-0.0141-0.0582-0.00559-0.0171-0.0184(-1.37)(-2.17)(-1.2)(-2.16)(-2.06) #Obs461000461000461000461000461000461000461000R-squared0.670.450.7890.7840.7530.770.776 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifhomeequityfundedbusinessesdi erfromnon-homeequityfundedbusinesses:Yi= + I(HomeEquityFundedi)+!Controlsi+iwhereiindexesabusiness.I(HomeEquityFundedi)isanindicatorvariable=1ifabusinessisinitiallyfundedwithhomeequity(entrepreneurextracted&#x]TJ/;ø 9;&#x.962; Tf;&#x 18.;ʖ ;� Td;&#x [00;$5,000intheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear).ThepopulationisthemergedLBDtoATTOMdatasetandincludessmallbusinesses(startedwithtenorfeweremployeesandinitiallysingle-unit rms)foundedbetween2001and2011.OutcomevariablesarefromATTOMandtheLBD.Columns1and2usehousinginformationfromATTOMasoutcomevariablesandControlsiincludes xede ectsfortheinteractionofhomezipcodebyhomepurchaseyear,LFO,and2-digitSICindustry.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthehomezipcodelevel.Columns3through7usedataonthebusinessesfromLBDasoutcomevariablesandControlsiincludeslogpurchasevalue,CLTV,and xede ectsforthetripleinteractionof2-digitSICbycreationyearby rmzipcodeandLFO.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe2-digitSICby rmzipcodelevel. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP46 Table1.11:ComparingDi erencesinPersonalForeclosureOutcomeByInitialFundingSource (1)(2)(3)(4)2001-20112001-20042005-20072008-2011 I(HomeEquityFundedi)0.0156-0.01010.0636-0.0239

59 ;(1.59)(-0.22)(4.14)(-1.82) #Obs55188757
;(1.59)(-0.22)(4.14)(-1.82) #Obs55188757501158062334300R-squared0.8800.9240.8650.881OverallDefaultRate0.1930.1430.2480.177 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifhomeequityfundedbusinessesdi erfromnon-homeequityfundedbusinessesinforeclosureprobability:I(Foreclosurei)= + I(HomeEquityFundedi)+!Controlsi+iwhereiindexesabusiness.I(HomeEquityFundedi)isanindicatorvariable=1ifabusinessisinitiallyfundedwithhomeequity(entrepreneurextracted&#x]TJ/;ø 9;&#x.962; Tf;&#x 18.;ʖ ;� Td;&#x [00;$5,000intheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear).ThepopulationisthemergedNETStoATTOMdatasetthatisfurthermergedtoMcDashandincludessmallbusinesses(startedwithtenorfeweremployeesandinitiallysingle-unit rms)foundedbetween2001and2011.ForeclosureisestimatedfromATTOMandthedependentvariableequals1ifabusinessownerhasaforeclosureontheirhomewithinfouryearsofstartingthebusiness.Controlsiisvectorofcontrolsthatincludes:homepurchaseyear* rmcreationyear*homezipcode* rmzipcode*2-digitSICindustryFE,purchasevalue,combinedloantovalue(CLTV)atpurchase,initial rmemploymentFE,originalmortgageinterestrate,andFICOattimeofhomepurchase.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthehomezipcodelevel.Column1isbasedonthefull2001-2011period,whilecolumns2to4segmentintothepre-crisis(2001-2004 rmentryyears),crisis(2005-2007 rmentryyears),andpost-crisis(2008-2011 rmentryyears)periods,respectively. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP47Table1.12:SummaryStatisticsofContinuingBusinessMatchedSample (1)(2)(3)NMeanSD InitialEmployment11,5001.7111.096InitialPayroll($000s)11,500$62.46$70SurvivedtoEventYear+311,5000.7581-AmountofHomeEquityExtractedinEventYear11,500$7,909$36,350HomeZipCode2000MedianFamilyIncome11,500$62,800$20,710HomeZipCodePercentWhite11,5000.76640.1921HomeZipCodePercentBelowPovertyLine11,5000.088690.06358HomeZipCodePercentRenter1

60 1,5000.30570.168CLTVatPurchase11,5000.73
1,5000.30570.168CLTVatPurchase11,5000.73340.3258HomeValueatPurchase($000s)11,500$227.8$152.93-yearHPIGrowthBeforeEventYear11,5001.0880.3848#MonthsBetweenHomePurchaseandFirmCreation11,50059.7744 Summarystatisticsof(unique)continuingsmallbusinessesinthematchedcontinuing rmsample.Thematchedcontinuing rmsampleisconstructedassmallbusinessesthathavesurvivedthrougheitheryear3or4(theeventyear),wheretheentrepreneurlivesinadi erentzipcodefromthebusiness,andwherethehomewaspurchasedatleastthreeyearspriortotheeventyear.Pairsareformedfromexactmatchesonthezipcodeofthebusiness,thezipcodesofthehomesbeingdi erentfromeachother(andthebusinesses),SICdivision,yearofbusinesscreation,andsameinitialemployment.Thepairsarerestrictedtocaseswherethehomevalues(asmeasuredthreeyearspriortotheeventyear)arewithin20%or$100k(forlessvaluablehomes)ofeachotherandemploymentoneyearpriortotheeventyeariswithinthreeemployeesofeachother.Withinthepair,thetreated rmistheonethatexperiencedgreaterhomepricegrowthwithinthe3-yearperiodpriortotheeventyear.Thecontrol rmisselectedastheonethathasthemostsimilarhomevalueasthetreated rm.Abusinesscanbeacontrol rmmultipletimes(andcanbebothacontrolandtreated rmindi erentpairs)butcanonlybeatreated rmonceforeachofthetwoeventyears.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Duetorestrictionsondisclosure,onlyroundedsamplecounts,mean,andstandarddeviationareshownforselectvariables.Theamountofhomeequityextractedintheeventyearissetto0forthebusinessesthatdonotextracthomeequityintheeventyear. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP48Table1.13:SummaryStatisticsBetweenTreatedandControlMembersforContinuingBusi-nessMatching (1)(2)(3)NMeanSD LNDi erenceinHomeValue8,900-0.0048870.2766LNDi erenceinCLTVatPurchase8,900-0.0046170.2975LNDi erenceinNumberofMonthsfromPurchaseUntilFirstYearofFirm8,900-0.0054211.082L

61 NDi erenceinMedianHomeZipCodeIncome8
NDi erenceinMedianHomeZipCodeIncome8,9000.01290.3745Di erenceinHomeZipCodePercentofResidentsWhoAreWhite8,9000.00420.2238Di erenceinHomeZipCodePercentofHouseholdsBelowPovertyLine8,9000.0018660.07808Di erenceinHomeZipCodePercentofHouseholdsWhoRent8,9000.014980.2202Di erenceinNumberofEmployeesinYearPriortoEventYear8,9000.0011291.413LNDi erenceinPayrollinYear18,9000.015651.125 RatioofLagged3-YearHomeZipCodeHPIGrowth8,9000.10160.115 Summarystatisticscomparingdi erencesinvariablesbetweenthetreatedandcontrolmembersofthematchedcontinuing rmsample.Thematchedcontinuing rmsampleisconstructedassmallbusinessesthathavesurvivedthrougheitheryear3or4(theeventyear),wheretheentrepreneurlivesinadi erentzipcodefromthebusiness,andwherethehomewaspurchasedatleastthreeyearspriortotheeventyear.Pairsareformedfromexactmatchesonthezipcodeofthebusiness,thezipcodesofthehomesbeingdi erentfromeachother(andthebusinesses),SICdivision,yearofbusinesscreation,andsameinitialemployment.Thepairsarerestrictedtocaseswherethehomevalues(asmeasuredthreeyearspriortotheeventyear)arewithin20%or$100k(forlessvaluablehomes)ofeachotherandemploymentoneyearpriortotheeventyeariswithinthreeemployeesofeachother.Withinthepair,thetreated rmistheonethatexperiencedgreaterhomepricegrowthwithinthe3-yearperiodpriortotheeventyear.Thecontrol rmisselectedastheonethathasthemostsimilarhomevalueasthetreated rm.Abusinesscanbeacontrol rmmultipletimes(andcanbebothacontrolandtreated rmindi erentpairs)butcanonlybeatreated rmonceforeachofthetwoeventyears.Smallbusinessesarede nedashavingtenorfeweremployeesandbeingsingle-unit rmsatentry.Duetorestrictionsondisclosure,onlyroundedsamplecounts,mean,andstandarddeviationareshownforselectvariables. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP49 Table1.14:E ectofCreditAccessonContinuingBusinessSurvival (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)Survivaltot+p+3O

62 LSOLS1stStage2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS ln($Amount
LSOLS1stStage2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)-0.000121-0.000168-0.005330.006690.006690.00669(-0.08)(-0.11)(-0.10)(0.13)(0.13)(0.12)3ln(ZipCodeHomePricei;t+p)1.162(3.76) #Obs17500175001750017500175001750017500R-squared0.5240.5320.5430.5230.5310.5310.531F-Statistic--14.11---- Includecontrolsforinitialpayroll,payroll/employmentgrowth?NYYNYYYClusteronFirmZip*SICDivision?YYYYYNNClusteronFirmZip*SICDivision*CreationYearNNNNNYNClusteronCommutingZone*SICDivisionNNNNNNY tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifcontinuingsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialsurvivaloutcomesbasedontheamountofhomeequityextracted:I(Survivedi;j;t+p+3)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+p+3Firmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,thepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj,pisthenumberofyearssincefoundingtthathomeequityisextractedforexpansion(eithertwoorthree,whichcorrespondstothe rmsofagethreeorfour).Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.TheregressionsarealinearprobabilitymodelwithI(Survivedi;j;t+p+3)equaltooneifthebusinesssurvivedthroughyeart+p+3.ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedinyeart+p(setto0ifhomeequityisnotextracted).Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart+p�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects, xede ectforifthebusinesswasinitiallyfundedwithhomeequity,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Dependingontheregression,additionalcontrolsincludenon-parametric xede ectsestimatedby2-digitSICforinitialpayrollandemploymentandpayrollgrowthbetweenyears1and2.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsarees

63 timatedonthecontinuing rmmatchedpair
timatedonthecontinuing rmmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatsurvivedthroughtheeventyeart+p.Columns1and2estimatethee ectusingOLS,column1doesnotincludethenon-parametriccontrolsforinitialpayrollandemployment/payrollgrowthbetweenyears1and2.Column3estimatesthe rststagewiththeinstrumentbeinglaggedlog3-yearhomezipcodelevelhomepricegrowthfromZillow.Columns4and5estimatethecausalimpactonsurvival,column4doesnotincludethenon-parametriccontrolsforinitialpayrollandemployment/payrollgrowthbetweenyears1and2.Forrobustness,columns6and7replicatecolumn5withclusteringatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionby rmyearlevelandcommutingzonebySICdivisionlevel,respectively. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP50 Table1.15:E ectofCreditAccessonContinuingBusinessEmployment (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)ln(Employment)EmploymentGrowthRatest+p�1t+pt+p+1t+p+2t+p+3t+p�1tot+p+1t+p+1tot+p+3 ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)-0.03830.1140.1730.1490.1590.2080.0576(-0.99)(2.10)(2.20)(1.70)(1.69)(1.73)(0.48) #Obs17500175001750017500175001750017500R-squared0.7270.5380.3420.4350.4120.3150.53 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifcontinuingsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialemploymentoutcomesbasedontheamountofhomeequityextracted:ln(Employmenti;j;t+p+k)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+p+kFirmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,thepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj,pisthenumberofyearssincefoundingtthathomeequityisextractedforexpansion(eithertwoorthree,whichcorrespondstothe rmsofagethreeorfour).Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.Theoutcomevariablesarelogemploymentkyearsaroundtheeventyeart+p,wherekrangesfrom-1to3.ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedinyeart+p(setto0ifhomeequityisnotextracted).Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:l

64 ogofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart
ogofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart+p�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects, xede ectforifthebusinesswasinitiallyfundedwithhomeequity,non-parametric xede ectsestimatedby2-digitSICforinitialpayroll,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Exceptforcolumns1and6,whoseoutcomevariablesarebasedondatafromyeart+p�1,controlsalsoincludenon-parametric xede ectsestimatedby2-digitSICforemploymentandpayrollgrowthbetweenyears1and2.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsareestimatedonthecontinuing rmmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatsurvivedthroughtheeventyeart+p.Columns1through5estimatethecausalimpactoftheamountofhomeequityextractedonlogemploymentfromyearst+p�1throught+p+3,respectively.Columns6and7estimatetheimpactonemploymentgrowthfromyearst+p�1tot+p+1andt+p+1tot+p+3,respectively. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP51 Table1.16:E ectofCreditAccessonContinuingBusinessPayroll (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)ln(Payroll)t+p�1t+pt+p+1t+p+2t+p+3 ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)-0.1110.2070.3000.2180.202(-1.42)(2.02)(1.63)(1.01)(0.81) #Obs1750017500175001750017500R-squared0.7870.6850.5220.5710.559 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingifcontinuingsmallbusinesseshavedi erentialpayrolloutcomesbasedontheamountofhomeequityextracted:ln(Payrolli;j;t+p+k)= + \ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)+ Xj+!Controlsi+i;j;t+p+kFirmsaredenotedbyi, rmcreationyearbyt,thepairthatthe rmbelongstobyj,pisthenumberofyearssincefoundingtthathomeequityisextractedforexpansion(eithertwoorthree,whichcorrespondstothe rmsofagethreeorfour).Xjare xede ectsforeachpair.Theoutcomevariablesar

65 elogpayrollkyearsaroundtheeventyeart+p,w
elogpayrollkyearsaroundtheeventyeart+p,wherekrangesfrom-1to3.ln($AmountExtractedi;t+p)istheamountofhomeequitythattheentrepreneurextractedinyeart+p(setto0ifhomeequityisnotextracted).Controlsiisavectorofzipcodeleveland rmlevelcontrolsthatincludes:logofCLTVatpurchase,logofhomevalueatyeart+p�3,2-digitSICindustry xede ects,thelogofthenumberofmonthsbetweenhomepurchaseandyeart,legalformoforganization(LFO) xede ects, xede ectforifthebusinesswasinitiallyfundedwithhomeequity,non-parametric xede ectsestimatedby2-digitSICforinitialpayroll,andnon-parametriccontrolsforhomezipcodecharacteristicsofpercentwhite,percentrenter,percentbelowpovertyline,andmedianincome.Exceptforcolumn1,whoseoutcomevariableisfromyeart+p�1,controlsalsoincludenon-parametric xede ectsestimatedby2-digitSICforemploymentandpayrollgrowthbetweenyears1and2.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmzipcodebySICdivisionlevel.Theregressionsareestimatedonthecontinuing rmmatchedpairsampleandincludessmallbusinessesthatsurvivedthroughtheeventyeart+p.Columns1through5estimatethecausalimpactoftheamountofhomeequityextractedonlogpayrollfromyearst+p�1throught+p+3,respectively. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP52 Table1.17:ExtensiveMarginE ectsofRe nancingActivityonBusinessFormation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)ExcludingNon-tradeable,Construction, Excluding AllIndustriesFinance,Insurance,RealEstate Non-tradeable Y=ln(EntryManyShocks WLSRatec;t+1)Instrument WLSWLS1stStage2SLS2SLS2SLS2SLS 2SLS 2SLS ln(#Extractedc;t+1)0.003830.01820.2470.2240.2360.2220.200(0.68)(3.26)(2.26)(2.23)(1.74)(2.30)(2.25)Avg%IMBc;t�10.301%IMB�c;t(3.18)ln($Amt0.197(Extractedc;t+1)(2.00) #Obs971992659173917391739173916891739174R-squared0.2690.3810.4370.2000.005580.2270.2160.2960.368F-stat--10.09------Zc;tFE?NYYYYYYYY

66 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,&
tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingthee ectofcash-outre nancingactivityonbusinessentryinaggregate:ln(#NewEstablishmentsc;t+1)= + \ln(#Extractedc;t+1)+!c+t+1+Zc;t+c;t+1Countiesareindexedbyc(1,493counties)andyearsbyt(2009to2015).#NewEstablishmentsc;t+1arefromtheCensusSUSBdataset,whichprovidesannualestablishmententrycountsbycountyandindustry.#Extractedc;t+1iscalculatedfromATTOMandisacountylevelcountofthenumberofhouseholdswhoextractedpersonalhomeequityinyeart+1incountyc.Zc;tisavectorofnon-parametriccontrolsfortime-varyingzipcodelevellaggedgrowthrates(t�1!t)of:homeprices,numberofhomepurchases,unemploymentrate,smallbusinessloanvolume,andthetotalnumberofestablishments.Regressionsareweightedbythecounty's2010Censuspopulation.Columns1-2useWLS,column3showsthe rststage,andcolumns4-9useweighted2SLS.Columns1-7estimatethee ectexcludingestablishmentsinthenon-tradeable,construction, nance,insurance,andrealestateindustries.Column4showsthebaselinee ectforindustriesnotreliantonlocaldemand,column5estimatesthee ectforgrowthinthedollaramountextracted(insteadof#ofhouseholdsextractinghomeequity),column6replacesthedependentvariablewithlngrowthinestablishmententryrates,andcolumn7usestheinstrumentwithmanyexogenousshocks.Column8estimatesthee ectexcludingestablishmentsinnon-tradeableindustries.Column9includesallindustries. CHAPTER1.THELONG-RUNEFFECTSOFMORTGAGECREDITACCESSONENTREPRENEURSHIP53 Table1.18:RobustnessTestsforExtensiveMarginInstrument (1)(2)(3)(4)BusinessLoanVolumeUnemploymentRateShareofResidentsShareofResidentsWhoareWhiteWithoutaHighSchoolEducation Avg%IMBc;t�1%IMB�c;t0.04440.0364-0.002990.0111(1.45)(1.31)(-0.64)(0.34) #Obs9266926644804474R-squared0.5490.9240.5650.0739 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionestimatestestingiftheinstrumentiscorrelatedwithcoun

67 tylevelvariablesacrosstime:Yc;t=
tylevelvariablesacrosstime:Yc;t= +Avg%IMBc;t�1%IMB�c;t+!c+t+Zc;t+c;tCountiesareindexedbyc(1,493counties)andyearsbyt(2009to2015).Zc;tisavectorofnon-parametriccontrolsfortime-varyingzipcodelevellaggedgrowthrates(t�1!t)of:homeprices,numberofhomepurchases,unemploymentrate(notincludedincolumn2),smallbusinessloanvolume(notincludedincolumn1),andthetotalnumberofestablishments.Regressionsareweightedbythecounty's2010Censuspopulation.Incolumn1,thedependentvariableisgrowthinsmallbusinessloanvolume(businessloansforlessthan$100k)betweentandt+1.Thisdependentvariableisbetweentandt+1sincethepotentialconcernisimpactsonbusinessformationbetweentandt+1duetobusinessloanfunding(whichiscontemporaneous).LoanvolumedataarefromtheCommunityReinvestmentAct(CRA)dataset.Incolumn2,thedependentvariableisgrowthintheunemploymentratebetweent�1andtfromBLSLAU.Incolumns3and4,thedependentvariablesaregrowthintheshareofresidentswhoarewhite(andnon-Hispanic)andwhohavelessthanhighschooleducation,respectively,fromCensusACSbetweent�1andt. 54Chapter2PersonalWealthShocksandInvestmentManagerOvercon dence2.1IntroductionOneofthepredominatequestionsin nanceisifprofessionalinvestmentmanagersaddvalue.Giventhatactiveequitymutualfundsinvestinover$5trillionofassets,thisissuehaslargee ectsonbothreturnstoclientsandtheoveralleciencyofthemarket.Mostofthepriorliteraturehasfocusedonex-antestaticmeasuresthatareusedtodeterminewhichfundmanagershaveskill,andhaslargelyassumedrationality.Studiesofdeviationsfromrationalbehavior,suchasovercon dence,havelargelybeenrestrictedtoretailinvestors(BarberandOdean,2001;Kumar,2009;GrinblattandKeloharju,2009).Thispaperinvestigatespositiveshockstothepersonalhousingwealthoffundmanagersasachanneloftime-varyingovercon denceformutualfundmanagers.Homepricesvarydramaticallywithinnarrowgeographicalareas,whichprovideslargeid-iosyncraticvariationinreturns.Iffundmanagersinferth

68 eirprofessionalskillfromreturnstotheirpe
eirprofessionalskillfromreturnstotheirpersonalhousingwealth,positiveshockstohousingwealthmayleadtoovercon dencebeliefs.Localhomepricegrowthshouldhavenoe ectonfundperformancebasedonratio-nalmodels.Surprisingly,astrongandrobustrelationshipisfoundbetweenpositivelaggedchangesinzipcodelevelhousingpricesandforecastsofriskadjustedperformance.Thisalonedoesnotsignalovercon dence.Todisentanglethechanneldrivingtheanomaly,thetradingbehavioroffundmanagersisanalyzed.Astunningpatternemergesfromstudyinghowfundmanagertradingchangesashomepriceshocksevolve.Followingpositivehomepriceshocks,fundmanagersbecomemorelikelytoleveruponexistingstockholdingsthathaveperformedpoorly,shifttheirbuyingtowardsleveringuponcurrentlyheldstocksandawayfromselectingnewstocks,makeworsechoicesinchoosingexistingpositionstoliquidate,andbecomelesslikelytofullyliquidateexistingpositions.Interestingly,fundmanagersdonotmakeworsedecisionsinselectingstockstobuythatarenotcurrentlyheldintheirportfolioafterapositivehomepriceshock.Instead,theybecome CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE55biasedtowardstheirpastchoicesandbecomemorelikelytobelievetheirpoorpaststockpickswillbecomewinners.Akepanidtaworn,Mascio,Imas,andSchmidt(2018) ndthatfundmanagersunderperformbecauseofpoorsellingchoices.Theovercon dencechannelshowninthispapermakesthesellingchoicesoffundmanagersevenworse.Inadditiontohavingashort-runimpactontrading,overcon dencealsohasalong-rune ect.Toshowthis,thefund'sownex-anteportfolioholdingsareusedasabenchmark,similartotheapproachinBarberandOdean(2001)forretailinvestors.Ashomepricegrowthpositivelyaccelerates,thefund'sactivereturndecreasesandbecomesworsethantheirpassiveportfolio.Additionally,tradingcostsincrease,whichispartiallytoblameforthedeclineinperformance.Totestthisfurther,thefund'sannualturnoverisanalyzedandfoundtoincreaseashomepricegrowthincreases|acommonsignofovercon dence.Tofurthershowthattheresul

69 tisdrivenbyovercon dence,thispaperbo
tisdrivenbyovercon dence,thispaperborrowsfromtheretailinvestorandcorporate nanceliteratures.Thee ectisstrongestamonggroupsoffundmanagerswhoaremorelikelytobesusceptibletoovercon dencebeliefs.Thisincludesfundmanagerswhoaremale(BarberandOdean,2001),lessexperienced(GreenwoodandNagel,2009;Chernenko,Hanson,andSunderam,2016),havegreaterhousingleverage(Cronqvist,Makhija,andYonker,2012;LiuandYermack,2012),whoboughttheirhomemorerecently,andhavelesseducation.Pastresearchhasshownthatfund owsa ectreturns(BerkandGreen,2004;Song,2019)andthatinvestorsinvestlocally(CovalandMoskowitz,1999;IvkovicandWeisbenner,2005;Pool,Sto man,andYonker,2012).Toruleoutthatthedeclineinperformanceisdrivenbylocalincreasesinfund owscausedbylocalhousingwealth,threetestsareperformed.First,itisshownthatfund owsarenota ectedbyhomepriceshocks.Second, owsareincludedasanadditionalcontroltotheperformanceregression,whichisfoundtonota ecttheresults.Lastly,pastperformanceisaddedasanadditionalcontroltotheperformanceregressionandisalsofoundtonota ecttherelationshipbetweenpositivehomepriceshocksandfuturefundperformance.Thistestistoruleoutthatfuturereturnsaredecreasingduetostrongpriorreturns.Iflaggedperformancewasstrong,fund owsmightincrease,whichsubsequentlywoulddecreasereturns.Toruleoutaspuriousrelationship,threeplacebotestsareperformed.First,itisshownthatindexfundsdonotrespondtothesehomepriceshocks(Pastor,Stambaugh,andTaylor,2017).Inadditiontoindexfunds,fundswithalowtrackingerrororActiveShareshouldalsonotrespondtohomepriceshocks.Thelogicbeingthatifafundmanagerisaclosetindexer,theywillmaintainthesamepassivestrategybeforeandaftertheshock.Itisfoundthatbothde nitionsofclosetindexersdonotrespondviathischannel,andthee ectisstrongerfortrulyactivefundmanagers.Thesetestsruleoutthepossibilitythattheresultisdrivenbyanunobservedlocalfactorthatin uencesfundreturns.Oneconcernwiththeresultsinthispaperisthatfundmanagersmi

70 ghtnotbepayingattentiontochangesintheirh
ghtnotbepayingattentiontochangesintheirhomevalue.Toprovideevidenceagainstthisconcern,fundmanagerswhoextractpersonalhomeequityviacashoutre nancingareshowntohaveadeclineinperformancerelativetotheirperformancepriortoextractinghomeequity.Cash-outre nancinghasalargee ectonthehouseholdbalancesheet(GreenspanandKennedy, CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE562008;BhuttaandKeys,2016;DeFusco,2018)andtheseresultsshowthatthereisalinktoprofessionalperformanceaswell.Withthisresult,homepricegrowthisusedasaninstrumentalvariableforthedecisiontoextracthomeequitytoshowthatfundmanagerswhoextracthomeequitydecidetore nancewhenhomepricesarehigher.Theuseoftheinstrumentalvariableistoprovideevidencethatfundmanagerspayattentiontotheirpersonalhomevalueandisnotintendedforuseasaninstrumentinthetraditionalsense.Thispaperprovidesresultsshowinghowprofessionalbehaviorcanbea ectedbyhomepriceshocks,focusingonthee ectfrompositivehousingwealthshocks.ThisisrelatedtorecentworkbySto manetal.(2018)andBernsteinetal.(2018),whostudytheimpactofnegativehousingwealthshocksformutualfundmanagersandinnovativeworkers,re-spectively.Sto manetal.(2018) ndthatinresponsetonegativehousingwealthshocks,fundmanagersdecreasetheirportfolioriskduetocareerconcerns.They ndnoe ectonrisk-adjustedreturnsandamarginallysigni cante ectonrawreturns.Thispaper ndsasimilare ectonreturnsandrisktakingduringperiodsofnegativehomepriceshocks.Whenextendedtoabroadertime-series,thee ectforchangesinriskduringperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowthsurvives,whiletheresultduringperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowthdoesnot.Thispaperbuildsontheliteratureforsortinginstitutionalinvestmentmanagersbyex-antemeasuresofskill.Mostofthepriorworkinthisbodyofresearchhasfocusedonstaticmeasures(Khorana,Servaes,andWedge,2007;Chen,Goldstein,andJiang,2008;Evans,2008;CremersandPetajisto,2009;Cremers,Driessen,Maenhout,andWeinbaum,2009;Gre

71 enwoodandNagel,2009;HongandKostovetsky,2
enwoodandNagel,2009;HongandKostovetsky,2012;Pool,Sto man,andYonker,2015;Chernenkoetal.,2016;CremersandPareek,2016).Recentwork,suchasGuptaandSachdeva(2017)andPastoretal.(2017),hasfounddynamicmeasuresthatforecastperformance.Thispaperfocusesonanoveldynamicmeasurethathasnotbeenexploredpreviously.Tostudyhousingwealthshocks,dataonthepersonalrealestateholdingsandtransactionsofmutualfundmanagersaremergedtodataontheirprofessionalportfolioholdingsandreturnsoftheirfundsforasampleofover1,200activelymanageddomesticequitymutualfundswithdatabetween2001and2018.Theremainderofthispaperisorganizedasfollows.Section2providesanoverviewonhomepricevariationandtheapproachusedinthispaper.Section3describesthedatasetsusedinthispaper,aswellashowtheyaremerged.Section4describestheempiricalmethodologyandresultsforthee ectonperformanceandrelatedtests.Section5studieshowtradingbehaviorisa ectedbyhousingwealthshocks.Section6presentsevidencethatfundmanagerspayattentiontothevaluesoftheirhomes.Lastly,Section7concludes.2.2HomePriceVariationForthevastmajorityofhouseholds,thehomeisthesinglelargestinvestment(Campbell,2006).Fundmanagersareawealthiersubsetofthepopulation,buttheyownlargerhomesthantheaveragehouseholdandtheirhomevaluesdwarftheirannualsalary(Figure2.1). CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE57Theaveragehomevalueoffundmanagersisgenerallyover$800k,whiletheiraverageannualsalaryisbetween$200-300k.A20%idiosyncratichomepriceshockcanequalmorethanoneyearofsalary.Ifhomepricegrowthisabnormallylargethenfundmanagersmightusethisasfeedbackreinforcingabeliefintheirsuperiorabilitytopickassets.Atthesametime,thisrepresentsalargewealthshock.Whilethewealthe ectcannotberuledout,testsshowingwhichtypesoffundmanagersrespondtotheseshocksandthechangeintheirtradingbehaviorfromtheseshockslendcredencetotheovercon dencechannel.Totestthehypothesisthathomepriceshocksa ectfundmanagerperformance,lagged3-yearzipcodelevelh

72 omepricechangesoftheprimaryhomeoffundman
omepricechangesoftheprimaryhomeoffundmanagersareregressedonforecastsofperformanceandinvestmentselections.1Inordertoobservetherealestatedataforfundmanagers,amergeisutilizedbetweenfundmanagersinMorningstarandrealestatetransactionandassessordatafromATTOM(discussedintheDatasection).Fundmanagersareincludedinthesamplewhenatleastthreeyearshaspassedsincethepurchaseoftheirhome.Thisrestrictionensuresthatfundmanagersrealizedthehomepricegains.2Theprimaryregressionmodelinthispaperutilizesfund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)andmonthlytime xede ects.ItispossiblethatthemergebetweenMorningstarandATTOMproducesdisjointsamplesacrosstimeforafund.Forthesefunds,eachgroupofmergedoverlappingfundmanagersthatproducesanon-disjointsampleacrosstimeisseparatelystudied.Ifmorethanonefundmanagerismergedforagivenmonth,thehomepricegrowthofthefundmanagersisaveraged.These xede ectsremovetimeinvariantpreferencesoffundmanagers,includinghousinglocationchoice(therebycontrollingforsortingintohomezipcodeswithinageographicalarea).Withthesepreferencesremovedandaggregateeconomicconditionsabsorbedbythetime xede ects,theremainingvariationinhomepricegrowthisunlikelytobeendogenous.3Homepricegrowthismeasuredatthezipcodelevel.Thismicro-levelmeasurementofhomepricegrowthprovidesdramaticvariationwithinsmallgeographicalareas.Figure2.2showshomepricegrowthatthezipcodelevelfortheBostonarea,apopularregionformutualfundmanagers.Thevolatilityinhomepricegrowthwithinsmallgeographicalareasmakesitunlikelythatmicrolevelhomepricegrowthiscorrelatedwithinvestmentchoicesduetoanomittedvariableoflocaleconomicactivity.Tofurthershowthemicrolevelvariationinhomepricegrowth,Figure2.3showschangesinhomepricegrowthfortwoneighboringzipcodesinthePhiladelphiasuburbs.Thesetwozipcodesarepopularforfundmanagers. 1Forrobustness,2-yearand4-yearhomepricechangesand3-yearhomepricegrowthontheirsecondaryhomesarealsotested.2Fundmanagerswhoboughtfewerthanthr

73 eeyearsagoareincludedinthesampleiftheyow
eeyearsagoareincludedinthesampleiftheyownedanotherpropertythatwasmergedandspent,inaggregate,atleastthreeyearsinthetwoproperties.Inthiscase,thehomepricegrowthofthetwopropertiesisaveragedbasedontheamountoftimeeachpropertywaslivedin.3Intheappendix,asecondmodelutilizingcommutingzonebytime xede ectsandabatteryofcontrolsisestimated,andasimilare ectisfound.Theadditionalcontrolsattempttocorrectforfundmanagerpreferences,includinglocationpreferencewithinacommutingzone.Thisleavesidiosyncratichomepricegrowthwithinacommutingzone.AsimilarmethodisutilizedbySto manetal.(2018)andBernsteinetal.(2018). CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE58The rstobservationisthatidiosyncratichomepricevariationisnotpersistent.Initiallyzipcode19087outperforms19405,butafteracoupleyearstherelationship ipsandzipcode19405outperforms19087.Overthe2001to2018period,thewinnerbetweenthesetwozipcodesswitchesmultipletimes.Itisnotthatonezipcodealwaysoutperforms.Thedynamicnatureofwhichzipcodesoutperformmakesitlesslikelythatfundmanagersboughtinazipcodeinanticipationthatitwilloutperformaneighboringzipcode.Second,variationbetweenneighboringzipcodesissubstantial.In2003,zipcode19405hadlagged3-yearhomepricegrowthof20%,whilezipcode19087hadgrowthof40%.Inotherwords,ahomeashortdistanceawayexperienceddoubletheamountofhomepricegrowth.Giventhatmanyfundmanagershavehomevaluesinexcessof$1million,thiscreatesverylargeidiosyncraticshocks.2.3DataTostudythee ectofpersonalwealthshocksonprofessionalbehavior,dataonboththehouseholdbalancesheetandchangesinperformanceonthejobareneeded.Forcon den-tialityreasons,thiscombinationofdataischallengingtoobtain.Mutualfundmanagersandtheirpersonalrealestatearetheperfectset-uptostudythis.Securitieslawsmaketheprofessionalbehaviorofmutualfundmanagerspublicinformation.Afund'sperformance,managementteam,andholdingsarepublicknowledge.Thiscombinationofdatapresentsextremelyrichdataonprofessionalbehavi

74 or.IntheUnitedStates,realestatetransacti
or.IntheUnitedStates,realestatetransactionsandtheassociatedbuyersarealsopublicrecordandarecollectedbycountyrecorderof- ces.Whenmergedtogetherthiscombinationofdatapresentsauniqueopportunitytodynamicallystudychangesinprofessionalbehaviorfrompersonalwealthshocks.FundcharacteristicsandperformancedataarefromCRSPandinformationonwhoman-agesamutualfundisobtainedfromMorningstar.UsingamethodsimilartoLoutskinaandStrahan(2015),CRSPandMorningstararemergedonCUSIPandticker.Roughly70%ofthefundsinCRSParemergedtoMorningstar.QuarterlyholdingsdataarefromThomsonReuters,whichismergedtoCRSPonWFICNusingthem ink les.4Thismergeisonlyusedforanalysisonmutualfundholdings;forthemajorityoftheresults,thedataarenotrestrictedtofundsmergedtoThomsonReuters.5Fundsareonlyincludedinthesampleif 4TheholdingsdataaresupplementedwithCRSPholdingsdatawhenthedataaremissinginThomsonReuters.5AdditionaldataonstockcharacteristicsareobtainedfromCRSP.FactordataisobtainedfromFama-French-CarhartinWRDSandbenchmarkreturndataisobtainedfromFRED. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE59theyareactivelymanageddomesticequityfundsthatpredominantlyinvestinUSequities.6Indexfundsareidenti edbytheindexfund aginCRSPbeingpopulatedorhavingtheword\index"inthenameofthefundandareremovedfromtheactivelymanagedpopulation.Thepopulationisfurtherrestrictedtofundmonthswithatleast$15millionintotalnetassets(TNA,measuredinin ationadjusted2000dollars)andwith10orfewermanagers.RealestatetransactiondataisobtainedfromATTOM,whichisanadministrativedatasetofrealestatetransactionsintheUnitedStates.ATTOMcollectsanddigitizesthedatafromcountyrecorderoces.Thedatasetincludesthelocationofthehome,loanamounts,andthevalueofthehomeattimeofpurchase.7Toobtainchangesinhomevalueovertime,monthlyzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthdatafromZillowareused.Thedatastartin1997,withdataforsomezipcodesnotavailableuntillater.Asaresult,fundperformancedatafrom2001toJune2018areutilized.Therelati

75 velyunexploreddataformutualfundmanagerpe
velyunexploreddataformutualfundmanagerpersonalrealestateisobtainedbyamergebetweenATTOMandMorningstar.ATTOMincludesthe(non-standardized)namesofhomebuyers,whicharemergedtofundmanagernamesinMorningstar.Namesarestandardizedtotrytoaccountforspellingdi erences(i.e.,ChristopherismappedtoChris).Twopassesareattemptedtomergethesetwodatasets.The rstpassmergesonthefullname(includingmiddleinitial,ifavailable).While,thesecondpassmergesontheinitialsofthe rstandmiddlenamesandthefulllastname.Otherattemptstomergeonpartialnamesornotusingmiddleinitialyieldedlimitedadditionalsuccessfulmerges.Amergeisonlykeptifthefundmanagernamemergedtoauniquehomebuyernamewithinthecommutingzoneofthefundlocation.FundlocationisobtainedfromthezipcodesofthefundoceslistedineitherCRSPorMorningstar.ThealgorithmissimilartotheoneusedinBernsteinetal. 6Thesetypesoffundsareidenti edbyrestrictingtheLipperProspectusobjectivecode,StrategicInsightobjectivecode,andtheWeisenbergerobjectivecodetothevalueslistedinCremersandPareek(2016).TherestrictionontheCDA/SpectrumcodeisnotusedasthisvalueisinThomsonReuters,whichwouldrequireanadditionalmergethatwouldlimitthepopulationsize.Additionalrestrictionsareincludedtobesurethatonlyactivelymanageddomesticequityfundsareincluded.TheCRSPobjectivecodeisrestrictedtodomesticequityfundsofcap-basedorstylefunds(the rstthreecharacterssettoEDCorEDY).Thisrestrictstodomesticequitylarge/mid/small/microcap,growth,income,hedged,short,andincomefunds.Additionally,theMorningstarcategoryhastobeinthe3-by-3size/valuegrid,asinSto manetal.(2018),orhaveacategorytypeof85%+equityallocation.TheMorningstarcategoryisalsousedtoassignfundsabenchmark.Thebenchmarksareassignedasfollows:USFundLargeGrowth(Value)isRussell1000Growth(Value)TotalReturn,USFundLargeBlendisRussell1000TotalReturn,USFundMid-CapGrowth(Value)isRussellMid-capGrowth(Value)TotalReturn,USFundMid-CapBlendisRussellMadcapTotalReturn,USFundSmallGrowth(Value)isRussell2000

76 Growth(Value)TotalReturn,USFundSmallBlen
Growth(Value)TotalReturn,USFundSmallBlendisRussell2000TotalReturn,andUSFundAllocation{85%+EquityisRussell3000TotalReturn.7AnadditionalfeatureofATTOMisinformationonthetaxaddressofproperties(basedonannual lesfromcountyassessoroces).Withthisinformation,secondaryhomesarelinkedtotheprimaryhomesofthefundmanagers.Roughly16%offundmanagersinthesampleownmorethanonehome,andatmostfourhomesareownedbyasinglefundmanageratanygivenpointintime.Thetop25zipcodesforthesesecondarypropertiesareoverwhelminglyinvacationdestinationssuchasNaplesFlorida,LakeTahoeCalifornia,skitownsinColoradoandtheBerkshires,andvariouslakeandbeachtowns(suchastheHamptonsandLakeWinnipesaukee).Thelocationsofthesehomesprovidesvalidationthatthesearevacationpropertiesownedbythefundmanager. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE60(2018).Mergesaredroppediftheyresultinanon-disjointperiodoflessthan24monthsoffunddataforwhichatleastonefundmanagerismergedtoATTOM.Thisisinordertoaccuratelyestimaterisk-adjustedreturns(robustnessisprovidedaroundthisrestriction).40%ofthemanagersinMorningstararesuccessfullymergedtoATTOM,whichislowerthanthe52%ratereportedinBernsteinetal.(2018)forinnovativeworkerswhoproducepatents.Theirpatentdataincludestheperson'shomezipcode,whileMorningstaronlyincludesthezipcodeofthefundanddoesnotincludeinformationonthelocationofthefundmanager'shome.Itisassumedthatafundmanagerliveswithinthesamecommutingzoneastheirfund.Managerswhowerenotmergedeitherrent,haveacommonname,liveoutsidethecommutingzoneoftheiroce,usedatrusttopurchasetheirhome(whichusuallypartiallyorfullyshieldstheiridentity),orhadamisspellingineitherdataset.The nalpopulationcomprises1,241fundsbasedoninformationfor1,368fundmanagers,foratotalpopulationof87,719monthlyfundpairs.Figure2.4showsthepercentageandnumberofmanagersmergedforeachfundinthe nalpopulation.Manyfundsaremanagedbyateamoffundmanagers,butforthemajorityoffundsonlyonemanagerismerged.Generally

77 ,atleast50%ofthemanagersaremergedforeach
,atleast50%ofthemanagersaremergedforeachfund.Incaseswhenmorethanonemanagerismerged,thefundmanagercharacteristicsandhousinggrowthinformationisaveraged.Nothavingallofthemanagersmergedleadstonoiseontherighthandside,whichshouldbiastheresultstowardszero|robustnessisprovidedaroundthemergerate.Table2.1providessummarystatisticscomparingthepopulationofactivedomesticeq-uitymutualfundsmergedtoATTOMagainstthepopulationnotmerged.Onaverage,bothpopulationshaveanegativealphaafterfeesofabout10bpspermonth.Themergedpopu-lationisbiasedtowardslargerfunds(bothintermsofTNAandnumberofmanagers)withlowerturnover.Onthefundmanagercharacteristicsqualities,almostallmanagersaremale(92%),mosthaveanMBAorCFA(57and56%,respectively),andmosthadsubstantialcareerexperienceatthetimetheybecamefundmanager(18yearsonaverage).Experiencedataareonlyavailableforasubsetofmanagersandissupplementedwithyearofbirth+22ortheyearofundergraduategraduationforthecareerstartdate(whenthesevariablesareavailable).2.4EmpiricalResultsonPerformance2.4.1MainSpeci cationTheprimaryhypothesisofthispaperisthatexogenouspositivereturnstothepersonalrealestateoffundmanagersa ectsfundmanagersviaovercon dence.Totestthis,aregressionmodeloflaggedzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthonforecastsofperformanceisestimated.Thebaselinemodelanalyzes1-monthaheadforecastsofriskadjustedreturnsonlagged3-yearhomepricechangesforthevaluesoftheprimaryhomesoffundmanagers.Additionaltestsareperformedtolinkthise ecttoovercon dence. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE61TheregressionframeworkissimilartotheoneutilizedbyGuptaandSachdeva(2017).ThefourfactorFama-French-Carhartmodelisestimatedatthefundlevel:Rit�Rft= MKT;iMKTt+ SMB;iSMBt+ HML;iHMLt+ UMD;iUMDt+it(2.1)Returnsarenetoffees(robustnessisprovidedaroundthis),whichrepresentsthereturnsexperiencedbyinvestors.Thefactorloadingsareusedtoobtainmonthlyalphas:b FFCit=Rit�Rft�b iFF

78 CtwhereFFCt=(MKTtSMBtHMLtUMDt)(2.2)
CtwhereFFCt=(MKTtSMBtHMLtUMDt)(2.2)Theb FFCitareusedinpanelregressionstoestimatethepredictiveabilityoflaggedhomepricegrowthtoforecast1-monthaheadriskadjustedperformance:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+ita(2.3)whereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects,andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Standarderrorsareclusteredattheleveloffundbyeachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime(robustnessisprovidedaroundthis),whichallowsforarbitrarycorrelationoftheerrortermswithinfundovertime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Totestthee ectoverperiodsofpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth,twoapproachesareused.The rstsimplydividesthesampleintotwoperiods,onewhere3yrHPIi;t�10andtheotherwhere3yrHPIi;t�10.Thesecondapproachusestheentirepopulationandestimatesthecoecientsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthseparatelyinasingleregression.ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)isinteractedwithindicatorvariablesforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth,denotedasln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)andln(3yrHPI�i;t�1),respectively.Forthisregression,thetime xede ectsarealsointeractedwithindicatorvariablesforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthtocontrolforvariationinreturnsamongfundsmanagedbymanagersexperiencingpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinagivenmonth,denotedby+tand�t,respectively.TheresultsforthemainregressionmodelarepresentedinTable2.2.Overall,homepricegrowthsigni cantlynegativelyimpactsfutureperformancewhenusingdatafromtheentire2001to2018period(column1).Incolumns2and3,thesampleisdividedintoperiodsofpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth,respectively.Fromthissegmentation,itisshownthatthee ectisisolatedtoperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowth,withthemagnitudeincreasingwhenperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowthareremoved.Interestingly,duringperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowththereisnoe

79 ect.Thisisinlinewiththe ndingso
ect.Thisisinlinewiththe ndingsofSto manetal.(2018),whoalso ndnoimpactonriskadjustedreturnsfromhomepriceshocksduringtheGreatRecession.Thisalsoshowshowthetwoshocksoperateviadi erentchannels,overcon denceduringperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowthand,asshownbySto manetal.(2018),careerconcernsduringperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowth.When CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE62theregressionisestimatedusingtheentiresampleandthehomepricegrowthvariableisbifurcatedintoperiodsofpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth,similarresultsarefound(column4).Theaveragestandarddeviationin3-yearhomepricegrowthwithinfundis12%,whichyieldsadeclineinalphaof37bpsperyearforaonestandarddeviationpositivehomepriceshock.Giventhedramaticriseinhomepricegrowthoverthemid-2000sandlate2010s,thereisthepotentialforadramaticdecreaseinperformancefromexogenouspositiveshockstohomepricegrowth.Theresultsaresigni cantatthe1%levelandthet-statisticsaregenerallyabove3topassthethresholdofHarvey,Liu,andZhu(2016).Incolumn5,1-yearlaggedalpha(calculatedfromaregressionofFama-French-Carhartonthepreceding12months)and1-monthforwardfund owsareaddedascontrols.Withthesevariablesincluded,thesamplesizeisreducedsincetherehavetobe12-monthsoflaggeddataavailable.Theresultisstrengthenedwiththeinclusionofthesecontrols.Tofurthershowthatfund owsarenota ectedbyhomepriceshocks,theregressionisestimatedwiththelefthandsidereplacedwith1-monthand1-yearforecastsoffund ows,calculatedusinggrossreturns(beforefees).Table2.3showsthatthehomepriceshocksdonothaveanimpactonfund ows.Combinedwiththeearlierresultshowingthattherelationshipbetweenhomepriceshocksandreturnsisnota ectedbycontrollingforfund ows,fund owsarenotaconcernforthe ndingsinthispaper.AdditionalrobustnesstestsareprovidedintheAppendix.Acommonplacebotestistore-estimatethee ectonperformanceforasampleofindexfunds.Table2.4showsthatwhenthesampleofactivefundsisreplacedwithasamp

80 leofindexfunds,theresultbecomesinsigni&#
leofindexfunds,theresultbecomesinsigni cant.Inadditiontousingindexfundsasaplacebo,closetindexfundsrepresentanotherpotentialplacebotest.Forrobustness,twoapproachesareusedtode neafundmanagerasbeingaclosetindexer.The rstapproachlabelsafundmanagerasaclosetindexeriftheirfund'strackingerrorisinthelowestquantile.Column4showsthatforthispopulationofclosetindexfundsnoe ectisfound.Thisapproachcanalsobeusedtorestrictthesampletothemostactivefunds.Whenrestrictedtoveryactivefunds,alargerresponseisfound(column5).Forthesecondapproach,afundisde nedasaclosetindexfundifthefund'sActiveShareislessthan60%,followingChernenkoetal.(2016).ActiveShareisprovidedbyCremersandPetajisto(2009).Similarly,whenusingtheActiveSharede nitionofaclosetindexernoe ectisfound(column6).UsingActiveSharetorestricttothemostactivefunds(thosewithanActiveShare�60%),astrongere ectisfoundonceagain.2.4.2Whichfundmanagers/fundsrespondtohomepricegrowth?Thissectionprovidessubsampleanalysistoseewhichtypesoffundmanagersandfundsrespondtohomepriceshocks.Ifovercon denceisdrivingtheresultthenfundmanagerswithlesseducation,lessexperience,whoboughttheirhomesmorerecently,withgreater CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE63housingleverage,andwhoaremaleshouldrespondmoretohomepriceshocks.Totestthis,theregressionmodelisestimatedwiththehomepricegrowthvariableinteractedwithindicatorvariablesfordi erentmeasuresofcharacteristicsoffunds/fundmanagersduringperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowth.Theomittedcategoryisthegroupoffunds/fundmanagerswhoareleastlikelytobea ectedbyhomepriceshocks(i.e.thosewithanMBAwhensplittingthesamplebyeducation).Figures2.5,2.6,and2.7presenttheseresultsgraphically.Figure2.5showsthatnothavinganMBA,havinglessexperience,andbuyingahomemorerecentlyallproduceastrongere ect.Theseareexactlythetypesoffundmanagersonewouldexpecttobuyintoovercon dencefromhomepriceshocks.Whilemoreexperiencedfundma

81 nagersgenerallydonotrespondtohomepricesh
nagersgenerallydonotrespondtohomepriceshocks,experiencedfundmanagerswhoboughttheirhomemorerecentlyrespondstronglytohomepriceshocks.Buyingmorerecentlyshouldinduceastrongerresponseashomeownerswouldbemorelikelytopayattentiontotheirhomevalueshortlyaftertheybuytheirhome.Thisisduetotworeasons.First,theirhomevalueismorelikelytobeontheirmind.Second,short-runmovementswillhavealargere ectontheoverallreturnontheirpurchase.Buyinginthedistantpastmakesshort-runmovementsinhomepriceslessimportantduetoalreadyhavingaccumulatedhomepricegains.Figure2.6alsocon rmsthatfundmanagerswithoutaCFAdesignation(notsigni -cantly),withmoreexpensivehomes,andwithgreaterhousingleverage(asmeasuredbyloantovalue[LTV]atpurchase)alsohaveastrongerresponsetohomepriceshocks.ThisisrelatedtotheCEOliterature,namelyCronqvistetal.(2012)andLiuandYermack(2012),whoshowthatCEOswithlargerhomesandhigherLTVratiosengageinriskierbehavior.Consistentwiththeovercon denceresultsofBarberandOdean(2001)andLuandTeo(2018),fundswithonlymalemanagers(amongthemergedmanagers)haveamuchstrongerresponse.Inadditiontosegmentingthepopulationonfundmanagercharacteristics,thepopulationissegmentedonfundcharacteristicstoidentifythetypesoffundsthataremorelikelytohavemanagersa ectedbyhomepriceshocks(Figure2.7).Thesizeofthefund(asmeasuredbyTNA)doesnotproduceadi erentialresponse,indicatingthattheresultisnotdrivenbysmallfunds.Fundtypeandcapitalizationfocusdo,however,providestrongsegmentation.Valueandsmallcapfundmanagersarelessa ectedbyhomepriceshocks,whilegrowth/blendandlargeandmid-capfundsarestronglya ected.Lastly,fundswithlowexpenseratioshaveastrongerimpact.Thiscouldbeexplainedbythefactthatfundsthatareabletocommandahighexpenseratioarelikelymanagedbyseniormanagerswithsigni cantexperience,andassucharelesslikelytobeswayedbyhomepriceshocks.Asalasttest,thesampleisdividedintofundsmanagedbyfundmanagerswhohaveneverownedasecondhomeandfundmanagerswhohave.InTable2.5,ho

82 mepricegrowthforsecondaryhomesisincluded
mepricegrowthforsecondaryhomesisincludedasanadditionalregressor.Ifthepopulationisrestrictedtofundmanagerswhoeverownedasecondhome(columns1and3)theresultbecomesinsigni cant,whilefocusingonfundmanagerswhoneverownedasecondhomepreservestheresults(columns2and4).Thisisadditionalevidenceofovercon dence,asfundmanagerswhoownasecondhomearelikelytohavegreaterexperience.Whileotherchannelscannot CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE64beruledout,suchasincreasedrisktakingfromawealthe ect,theresultsareconsistentwithovercon dencebeingthechannel.Inthenextsection,tradingbehaviorisexploredandtheresultsprovideadditionalevidenceoftheovercon dencechannel.2.5TradingBehaviorInordertounderstandwhyperformancedeclinesfollowingpositivehomepriceshocks,thetradingbehavioroffundmanagersisanalyzed.First,short-runchangesintradingbehavioroffundmanagersisanalyzed.Second,longruntradingbehaviorisstudiedusingthefund'sownbenchmarkreturnsasapassiveportfolio.Lastly,portfoliorisktakingisanalyzed.2.5.1TradingReturnAfterestablishingthatperformancedeclinesandtradingincreasesfrompositivehomepriceshocks,itiscrucialtounderstandthemechanismsthataredrivingthis.Inthissection,thetradesperformedeachquarterarestudiedusingquarterlyequityholdingsdata.8Withthisdata,stocksareidenti edaspurchased,heldconstant,orsoldbetweenquarters.Atradeislabeledabuytradeifthefund'spositioninthestockincreasesbyatleast5%.Istartbyestimatingthee ectofhomepriceshocksonthe1-quarteraheadreturntothesetrades.Returnsareweightedbythevalueofthechangeinthenumberofsharesusingtheaverageofthestock'spriceatthebeginningandendofthequarterinwhichthestockistraded.Toestimatethee ectthefollowingregressionisestimated:Yi;t+1;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t)+i+t+a+i;t;a(2.4)whereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),tarequarterlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepr

83 icegrowth),andaarenon-parametric
icegrowth),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Theforecastedreturntothenettradingdecisions(thereturntothebuytradeslessthereturntotheselltrades)offundmanagersdeclinesashomepricegrowthincreases(Table2.6,column1).Thisimpliesthatfundmanagersaremakingworsetradingchoicesfrompositivepersonalwealthshocks.A12%positiveshocktohomepricegrowthdecreasesthereturndi erencebyroughly7bps,whichisalmost100%ofitsmean.Tounderstandwhythereturndeclines,thereturnisdecomposedintobuyandsellchoices.Broadlyspeaking,afundmanagerhas vedi erenttradingchoices:buyanewstocknotcurrentlyheld,increasethepositionofastockcurrentlyheld,nottradeastockcurrentlyheld,fullyliquidateaposition,orpartiallyliquidateaposition.Usingthese veactions,the1-quarteraheadreturnslessthebenchmarkreturnarecalculatedforeach. 8ThedataarefromThomsonReuterss12,supplementedwithdatafromCRSP.Thedataarereportedasoftheendofeachquarter.Itispossiblethatstocksareboughtandsoldwithineachquarter,inwhichcasetheywouldnotbecaptured. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE65Table2.6column2showsthatfundmanagersarenotmakingdi erentialchoiceswhenselectingnewstockstopurchase.Instead,fundmanagersmakeworsechoicesinpickingstockstoleverupon(column3).A12%positiveshockdecreasesthereturntoleveringupby35%ofitsmean.Themeanreturntothebuytradesofbuyingnewstocksandleveringuponexistingstocksarebothapproximately16bps,indicatingthatonaveragefundmanagersdonotmakebadchoicesinselectingstockstobuy.Foranalyzingthereturntosales,homepricegrowthisnotdividedintoperiodsofpos-itiveandnegativehomepricegrowthduetothestrongoveralle ect.Theliteraturehasfoundthatakeyreasonforfundunderperformancestemsfrommakingpoorsellingchoices(Akepanidtawornetal.,2018).Theyattributethistoinattentioninthestocksellingdecisionandfollowingaheuristicofsellingstockswithrecentextremepricemovements.Fundman-agersmakeworsechoicesinfullyliquidatingexistingpositionsashomepriceshocksincrea

84 se(column6|thepositivecoecientimpli
se(column6|thepositivecoecientimpliesthatthestocksoldsubsequentlyperformsbetter).Thisresultprovidesanotherchannelthatdrivesthedeteriorationinthechoiceofstockstosell.Lastly,column7showsthat owsarenota ected,indicatingthattheresultsarenotdrivenbyfundmanagerstradingduetovariationsin owashomepriceshocksevolve.Thedeclineinreturnstoincreasingpositionsinexistingstocksisexploredfurtherbyaugmentingtheaboveregressionsto tlinearprobabilitymodelsofthelikelihoodofastockbeinglevereduponhavingex-anteperformedworseinthe2-quarterperiodduringandpriortothetrade.Table2.7showsthatthestocksleveredupbecomemorelikelytohaveex-anteperformedworseashomepriceshocksincrease.Theresultisstrongestincolumn2wheretheprobabilityofbuyingmoreofstocksthathaveperformedatleast20%worsethanthebenchmarkintheprior6-monthperiodincreases.Asfundmanagersexperiencepositivehomepricegrowth,theybecomemorelikelytoincreasetheirpositionsinstocksthathaveperformedpoorly,relativetoboththebenchmarkandthestockstheyholdbutchoosenottoincreasetheirstakesin.Column4showsthatthisisnottruefornewstockspurchasedthatarenotcurrentlyheld.Fundmanagersdonotbecomeovercon dentinpoorlyperformingstocksthattheydidnotpreviouslybuy.However,conditionalonhavingalreadyownedthestock,fundmanagersbecomemorelikelytodoubledownontheirpositionifthestockhadaperiodofpoorperformance.Columns5and6estimatethee ectontheshareofbuy(sell)tradesthatareincreasesinexistingpositions(fullliquidations).Ashomepricegrowthincreases,fundmanagersshifttheirbuytradestowardsleveringupandshifttheirselltradestowardspartiallyliquidating(insteadoffullyselling).Notonlydofundmanagersleveruponlosersbuttheydevotelessattentiontopickingnewstocks.Inaddition,theybecomemorelikelytopartiallyholdontotheirpositions.Inthenextsection,along-runimpactontheactivetradingreturnsoffundmanagersfromtheirpersonalhomepriceshocksisestablished.2.5.2ComparisontoaPassiveStrategyInthissection,evidenceispresentedthatpositivehomepricesho

85 cksalsohavealong-runimpactonperformance.
cksalsohavealong-runimpactonperformance.Toshowthis,actualreturnsarecomparedagainstown-benchmark CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE66("passive")returnsinasimilarspiritofBarberandOdean(2001),whostudyretailinvestors.EachJune(foreveryyeart)thechangeinln(3yrHPIi;t)overtheprior1-yearperiod(therateofchange)iscalculated.Figure2.8showsthedistributionofthesevalues.Overaoneyearperiodtherecanbeadramaticchangeintherateofhomepricegrowth.Thisrateofchangeisinteractedwithindicatorvariablesforln(3yrHPIi;t)beingpositiveornegative.Therateofchangeinhomepricegrowthisused,aschangesintradingbehaviorduetochangesinhomepricegrowthisstudied.Toconstructtheperformanceofa"passive"portfolio,the2-year(24monthsofdata)alphaisconstructedfromaFama-French-Carhartregressionofthereturnstothestocksheldinquarter3ofyeart�1betweenquarter3ofyeart�1andquarter2ofyeart+1.Fortheactiveperformance,analphaoverthesametimeperiodiscalculatedusingreturnstotheactualquarterlyholdings,updatedeachquarter.Thesampleisrestrictedtofundswhosemanagerssurvivedfortherespective24monthperiod,haveatleast80%oftheirassetsrepresentedbytheseholdings,andhaveacorrelationbetweenactualreturnsandtheconstructedactivereturnsofatleast99%(80%oftherecords).Theselasttworestrictionsaretoensurethatthereturnsfromtherawholdingsdatarepresenttheactualreturnstothefunds.Withoutthisrestriction,itmightbethatthefundmanagertradesinotherassetclasses,forwhichholdingsdataarenotavailable(i.e.cash,derivatives,etc.),andthiswoulda ecttheirpositionsinequitiesandtheiroverallreturns.Toestimatetradingcosts,theapproachofKiyotakiandMoore(1997)isused.9Sincethedataareannual,commutingzonebytime xede ectsareusedinlieuoffund xede ects.Includedarethefollowingadditionalcontrolvariables:Morningstarfundcategory xede ects,numberofmanager xede ects,anindicatorforifthemanagerownsasecondhome,anindicatorforifthemanagerhasanadvanceddegree(aboveundergradua

86 te),andnon-parametric xede ectsf
te),andnon-parametric xede ectsforTNA,homevalue,combinedLTV(CLTV),averagezipcodelevelincome(fromthe2010IRSSOI),andthepercentofnon-whitehouseholdsatthezipcodelevel(fromthe2000Census).Thesevariablescontrolforfundandhomelocationtimeinvariantqualities.Thefollowingregressionmodelisestimated: Activei;t�12mo!t+12mo;cz� Passivei;t�12mo!t+12mo;cz=c+ (ln(3-yrHPIi;t)�ln(3-yrHPIi;t�12mo))+cz;t+Controlsit+i;t;cz(2.5)wherecz;tareannual(tisannual)timebycommutingzone xede ects(interactedwithindicatorvariablesforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth). capturesthee ectoftherateofchangeinhomepricegrowthontheperformanceofthefundrelativetotheperformanceifthefundmanagerdidnottrade.Apositivecoecient 9KiyotakiandMoore(1997)estimateinstitutionalstockleveltradingcostsasafunctionof:tradesize,marketcapitalization,ifthefundisatechnicalfund,ifthestockisNasdaqlisted,andifthefundisanindexfund.Thislastindicatorvariableissettozeroforthepopulationofactivemanagersinthispaper.FollowingBusse,Chordia,Jiang,andTang(2016),thetechnicalfundindicatorissetto0.45forbuysand0.6forsales.Forobviousreasonstradingcostsarenotsubtractedfromthereturnstothepassiveportfolio. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE67wouldimplythatincreasesinhomepricegrowthleadtothefundmanager'stradingaddingvaluerelativetodoingnothing.Standarderrorsareclusteredbyfund(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime).Table2.8column1estimatesthee ectonactivereturnslessestimatedtradingcostsandtheirown-benchmarkpassivereturn.Theresultisnegativeandsigni cantatthe5%levelforperiodswherehomepricegrowthispositive.Aonestandarddeviationshocktotherateofchangeinhomepricegrowthis0.1,whichequatestoadeclineinactiverisk-adjustedperformanceof45bpsperyearrelativetotheirpassivebenchmark.Thereisnoe ectwhenhomepricegrowthisnegative.Column2replacesthelefthandsidewithanindicatorvariableforiftheactivealpha,ne

87 toftradingcosts,beatsthepassivealpha.Aon
toftradingcosts,beatsthepassivealpha.Aonestandarddeviationshocktotherateofchangeinhomepricesdecreasestheprobabilityofbeatingthepassivebenchmarkby8%.Thisimpliesthatnotonlydoestheactiveperformancedeclinebutitalsomakesthemanagerlesslikelytoaddvalueovertheirown-benchmarkpassiveholdings.Onaverage,only35%offundmanagersbeattheirpassivebenchmarkwhenaccountingfortradingcosts.Again,thereisnoe ectfromnegativehomepriceshocks.Whentradingcostsarenotincluded,theresultforperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowthlosesmagnitudeandsigni cancebutremainssigni cantatthe10%level.Partofthereasonforthedeclineinperformanceisduetoanincreaseintradingcosts.Column4showsthattradingcostsincreaseashomepricegrowthincreases.Anincreaseintradingisacommonsignofovercon denceintheliterature.Tocon rmthattradingisincreasing,thee ectonannualturnoverdatafromCRSPisestimated.Forthisregression,thefullsampleofmergedfundsisused(notonlytheonesthatfurthermergedtoThomsonReuters).Sincethedataareannual,theregressionusesthespeci cationabovewithcommutingzonebytime xede ectsandadditionalcontrolvariables.Laggedlogturnoverisincludedasacontrolvariableaswell.Column5showsthatturnoverdoesindeedincreaseashomepricegrowthincreases.Forretailinvestors,itiswellestablishedthatexcessivetradingleadstoworsereturns(Odean,1999;OdeanandBarber,1999;BarberandOdean,2001),whileforinstitutionalinvestorstheresultsaremixed.Overall,Pastoretal.(2017) ndthathighertradingleadstohigherreturns,withthee ectbeingstrongerforhighfeefunds.Conversely,CremersandPareek(2016) ndthatpatientinvestmentstrategiesofinstitutionalinvestorsleadstohigherreturns.Thispaperarguesthatifturnoverisdrivenbyovercon denceduetohomepriceshocks,performancewillsu er.Thisisduetotheincreaseintradingbeingdrivenbyirrationalreasons.2.5.3RiskTakingInthissection,thelinkbetweenhomepriceshocksandrisktakingisinvestigated.ThissectionrelatestoSto manetal.(2018)andextendstheir ndi

88 ngstoabroadertimeseries.Intheirwork,thep
ngstoabroadertimeseries.Intheirwork,theprimaryfocusisontherisktakingmeasureofthestandarddeviationofreturnsduringtheGreatRecession.Usingalongerperiod(2001to2018),thestandarddeviationofreturnsiscalculatedusingmonthlyreturnsforthesubsequent12-monthperiodfollowingeachmonthlyobservationoflagged3-yearhomepricegrowth.Additionally,results CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE68fortrackingerrorandCAPMbeta(marketrisk)areshown.Theregressionusesthebaselinespeci cationinthispaperandincludesfund(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime) xede ects,time xede ects,andnon-parametricTNA xede ects.Table2.9columns1and2showthatpositivehomepricegrowthhastheoppositee ectonthestandarddeviationofreturnscomparedtonegativehomepricegrowth.Forperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowth,thee ectisnegative.Whileforperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowth,thee ectispositive.BoththispaperandSto manetal.(2018) ndapositiveandsigni cante ectonrisktakingduringperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowth.Whenrunningahorseraceonthebroader2001to2018period,thee ectfrompositivehomepricegrowthsurviveswhilethee ectfromnegativehomepricegrowthdoesnot.InSto manetal.(2018)apositivee ectisfoundfortrackingerrorandnoe ectisfoundonmarketrisk.Similarly,thispaper ndsapositivee ectfortrackingerror(column5)andnoe ectformarketrisk(column8)duringperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowth.Similartothee ectforthestandarddeviationofreturns,inahorseracethee ectonmarketriskonlyremainsforperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowth.Forperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowth,trackingerrorandmarketriskdecline(columns4and7).Overall,positivehomepriceshocksleadtoadeclineinrisktaking.Giventheearlierresults,thisismostlikelyreconciledwithadeclineintakingpositionsonnewstocksandrelyinginsteadonexistingpositions.2.6AttentiontoHomePriceGrowthAkeyassumptionoftheresultsinthispaperisthatfundmanagerspayattentiontohomepricegrowth.T

89 otestthis,personalhomeequityextractionso
otestthis,personalhomeequityextractionsoffundmanagersarestudied.Cashoutre nancingwascommonduringthehousingboomofthemid-2000s,withmanypaperswrittenaboutthisinthehousehold nanceliterature.10ForadescriptionofhowtheamountofhomeequityextractedisconstructedusingATTOMdatapleaseseetheOnlineAppendixtoChapter1.Thispaperuseshomeequityextractionstostudyiffundmanagersarepayingattentiontohomeprices,amongtheselectedgroupofhomeownerswhoextracthomeequity.Iffundmanagersaremorelikelytoextractequitywhenhomepricesaregrowingatafasterrate,thisisevidencethatmanagersareawareofthechangesintheirhomevalue.Fundmanagersareawealthiersegmentofthepopulationbuttheyalsoheavilyengageincashoutre nancing.Itisleftasanopenquestionastowhyfundmanagersextracthomeequity(i.e.,isittosupplementincome,forconsumption,tostartasmallbusiness,toinvest,etc.).Around5-15%offundmanagersextracthomeequityinanygivenyear,withtheproportionoffundmanagersextractinghomeequitydecreasingovertime(Figure2.9a).Amongfundmanagerswhoextracthomeequity,themedianfundmanagerextractsroughly$36,000and10%offundmanagersextractover$340,000(Figure2.9b).Totesttheimpactofhomeequityextractiononfundperformance,thefollowingregressionmodelisestimated: 10SeeGreenspanandKennedy(2008),BhuttaandKeys(2016),andDeFusco(2018),amongothers. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE69 i;t+1;a� i;t�1;a=c+ \I(ExtractHomeEquityi;t)+i+t+a+ i;t�1;a+i;t;a(2.6)where i;t;aistheaveragemonthlyalphainquartertandI(ExtractHomeEquityi;t)isanindicatorequalto1ifafundmanagerextractedhomeequityinquartert.iarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),tarequarterlytime xede ects,andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.tismeasuredasquarterlyobservationsandstandarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime).If isnegative,homeequityextractioninquartertforecastsadec

90 lineinrisk-adjustedperformanceinquartert
lineinrisk-adjustedperformanceinquartert+1relativetoperformanceinquartert�1.Theseresultsareforecastsandprovideex-anteinformationthatcanbeusedtoscreenfunds.Thechangeinlagged3-yearzipcodelevelhomepricesisusedasaninstrument.Thepurposeofthisinstrumentisnottocorrectforendogeneity,buttoshowthatvariationinhomepricegrowtha ectstheprobabilityofhomeequityextraction.Table2.10,column1showsoverallthereisnosigni cante ectforhomeequityextractionsonfutureperformance.Whenthechoiceofhomeequityextractionisdrivenbyvariationinhomepricegrowth(columns3and5)thereisalargenegativee ectonforecastedfundperformance.Additionally,laggedhomepricegrowthpredictsahigherpropensitytoextracthomeequityinthe rststage(columns2and4).Thisisevidencethatfundmanagersareawareofhomepricegrowthandthatextractionsofhomeequitysignalasubsequentdeclineinfundperformance.2.7ConclusionNumerouspapershavefocusedonovercon dencebehaviorofretailinvestors,butthemajor-ityofthesestudieshaveonlylookedatstaticmeasures,andtheliteratureonovercon dencebehaviorofinstitutionalinvestorsisscant.Thispaperprovidesin-depthandhighlyro-bustevidenceofatimevaryingmeasureofovercon denceanddetailed ndingsonhowthistranslatesintolowerperformanceamonginstitutionalinvestors.Usingmutualfundhold-ingsdata,thetradingbehaviorforfundmanagersisbackedout,whichprovidesdetailedevidenceexplaininghowfundmanagersreacttopositivehomepriceshocks.Fundmanagersinterpretchangesinthevalueoftheirpersonalhomesasfeedbackontheirabilitytopickinvestments.Thispaper ndsthatpositiveshockstothevalueofthepersonalrealestateoffundmanagersforecastsadeclineinperformance.Fundmanagerswhoaremoresusceptibletoovercon dencehaveamuchstrongerresponse,particularlyinexperienced,lesseducated,andmalefundmanagers.Thedeclineinperformancestemsfromanincreaseintrading(andtheassociatedtradingcosts)andmakingworsechoicesinpickingstockstoleveruponandtosell.Interestingly,followingpositivehomepriceshocks,f

91 undmanagersdonotmakeworsechoiceswhenpick
undmanagersdonotmakeworsechoiceswhenpickingnewstocksbutinsteadbecomemorelikelytobuymoreoftheirexistingpositionsthathaveunderperformed.Fundmanagersdonotengageinthistypeoftradingbehaviorduringperi-odsofnegativehomepriceshocks.Overall,housingshocksa ectbehaviorbutviadi erent CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE70channelsdependingonthesignoftheshock.Thechannelofovercon denceduringperiodsofpositiveshocksleadstoastronge ectonrisk-adjustedreturns.Homeequityextractionssignalasigni cantdeclineinfutureperformanceaswell,highlightingtheimportanceofscreeningfundsonthepersonalqualitiesoftheunderlyingfundmanagers.Whilethispaperfocusespurelyonpersonalrealestate,otherpersonal nancemeasuressuchasFICOandoverallhouseholddebtareotherpotentiallyrelevantmetrics.Althoughthesemeasurescouldpotentiallyraiseprivacyissuesastheyarenotpublicinformation,unlikerealestate.Overall,thispaperdocumentsastrongfeedbackloopoffundmanagersbecomingovercon dentinprofessionalbehaviorfromtheinvestmentselectionofpersonalrealestate.Thise ectverylikelygeneralizestotheassetsboughtbythefundmanagerfortheirfund(s)andotherassetclasses(suchasart),therebypotentiallyindicatingfeedbackloopsthatcouldleadtoaspiralofovercon dence. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE712.8FiguresandTables Figure2.1:ComparisonofAverageSalaryandHomeValuesforInvestmentManagersAcomparisonofaveragesalaryandaveragehomevalueforinvestmentmanagersbetween2001and2016.DataonaverageannualsalaryisfromtheQCEWandaveragehomevalueisfromATTOMforthesamplemergedtoMorningstar. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE72 Figure2.2:BostonMetroAreaZipCodeLevelHomePriceGrowthMedianhomepricegrowthatthezipcodelevelforzipcodesintheBostonmetroareabetweenJanuary1997andDecember2017.DataarefromZillowandusesingle-familyresidentialandcondo/co-op.ValuesarenormalizedtothevalueinJanuary1997. Figure2.3:Comparisonof3

92 -yearHomePriceGrowthforNeighboringZipCod
-yearHomePriceGrowthforNeighboringZipCodesComparisonof3-yearlaggedzipcodelevelhomepricegrowthforneighboringzipcodes19405and19087.BothzipcodesareinthesuburbsofPhiladelphia. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE73 (a) (b)Figure2.4:NumberandShareofFundManagersMergedFigureA(B)showsthenumber(percentage)offundmanagersmergedforeachfundinthe nalpopu-lation. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE74 Figure2.5:HeterogeneousE ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha:1Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+Xi iln(3yrHPIi;t�1)I(ExperienceMeasurei)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)isinteractedwithindicatorvariablesformeasuresofeducation,experience,orhomepurchasetiming(measuredbetweenpurchaseandwhenthefundmanagerstartedatthefund).Theomittedcategoryistheoneforthegroupofmanagerswhoareleastlikelytobea ectedbyhomepricegrowth(i.e.thosewithanMBA).Percentageslistednexttovaluesonthex-axisrepresentthepercentofthepopulationthatfallsintothecategorylisted.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fun

93 dmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10
dmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managers,ifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million,orifhomepricegrowthisnegative(onlymonthswithpositivehomepricegrowtharekept).OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE75 Figure2.6:HeterogeneousE ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha:2Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+Xi iln(3yrHPIi;t�1)I(ExperienceMeasurei)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)isinteractedwithindicatorvariablesformeasuresofcerti cation(CFAstatus),ifallofthemergedfundmanagersaremale,homevalueattimeofpurchase,orLTV(includingsecondliens)attimeorpurchase.Theomittedcategoryistheoneforthegroupofmanagerswhoareleastlikelytobea ectedbyhomepricegrowth(i.e.thosewithaCFA).Percentageslistednexttovaluesonthex-axisrepresentthepercentofthepopulationthatfallsintothecategorylisted.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managers,ifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million,orifhomepricegrowthisnegativ

94 e(onlymonthswithpositivehomepricegrowtha
e(onlymonthswithpositivehomepricegrowtharekept).OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE76 Figure2.7:HeterogeneousE ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha:3Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+Xi iln(3yrHPIi;t�1)I(FundMeasurei)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)isinteractedwithindicatorvariablesformeasuresoffundstyle,fundsizefocus,expenseratio,orTNA.Theomittedcategoryistheoneforthegroupofmanagerswhoareleastlikelytobea ectedbyhomepricegrowth(i.e.lowexpenseratio),exceptforfundsizewheretheomittedcategoryisrandomlypicked.Percentageslistednexttovaluesonthex-axisrepresentthepercentofthepopulationthatfallsintothecategorylisted.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managers,ifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million,orifhomepricegrowthisnegative(onlymonthswithpositivehomepricegrowtharekept).OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE

95 77 Figure2.8:Distributionof1-yearChanges
77 Figure2.8:Distributionof1-yearChangesin3-yearHomePriceGrowthDistributionofthe1-yearchangeinln(3yrHPIi;t),measuredasofJuneeachyear. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE78 (a) (b)Figure2.9:ShareofFundManagersExtractingHomeEquityandAmountofHomeEquityExtractedFigureAshowstheproportionoffundmanagersextractinghomeequityinagivenyear.FigureBisahistogramoftheamountofmoneyextractedamongfundmanagerswhoextracthomeequityviaacashoutre nance.Valuesarewinsorizedatthe10%level,forreadability. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE79 Table2.1:SummaryStatisticsComparingtheMergedandNotMergedPopulationsNMeanP1P25P50P75P99StdDev MergedPopulation ManagerStatistics YearsExperienceWhenStarted77619185131722397PercentFemale889980.08000010.17PercentWithCFA889980.5600.330.57110.36PercentWithMBA862070.5700.330.50110.36 FundStatistics TNA($millions,2000dollars)8899816111778271978320555515AnnualExpenseRatio862011.12%0.20%0.91%1.11%1.33%2.15%0.37%Turnover106230.630.020.260.470.812.920.61Monthly 88962-0.09-3.88-0.79-0.080.623.501.41NumberofManagers889983.261234102.05PercentofManagersMerged889980.560.130.330.500.831.000.29 NotMergedPopulation ManagerStatistics YearsExperienceWhenStarted191584184131722397PercentFemale2360050.10000010.23PercentWithCFA2360050.59000.67110.41PercentWithMBA2226260.5800.140.63110.40 FundStatistics TNA($millions,2000dollars)23600510401774226781143703230AnnualExpenseRatio2284361.18%0.29%0.95%1.15%1.39%2.25%0.38%Turnover276240.750.030.300.550.973.480.82Monthly 231528-0.10-4.16-0.84-0.080.663.831.46NumberofManagers2360052.36112381.59Statisticscomparingthemergedpopulationtotheun-mergedpopulationforactivedomesticequitymutualfunds.Dataareaggregatedfromthefundbymonthlevel. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE80 Table2.2:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)AllPeriodsHPI0HPI0AllPeriodsAllPeriods ln(3yrHPIi

96 ;t�1)-0.171-0.236
;t�1)-0.171-0.236-0.0286(-3.03)(-2.73)(-0.21)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.258-0.301(-3.46)(-3.45)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)-0.148-0.129(-1.35)(-1.01) #Obs8771959799279208771971581R-squared0.08770.09150.1140.09010.0903 ControlsforFlowtand t�13!t�1?NNNNY tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Baselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalpha,withfundandtime xede ects.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE81 Table2.3:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundFlow (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)1-monthFlowForecast1-yearFlowForecastAllPeriodsHPI0HPI0AllPeriodsAllPeriods ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)0.004990.004650.00887(0.98)(0.72)(1.06)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)0.005210.0435(0.82)(0.43)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)0.009170.0163(1.

97 03)(0.11) #Obs8383157202266298383171833R
03)(0.11) #Obs8383157202266298383171833R-squared0.1820.2290.2340.1840.424 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Thee ectofhomepriceshocksonfund ow.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:Flowi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Flowiscalculatedusinggrossreturnsandiscalculatedboth1-monthand1-yearahead.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE82 Table2.4:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlphaforIndexandPassiveFunds (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)IndexFundsLowestQuantileHighestQuantileActiveShareActiveShareTrackingErrorTrackingError60%�60%HPI0HPI0AllPeriodsAllPeriodsAllPeriodsAllPeriodsAllPeriods ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)0.0746-0.0259(0.42)(-0.07)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.0206-0.217-0.585-0.127-0.365(-0.13)(-1.28)(-2.56)(-0.79)(-3.18)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)-0.000272-0.1130.0799-0.284-0.0198(-0.00)(-0.49)(0.19)(-1.39)(-0.13) #Obs63263362968817616174671080647913R-squared0.1770.1500.1470.1160.1520.1160.119 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Placebotestforthebaselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalphausingindexfundsandsplit

98 sbytrackingerrorandActiveShare.Estimatio
sbytrackingerrorandActiveShare.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE83 Table2.5:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlphabySecondHomeOwnershipStatus (1)(2)(3)(4)HPI0HPI0HPI0HPI0HasSecondDoesNotHaveHasSecondDoesNotHaveHomeSecondHomeHomeSecondHome ln(3yrHPI,PrimaryHomei;t�1)-0.313-0.213-0.3340.0796(-1.47)(-2.18)(-0.97)(0.54)ln(3yrHPI,SecondHome(s)i;t�1)0.2410.159(1.47)(0.87) #Obs893150868475123169R-squared0.1240.09230.1310.116 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Robustnessofthebaselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalpha,withfundandtime xede ects,usingdataforallresidentialrealestateholdingsoffundmanagers.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ 1ln(3yrHPIPrimaryHomei;t�1)+ 2ln(3yrHPISecondaryHome(s)i;t&#

99 0;1)+i+t+a+itawhere&
0;1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Homepricegrowthiscalculatedseparatelyforprimaryandsecondaryhome(s).b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE84 Table2.6:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonReturnsforBuyandSellTrades:1 (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)RBuyi;t+1�RSelli;t+1RNewPurchasesi;t+1�RBuysofExistingi;t+1�RNotTradedi;t+1�RPartiallySelli;t+1�RFullySelli;t+1�FlowRBenchi;t+1RBenchi;t+1RBenchi;t+1RBenchi;t+1RBenchi;t+1 ln(3yrHPI+i;t)-0.5780.0132-0.502-0.0767.0393(-2.43)(0.05)(-1.79)(-0.32)(1.35)ln(3yrHPI�i;t)-0.349-0.1510.185-0.242-.014(-0.85)(-0.32)(0.49)(-0.61)(-0.27)ln(3yrHPIi;t)-0.2260.613(-1.13)(2.78) #Obs27460233842281323519229812331128383R-squared0.07160.1830.2040.1860.1870.1650.279MeanofDepVar0.07480.1520.1680.2010.1250.128-0.0057SDofDepVar2.5252.7622.5782.5242.5373.0200.181 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,

100 p0:01Modelofe ectofhomepricegrowthon
p0:01Modelofe ectofhomepricegrowthontradingbehaviorandperformance.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:Yi;t+1;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t)+i+t+a+i;t;awhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),tarequarterlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Yi;t+1;aare:thedi erenceinreturnbetweenbuyandselltradeslessthebenchmarkreturn,thereturnonpurchasesofstocksintthatwerenotheldinquartert�1lessthebenchmarkreturn,thereturnonpurchasesofstocksintthatwereheldinquartert�1lessthebenchmarkreturn(atleast5%increaseinnumberofshares),thereturnonstockscurrentlyheldbutnottradedinquartertlessthebenchmarkreturn,thereturnonstockscompletelysoldinquartertint+1lessthebenchmarkreturn,thereturnonstockspartiallysoldinquartertint+1lessthebenchmarkreturn,and owbetweenquarterst�1andt.Dataarequarterlyduetothetheregressionsusingquarterlyholdingsdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundquartersaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE85 Table2.7:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonReturnsforBuyandSellTrades:2 (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)I(RBuysofExistingi;t�1!tI(RBuysofExistingi;t�1!tI(RBuysofExistingi;t�1!tI(RBuysofNewi;t�1!tExistingBuys AllBuysFullLiquidations AllSalesRBenchi;t�1!t)RBenchi;t�1!t:80)RNotTradedi;t�1!t)RBenchi;t�1!t) ln(3yrHPI+i;t)0.09470.1140.08670.03060.0744-0.0711

101 (1.99)(2.36)(1.76)(0.71)(2.03)(-2.30
(1.99)(2.36)(1.76)(0.71)(2.03)(-2.30)ln(3yrHPI�i;t)-0.0887-0.0762-0.0709-0.00181-0.0241-0.00613(-1.18)(-1.01)(-1.02)(-0.03)(-0.45)(-0.13) #Obs297782977829778297782977829778R-squared0.2800.2870.1290.2510.2430.219MeanofDepVar0.3520.3140.5350.2790.4870.344SDofDepVar0.4780.4640.4990.4480.3340.313 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Modelofe ectofhomepricegrowthontradingbehaviorandperformance.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:Yi;t+1;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t)+i+t+a+i;t;awhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),tarequarterlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Yi;t+j;aare:indicatorvariablesforifthereturnonexistingstockspurchasedinquartertbetweenquarterst�1andtislessthanthebenchmarkreturnoverthesameperiod,80%ofthebenchmarkreturn,orthereturntostocksheldbutnottradedinquartert,indicatorvariableforifthereturnonnewstockspurchasedinquartertbetweenquarterst�1andtisworsethanthebenchmarkreturnoverthesameperiod,thepercentofbuytradesthatwereincreasesinexistingpositions,andthepercentofselltradesthatwerefullliquidations.Dataarequarterlyduetothetheregressionsusingquarterlyholdingsdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundquartersaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE86 Table2.8:E ectofChangesinHomePriceGrowthonActiveTradingPerformance (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) ,NetofT

102 radingCostsI( Active� Pas
radingCostsI( Active� Passive)Gross lnTradingCostsi;t�1!t+1 TNAitln(Turnoveri;t!t+1) ln(3-yrHPI+it)�ln(3-yrHPIi;t�12mo)-0.374-0.763-0.2750.991(-2.15)(-1.92)(-1.67)(2.09)ln(3-yrHPI�it)�ln(3-yrHPIi;t�12mo)0.06800.2080.0314-0.0285(0.39)(0.63)(0.19)(-0.08)ln(3yrHPI+i;t)0.254(1.96)ln(3yrHPI�i;t)-0.0966(-0.66) #Obs19641964196419646160R-squared0.3800.3610.3770.9260.793MeanofDepVar-0.07780.351-0.00182-13.80-0.734SDofDepVar0.2350.4770.2261.7680.908 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Modelofe ectofchangesinhomepricegrowthonthelong-runactivetradingperformancerelativetothefund'sownbenchmark.Estimationoftheregressionmodel: Activei;t�12mo!t+12mo;cz� Passivei;t�12mo!t+12mo;cz=c+ (ln(3-yrHPIi;t)�ln(3-yrHPIi;t�12mo))+cz;t+Controlsit+i;t;czwherecz;tareannual(tisannual)timebycommutingzone xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowth)andControlsitiscomprisedof:Morningstarfundcategory xede ects,numberofmanager xede ects,anindicatorforifthemanagerownsasecondhome,anindicatorforifthemanagerhasanadvanceddegree(aboveundergraduate),andnon-parametric xede ectsforTNA,homevalue,combinedLTV(CLTV),averagezipcodelevelincome(fromthe2010IRSSOI),andthepercentofnon-whitehouseholdsatthezipcodelevel(fromthe2000Census). Activei;t�12mo!t+12mo;czisthemonthlyalphaobtainedfroma2-yearregressionoftheactivereturnsmeasuredbetweenquarter3ofyeart�1andquarter2ofyeart+1. Passivei;t�12mo!t+12mo;czisthemonthlyalphaobtainedfroma2-yearregressionofthereturnstoholding xedtheportfolioofstocksheldinquarter3ofyeart�1betweenquarter3ofyeart�1andquarter2ofyeart+1.Thelefthandsideisreplacedwithanindicatorvariableforiftheactivealphanetoftradingcostsbeatsthepassivealpha(column3)andthelogratiooftradingcostsoverthe2-year

103 periodrelativetoTNAinJuneofyeart(column4
periodrelativetoTNAinJuneofyeart(column4).Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsanddidnotsurvivetheperiodbetweenquarter3ofyeart�1andquarter2ofyeart+1aredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundswithmorethan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15millionarealsodropped.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded.Column5usesthesamplefromTable2andestimatesthee ectofhomepricegrowthon1-yearaheadturnover,includeslnlaggedturnoverasacontrol,andusesannualdata. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE87 Table2.9:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonRiskTaking (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(Returns)TrackingErrorCAPMBeta(MarketRisk)HPI0HPI0AllPeriodsHPI0HPI0AllPeriodsHPI0HPI0AllPeriods ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)-0.1100.0670-0.1250.0769-0.09320.0561(-2.92)(1.92)(-2.75)(1.94)(-2.47)(1.65)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.0769-0.0905-0.0804(-2.27)(-2.16)(-2.48)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)0.006280.01780.00586(0.17)(0.40)(0.17) #Obs486102475773367486232478173404486232478173404R-squared0.8790.9410.9000.8200.9220.8660.5760.7050.568MeanofDepVar1.2381.5441.3410.9161.2921.0430.01430.03550.0214SDofDepVar0.4080.3880.4270.3890.3800.4250.2280.1610.208 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionsshowingthee ectofhomepriceshocksonrisktaking.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:ln(RiskTakingi;t!t+12;a)=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswhereh

104 omepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositive
omepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Risktakingvariablesare:standarddeviationofreturns,trackingerror,andCAPMbeta.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. CHAPTER2.PERSONALWEALTHSHOCKSANDINVESTMENTMANAGEROVERCONFIDENCE88 Table2.10:E ectofHomeEquityExtractiononFundPerformance (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)AllManagers,OLS Extractors,1stStageExtractors,2ndStage AllManagers,1stStageAllManagers,2ndStage I(extractedit)-0.0354 -2.526 -3.179(-1.64) (-2.03) (-1.73)ln(3yrHPIi;t) 0.0787 0.0473 (2.69) (2.14) #Obs26647 1608816083 2664726638R-squared0.558 0.1170.144 0.1370.137 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Modelofe ectofhomeequityextractiononchangesinperformanceandtestsforiffundmanagersarepayingattentiontohomepricegrowth.Estimationoftheregressionmodel: i;t+1;a� i;t�1;a=c+ \I(extractedit)+i+t+a+ i;t�1;a+i;t;awhere i;t;aistheaveragemonthlyalphainquartert,I(extractedit)isanindicatorvariableequalto1ifafundmanagerextractedpersonalhomeequityinquartert.iarefund xede ects,tarequarterlytime xede ects,andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.tismeasuredasquarterlyobservationsandstandarderrorsareclusteredatthefundforeachmergednon-disjointperiodoftimelevel. i;t;aaretheaverageofthemonthlyalphasinquartertwherethemonthlyalphasareobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafu

105 ndlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodo
ndlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.2SLSregressionisestimatedincolumns3and5,wherethe1ststageinstrumentstheindicatorforextractinghomeequityinquartertwith3-yearhomepricegrowth(the rststageresultsarepresentedincolumns2and4).Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. 89Chapter3DurationMeasurementandHedgingChannelsforGSEInsuredMortgageBackedSecurities13.1IntroductionInmostacademicterm-structuremodels,theinterestrateriskofanyparticularbondcanbeexactlyreplicatedwithaportfolioofbondsofothermaturities,soshockstosupplyordemandforanybondmaturitymusta ecttheentireyieldcurve.However,underthe\preferredhabitat"viewofinterestrates, rstdescribedbyCulbertson(1957)andmodeledtheoreticallybyVayanosandVila(2009),investorclienteleshavepreferencesforparticularmaturities,soshockslocaltoaparticularmaturitymaya ectthatinterestratewithouta ectinginterestratesofothermaturities.Thisviewisconsistentwithalargeliteratureovertheyearsshowingtheimportanceoflocalsupplyanddemandshocksforthelevelofinterestrateswithspeci cmaturities(e.g.,GreenwoodandVayanos,2010,2014;ModiglianiandSutch,1966;Ross,1966;Wallace,1967;KrishnamurthyandVissing-Jrgensen,2011;Gagnon,Raskin,Remache,andSack,2011).Historically,thisliteraturehasfocusedonregulationchangesorothergovernmentactionsovertheyearsthathavesigni cantlya ectedthesupplyordemandforbondsofaparticularmaturity.Duetothesheersizeoftheoutstandingstockofmortgage-backedsecuritiesintheU.S.(about$13t

106 rillionpre-crisis)andrecentcrisis-relate
rillionpre-crisis)andrecentcrisis-relatedstabilizationpolicyinitiativesonthepartoftheFederalReserveBoard,suchasQuantitativeEasingI{IIIandOperationTwist,thathavespeci callytargetedthepurchaseofmortgage-backedsecurities,itisim-portantbothforourgeneralunderstandingofthetermstructureandforevaluatingandmodifyingtheseinterventionpoliciestofullyunderstandtheexactchannelsthroughwhichshockstomortgagebackedsecuritiesa ecttheTreasuryyieldcurve.Recently,someauthors(inparticular,Hanson,2014;Malkhozovetal.,2016)havear- 1Co-authoredwithAyaBellicha,RichardStanton,andNancyWallace. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES90guedthatthenegativeconvexityofmortgagesandmortgage-backedsecuritiesmeansthatthechangeinaggregateinterestrateriskcausedbydurationshiftsinthesesecuritiesisofcomparablemagnitudetothatcausedbygovernmentinterventions,andthatthiscanleadtoanampli cationofbond-marketshocks.Empirically,theseauthorslookforarelation-shipbetweenbondriskpremiaandmortgagedurationbyregressingexcessbondreturnsonmortgagedurationandothercontrols,suchastheCochraneandPiazzesi(2005)factor.Whenwestudytheseregressionsinmoredetail,we ndthattheevidenceisratherweakerthanit rstseems,beingverydependentontheexactsampleperiodchosen,andalsodrivenatleastinpartbymodelingchangesbyBarclaysduringtheperiod.Additionally,Barclaysdurationislessanchoredtorealitybasedonhavingaweakrelationshiptounderlyingmort-gageprepayments.However,amorefundamentalproblemisthatthemechanismproposedtoexplaintheseresultsreliesonMBSholdersbuyinglongtermTreasurieswhendurationislow.AnalyzingthebehaviorofthemajorityofMBSinvestors,we ndthatinvestorsgenerallydonotactinthisway.ToidentifytheimpactofdurationandMBSholdingsontheTreasurypositionsofbanksweusecallreportdata.WeareabletoestimatethechangeinTreasuryholdingsseparatelyforbanksthathedgeandbanksthatdonothedge,identi edbytheirholdingsofinterestratederivatives,inresponseto

107 duration.Forforeigninvestorsweusedatafro
duration.ForforeigninvestorsweusedatafromtheTreasuryInternationalCapital(TIC)datasetthatlistsmonthlyTreasuryholdingsbycountryformajorforeignholders.TheGSEsholdaverysmallamountofTreasurydebt,howevertheyareknowntobethemostaggressivehedgers.UsingquarterlydatafromFHFA/OFHEOregulatoryreportswestudytheimpactoftheGSEhedgingpositionsonexcessbondreturns.Unfortunately,forpensionsandretirementfundswearenotabletoobserveTreasuryorMBSholdings.Theannualcomprehensiveannual nancialreports(CAFRs)forpensionsandretirementfundsonlyreportthepercentageoftheirassetsinUSbonds,whichincludesbothTreasuriesandMBS(amongotherassets).Weestimatethee ectofdurationonTreasuryholdingsofmutualfundsusingdatafromCRSP.Lastly,usingNAICSdataweestimatetheprobabilityoflifeinsurancecompaniesbuyingTreasuriesinagivenmonthbasedonlaggedMBSduration.We ndthattheonlyinvestorsthatmayfollowthemodelsofHanson(2014)andMalkho-zovetal.(2016)arelifeinsurance rms.Wealso ndarelationwithbankshoweverwecannotruleoutthatthisismerelycorrelation.Lifeinsurance rmmarketsharehasdeclinedovertheperiod,droppingbelow10%since1996andreaching4%in2016.Oftheinvestorswearenotabletostudy,hedgefundsandpensions/retirementfundsarethetwoinvestorgroupsthatmaytradealongtheHanson(2014)andMalkhozovetal.(2016)models.Thesetwoinvestorgroupsheldalmost25%oftheAgencyMBSmarket(includinghouseholdsandnonpro torganizations)inthelate1990s,howeverpostcrisistheirsharehasfallenbelow10%. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES913.2DurationDurationisanamegiventoanumberofmeasuresofinterest-ratesensitivity.Fora xed-couponbond,the rstsuchmeasure,Macaulayduration(Macaulay,1938),isaweightedaverageofthetimetoeachpayment,theweightsproportionaltothePVofeachpayment(discountingusingthebond'syieldtomaturity,y).Forabondwithyieldtomaturityycompoundedntimesperyear,itsMacaulayduration,Dmac,isDmac=1 PnXi=1tiCi (1+y=n)nti;wheretiisthetime(inyears)u

108 ntiltheithpayment.Amorecommonlyusedmeasu
ntiltheithpayment.Amorecommonlyusedmeasureinpracticeismodi edduration,Dmod(Hicks,1939):2Dmod=Dmac (1+y=n):ItisasimplemattertoshowthatDmod=Dmac (1+y=n)=�1 P@P @y;(3.1)soforsmallchangesiny,thebond'spricechangesbyapproximatelyP P�Dmac 1+y=ny=�Dmody:Tohedgeaportfolio,weaddanothersecurityuntiltheportfolio'soveralldurationiszero.Thede nitionofbothMacaulayandmodi eddurationrequiresthecash owsonthesecuritytobe xed.Durationcan,however,beextendedtosecuritieswithinterest-rate-dependentcash ows(e.g.,securitieswithembeddedoptions)byusingEquation(3.1)asthede nitionof\e ectiveduration,"De =�1 P@P @y:3Allofthesemeasuresrelateabond'spricetochangesinitsownyield,whichcancauseproblemswhenaggregatingtotheportfoliolevel,sincetheyieldsondi erentbondsdonotnecessarilymoveexactlytogether.Moreconsistentistomeasurethesensitivityofallbondstomovementsinthesameunderlyingstatevariable.FisherandWeil(1971)duration 2NotethatMacaulayandmodi eddurationcoincidewithcontinuouscompounding,wheren!1.3Whenmodi eddurationcanbecalculated,itisalwaysequaltoe ectiveduration.However,e ectivedurationcanbecalculatedforawiderrangeofsecurities. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES92issimilartoMacaulayduration,buteachcash owisdiscountedusingtheappropriate-maturityspotinterestrate.Itthusmeasuresabond'ssensitivitytoparallelshiftsintheentire(notnecessarily at)yieldcurve.Similarly,inmodelsbasedonthedynamicsoftheshort-termrisklessrate,r(e.g.,Vasicek,1977;Cox,Ingersoll,andRoss,1985),wecancalculatethedurationofasecurityrelativetor,�1 P@P @r;andinmodelswithmorethanonefactor,wecancalculatedurationswithrespecttoeachoftheunderlyingstatevariables.4Givenaninterest-ratemodel,thederivativesabovecanbeevaluatedeitherinclosedformornumerically.However,anyerrorsinthemodelwillgiverisetoerrorsintheresultingdurationsandhedgeratios.Analternative,model-fr

109 ee,techniqueistocalculateasecurity's\emp
ee,techniqueistocalculateasecurity's\empiricalduration"(see,forexample,Hayre,2001,Chapter14),inwhichreturnsonthesecurityareregressedonchangesinoneormorestatevariablestoestimatedirectlytheaveragechangeinpriceforagivenchangeintheunderlyingvariable.5Anextensionofthisideaiskey-rateduration(Ho,1992),whereamultivariateregressionisrunofreturnsagainstchangesinseveraldi erentinterestrates,thusestimatingthesensitivityofthesecuritytochangesineachofthese\keyrates"keepingtheotherratesconstant.3.2.1MeasuringthedurationofGSEMBSHanson(2014)andMalkhozovetal.(2016)focusontheroleofprepaymentrelatedshockstothedurationofoutstandingresidentialmortgagebackedsecuritiesthat,inturn,leadtolarge-scaleshockstothequantityofinterestrateriskbornebyprofessionalbondinvestors.BothpapersusedurationmeasuresobtainedfromDatastreamthataretheproductofpro-prietaryprepaymentmodelsdevelopedBarclaysCapital,formerlyLehmanBrothers.TheBarclaysU.S.MBSindexcoversmortgagebackedpass-throughsecuritiesguaranteedbyGovernmentNationalMortgageAssociation(GNMA),theFederalNationalMortgageAs-sociation(FannieMae),andtheFederalHomeLoanMortgageCorporation(FreddieMac),collectivelyknownasU.S.AgencyMBS.Theindexiscomposedofpass-throughsecuritiesbackedbyconventional xed-ratemortgages.TheMBSindexdoesnotincludenon-agencyorprivate-labelMBS(e.g.,MBSbackedbyJumbo,Alt-A,orsubprimemortgages).Malkhozovetal.(2016)useaduration-to-worstmeasure(LHMNBCK(DU)inDatas-tream)whichisanMBSdurationcomputedusingthebond'snearestcalldateormaturity,whichevercomes rst.Theythenscaletheirduration-to-worstmeasurebytheaverageunitpriceofU.S.agencyMBSwhichproducesadollardurationperunitofMBSinthemarketnottheaggregateMBSdollarduration.Alimitationofthisdurationmeasureisthatit 4Hedgingaportfolioina(say)two-factorworldinvolvesaddingatleasttwoadditionalsecuritiesuntilbothdurationsequalzero.5Thisassumesthatthesensitivityremains xedovertheperiodoftheregression(seeBoudoukh,Richard-son,Stanton,andWhite

110 law,1995,foradiscussionandextensions). C
law,1995,foradiscussionandextensions). CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES93ignoresfuturecash ow uctuationsduetoembeddedoptionality.Sincetheintentoftheirempiricalexerciseistomeasuretheimpactofprepaymentrelatedshocksonthequantityofinterestraterisk,aduration-to-worstmeasurewouldnotbeanaccuratecontrolforthechannelofinterest.Hanson(2014)usestwomeasuresofdurationalsoconstructedusingdatafromBarclaysCapitalmodelsandobtainablefromDatastream.The rstoftheseisane ectivedura-tion(correspondingto(LHMNBCK(DM)inDatastream)fortheBarclaysMBSIndexandmeasuresthepercentagechangeinU.S.agencyMBSmarketvaluefollowingashiftintheyieldcurve.HissecondpreferreddurationmeasureisthecontributionofMBSbondstotheBarclaysAggregateIndexduration.Thismeasureisconstructedbyweightingthee ectivedurationmeasurebytheratioofthemarketvalueofMBS,usingBarclaysU.S.MortgageBackedSecurities{MarketValue(MM),totheBarclaysmeasureoftheU.S.Aggregate{MarketValue(MM).ThisscaleddurationmeasureisthereforeEffectiveDurtMBSMVt AGGMVtwhereMBSMVisU.S.MortgageBackedSecurities{MarketValue(MM)andAGGMVtistheU.S.Aggregate{MarketValue(MM).Themeasure,capturesthefactthatshiftsinMBSdurationintheU.S.havehadagrowingimpactonaggregatebondmarketdurationduetothegrowthoftheMBSmarket.ThemeasureproxiesforthetransientcomponentofaggregatebondmarketdurationduetoMBSandconstituteshispreferredforecastingvariable.Weapplya\prepaymentmodelfree"empiricaldurationmeasureusingtheuniverseofoutstanding30-yearFannieMae(FNMA),FreddieMac(FHLMC),andGinnieMae(GNMA)MBS.OurempiricaldurationestimatesthesensitivityofdailyMBSpricechangestodailychangesin10-yearTreasuryyields.Weuse10-yearzerocouponTreasuryyieldsfromGurkay-nak,Sack,andWright(2007)andTBApricesattheagency,maturity,andcouponlevelfromEMBStoestimatethefollowingequation:TBAPricet;c;p�TBAPricet�1;c;p TBAPricet�1;c;p= + yieldt�yieldt�1 100+t;c;p(3.2)where�1 ist

111 heempiricalduration,tistime(daily),cisco
heempiricalduration,tistime(daily),ciscoupon(in50bpsincrements),andpisprogram(i.e.FNMA30-yearorGNMA15-year).ThefollowinganalysisusesdataforFNMA,FHLMC,andGNMA30-yearMBSwithacouponbetween2.5and10%.Forourseconddurationmeasure,wescaleourempiricaldurationbythemarketvalueoftheoutstandingstockofU.S.MBSandthemarketvalueoftheBarclaysAggregatefollowingHanson(2014).6Oursecondmeasureisthus,EmpiricalDurtMBSMVt AGGMVt,whereMBSMVtistheEMBSmeasureofthemarketvalueoftheoutstandingstockofU.S.agencyMBSandAggMVtistheU.S.Aggregate{MarketValue(MM).Our nalpreferreddurationmeasureisourempiricaldurationmeasuretimesU.S.MortgageBackedSecurities{MarketValue(MM)toBarclaysaggregatee ective,durationobtainedfromDataStream,timesU.S.Aggregate{MarketValue,EmpDurtMBSMVt AggDurtAggMVt.ThisistherelativecontributionofMBSdollardurationtotheaggregatedollarduration. 6OurEMBSmeasureofthemarketvalueoftheoutstandingstockofU.S.agencyMBSexactlymatchestheBarclaymeasureU.S.MortgageBackedSecurities{MarketValue(MM). CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES94Malkhozovetal.(2016)notesthatthedurationchannelisstrongerwhenGSEshareishigher.TheybasethisonthecorrelationbetweentherollingR-squaredfromtheregressionofexcessbondreturnondurationandtheshareofMBSheldbytheGSEs.ThiscontrastswiththeimplicationsofthemodelinHanson(2014).HansonnotesthattheMBSbuyersthatdeltahedgebearaconstantamountofinterestrateriskandarenotimportantforthechannel.AsshownintheGSEsection,theGSEsdonotin uenceexcessbondreturnsbytheirhedgingactivity.TheGSEsprimarilyuseswaps,swations,Treasuryfuturesoptions,Eurdollarfuturesoptions,andotherinterestratederviatiesaswellastheirissuanceofAgencydebttohedgetheirdurationexposure.TheydonotuseTreasurydebtforthispurpose.ConsequentlyanincreaseinGSEshareshouldreducetheimportanceofthedurationchannelonbondreturnsiftradinginthederivativesmarketsdoesnotin uenceexcessbondreturns.Onasimilarnote,themodelinMalkhozovetal.(2016)

112 reliesonthedi erencebetweentheaverag
reliesonthedi erencebetweentheaverageMBScouponandthe5-yearswaprate.NotethattheaverageMBScoupondoesnotaccountforthechangeindistribution.Italsodoesnotaccountforvariousmeasuresthatareparamountinprepaymentmodeling,suchas:SATO,thepercentunderwater,FICO,etc.3.2.2BarclaysModelingChangesStartinginNovember2008,Barclaysregularlyupdatedtheirprepaymentmodeltocapturechangesinthemarketandregulatoryenvironment(Risa,Ibanez-Meier,Fan,andMaoui(2008)andSrinivasanandVelayudham(2010)).Primarily,Barclaysisinterestedincapturingfrictionsassociatedwithmortgageterminations.Themodelchangesareine ectstructuralbreaksinthedata.Thesechangescanhavedramatic(andpersistent)e ectsonduration.TheBarclayse ectivedurationmeasurechangedby1.64(from1.29to2.93versusachangefrom1.2to1.48intheempiricaldurationmeasure)betweenAugustandSeptember2010,primarilyduetothemodelchangeinSeptember2010.Figure3.1ashowsthedi erencebetweenBarclayse ectivedurationandempiricaldu-ration.Theseriesisroughlywhitenoisearoundzerountil2008.Startinginlate2008,themodelstartstodeviatefromthezerotrend,withthebiggestbreakinSeptember2010whenBarclaysintroducedchangestotheirprepaymentmodelthathadlargee ectsontheirdurationmeasures.Thisisalsoshownin gure3.1b,whichcomparesthelevelsofthetwodurationseries.Asisclearfromthetwographs,Barclayse ectivedurationmeasureisnearlyuniformlyhigher(implyingthebondsarelonger)thantheempiricaldurationmea-surebetweenSeptember2010andOctober2015.TheseresultssuggestthatrevisionstotheBarclaysprepaymentmodelledtopersistentunderpredictionsofprepaymentrelativetoactualGSEprepaymentspeedsformostofthelaterpartofthesample.3.2.3In uenceofExtremeObservationsGiventheissueswiththeBarclaysdurationmeasureandtherelativelystablenatureofdurationexceptforafewperiodsofextremeandpersistentchangesindurationitisnatural CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES95toseeiftheresultisdrivenbyafewextremeobservatio

113 nsforthesubsamplethatdoesnotincludemodel
nsforthesubsamplethatdoesnotincludemodelchanges.We rstconsiderourtwomeasuresofe ectiveduration,Barclayse ectivedurationandourempiricalduration.Column1ofTable3.1replicatesthe ndingofHanson(2014)butfortheperiodbetweenFebruary1996andOctober2015.We ndasimilarresult.Column2replicatesthisusingempiricaldurationandweagain ndasimilarresult,albeitslightlysmaller.However,giventheissueswithmodelingchangesstartingintheendof2008wecannotbecertainthattheresultoverthisperiodisduetoportfoliorebalancingormodelingchanges.Toaccountforthis,welookattheperiodbetweenJanuary1989andAugust2008andincludeperiod xede ectsforthetwore nanceperiods(August1998-January1999andAugust2002-June2003).Usingthisdaterangeandwiththese xede ects,asreportedincolumn3ofTable3.1,we ndtheBarclayse ectivedurationmeasureisnolongersigni cant.Furthermore,onlytheearliestAugust1998toJanuary1999re nanceepisodeissigni cant.FortheempiricaldurationserieswecanincludethedatathroughOctober2015,howevertheseresultsmaybebiasedbytheactionsoftheFederalReserve.WewouldexpecttheFederalReserveinterventionstodirectlyin uenceexcess10yearTreasuryreturnsastheFederalReserveenteredthemarkettoin uencebondyields,especiallyduringOperationTwist.OperationTwiststartedinSeptember2011andlastedthrough2012,however,unliketheotherthreequantitativeeasingprogramsOperationTwist'ssoleintentionwastobuylongtermTreasurydebtandsellshorttermTreasurydebt.TheconsequencesoftheFed'stradingactivityshouldbeadecreaseintheexcessreturnmeasuresincethelongrateshoulddeclineaslongtermdebtpricesarebidupandtheshortrateshouldincreaseasshorttermdebtpricessello .Sinceitseemsunlikelythattheexcessbondreturndynamicsoverthisperiodareonlyrespondingtothe uctuationsinMBSduration,wealsoestimateaspeci cationthatintroducesperiodcontrolsforQE1,QE2,QE3,OperationTwist,andthetaperingperiod,aswellasthe xede ectsforthetwoearlierre nanceepisodes.FortheFederal

114 Reservecontrols,weincludevariablesequalt
Reservecontrols,weincludevariablesequaltothedollaramountoflong-termTreasuries(greaterthan5yearsmaturity)heldbytheFederalReserveduringtherespectiveperiod(and0otherwise).Asshownincolumn4ofTable3.1,we ndthattheempiricaldurationvariableisnolongersigni cant.Aswewilldiscuss,giventheissueswithmodelriskfortheBarclaysdurationmeasureoverthislaterperiodweputmoreemphasisontheempiricaldurationresultforthefullsample.Columns5-8ofTable3.1repeattheregressionsincolumns1-4butusethefractionofdollarMBSdurationtodollarmarketdurationtoaccountforgrowthinMBSinterestrateriskrelativetogrowthinoverallinterestraterisk.Overthelongperiodstudied,MBSandoveralldebtvolumesincreaseddramatically.We ndthattheempiricaldurationmeasureisnotsigni cantwhenincludingthepreviouslymentionedperiod xede ects,howeverBarclaysdurationisalwayssigni cant. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES963.2.4MortgageTerminationsAkeyreasonthatMBSduration uctuatesfromchangesininterestratesisthatunderlyingmortgageholdersprepaytheirmortgageasinterestratesfallorbecomelesslikelytoprepaytheirmortgageasinterestratesrise.Basedonthis,wecomputeameasureofthepercentofoutstandingmortgagesthatprepayeachmonth.ThismeasureshouldcloselyalignwithMBSduration,basedonthemechanismthroughwhichMBSduration uctuates.ToconstructameasureweusedatafromMcDash,whichprovidesuswithmonthlymort-gagepaymentinformationforeveryoutstandingmortgagefromtheeightlargestmortgageservicers.Werestrictto30year xedrate rstlienmortgagesheldinFreddieMac,FannieMae,orGinnieMaeMBSandremoveconstructionloans.ForeachmonthbetweenJanuary1992andApril2018,wecalculatethepercentofmortgagesthatvoluntarilyterminateasafractionofoutstandingmortgages,weightedbytheoriginalloanamount.Wedonotincludemortgagesthatterminateduetoforeclosure,servicingtransfers,orthatgomissinginthedata,astheseterminationsdonotcorrelatetochangesininterestrates.Ina gureavailableuponre

115 quest,weshowthatthedynamicsofthismeasure
quest,weshowthatthedynamicsofthismeasurematchthedynamicsofasimilarmeasurecalculatedfromEMBSloanperformancedata.EMBSloanperformancedatain-cludesdataforeverymortgageinaGSEorGinnieMaepool(notjustfromtheeightlargestservicers).However,EMBSdatadonotprovideuswiththereasonforloantermination,whichincludesnon-voluntaryterminationsandservicingtransfers.Figure3.2comparesnormalizedversionsoftheempiricalandBarclaysdurationmeasuresagainstthevoluntaryterminationmeasure.Theterminationmeasuremovescloselywiththedurationmeasures,asexpected.Interestingly,empiricaldurationappearstomorecloselyalignwiththemeasureoftheunderlyingmortgageterminationscomparedtoBarclaysdura-tion.Thisiscon rmedby ndinganR-squaredof0.35whenregressingempiricaldurationontotheterminationmeasure,comparedtoanR-squaredof0.19whenregressingBarclaysdurationontotheterminationmeasure.Thisshowsthateventhoughtheempiricaldurationmeasureis"modelfree",itmorecloselytracksrealitycomparedtothemodelbasedBarclaysdurationmeasure.Next,wereplicatetheearlierresultsusingtheterminationmeasure.Inaddition,McDashprovidesuswithmorerecentdata,whichallowsustoextendtheanalysisthroughApril2018.We ndthatfortheJanuary1992throughApril2018period,bothBarclaysdurationandtheterminationmeasurearesigni cantatthe5%level.However,whenweincludeperiod xede ectsforthelate1990sandearly2000sre nancecyclesandthevariousquantitativeeasingmeasurestakenbytheFederalReserve,we ndthatthemortgageterminationmeasurebecomesinsigni cant.Barclaysdurationremainssigni cantatthe10%level.However,thisresultispartlybasedondataduringtheperiodforwhichBarclaysactivelyadjustedtheirmodel.Lastly,whenwerestricttotheperiodafterthequantitativeeasingmeasuresbytheFederalReserveended(January2014throughApril2018),we ndthatthemortgageterminationmeasuresbecomesinsigni cant,whiletheBarclaysmeasureremainssigni cant.Theseregressionsshowtheimportanceofthechoiceinameasuretore ectMBSinterestrater

116 isk.Withameasureofrealizedmortgagetermin
isk.Withameasureofrealizedmortgageterminations,we ndaveryweakrelationship CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES97thatisbasedonafewuniqueepisodesandthathassincebecomeirrelevantinrecentyears.However,usingamodelderivedmeasureofMBSinterestraterisk,we ndastrongere ectthatiscurrentlyafactorin uencingTreasuryyields.BasedontheinherentweaknessesoftheBarclaysmodelderivedmeasureandtheconsistencyoftheresultsbasedontwoindependentmeasuresofMBSinterestrateriskthatarebasedonfundamentals,we ndlimitedsupportoftheclaimthatMBSdurationhedginga ectsTreasuryyields.Tofurthershowthis,inSection3werigorouslyshowthatmostclassesofinvestorsdonotbuyTreasuriestohedgeMBSdurationrisk,whichisthechannelhighlightedbypreviousworktoexplainarelationshipbetweenMBSdurationandexcessTreasuryyields.3.3EvidenceforMBSInvestorHedgingUsingtheFederalReserveFlowofFunds,AgencyMBSinvestorsarepresentedinFigure3.3.TheinvestorswecanaccountforaretheFederalReserve,banks,foreigninvestors,theGSEs,mutualfunds,andlifeinsurancecompanies.Wedonotaccountforbrokers/dealers,fed-eral/state/localgovernment,property/casualtyinsurancecompanies,householdsandnon-pro torganizations(includeshedgefunds),retirementandpensionfunds,issuersofABS,andREITs.Overall,weareabletoestimatethehedgingresponseofinvestorscomprisingatleast70%oftheMBSmarketsincethe rstquarterof2001(barringafewmonthswheretheirsharedippedslightlybelow70%)andinsomemonthsmorethan80%ofthemarket.3.3.1TheFederalReserveSinceNovember2008theFederalReservehaspurchasedover$2.3trilliondollarsofmortgagebackedsecuritiesthroughitsquantitativeeasingprograms(FederalHousingFinanceAgencyOcerofInspectorGeneral,2014).Bythe rstquarterof2014,theFederalReserveheld$1.5trillionFreddieMacPCs,FannieMaemortgagebackedsecurities,andGNMAmortgagebackedsecuritiesonitsbalancesheet(Patrabansh,Doerner,andAsin2014).TheFederalReservedoesnothedgenordotheycareaboutportfoliodurat

117 ionsothisimportantinvestorcannotimportan
ionsothisimportantinvestorcannotimportantforthemeasurementoftheoverallU.S.GSEMBSduration.Malkhozovetal.(2016) ndsthattheFederalReserve'smarketshareisnegativelycorrelatedwiththestrengthofthedurationchannel.ThisisattributedtotheFederalReserveabstainingfromhedging.However,theperiodwhenFederalReserveMBSholdingsarehigheristheperiodduringunconventionalmonetarypolicyandthusitisdiculttoattributethereductioninthestrengthofthedurationchanneloverthisperiodtoFederalReserveMBSholdingsorFederalReserveopenmarketoperationsmorebroadly(suchasOperationTwist).3.3.2GovernmentSponsoredEnterprisesMalkhozovetal.(2016)notesthatthedurationchannelisstrongerwhenGSEshareishigher.TheybasethisonthecorrelationbetweentherollingR-squaredfromtheregressionofexcess CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES98bondreturnondurationandtheshareofMBSheldbytheGSEs.ThiscontrastswiththeimplicationsofthemodelinHanson(2014).HansonnotesthattheMBSbuyersthatdeltahedgebearaconstantamountofinterestrateriskandarenotimportantforthechannel.Asshownbelow,theGSEsdonotin uenceexcessbondreturnsbytheirhedgingactivity.TheGSEsprimarilyuseswaps,swations,Treasuryfuturesoptions,Eurdollarfuturesoptions,andotherinterestratederivativesaswellastheirissuanceofAgencydebttohedgetheirdurationexposure.TheydonotuseTreasurydebtforthispurpose.ConsequentlyanincreaseinGSEshareshouldreducetheimportanceofthedurationchannelonbondreturnsiftradinginthederivativesmarketsdoesnotin uenceexcessbondreturns.Figure3.4showstheholdersofTreasurydebt.TheGSEshareisnotvisible,risingtoamaximumofonly1.8%overtheperiod.Figure3.5showsthedistributionoftheGSEsderivativesportfoliorevealingthatinterestrateswapsarethedominantinstrumentusedforhedging.Note,Figure3.5doesnotshowthenon-mortgageinvestmentsportfolio,whichcomprisesTreasurydebt.However,TreasurydebtisnotbrokenoutseparatelyandisrolledintotheOthercate-gory,showingthatitisaverysmallinvestmentcategoryfortheGSEs.Th

118 eGSEhedgingportfoliodataincludesholdings
eGSEhedgingportfoliodataincludesholdingsofinterestratederivativeproductsbytheGSEs(asshowninFigure3.5).UsingquarterlydatafromtheFHFA/OFHEOregulatoryreportswetestthee ectoftheGSEderivativesportfolioonlogexcessreturnfor10-yearzerocouponbonds.Thefollowingregressionisestimated:rx(10)t+12m= + 1GSEHedgingPortfoliot+(10)t+12m(3.3)EquationsincludingBarclayse ectiveandempiricaldurationarealsoestimated.ThedataarequarterlyandstandarderrorsareNeweyWestallowing18monthsofserialcorrelation.Regressionsofchangesindurationandinterestratederivativeholdingsonthechangeinexcessreturnarealsoestimated.IftheGSEsbuymoreinterestratederivativeswhendurationdeclinesandthebuyingofthesecontractsin uencesexcessbondreturnsthen 1shouldbenegative.Tables3.3and3.4showthattheGSEhedgingportfoliodoesnothaveanimpactontheexcessreturnandthecoecientispositive.Includingdurationorestimatingtheregressionwithdi erencesinsteadoflevelsdoesnotchangethe nding.Note,theFlowofFundsdata(L.211)measuresGSEholdingsofagencyandGSEbackedsecurities.However,theGSEsholdalargeamountofwholeloansandprivatelabelsecurities(PLS),whicharenotincludedintheFlowofFundsdata(Figure3.6).Furthercomplicatingmatters,inQ1of2010therewasanaccountingpolicychangethatdramaticallyreducedreportedGSEholdings(andincreasedtheirliabilities).TheretainedportfolioreportingdatadoesnotshowasimilardropinQ12010.UsingFHFA/OFHEOretainedportfolioreportingdatawe ndthatbefore2002theretainedportfoliodynamicsfollowedtheFlowofFundsdatabutdivergedafterwards.AgencyMBSholdings(FNMA,FHLMC,andGNMAMBS)intheFHFAdatacloselytracktheFlowofFundsdata.HowevertheFHFAdatadonotshowadeclinein2010fromtheaccountingchange. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES99Overall,theGSEsdonotdirectlyholdTreasuries,howevertheydoholdverylargeinterestratederivativeportfolios.Wetestwhetherthesein uenceexcessTreasuryyieldsand ndthattheydonot.3.3.3BanksUsingca

119 llreportdatawetesttheimpactofdurationonT
llreportdatawetesttheimpactofdurationonTreasurybondholdings(andmorebroadlynon-mortgagedebtholdingsbymaturity)ofbanks.WedividethesampleintobankswithMBSpass-throughholdingsintheirnon-tradingaccountsthathaveandhaveneverheldinterestratecontractsintheirnon-tradingaccountsaswellasbanksthatneverheldMBSsecuritiesasacomparison.Figure3.7showstheholdingsofMBSpass-throughbyaccountforbanksthathaveheldinterestratecontractsandforbanksthathavenotheldinterestratecontracts.Mostbankshaveneverheldaninterestratecontract.Themajorityofthebankpass-throughholdingsareheldbythesmallersubsetofbanksthathaveheldinterestratecontractsandarekeptintheavailableforsaleaccount.However,thiswasnottruebeforetheearly2000s.Thetradingassetsaccountisomitted,howeveranegligibleamountofMBSisheldinthisaccount.Weusefourdi erentdependentvariables.First,welookattheoverallTreasurytoassetratio(thesumofRCFD0211[heldtomaturityamortizedcost]andRCFD1287[availableforsalefairvalue]overRCFD2170[totalbalancesheetassets]).However,thisdoesnotallowustodecomposebymaturity.Forthatwelookatthenon-mortgagedebttoassetratio(thesumofRCFDA549/550/551/552/553/554[securitiesissuedbytheU.S.Treasury,U.S.Governmentagencies,andstatesandpoliticalsubdivisionsintheU.S.;othernon-mortgagedebtsecurities;andmortgagepass-throughsecuritiesotherthanthosebackedbyclosed-end rstlien1-4familyresidentialmortgages,byremainingmaturityornextrepricingdate]overRCFD2170).Forthisvariablewealsolookattheratiofordebtwiththreeorfeweryearsremainingmaturityandfordebtwithmorethanthreeyearsremainingmaturity.Figure3.8showstheunweightedaverageTreasuryandnon-mortgagedebt(asde nedabove)toassetratiosforallbanks(includingthosethatdonotholdMBS).We ndthatsince2002,bankshaveheldaverysmallportfolioofTreasuries,howevertheydohavesizableholdingsofothernon-mortgagedebt(suchasagencydebtandmunicipaldebt).Thisislogicalastheseformsofdebtarealsoverysafebutprovideahigheryield.Thisisalsocon rmedbythe owoffundsdata(Fi

120 gure3.4)whichshowedthatbankshaveheldaneg
gure3.4)whichshowedthatbankshaveheldanegligibleamountofTreasuriessince2002.Thefollowingequationisestimated:Debtt;i Assetst;i= + 1Durationt�12m+ 2MBSSecuritiest�12m;i Assetst�12m;i+ 3MBSSecuritiest�12m;i Assetst�12m;iDurationt�12m+Xi;t�12m+t;i(3.4)whereiisabank,andXiarebank xede ectsandtimevaryingcontrolsfortheratioofresidentialloanstototalloans,loantoassetratio,capitalandliquidityratios,deposit CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES100andfundingcosts,anddeposittoassetratio.ThemeasureofMBSsecuritiesisthesumofRCFDG300/304/308/303/307/311(heldtomaturityamortizedcostandavailableforsalefairvalueresidentialpass-throughsecuritiesissuedbyGNMA/FNMA/FHLMC/other).ThedataarequarterlybetweenJune1997andDecember2013andstandarderrorsareclusteredatthebanklevelallowingforcorrelationinthestandarderrorswithinbanks.Wereportresultsusingonlyempiricalduration,asitdoesnotsu erfrommodelrisk.IfbanksincreaseTreasuryholdingsfollowingadeclineindurationwewouldexpect 1tobenegative.Wewouldalsoexpect 3tobepositiveifbanksthatholdmoreMBSaremoresensitivetoduration( 3isexpectedtobepositiveinthiscaseas 2isnegative,aswillbeshownintheregressionsbelow).Thee ectshouldbemuchstrongerforbanksthatdonothaveinterestratederivativeholdingsandforTreasurieswithlongerduration(assumingbanksholdinginterestratederivativeshedgedtheirMBSpositions).Table3.5showsresultsusingdataforbanksthathaveheldMBSintheirnon-tradingaccountsandthathaveneverheldinterestratederivativesintheirnon-tradingaccountsincolumns1-4andbanksthathaveheldinterestratederivativesintheirnon-tradingaccountsincolumns5-8.Columns1and5showthatTreasuryholdingsoverallincreaserelativetoassetswhendurationdeclines.Columns2and6showadi erentpatternforallnon-mortgagedebtrelativetoassets.Banksthatdonotholdinterestratederivativesdecreasethisvariablewhendurationdeclines,howeverlon

121 gdurationdebtstillincreasesfollowingdecl
gdurationdebtstillincreasesfollowingdeclinesinduration(column3).Shortdurationbondsseemtodominateleadingtotheoverallpositiverelationshipfoundincolumn2.Banksthathaveheldinterestratederivativesincreasethisvariableinresponsetodeclinesinduration,withanegativecoecientforlongdurationnon-mortgagedebttoassets(column7).Theinteractiontermisnotsigni cantincolumns1and6-8indicatingmixedresultsforthesensitivityofbanksrelativetothesizeoftheirMBSholdings.Overall,we ndanegativerelationbetweenMBSholdingsandTreasuryholdingsindicatingapossiblecrowdingoute ectorsubstitutione ect.Asaplacebotest,wereplicatetheseregressionsforthepopulationofbanksthatneverheldMBSsecuritiesintheirnon-tradingaccounts.MBSdurationshouldhavenoimpactondebtholdingsforthesebanks,howeverwe ndsimilarresults.Table3.6showsthatthesebanksdoinfactincreasetheirTreasuryandlongdurationnon-mortgagedebtwhendurationdeclines(columns1and3).This nding,alongwiththeinsigni cantinteractiontermsintable3.5indicatesthatthereispotentiallyanotherchanneldrivingtheseresults.WhendurationdeclinesitistypicallywhentheFederalReserveislooseningpolicythusindicatingheightenedriskaversionandlowin ation.Thisisanenvironmentconducivetobuyingsafelongdurationassets.BasedontheseregressionswecannotconcludethatMBSdurationresultsarecausal.3.3.4MajorForeignHoldersSince2002,foreigninvestorshaveheldbetween10and22%ofoutstandingAgencyMBS(Figure3.3).Furthermore,foreigninvestorsaremajorholdersofUSTreasurydebt,holding CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES101morethan40%inrecentyears(Figure3.4).ThisisaninvestorgroupthatholdsasizableMBSportfolioandalsoholdsasigni cantportionofTreasurydebt.Figure3.9showsthatChinaandJapaneachholdroughly10%oftotalUSTreasurydebt.UsingdatafromtheTreasuryInternationalCapital(TIC)datasetthefollowingequationisestimated:TSYHoldingst;t+12m TSYHoldingst= + 1Durationt�12m;t+ 2

122 ;FXRatet�12m;t+t;t+12m(3.5)where
;FXRatet�12m;t+t;t+12m(3.5)wheretheforeignexchangerateishowmanyunitsofthecountry'scurrencybuysoneUSDollar.ThedataaremonthlyandthestandarderrorsareNeweyWestallowingfor18monthlags.RegressionsareestimatedusingpercentagechangeinTreasuryholdingsinsteadofthedi erenceinTreasuryholdingstocontrolforthemassiveincreaseinholdingsovertheperiod.IfthesecountriesbuyTreasurieswhendurationdecreasestoextendthedurationoftheirportfoliosweshould nd 1tobenegative.InvestorsinthesecountriesmayalsobuyTreasurieswhentheircurrencyappreciates,inwhichcasewewouldexpect 2tobenegative.However,ifthecountry'scurrencyfreely oatsthenlowdurationmayalsocoincidewithamorevaluableforeigncurrencyforthecountryaslowdurationmaybefromalowFedFundsrate,whichwoulddepreciatetheUSdollarrelativetoforeigncurrencies.AmorevaluableforeigncurrencymayleadtoincreasedbuyingofUSTreasurydebt.Table3.7showsresultsusingBarclayse ectiveduration.Thechangeindurationvariableisneversigni cant.Usingempiricaldurationwe ndsimilarresults(Table3.8).Thus,thelargestforeignholdersofUSTreasuriesdonotbuyTreasurieswhendurationdeclines.3.3.5MutualFundsUsingdatafromCRSP,wetesttheimpactofdurationonTreasurybondholdingsofmutualfunds.ThedataareavailablequarterlybetweenQ12010(whenthegovernmentbondholdingpercentages rststartedbeingreported)andQ22016.Thefollowingequationisestimated:PerGovtBondst;i= + 1Durationt�12m+Xi+t;i(3.6)whereiisamutualfund,durationiseitherempiricalorBarclayse ectiveduration,andXiaremutualfund xede ects.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthemutualfundlevel.Regressionsarealsoestimatedonchangesinsteadoflevels.WeestimatetheequationforallmutualfundsinthesampleandformutualfundsthateverhadMBSholdings.DataonMBSholdingsbecameavailableinOctober2010.IfmutualfundsincreaseTreasuryholdingsfollowingadeclineindurationwewouldexpect 1tobenegative.Table3.9reportsresultsfortheestimatesoftheequationonlevelsandshowsthat 1ispos

123 itiveandsigni cantacrossallspeci
itiveandsigni cantacrossallspeci cations.Table3.10reportsresultsforchangesand nds 1ispositiveandsigni cantacrossallspeci cations.TheseresultsshowthatmutualfundsdonotincreasetheirTreasuryholdingswhendurationdeclines. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES1023.3.6LifeInsuranceCompaniesLifeinsurancecompanyliabilitiesaregenerallylongdurationandrequireaminimumlevelofreturnwithminimalrisk.Tosatisfytheirliabilitieslifeinsurancecompaniesprimarilyhold xedincomeassets.Berends,McMenamin,Plestis,andRosen(2013) ndthat75%oflifeinsurancegeneralaccountassetsareinbonds.Ofthebondholdings60%areincorporatebonds,18%areinMBS(bothprivatelabelandGSE),andonly7%areinTreasuries.Cor-roboratingthis nding, gure3.4showsthatoverthisperiodinsurancecompanies,includingpropertyandcasualtyinsurancecompanies,heldaverysmallshareofTreasurydebt.Figure3.3showsthatinsurancecompaniesheldroughly10%ofoutstandingAgencyMBSin1985howeverthissharehasdeclinedovertime(70{80%oftheseholdingsarefromlifeinsurancecompanies).UsingdatafromNAICSweareabletoidentifylifeinsurance rmsthatholdMBS(eitherGSEorprivatelabel)andtheirmonthlytradingofTreasurysecurities.Weusedatafromthe300 les,ScheduleDPart1,whichreportssecuritiesheldasofyearend.Thereisalsoa303/304 le,ScheduleDPart3,whichreportsalltradesinayear.Howeverdataforthe303/304 lesendsin2007,whiledataforthe300 lesendsin2012.Thedownsidetousingthe300 lesisthatthereportingwillnotcapturesecuritiesheldandthensoldafterashortperiodoftimeorsecuritiesthatmaturebeforetheendoftheyearthattheyarepurchased.However,sinceweareinterestedinTreasuryholdingsthatareboughtforthepurposeofextendingportfoliodurationduringperiodsofpersistentdeclinesinMBSdurationthisislikelytobelessofanissue.IntermsofabsolutenumbersofTreasurypurchased,the300 lescontain97%ofthenumberofTreasurypurchasescomparedtothe303/304 les,whilethe300 lesonlycont

124 ain79%ofalltradescomparedtothe303/304
ain79%ofalltradescomparedtothe303/304 les.ThusitseemsthatTreasuriesarelikelytobeheldforextendedperiodsoftime.However,comparingcountsbytuplesof rmandyearandmonthofthetradeonly82%ofTreasuriesinthe303/304 lesarematchedtothe300 les,thusthereisvariationinthehighfrequencydata.Forrobustness,wereportregressionsfortheoverlappingperiodof2001{2007forboththe300and303/304 les.TotestiflifeinsurancecompaniesbuyTreasurieswhenMBSdurationislowweestimatealinearprobabilitymodeloftheprobabilityofbuyingTreasuriesinagivenmonthbasedonlaggeddurationwith rm xede ects.Theequationestimatedis:1t;i= + 1Durationt�j+Xi+t;i(3.7)where1t;iisequalto1if rmiboughtTreasuriesinmontht,Durationt�jiseitherBarclayse ectiveMBSdurationorempiricalduration(wherejisthelagrelativetothemonthofbuyingTreasuriesandiseither1,6,or12months),andXiare rm xede ects.Thestandarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmlevel.Ouridenti cationofTreasuriesincludesTIPSandexcludeswhenissuedandSTRIPS.Theregressionsareestimatedusingdatafor rmsthatheldMBSsecurities(identi cationofMBSsecuritiesincludesGSEdebt)atanypointinthedata. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES103IflifeinsurancecompaniesbuyTreasurieswhendurationislowwewouldexpect 1tobenegative.Table3.11showsthat 1isnegativeandsigni cant,indicatingthatlifeinsurance rmsbuyTreasurieswhenMBSdurationislow.However,thecoecientissmallindicatingasmallrelativeincreaseinTreasurypurchases.Many rmsinfrequentlybuyTreasuries.13%neverboughtTreasuriesand65%boughtTreasuriesin12orfewermonthsoverthe12yearperiod.WeimputethematurityoftheTreasuriespurchasedbasedontheyearofthetradeandthestatedmaturityoftheTreasury.Roughly53%haveamaturityof5orfeweryearsand44%haveamaturityofmorethan5years(wearemissingthematurityfor3%ofthebonds).Furthermore,only33%haveamaturitygreaterthan8years,thustheTreasuriespurchasedte

125 ndtobeofshortermaturity.Column9showsresu
ndtobeofshortermaturity.Column9showsresultsforthelinearprobabilitymodelestimatedwiththelefthandsideequaltooneifaTreasurywith5yearsispurchasedinthegivenmonthand0otherwise.Conversely,column10isestimatedwiththelefthandsideequaltooneifaTreasurywith�5yearsmaturityispurchasedinthegivenmonth.Bothcoecientsarenegativeandsigni cant.Asarobustnesscheck,columns11{12showthatweobtainsimilarresultsifweuseeitherthe300or303/304 lesoverthe2001{2007period.Table3.12showsresultsusingempiricaldurationandresultsaresimilar.3.4ConclusionsWeproposeanempiricaldurationmeasureforthestockofU.S.AgencyMBSthatappearstobelesspronetomodelriskthanmeasuressuchastheBarclaysE ectiveDurationmeasure.We ndthatthismeasuredoesnotappeartohaveastronge ectonthe12-monthexcessreturnsoften-yearTreasuriesaswouldbeexpectedifshockstoMBSdurationleadtocommensurateshockstothequantityofinterestrateriskbornebyprofessionalbondinvestors(Hanson,2014;Malkhozovetal.,2016).Giventhisnegativereducedformresult,wethenexplorethemortgageandtreasuryhedgingactivitiesoftheprimaryMBSinvestorssuchascommercialbanks,insurancecompanies,theagencies,theFederalReserveBank,mutualfunds,andforeigninvestors.We ndthattheonlyinvestorsthatmayfollowthemodelsofHanson(2014)andMalkhozovetal.(2016)arelifeinsurance rmsandpossiblybanks.Lifeinsurance rmmarketsharehasdeclinedovertheperiod,droppingbelow10%since1996andreaching4%in2016.Oftheinvestorswearenotabletostudy,hedgefundsandpensions/retirementfundsarethetwoinvestorgroupsthatmaytradealongtheHanson(2014)andMalkhozovetal.(2016)models.However,althoughthesetwoinvestorgroupsheldalmost25%oftheAgencyMBSmarket(includinghouseholdsandnonpro torganizations)inthelate1990s,postcrisistheirsharehasfallenbelow10%. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES1043.5FiguresandTables (a) (b)Figure3.1:ComparisonofBarclaysE ectiveDurationandEmpiricalDurationFigureAshowsthedi

126 ;erencebetweenBarclayse ectivedurati
;erencebetweenBarclayse ectivedurationandempiricaldurationfromFebruary1996toOctober2015.TheverticaldashedgraylinerepresentsSeptember2010.FigureBcomparestheempiricaldurationandBarclaysdurationseriesinlevels. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES105 (a) (b)Figure3.2:ComparisonofDurationMeasures(EmpiricalandBarclayse ective)AgainstTerminationMeasureFiguresA(empiricalduration)andB(Barclayse ectiveduration)comparedurationmeasuresagainstthevoluntaryterminationmeasureconstructedfromMcDashdata.Thetimeseriesarenormalized(de-meanedanddividedbystandarddeviation)andthevoluntaryterminationmeasureismultipliedby-1tobecomparabletoduration. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES106 Figure3.3:DistributionofAgencyandGSEBackedSecuritiesHoldingsbyInvestorGroupThedataarefromtheFederalReserve owoffundsandarequarterlyfromQ11985toQ12016(leftaxis).Thesolidline(rightaxis)showstotaloutstandingAgencyandGSEbackedsecuritiesinUSDmillions. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES107 Figure3.4:DistributionofUSTreasuryHoldingsbyInvestorGroupThedataarefromtheFederalReserve owoffundsandarequarterlyfromQ11985toQ12016(leftaxis).Otherincludesnon- nancialcorporatebusiness,non- nancialnon-corporatebusiness,closedendfund,exchangetradedfund,issuerofABS,securitybrokeranddealer,andholdingcompanyholdingsofUSTreasuries.Thesolidline(rightaxis)showstotaloutstandingUSTreasurydebtinUSDmillions. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES108 (a) (b)Figure3.5:FannieMaeandFreddieMacDerivativesPortfoliosFiguresA(FannieMae)andB(FreddieMac)showthetotaldollaramount(notional,inmillions)andcompositionofthe nancialderivativesportfoliosusingquarterlydatafromtheFHFA/OFHEOannualreportstoCongressbetweenQ12000andQ42015.ThecategoriesofsecuritiesarenotconsistentbetweenFannieMaeandFr

127 eddieMac.ThedataarenotavailableforFreddi
eddieMac.ThedataarenotavailableforFreddieMacbetweenQ12003andQ32003. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES109 Figure3.6:ComparisonofGSERetainedPortfolioReportingtoCongressvsFederalReserveFlowofFundsComparestheaggregatesizeoftheGSEretainedportfolios(forFannieMaeandFreddieMac)asreportedbytheFHFA/OFHEOannualreportstoCongress(dottedline)andtheAgencyandGSEbackedholdingsoftheGSEsasreportedbytheFederalReserve owoffundsdata(solidline).WithintheportfolioreportedbytheFHFA/OFHEOannualreportstoCongressthe gureshowsthecompositionbysecuritytype(AgencyMBS,wholeloans,privatelabelMBS,andmortgagerevenuebonds).Thedataareannualbetween1998and2015. Figure3.7:BankMBSPass-ThroughHoldingsBankMBSpass-throughholdingsgroupedbyaccountandifthebankeverheldaninterestratecontract.Thedataarefromthecallreportsandarequarterlybetween1995and2013. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES110 Figure3.8:BankRatioofTreasuriestoAssetsUnweightedaverageTreasurytoassetratioandnon-mortgagedebttoassetratiofromthecallreports.ThedataarequarterlybetweenJune1975andDecember2013andincludesbanksthatdonotholdMBS. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES111 Figure3.9:ShareofUSTreasuryDebtHeldbyChinaandJapanThepercentageoftotaloutstandingUSTreasurydebt(fromtheFederalReserve owoffundsdata)heldbymainlandChinaandJapanasreportedintheTreasuryInternationalCapitalSystem(TIC)data.DataarequarterlybetweenQ22000andQ12016. CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES112 Table3.1:E ectofMBSDurationonTreasuryExcessBondReturns (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) BarclaysDurationt2.5772.589(3.01)(1.66)EmpiricalDurationt1.7231.186(2.43)(1.87)DatesinAug98-Jan99-13.61-16.44-11.54-16.80(-4.37)(-9.82)(-3.61)(-11.01)DatesinAug02-Jun032.755-2.0454.688-2.888(0

128 .64)(-1.14)(1.15)(-1.87)QE11.474
.64)(-1.14)(1.15)(-1.87)QE11.4741.242(2.44)(2.17)QE22.2032.233(10.43)(10.43)QE3-0.297-0.239(-2.11)(-1.43)Tapering0.1010.189(1.21)(2.04)OperationTwist-0.299-0.356(-1.52)(-1.89)BarDurtMBSMVt AggDurtAggMVt55.9156.42(3.66)(2.33)EmpDurtMBSMVt AggDurtAggMVt22.0812.42(1.96)(1.54)Constant-3.684-0.222-4.2191.576-8.1210.223-8.8402.502(-1.07)(-0.08)(-0.70)(0.61)(-2.02)(0.07)(-1.38)(1.09) #Obs237237236237237237236237DateRangeFeb96-Oct15Feb96-Oct15Jan89-Aug08Feb96-Oct15Feb96-Oct15Feb96-Oct15Jan89-Aug08Feb96-Oct15 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01 Regressionsmeasuringthee ectofe ectiveMBSdurationandMBSinterestrateriskrelativetoaggregateinterestraterisk(theratioofMBSdollardurationtoaggregate xedincomedollarduration)on10yearTreasury12monthexcessbondreturns.ForMBSdurationweuseeitherBarclayse ectivedurationorempiricalduration.Foraggregate xedincomedurationweusetheaggregate xedincomedurationprovidedbyBarclays.MBSandtotal xedincomemarketvalue(AGG)areprovidedbyBarlcays.TheMBSmarketvalueonlyincludesGSEandGinnieMaeMBS.Barclayse ectivedurationbeginsinJanuary1989,whiletheempiricaldurationseriesbeginsinFebruary1996.BothserieshavedatathroughOctober2015.Themodelis ttedonmonthlydataandstandarderrorsareNeweyWestwith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstructureofthedata.Theregressionmodelis:rx(10)t+12m= + 1Durationt+(10)t+12m CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES113 Table3.2:E ectofMortgageTerminationsonTreasuryExcessBondReturns (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) %VoluntaryPayo t�1003.6373.6094.204(2.19)(1.44)(0.68)BarclaysDurationt2.4522.5453.422(2.69)(1.92)(3.73)DatesinAug98-Jan99-16.25-13.23(-9.73)(-5.25)DatesinAug02-Jun031.2093.089(0.32)(0.88)QE14.1185.049(

129 1.61)(2.29)QE214.9711.92
1.61)(2.29)QE214.9711.92(9.01)(7.43)QE3-1.486-6.090(-0.50)(-2.86)Tapering3.335-0.717(2.55)(-0.30)OperationTwist-1.267-1.745(-0.41)(-0.77)Constant7.260-4.1766.936-4.5075.031-12.96(5.30)(-1.19)(4.75)(-0.91)(0.92)(-4.67) #Obs3163163163165252DateRangeJan92-Apr18Jan92-Apr18Jan92-Apr18Jan92-Apr18Jan14-Apr18Jan14-Apr18 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectofBarclayse ectiveMBSdurationandunderlyingvoluntarymortgageterminationson10yearTreasury12monthexcessbondreturns.VoluntarymortgageterminationsarecalculatedfromMcDashandarebasedon30-year xedrate rstlienmortgages,excludingconstructionloans,thataresecuritizedintoGSEorGinnieMaeMBS.ThedataaremonthlybetweenJanuary1992andApril2018andstandarderrorsareNeweyWestwith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstructureofthedata.Theregressionmodelis:rx(10)t+12m= + 1Durationt+(10)t+12m CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES114Table3.3:E ectofGSEHedgingPortfoliosonTreasuryExcessBondReturns (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) BarclaysDurt2.3842.880(2.95)(2.63)EmpiricalDurt1.7441.857(2.12)(2.39)HedgingPortfoliot1.2303.1751.815(0.87)(1.79)(1.33)Constant-2.5080.4363.499-9.525-2.946(-0.84)(0.14)(1.25)(-1.41)(-0.88) #Obs6363636363 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectoftheGSEhedgingportfolioson10yearTreasury12monthexcessbondreturns.MBSdurationisalsoincludedincolumns1,2,4,and5.ForMBSdurationweuseeitherBarclayse ectivedurationorempiricalduration.TheGSEhedgingportfoliodataarequarterlyandwereretrievedfromthehistoricalFHFA(OFHEOpriortothecreationofFHFA)reportstoCongress.GSEhedgingportfoliodataarethesumof nancialderivativesholdingsofFannieMaeandFreddieMac.ThedatastartinQ12000andendinQ32015.StandarderrorsareNeweyWestw

130 ith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstruc
ith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstructureofthedata.Theregressionmodelis:rx(10)t+12m= + 1HedgingPortfoliot+ 2Durationt+(10)t+12m CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES115Table3.4:E ectofChangeinGSEHedgingPortfoliosonChangeinTreasuryExcessBondReturns (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) BarclaysDurt;t�12m-1.573-1.665(-1.70)(-1.85)EmpiricalDurt;t�12m-1.446-1.452(-1.75)(-1.73)GSEHedgingPortt;t�12m-1.144-1.836-1.237(-0.31)(-0.48)(-0.32)Constant-0.0806-0.266-0.177-0.00385-0.220(-0.04)(-0.14)(-0.10)(-0.00)(-0.11) #Obs5656565656 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectofthe12monthchangeinGSEhedgingportfoliosonthe12monthchangein10yearTreasury12monthexcessbondreturns.The12monthchangeinMBSdurationisalsoincludedincolumns1,2,4,and5.ForMBSdurationweuseeitherBarclayse ectivedurationorempiricalduration.TheGSEhedgingportfoliodataarequarterlyandwereretrievedfromthehistoricalFHFA(OFHEOpriortothecreationofFHFA)reportstoCongress.GSEhedgingportfoliodataarethesumof nancialderivativesholdingsofFannieMaeandFreddieMac.ThedatastartinQ12000andendinQ42014.StandarderrorsareNeweyWestwith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstructureofthedata.Theregressionmodelis:rx(10)t+24m;t+12m= + 1GSEHedgingPortfoliot;t�12m+ 2Durationt;t�12m+(10)t+24m;t+12m CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES116 Table3.5:E ectofMBSDurationonBankTreasuryBondHoldingsforBanksWithMBSHoldings (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) EmpiricalDurt�12m-0.0008720.000715-0.004410.00513-0.00136-0.00155-0.003850.00230(-3.96)(3.31)(-21.57)(22.36)(-14.71)(-5.25)(-15.07)(9.56)MBSHoldingst�12m Assetst�12m-0.0783-0.480-0.188-0.292-0.

131 0564-0.412-0.180
0564-0.412-0.180-0.232(-12.27)(-29.02)(-13.31)(-24.64)(-8.04)(-16.89)(-9.19)(-13.44)MBSHoldingst�12m Assetst�12m-0.000141-0.0141-0.00979-0.004290.003140.002640.00275-0.000102EmpiricalDurt�12m(-0.15)(-5.02)(-3.88)(-2.41)(3.43)(0.60)(0.79)(-0.04)Constant-0.02770.2600.1650.09450.001200.1730.1050.0687(-5.19)(17.53)(13.97)(8.89)(0.21)(8.99)(8.48)(4.35) #Obs327440327440327440327440115350115350115350115350R-squared0.5720.8160.7120.6720.4650.7590.6800.619MaturityofDepVariableTreasAll�3yrs3yrsTreasAll�3yrs3yrsBankHasHeldIRNoIRNoIRNoIRNoIRHasIRHasIRHasIRHasIR tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectof12monthlaggedMBSdurationontheratioofdebtholdingstototalassetsatthebanklevelforbanksthathaveneverheldinterestratederivativesintheirnon-tradingaccountsincolumns1-4andforbanksthathaveheldinterestratederivativesintheirnon-tradingaccountsincolumns5-8.AllbanksinthissamplehaveheldMBSintheirnon-tradingaccounts.ThebankleveldataareretrievedfromthebankcallreportsandarequarterlyfromJune1997toDecember2013.ForMBSdurationweuseempiricalduration.Bank xede ectsandbanktimevaryingcontrolsarealsoincluded.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthebanklevel(rssd9001).Theregressionmodelis:Debtt;i Assetst;i= + 1Durationt�12m+ 2MBSSecuritiest�12m;i Assetst�12m;i+ 3MBSSecuritiest�12m;i Assetst�12m;iDurationt�12m+Xi;t�12m+t;i CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES117Table3.6:E ectofMBSDurationonBankTreasuryBondHoldingsforBanksWithoutMBSHoldings (1)(2)(3)(4) EmpiricalDurt�12m-0.0006150.00122-0.005100.00632(-1.70)(2.55)(-11.69)(12.93)Constant0.02680.282

132 0.1300.152(1
0.1300.152(1.40)(9.83)(7.66)(6.77) #Obs47227472254722747225R-squared0.7240.8750.7430.759MaturityofDepVariableTreasAll�3yrs3yrs tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectof12monthlaggedMBSdurationontheratioofdebtholdingstototalassetsatthebanklevelforbanksthathaveneverheldMBSintheirnon-tradingaccounts.ThebankleveldataareretrievedfromthebankcallreportsandarequarterlyfromJune1997toDecember2013.ForMBSdurationweuseempiricalduration.Bank xede ectsandbanktimevaryingcontrolsarealsoincluded.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthebanklevel(rssd9001).Theregressionmodelis:Debtt;i Assetst;i= + 1Durationt�12m+Xi;t�12m+t;i CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES118Table3.7:E ectofChangeinBarclaysE ectiveMBSDurationonChangeinForeignTreasuryBondHoldings (1)(2)(3)(4) BarclaysDurationt�12m;t-0.0142-0.00844-0.0198-0.0207(-0.66)(-0.40)(-0.75)(-0.74)FX=1USDt�12m;t-0.00461-0.0977(-2.17)(-0.35)Constant0.1060.1050.2430.228(2.60)(2.73)(4.86)(3.58) #Obs175175175175CountryJapanJapanChinaChina tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectof12monthchangesinMBSBarclayse ectivedurationonthe12monthpercentagechangeinUSTreasuryholdingsofmainlandChinaandJapan.ChangeinFXratesarealsoincludedasacontrolinsomespeci cations.CountrylevelUSTreasuryholdingdataarefromtheTreasuryInternationalCapital(TIC)dataset.ThedataaremonthlyfromJune2000toDecember2014.StandarderrorsareNeweyWestwith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstructureofthedata.Theregressionmodelis:TSYHoldingst;t+12m TSYHoldingst= + 1Durationt�12m;t+ 2FXRatet�12m;t+t;t+12m CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES119Table3.8:E ectofChangeinEm

133 piricalMBSDurationonChangeinForeignTreas
piricalMBSDurationonChangeinForeignTreasuryBondHoldings (1)(2)(3)(4) EmpiricalDurationt�12m;t-0.0108-0.004290.002380.00176(-1.08)(-0.42)(0.11)(0.08)FX=1USDt�12m;t-0.00462-0.0881(-2.11)(-0.31)Constant0.1050.1040.2410.229(2.62)(2.76)(4.57)(3.47) #Obs175175175175CountryJapanJapanChinaChina tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectof12monthchangesinMBSempiricaldurationonthe12monthpercentagechangeinUSTreasuryholdingsofmainlandChinaandJapan.ChangeinFXratesarealsoincludedasacontrolinsomespeci cations.CountrylevelUSTreasuryholdingdataarefromtheTreasuryInternationalCapital(TIC)dataset.ThedataaremonthlyfromJune2000toDecember2014.StandarderrorsareNeweyWestwith18lagstoaccountfortheoverlappingstructureofthedata.Theregressionmodelis:TSYHoldingst;t+12m TSYHoldingst= + 1Durationt�12m;t+ 2FXRatet�12m;t+t;t+12m CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES120 Table3.9:E ectofMBSDurationonMutualFundTreasuryBondHoldings (1)(2)(3)(4) BarclaysDurt�12m0.1430.313(12.23)(12.31)EmpiricalDurt�12m0.05560.118(7.18)(7.16)Constant7.64115.568.05616.49(168.70)(157.23)(416.20)(399.54) #Obs724356250620724356250620R-squared0.9340.9100.9340.910OnlyFundswithMBSPositions?NYNYDurationMeasureBarclaysBarclaysEmpiricalEmpirical tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectofMBSdurationonthepercentageofassetsheldinTreasurybondsbymutualfunds.MutualfunddataarefromCRSPandarequarterlyfromQ12010toQ22016.MBSdurationiseitherBarclayse ectivedurationorempiricalduration.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthemutualfundlevel.Theregressionmodelis:PerGovtBondst;i= + 1Durationt�j+Xi+t;i CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEAS

134 UREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMO
UREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES121 Table3.10:E ectofChangeinMBSDurationonChangeinMutualFundTreasuryBondHoldings (1)(2)(3)(4) BarclaysDurt�12;t0.06640.206(8.25)(11.59)EmpiricalDurt�12;t0.03850.115(6.01)(8.08)Constant0.1490.2150.1650.264(67.13)(44.42)(400.30)(293.21) #Obs571324199230571324199230R-squared0.1400.1280.1400.127OnlyFundswithMBSPositions?NYNYDurationMeasureBarclaysBarclaysEmpiricalEmpirical tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01Regressionsmeasuringthee ectofthechangeinMBSdurationonthechangeinthepercentageofassetsheldinTreasurybondsbymutualfunds.MutualfunddataarefromCRSPandarequarterlyfromQ12010toQ22015.MBSdurationiseitherBar-clayse ectivedurationorempiricalduration.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthemutualfundlevel.Theregressionmodelis:PerGovtBondst!t+j;i= + 1Durationt�j!t+Xi+t!t+j;i CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES122 Table3.11:E ectofBarclaysE ectiveMBSDurationonLifeInsuranceCompanyTreasuryBondPurchases (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) BarclaysDurationt�1m-0.00510-0.00541-0.00837-0.00270-0.00579-0.00515-0.00562(-4.36)(-2.20)(-3.41)(-2.70)(-6.59)(-3.48)(-3.70)BarclaysDurationt�6m-0.00520(-4.34)BarclaysDurationt�12m-0.00912(-8.05)Constant0.1310.1320.1440.1300.2420.08140.07470.1310.133(37.27)(36.13)(40.98)(17.51)(32.50)(27.08)(28.23)(30.23)(29.84) #Obs11940211940211940227741499171194021194027698878867R-squared0.1540.1540.1550.01910.1050.1160.1250.1680.169YearsAllAllAllAllAllAllAll2001-20072001-2007NumMoWithTSYTradeAllAllAll12�12A

135 llAllAllAllFile3003003003003003003003003
llAllAllAllFile300300300300300300300300303/304TSYMaturityAllAllAllAllAllSTNLTDLTDAll tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01 Regressionsestimatealinearprobabilitymodeloftheprobabilityoflifeinsurance rmsbuyingTreasuriesduetolaggedMBSduration.LifeinsuranceholdingdataarefromNAICSandaremonthlyfrom2001to2012.MBSdurationisBarclayse ectiveduration.Firm xede ectsarealsoincluded.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthe rmlevel.Modelswith1,6,and12monthlagsontheMBSdurationvariableareestimated.Theregressionmodelis:1t;i= + 1Durationt�j+Xi+t;i CHAPTER3.DURATIONMEASUREMENTANDHEDGINGCHANNELSFORGSEINSUREDMORTGAGEBACKEDSECURITIES123 Table3.12:E ectofEmpiricalMBSDurationonLifeInsuranceCompanyTreasuryBondPurchases (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) EmpiricalDurationt�1m-0.00574-0.00603-0.0116-0.00380-0.00562-0.00518-0.00534(-5.35)(-3.11)(-5.17)(-4.46)(-7.09)(-3.92)(-3.95)EmpiricalDurationt�6m-0.00215(-2.09)EmpiricalDurationt�12m-0.00735(-7.28)Constant0.1320.1220.1380.1310.2500.08430.07350.1320.133(42.82)(40.21)(44.87)(23.52)(38.80)(34.32)(32.14)(31.98)(31.40) #Obs11940211940211940227741499171194021194027698878867R-squared0.1540.1540.1550.01930.1060.1160.1250.1680.169YearsAllAllAllAllAllAllAll2001-20072001-2007NumMoWithTSYTradeAllAllAll12�12AllAllAllAllFile300300300300300300300300303/304TSYMaturityAllAllAllAllAllSTNLTDLTDAll tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:05,p0:01 Regressionsestimatealinearprobabilitymodeloftheprobabilityoflifeinsurance rmsbuyingTreasuriesduetolaggedMBSduration.LifeinsuranceholdingdataarefromNAICSandaremonthlyfrom2001to2012.MBSdurationisempiricalduration.Firm xede ectsarealsoincluded.Standarderrorsareclusteredatth

136 e rmlevel.Modelswith1,6,and12monthla
e rmlevel.Modelswith1,6,and12monthlagsontheMBSdurationvariableareestimated.Theregressionmodelis:1t;i= + 1Durationt�j+Xi+t;i 124BibliographyAdao,Rodrigo,MichalKolesar,andEduardoMorales,2019,Shift-sharedesigns:Theoryandinference,TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics134,1949{2010.Adelino,M.,A.Schoar,andF.Severino,2015,Houseprices,collateral,andself-employment,JournalofFinancialEconomics117,288{306.Akepanidtaworn,Klakow,RickDiMascio,AlexImas,andLawrenceSchmidt,2018,Sell-ingfastandbuyingslow:Heuristicsandtradingperformanceofinstitutionalinvestors,WorkingPaper.Angrist,D,1998,Estimatingthelabormarketimpactofvoluntarymilitaryserviceusingsocialsecuritydataonmilitaryapplicants,Econometrica.Bahaj,S.A.,A.Foulis,andG.Pinter,2017,Homevaluesand rmbehaviour,WorkingPaper.Ballou,J.,T.Barton,D.DesRoches,F.Potter,Z.Zhao,B.Santos,andJ.Sebastian,2007,Kau man rmsurvey(kfs)baselinemethodologyreport,WorkingPaper.Barber,BradM.,andTerranceOdean,2001,Boyswillbeboys:Gender,overcon dence,andcommonstockinvestment.,Thequarterlyjournalofeconomics116,261{292.Barnatchez,K.,L.D.Crane,andR.Decker,2017,Anassessmentofthenationalestablish-menttimeseries(nets)databases,WorkingPaper.Bartik,T.J.,1991,Whobene tsfromstateandlocaleconomicdevelopmentpolicies?,WEUpjohnInstituteforEmploymentResearch.Benmelech,MeisenzahlR.R.,E.,andR.Ramcharan,2017,Thereale ectsofliquidityduringthe nancialcrisis:Evidencefromautomobiles,TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics132,317{365.Berends,KyalR.,RobertMcMenamin,ThanasesPlestis,andRichardJ.Rosen,2013,Thesensitivityoflifeinsurance rmstointerestratechanges,EconomicPerspectives37.Berger,A.N.,andG.F.Udell,1995,Relationshiplendingandlinesofcreditinsmall rm nance,JournalofBusiness351{381. BIBLIOGRAPHY125Berk,JonathanB.,andRichardC.Green,2004,Mutualfund owsandperformanceinrationalmarkets,JournalofPoliticalEconomy112,1269{1295.Bernstein,S.,T.McQuade,andR.R.Townsend,2018,Dohouse

137 holdwealthshocksa ectproductivity?ev
holdwealthshocksa ectproductivity?evidencefrominnovativeworkersduringthegreatrecession,NBERWorkingPaper(No.24011).Bhutta,N.,andB.J.Keys,2016,Interestratesandequityextractionduringthehousingboom,AmericanEconomicReview106,1742{74.Blanchard,O.J.,L.F.Katz,R.E.Hall,andB.Eichengreen,1992,Regionalevolutions,Brook-ingsPapersonEconomicActivity1992,1{75.Blanch ower,D.G.,andA.J.Oswald,1998,Whatmakesanentrepreneur?,JournalofLaborEconomics16,26{60.Bord,V.M.,V.Ivashina,andR.D.Taliaferro,2018,Largebanksandsmall rmlending,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w25184).Borusyak,Kirill,PeterHull,andXavierJaravel,2018,Quasi-experimentalshift-sharere-searchdesigns,NBERWorkingPaper(No.w24997).Boudoukh,Jacob,MatthewRichardson,RichardStanton,andRobertF.Whitelaw,1995,Anewstrategyfordynamicallyhedgingmortgage-backedsecurities,JournalofDerivatives2,60{77.Buchak,G.,G.Matvos,T.Piskorski,andA.Seru,2018,Fintech,regulatoryarbitrage,andtheriseofshadowbanks,JournalofFinancialEconomics130,453{483.Busse,Je reyA.,TarunChordia,LeiJiang,andYuehuaTang,2016,Mutualfundtransac-tioncosts,WorkingPaper.Campbell,J.Y.,2006,Household nance,TheJournalofFinance61,1553{1604.Card,D.,andD.G.Sullivan,1988,Measuringthee ectofsubsidizedtrainingprogramsonmovementsinandoutofemployment,Econometrica.Chen,Qi,ItayGoldstein,andWeiJiang,2008,Directors'ownershipintheusmutualfundindustry,TheJournalofFinance63,2629{2677.Chernenko,Sergey,SamuelG.Hanson,andAdiSunderam,2016,Whoneglectsrisk?investorexperienceandthecreditboom,JournalofFinancialEconomics122,248{269.Chodorow-Reich,G.,2013,Theemploymente ectsofcreditmarketdisruptions:Firm-levelevidencefromthe2008{9 nancialcrisis,TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics129,1{59. BIBLIOGRAPHY126Cochrane,JohnH.,andMonikaPiazzesi,2005,Bondriskpremia,AmericanEconomicReview95,138{160.Corradin,S.,andA.Popov,2015,Houseprices,homeequityborrowing,andentrepreneur-ship,TheReviewofFinancialStudies28,2399{2428.Coval,JoshuaD.,andTob

138 iasJ.Moskowitz,1999,Homebiasathome:Local
iasJ.Moskowitz,1999,Homebiasathome:Localequityprefer-enceindomesticportfolios,TheJournalofFinance54,2045{2073.Cox,JohnC.,JonathanE.Ingersoll,Jr.,andStephenA.Ross,1985,Atheoryofthetermstructureofinterestrates,Econometrica53,385{407.Cremers,KJMartijn,andAnttiPetajisto,2009,Howactiveisyourfundmanager?anewmeasurethatpredictsperformance,TheReviewofFinancialStudies22,3329{3365.Cremers,Martijn,JoostDriessen,PascalMaenhout,andDavidWeinbaum,2009,Doesskininthegamematter?directorincentivesandgovernanceinthemutualfundindustry,JournalofFinancialandQuantitativeAnalysis44,1345{1373.Cremers,Martijn,andAnkurPareek,2016,Patientcapitaloutperformance:Theinvestmentskillofhighactivesharemanagerswhotradeinfrequently,JournalofFinancialEconomics122,288{306.Cronqvist,Henrik,AnilK.Makhija,andScottE.Yonker,2012,Behavioralconsistencyincorporate nance:Ceopersonalandcorporateleverage,JournalofFinancialEconomics103,20{40.Culbertson,J.M.,1957,Thetermstructureofinterestrates,QuarterlyJournalofEconomics71,485{517.Davis,S.J.,J.Haltiwanger,andS.Schuh,1996,Smallbusinessandjobcreation:Dissectingthemythandreassessingthefacts,SmallBusinessEconomics8,297{315.Davis,S.J.,andJ.C.Haltiwanger,2019,Dynamismdiminished:Theroleofhousingmarketsandcreditconditions,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w25466).Decker,R.,J.Haltiwanger,R.Jarmin,andJ.Miranda,2014,Theroleofentrepreneurshipinusjobcreationandeconomicdynamism,JournalofEconomicPerspectives28,3{24.DeFusco,A.,S.Johnson,andJ.Mondragon,2017,Regulatinghouseholdleverage,WorkingPaper.DeFusco,A.A.,2018,Homeownerborrowingandhousingcollateral:Newevidencefromexpiringpricecontrols,TheJournalofFinance73,523{573.Evans,AllisonL,2008,Portfoliomanagerownershipandmutualfundperformance,FinancialManagement37,513{534. BIBLIOGRAPHY127Evans,D.S.,andB.Jovanovic,1989,Anestimatedmodelofentrepreneurialchoiceunderliquidityconstraints,JournalofPoliticalEconomy97,808{827.Fisher,Lawrence,andRoman.L.Weil,1971,Copingwiththeriskofinte

139 restrate uctua-tions:Returnstobondholder
restrate uctua-tions:Returnstobondholdersfromnaiveandoptimalstrategies,JournalofBusiness44,111{118.Gagnon,JosephE.,MatthewRaskin,JulieAnnRemache,andBrianSack,2011,The -nancialmarkete ectsoftheFederalReserve'slarge-scaleassetpurchases,InternationalJournalofCentralBanking7,3{43.Gete,P.,andM.Reher,2018,Mortgagesupplyandhousingrents,TheReviewofFinancialStudies31,4884{4911.Goldsmith-Pinkham,Paul,IsaacSorkin,andHenrySwift,2018,Bartikinstruments:What,when,why,andhow,NBERWorkingPaper(No.w24408).Goodman,L.S.,2017,Quantifyingthetightnessofmortgagecreditandassessingpolicyactions,BCJLandSoc.Just.37,235.Gourio,F.,T.Messer,andM.Siemer,2016,Firmentryandmacroeconomicdynamics:astate-levelanalysis,AmericanEconomicReview106,214{18.Greenspan,Alan,andJamesKennedy,2008,Sourcesandusesofequityextractedfromhomes,OxfordReviewofEconomicPolicy24,120{144.Greenstone,M.,A.Mas,andH.L.Nguyen,2014,Docreditmarketshocksa ecttherealeconomy?quasi-experimentalevidencefromthegreatrecessionand`normal'economictimes,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w20704).Greenwood,Robin,andStefanNagel,2009,Inexperiencedinvestorsandbubbles,JournalofFinancialEconomics93,239{258.Greenwood,Robin,andDimitriVayanos,2010,Pricepressureinthegovernmentbondmarket,AmericanEconomicReview100,585{590.Greenwood,Robin,andDimitriVayanos,2014,Bondsupplyandexcessbondreturns,ReviewofFinancialStudies27,663{713.Grinblatt,Mark,andMattiKeloharju,2009,Sensationseeking,overcon dence,andtradingactivity.,TheJournalofFinance64,549{578.Gupta,Arpit,andKunalSachdeva,2017,Skinorskim?insideinvestmentandhedgefundperformance,WorkingPaper.Guren,A.M.,A.McKay,E.Nakamura,andJ.Steinsson,2018,Housingwealthe ects:Thelongview,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w24729). BIBLIOGRAPHY128Haltiwanger,J.,R.S.Jarmin,R.B.Kulick,andJ.Miranda,2016,Highgrowthyoung rms:Contributiontojob,outputandproductivitygrowth,USCensusBureauCenterforEco-nomicStudiesPaperNo.CES-WP-16-49.Haltiwanger,J.,R.S.Ja

140 rmin,andJ.Miranda,2013,Whocreatesjobs?sm
rmin,andJ.Miranda,2013,Whocreatesjobs?smallversuslargeversusyoung,ReviewofEconomicsandStatistics95,347{361.Hanson,SamuelG.,2014,Mortgageconvexity,JournalofFinancialEconomics113,270{299.Harvey,CampbellR.,YanLiu,andHeqingZhu,2016,...andthecross-sectionofexpectedreturns,TheReviewofFinancialStudies29,5{68.Hathaway,I.,andR.E.Litan,2014,What'sdrivingthedeclineinthe rmformationrate?apartialexplanation,TheBrookingsInstitution.Hayre,Lakhbir,ed.,2001,SalomonSmithBarneyGuidetoMortgage-BackedandAsset-BackedSecurities(JohnWiley,NewYork).Hicks,JohnR.,1939,ValueandCapital(ClarendonPress,Oxford,UK).Ho,ThomasS.Y.,1992,Keyratedurations:Measuresofinterestraterisks,JournalofFixedIncome2,29{44.Hong,Harrison,andLeonardKostovetsky,2012,Redandblueinvesting:Valuesand nance,JournalofFinancialEconomics103,1{19.Hurst,E.,G.Li,andB.Pugsley,2014,Arehouseholdsurveysliketaxforms?evidencefromincomeunderreportingoftheself-employed,ReviewofEconomicsandStatistics96,19{33.Hurst,E.,andA.Lusardi,2004,Liquidityconstraints,householdwealth,andentrepreneur-ship,JournalofPoliticalEconomy112,319{347.Iacus,S.M.,G.King,andG.Porro,2019,Atheoryofstatisticalinferenceformatchingmethodsincausalresearch,PoliticalAnalysis27,46{68.Ivkovic,Zoran,andScottWeisbenner,2005,Localdoesaslocalis:Informationcontentofthegeographyofindividualinvestors'commonstockinvestments,JournalofFinance60,267{306.Jarmin,R.S.,andJ.Miranda,2002,Thelongitudinalbusinessdatabase,WorkingPaper.Karahan,F.,B.Pugsley,andA.Sahin,2019,Demographicoriginsofthestartupde cit,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w25874). BIBLIOGRAPHY129Kerr,S.,W.R.Kerr,andR.Nanda,2015,Housemoneyandentrepreneurship,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w21458).Khorana,Ajay,HenriServaes,andLeiWedge,2007,Portfoliomanagerownershipandfundperformance,JournalofFinancialEconomics85,179{204.Kiyotaki,N.,andJ.Moore,1997,Creditcycles,JournalofPoliticalEconomy105,211{248.Krishnamurthy,Arvind,andAnnetteVissing-J

141 rgensen,2011,Thee ectsofquantitative
rgensen,2011,Thee ectsofquantitativeeasingoninterestrates:Channelsandimplicationsforpolicy,BrookingsPapersonEco-nomicActivity215{287.Krishnan,Karthik,DebarshiKNandy,andManjuPuri,2014,Does nancingspursmallbusinessproductivity?evidencefromanaturalexperiment,TheReviewofFinancialStudies28,1768{1809.Kumar,Alok,2009,Whogamblesinthestockmarket?,JournalofFinance64,1889{1933.Laufer,S.,andA.Paciorek,2018,Thee ectsofmortgagecreditavailability:Evidencefromminimumcreditscorelendingrules.,WorkingPaper.Lee,MayerC.J.,D.,andJ.Tracy,2012,Anewlookatsecondliens,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(No.w18269).Liu,Crocker,andDavidYermack,2012,Wherearetheshareholders'mansions?ceos'homepurchases,stocksales,andsubsequentcompanyperformance,CorporateGovernance3{28.Loutskina,E.,andP.E.Strahan,2015,Financialintegration,housing,andeconomicvolatil-ity.,JournalofFinancialEconomics115,25{41.Lu,Yan,andMelvynTeo,2018,Doalphamalesdeliveralpha?testosteroneandhedgefunds,WorkingPaper.Macaulay,FrederickR.,1938,Sometheoreticalproblemssuggestedbythemovementsofinterestrates,bondyields,andstockpricesintheUnitedStatessince1856,Workingpaper,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch.Malkhozov,Aytek,PhilippeMueller,AndreaVedolin,andGyuriVenter,2016,Mortgageriskandtheyieldcurve,ReviewofFinancialStudies29,1220{1253.Mian,A.,andA.Su ,2014,Whatexplainsthe2007{2009dropinemployment?,Economet-rica82,2197{2223.Modigliani,Franco,andRichardSutch,1966,Innovationsininterestratepolicy,AmericanEconomicReview56,178{197. BIBLIOGRAPHY130Mondragon,J.,2018,Householdcreditandemploymentinthegreatrecession,KiltsCenterforMarketingatChicagoBooth{NielsenDatasetPaperSeries1{025.Neumark,D.,J.Zhang,andB.Wall,2007,Employmentdynamicsandbusinessrelocation:Newevidencefromthenationalestablishmenttimeseries,AspectsofWorkerWell-Being39{83.Nguyen,H.L.Q.,2019,Arecreditmarketsstilllocal?evidencefrombankbranchclosings,AmericanEconomicJournal:AppliedEconomics11,1{32.Odean,T.,andB.Barber,1999,T

142 hecourageofmisguidedconvictions:thetradi
hecourageofmisguidedconvictions:thetradingbehaviorofindividualinvestors,FinancialAnalystJournal41{55.Odean,Terrance,1999,Doinvestorstradetoomuch?,AmericanEconomicReview89,262.Palmer,C.,2015,Whydidsomanysubprimeborrowersdefaultduringthecrisis:Loosecreditorplummetingprices?,WorkingPaper.Patnaik,M.,2017,Theimpactofcreditshocks:Microversussmall rms,WorkingPaper.Petersen,M.A.,andR.G.Rajan,1994,Thebene tsoflendingrelationships:Evidencefromsmallbusinessdata,TheJournalofFinance49,3{37.Pool,VeronikaK.,NoahSto man,andScottE.Yonker,2012,Noplacelikehome:Fa-miliarityinmutualfundmanagerportfoliochoice,TheReviewofFinancialStudies25,2563{2599.Pool,VeronikaK.,NoahSto man,andScottE.Yonker,2015,Thepeopleinyourneigh-borhood:Socialinteractionsandmutualfundportfolios,TheJournalofFinance70,2679{2732.Pastor,Lubos,RobertF.Stambaugh,andLucianA.Taylor,2017,Dofundsmakemorewhentheytrademore?,TheJournalofFinance72,1483{1528.Pugsley,B.W.,andA.S,ahin,2018,Grown-upbusinesscycles,TheReviewofFinancialStudies32,1102{1147.Risa,Sefano,RodrigoIbanez-Meier,MinFan,andIdrissMaoui,2008,Prime xed-rateprepaymentmodelupdate,Researchreport,BarclaysCapital.Robb,A.M.,andD.T.Robinson,2014,Thecapitalstructuredecisionsofnew rms,TheReviewofFinancialStudies27,153{179.Rosenbaum,P.R.,andD.B.Rubin,1983,Thecentralroleofthepropensityscoreinobser-vationalstudiesforcausale ects,Biometrika70,41{55. BIBLIOGRAPHY131Ross,MyronH.,1966,\OperationTwist":Amistakenpolicy?,JournalofPoliticalEconomy74,195{199.Rubin,D.B.,1973,Matchingtoremovebiasinobservationalstudies,Biometrics159{183.Rubin,D.B.,1974,Estimatingcausale ectsoftreatmentsinrandomizedandnonrandomizedstudies,JournalofeducationalPsychology66,688.Rubin,D.B.,1977,Assignmenttotreatmentgrouponthebasisofacovariate,JournalofEducationalStatistics2,1{26.Sarsons,H.,2017,Interpretingsignalsinthelabormarket:evidencefrommedicalreferrals,JobMarketPaper.Schmalz,M.C.,D.A.Sraer,andD.Thesma

143 r,2017,Housingcollateralandentrepreneurs
r,2017,Housingcollateralandentrepreneurship,TheJournalofFinance72,99{132.Siemer,M.,2016,Firmentryandemploymentdynamicsinthegreatrecession,AvailableatSSRN2172594.Song,Yang,2019,Themismatchbetweenmutualfundscaleandskill,WorkingPaper.Srinivasan,V.S.,andKumarVelayudham,2010,Prepaymentmodelupdate,Researchre-port,BarclaysCapital.Stiglitz,J.E.,andA.Weiss,1981,Creditrationinginmarketswithimperfectinformation,TheAmericanEconomicReview71,393{410.Sto man,Noah,VeronikaKPool,ScottEYonker,andHanjiangZhang,2018,Doshockstopersonalwealtha ectrisk-takingindelegatedportfolios?,TheReviewofFinancialStudies32,1457{1493.Tornqvist,L.,P.Vartia,andY.O.Vartia,1985,Howshouldrelativechangesbemeasured?,TheAmericanStatistician39,43{46.Vasicek,OldrichA.,1977,Anequilibriumcharacterizationofthetermstructure,JournalofFinancialEconomics5,177{188.Vayanos,Dimitri,andJean-LucVila,2009,Apreferred-habitatmodelofthetermstructureofinterestrates,WorkingPaper15487,NBER.Wallace,Neil,1967,ThetermstructureofinterestratesandthematuritycompositionoftheFederaldebt,JournalofFinance22,301{312. 132AppendixAAppendixtoChapter1A.1MergesA.1.1ATTOM-NETS(D&B)MergeThemicro-datautilizedbythispaperareauniquemergebetweenfourdi erentdatasets.Itisnotatrivialtasktolinkhomeequityextractionactivityofbusinessownerstothetaxrecordsoftheirbusiness,whichnecessitatedanovelapproach.ATTOMisacomprehensivepropertyandtransactionleveldatasetonresidential(andcommercial)realestatepurchasesandre nances.Fromthisdata,priorresearchhasconstructedtheamountofhomeequityextractedforre nancingtransactions(DeFusco,2018)|thisisdescribedinSection2oftheOnlineAppendix.However,linkingATTOMtoinformationonbusinessesownedbyhomeownersisdicult,sinceATTOMdoesnotlistemploymentinformation.Fortunately,ATTOMliststhenameoftheperson/peoplewhoarethelegalownersofthepropertyatthetimeofeachtransaction.Withthisinformation,ATTOMcanbemergedtoNETS,whichformostbusinessesliststhenamesofbusinessowners.T

144 hismergeprovidesadatasetofthehomeequitye
hismergeprovidesadatasetofthehomeequityextractionactivityofhomeownerslinkedtothebusinessesthattheyown.Forcon dentialityreasons,namesofpeopleandbusinessesarenotutilizedintheresearchandinformationonindividualrecordsarenotreported.TomergeATTOMtoNETS,thenameofthehomeownersinATTOMaremergedtothenameof rmownersinNETS.Roughly60%of rmsinNETShavethenameofthe rmownerlisted.Inbothdatasets,thenamesare rstcleanedandstandardized.Punctuation,pre xes,andsuxesareremovedand429commonnamesaremappedtoastandardspelling(e.g.AnneandAnniearebothmappedtoAnn).ATTOMcontainsnamesforuptotwopeopleforeachtransaction.Iftwonamesarelisted,bothnamesareincludedforthemergetoNETS.Forsometransactions,ATTOMliststhenameofatrustorbusiness(usuallyabankforcasesofforeclosuretransactions,whicharenotincludedinthemerge).Inthecaseofatrust,thecleaningalgorithmattemptstoextractanamelistedwiththetrust(i.e.JohnSmithfor"TheJohnSmithFamilyTrust").Themergeisattemptedinsixpasses,withsubsequentpassesbasedonloosercriteria. APPENDIXA.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER1133Foreachpass,mergedDunsnumbers(identi erforestablishments)inNETSarecountedassuccessfullymergedifonlyonerecordfromATTOMismerged.IncaseswheremorethanonerecordinATTOMismergedtoabusinessinNETS,therecordedmergeisdropped.Anyrecordsmergedinanearlierpass,evenifthemergewasnotuniqueandconsequentlydropped,arenotincludedinlaterpasses.Inthe rstpass,therecordsaremergedonfull rstandlastnames.IncaseswherebothATTOMandNETScontainamiddleinitialorname,themiddleinitialisalsoincludedinthemerge.Forthesecondpass,recordsarematchedon rstandmiddleinitialsandfulllastname.RecordsinATTOMandNETSmusthaveaknownmiddleinitialtobeincludedinthispass.NETSallowsforestablishmentsofmulti-unit rmstobelinkedtotheirheadquarters.Insomecases,thenameofthe rmownerreportedfortheheadquarterisdi erentfromthenameoftheownerofanestablishment.Inthethirdpass,thenameoftheheadquarterownerisusedtomergerecordsonfull rst

145 name,middleinitial(ifbothATTOMandNETSlis
name,middleinitial(ifbothATTOMandNETSlistamiddleinitial/name),andfulllastname.Thefourthpassalsousestheheadquarterownernameandmergeson rstnameinitial,middlenameinitial,andfulllastname.Forthefourthpass,bothATTOMandNETSmustcontaininformationonmiddlename.Thesetwopassesreplicatepassesoneandtwowithheadquarterownernameinsteadofestablishmentownername.Mostestablishmentsarealsotheheadquarters,sincemostbusinessesaresingle-unitentities.Inthe fthpass,recordsaremergedonfulllastnameandthelatitudeandlongitudeofthehomeinATTOMandthe rminNETS.Thispassprimarilyincludeshomebusinesses.Fortheanalysisofcreditconstraints,mostoftheserecordswouldbeexcludedasthese rmsarelocatedinthesamezipcodeofthe rmowner'shome.Latitudeandlongitudeareroundedtothethirddecimalplace,whichrepresents110metersofaccuracy.Forthesixthpass,recordsaremergedonthe rstthreelettersof rstnameandfulllastname.MiddleinitialsarealsomatchedforcaseswherebothNETSandATTOMcontainmiddleinitial.Additionalpassesinvolvingfuzzymergeswereattemptedbuthandscreeningthesemergesshowedthatthisresultedinanincreaseintherateoffalsemerges.A.1.2NETS(D&B)-SSELMergeTherestricteduseLongitudinalBusinessDatabase(LBD)containsalongitudinalpanelofdataonanestablishment'ssurvival,employmentandpayroll.ThedataincludeeveryemployerestablishmentintheUnitedStatesandareconstructedfromIRStaxrecordsofthebusiness.TheLBDNUMvariabletracksanestablishmentacrosstimeintheLBD.TheLBDdoesnotcontainbusinessnameandaddress,whicharenecessarytomergethedatatoNETS.TheBusinessRegistrar(SSEL)istherawunderlyingdatathattheLBDdataareconstructedfrom.TheSSELcontainsbusinessnameandaddress,whichnecessitates rsthavingtomergeNETStoSSELpriortothemergingNETStoLBD.BothNETSandSSELcontainbusinessname,address,andindustry.NETScontainsa rm's rstandlastyear,whiletheSSELareannual lesthatcontainallemployerestab-lishmentsopenintheyearofthe le(withouttheabilitytotrackestablishmentsacrossthe APPENDIXA.APPE

146 NDIXTOCHAPTER1134di erentannual
NDIXTOCHAPTER1134di erentannual les).ForeachannualSSEL le,allopenestablishmentsinNETS,basedonthe rstyear(yearbusinessopens)andlastyear(yearbusinesscloses)variablesinNETSrelativetotheSSEL leyear,arekeptforthemergetoSSEL.Toallowforreportingerrorsanddi erences,thevaluefor rstyearinNETSisallowedtobeupto veyearsaftertheSSEL leyear,andthevalueforlastyearinNETSisallowedtobeupto veyearspriortotheSSEL leyear.Onereasonforreportingdi erencesisthatthe rstyearinNETSisthe rstyearthebusinessisinoperation,evenifitstartsasanon-employer rm.IntheSSEL,a rmonlyappearswhenthe rmhasatleastonepaidemployee.TomergeNETStoSSEL, vepassesareattempted.Priortomerging,companynameandstreetaddressarecleanedtonormalizethestringsandCOMPGEDandSPEDISfunctionsinSASareusedtocalculatedistancescoresonstrings(thisisthebasisofthefuzzymatches).Inthe rstpass,zipcodesandstreetnumbersareexactmatchedandstreetname,unitnumber,andcompanynamearefuzzymerged.Withinthis rstpass, veseparatemergeswithvaryingdegreesoftightnessforthefuzzypartofthematchareattempted.Matchingonthe rst vecharactersofcompanynameandtheNAICSsectorofthebusiness(exceptforsector54[professionaloces],whichcontainmanybusinesseswiththesameinitialstringinthecompanyname)isalsoattempted.Inthesecondthrough fthpasses,themaximumscoresfromtheCOMPGEDandSPEDISfunctionsarelowered(thecriteriaaretightened)ascriteriaforotherattributesofthemergeareloosened.Inthesecondpass,zipcodeand2-digitNAICSsectorareexactmatchedandfuzzymatchesonstreetname,unitnumber,andcompanynameareused.Streetnumberandunitnumberareignoredinthispass.Forthethirdpass,zipcodeand4-digitNAICScategoryareexactmatchedandafuzzymatchoncompanynameisattempted.Addressinformationbeyondthezipcodeisnotusedforthispass.Inthefourthpass,county,state,and6-digitNAICScategoryareexactmatchedandafuzzymatchoncompanynameisattempted.Inthe fthand nalpass,county,sta

147 te,and4-digitNAICSareexactmatchedandaver
te,and4-digitNAICSareexactmatchedandaverytightfuzzymergeoncompanynameisattempted.Mostmergesarefromthe rstpass,witheachsubsequentpassproducingadiminishingnumberofmerges.Duetodisclosurereasons,statisticsonthemergeratefromindividualpassesarenotavailable.A.1.3LBD-SSELMergeTheSSELdoesnotcontainanidenti erthatlinksbusinessesthroughtime.OncetheSSELismergedtoNETS,eachrecordintheSSELthatismergedwillhavetheassociatedDunsnumberfromNETS.TheDunsnumberallowsforlongitudinaltrackingofestablishmentsintheSSEL.ForeachDunsnumber,themodalLBDNUMintheLBDisselected.IfthereismorethanonemodalLBDNUM,oneisrandomlyselected.IfthemodalLBDNUMismappedtomorethanoneDunsnumber,theonethatminimizesthedi erenceintheestablishment'slastyearbetweenNETSandLBDisselected.Ifthisatie,theonewiththeclosestSICindustrycodesbetweenNETSandLBDisusedasatiebreaker.Ifathirdtiebreakerisneeded,theonethatminimizesthedi erencebetweentheestablishment's rst APPENDIXA.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER1135yearinNETSandLBDisselected.Duetodisclosurereasons,statisticsonthemergeratearenotavailable.A.2HomeEquityExtractionDatafromATTOMATTOMcontainsarecordforeveryrealestatepurchaseandre nancetransaction,fromwhichtheamountofhomeequityextractedforeachre nancetransactioncanbeconstructed.ThispaperborrowsfromtheapproachusedbyDeFusco(2018).Theprimarydi erencesfromDeFusco(2018)'sapproacharethatthispaperaccountsforre-suborindationofsecondarylienswhenthe rstlienisbeingre nanced,andseparatelyaccountsforsecond-liensandHELOCs.Thesedi erencesarediscussedbelow.ATTOMtrackspropertiesthroughtimebythesr property idvariable,whilehomeownersarenottrackedviaasimilaridvariablethroughtime.Toconstructtheamountofhomeequityextractedforre nancingtransactions,debthistoriesareconstructedforeachpropertybyhomeownertuple.Foreachpurchasetransaction,re nancetransactionsthatoccurbeforethenextpurchasetransactionandthatcontainthesamehomeownerlastnameasthepurchasetransactionareusedt

148 oupdatethedebthistories.Therearethreebro
oupdatethedebthistories.Therearethreebroadtypesofre nancing.First,aborrowermaytakeoutahomeeq-uitylineofcredit(HELOC).ATTOMidenti esHELOCmortgagesbythelndr credit linevariable.AHELOCallowsaborrowertodrawuponacreditline,similartoacreditcard.ATTOMreportsthecreditlimitandnottheamountdrawnfromthiscreditline.Tode-terminetheamountofhomeequityextracted,itisassumedthattheentirecreditlineisextractedequity.Inarate-re nance,theborrowerdoesnotextracthomeequitybutoriginatesanewmortgageofthesamebalanceastheircurrentoutstandingmortgage(s)toobtainalowerinterestrate.Aborrowermayalsocash-outre nance,wheretheytakeoutanewmortgagethatincreasestheirtotalloanbalance.Withinthistypeofre nance,theborrowereithertakesoutasecondarylien,andgenerallytheentireloanamountishomeequityextracted1,ortakesoutanew rstlienandpayso theirtotaloutstandingmortgagedebt.Inthelattercase,thenew rstlienbalanceislargerthanthetotaloutstandingmortgagebalance(acrossallliens)andthedi erencebetweenthetwoistheamountofhomeequityextracted.Complicatingmatters,ATTOMdoesnotdi erentiatebetweenratere nanceorcash-outre nanceandwithincash-outre nancedoesnotstatewhetherthere nanceisa rstorsecondlien.Threedi erentdebthistoriesneedtobetrackedovertimeforeachpropertybyhome-ownertuple.The rstlien,secondlien,andHELOCdebthistoriesareconstructedstartingwitheachpurchaseorigination.Atthetimeofthepurchasemortgageorigination,ATTOMlists rstandsecondarylienstogether.Duringthemid-2000s,secondliensattimeofpur- 1Theexceptionbeingiftherealreadyisasecondlien,inwhichcasetheamountextractedisthedi erencebetweenthenewsecondlienamountandtheoutstandingbalanceontheexistingsecondlien(ifthisispositive-anegativeamountwouldimplyarate-re nanceofthesecondlien). APPENDIXA.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER1136chasewerecommonandreferredtoaspiggybackseconds.Thesewereusuallyoriginatedtocircumventprivatemortgageinsurance(PMI)requirementsforhighloanto

149 value(LTV)mortgages.ATTOMonlyrecordstheo
value(LTV)mortgages.ATTOMonlyrecordstheoriginationofeachmortgageanddoesnotprovideadatethemortgageisterminated(paido )ortherenamingbalancedueovertime.Forsimplicity,itisassumedthatthe rstandsecondliensare30-year xedratemortgageswithaninterestrateequaltothemarketmortgagerateatthetimeoforigination.2Thedebthistoriesofthe rstandsecondlienspaydownovertimeusingtheamortizationscheduleof30-year xedratemortgages.ThedebthistoryfortheHELOCbalancedoesnotdecreaseovertimesinceHELOCsaregenerallyinterest-onlyforthe rstfewyearsofpayments.IfadditionalHELOCsareoriginated,itisassumedthatifthenewcreditlimitishigherthanthepreviouscreditlimitthatthedi erencebetweenthetwocreditlimitsisextractedhomeequity.Ifthenewcreditlimitislessthanthepriorcreditlimit,nohomeequityisextracted.InbothcasestheHELOCdebthistoryisupdatedtothenewcreditlimit.Thechallengewithnon-HELOCre nancesisdeterminingwhetherthere nanceisaratere nance,acash-outre nancewithanewsecondlien,oracash-outre nancewithanew rstlien.Thedi erencebetweentheselasttwoisthatfortheformercase,thecash-outamountistheentirelienamount(lessthecurrentsecondlienbalanceiftherealreadyisasecondlien).Inthelattercase,thecash-outamountisthenewmortgageamountlessthebalanceofalloutstandingliens.Tohelpwiththecategorization,itisnotedthatwithanew rstlien,inmostcasesallexistingliens(includingsecondliensandHELOCs)arepaido .Thisisduetore-subrodination,wherethesecondarylienholderswouldhavetoagreetobere-suborindatedwhenthe rstlienisbeingre nancedsincetheycontractuallybecomethe rstlienholderunlesstheywaivethisright(re-subordination).Lendersgenerallydonotwaivethisright,whichnecessitatestheneedtopayo thesecondliensandHELOCswhenoriginatinganew rstlien.Tocategorizethemortgage,theabsolutedi erencesbetweenthenewloanamountandalloutstandingliens(includingHELOCs)andalsotheoutstandingsecondliens(=0ifnooutstandingsecondlien)arecalculated.I

150 fthenewloanamountiscloserinbalancetothet
fthenewloanamountiscloserinbalancetothetotaloutstandingdebt,itisassumedthatthere nanceisreplacingalloutstandingliensandbecomingthenew rstlien.Ifthenewmortgageamountismore(less)thanthetotaloutstandingdebtbalance,itisassumedtobeacash-out(rate-)re nance.Inbothcases,thedebthistoriesforexistingsecondliensandHELOCs(ifany)aresetto0andthe rstliendebthistoryissettothenewmortgageoriginationbalancewitha30-yearamortizationschedule.Theamountcashedout,ifthemortgageisclassi edasacash-outre nance,issettothedi erencebetweenthenewbalancelesstotaloutstandingmortgagedebt.Ifthenewloanamountiscloserinbalancetothesecondlien(whichis=0ifthereisnosecondlien),itisassumedthatthere nanceisassociatedwithasecondlien.Ifthereisnooutstandingsecondlien,thentheentireloanamountisextractedhomeequity.Ifthereisanoutstandingsecondlienthentheamountcashedoutisthethedi erencebetweenthe 2ThemarketmortgagerateisobtainedfromFreddieMac'sPMMSsurvey. APPENDIXA.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER1137newloanamountandthecurrentbalanceofthesecondlien.Ifthisamountisnegativethennohomeequityisextracted(likelyarate-re nanceoftheexistingsecondlien).Inallthreecases,thedebthistoryforthesecondlienissettothenewloanamountwitha30-yearamortizationschedule.Are nancemortgageoriginationcostsapproximately$5,000.Toaccountforthis,$5,000issubtractedfromtheamountofhomeequityextractedcalculatedabove.Iftheamountremainspositiveafterthisdeduction,there nancetransactioniscountedashomeequityextraction.A.3AppendixFiguresforChapter1 FigureA.1:ShareofSmallBusinessesFoundedwithHomeEquityFundingByFirmSizeTheshareofentrantsmallbusinessfundedbypersonalhomeequitybyyearofformation.ThedataareconstructedfromamergeofATTOMandNETS.Smallbusinessesarede nedashaving10orfeweremployeesintheyeartheyarefounded.Abusinessisclassi edasbeingfundedbyhomeequityiftheownerextractsover$5,000ofhomeequityintheyearthatthebusinessiscreatedortheprioryear.RegionsfollowtheCensusregioncl

151 assi cation.Therawunderlyingdataonly
assi cation.Therawunderlyingdataonlyincludesbusinessownerswhoownahome.Tocorrectforthis,thetimeseriesareadjustedbythehomeownershiprateofbusinessownersbasedonthepopulationofbusinessownersbyregionandyearfromtheAmericanCommunitySurveymicro-data.Thedataarefurthersegmentedbytheinitialsizeofthe rm. APPENDIXA.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER1138 FigureA.2:ShareofEntrantSmallBusinessWithFewerThan10EmployeesTheshareofentrantestablishmentswithfewerthan10employeesatentry.DataarefromthepublicuseCensusBusinessDynamicsStatistics(BDS)andaregroupedbyyearofentry. FigureA.3:ShareofMortgageOriginationbyIndependentMortgageBanksTheshareofpurchasemortgagesoriginatedbyindependentmortgagebanksbetween2005and2015forLosAngeles,Su olk,andBrowardcounties.ThetimeseriesarecalculatedfromHMDAandareweightedbyloanbalance. 139AppendixBAppendixtoChapter2B.1AdditionalRobustnessTestsInthissection,additionalrobustnesstestsareprovidedfortheresultofthee ectofhomepriceshocksonperformance.Inthebaselinespeci cation,fund(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)andtime xede ectsareincluded.Asasecondspeci cation,fund xede ectsarereplacedwithcommutingzonebytime xede ectsandcontrolstocontrolforfundspeci ce ectsandforzipcodepreferencesfortheirhomeareincluded.Includingcommutingzonebytime xede ects,partialsoutthecommontrendinhomepricegrowthwithincommutingzone,whichwillcon rmthattheresultisdrivenbyidiosyncratichomepricegrowthwithinanarrowgeographicarea.Aftercontrollingforzipcodelocationpreferencesitisunlikelythatfundmanagerscanforecasttheirrealizedidiosyncratichomepricegrowth.Underthisframework,theregressionmodelis:b FFCi;t;cz=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+cz;t+Controlsit+i;t;cz(B.1)wherecz;taremonthlytimebycommutingzone xede ectsandControlsitisavectorofcontrolvariablescomprisedof:Morningstarfundcategory xede ects,numberofmanager xede ects,anindicatorforifthemanagerownsa

152 secondhome,anindicatorforifthemanagerhas
secondhome,anindicatorforifthemanagerhasanadvanceddegree(aboveundergraduate),andnon-parametric xede ectsforTNA,homevalue,combinedLTV(CLTV),averagezipcodelevelincome(fromthe2010IRSSOI),andthepercentofnon-whitehouseholdsatthezipcodelevel(fromthe2000Census).Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime).TableB.1presentsresultsusingthissecondspeci cation.Theresultsaresimilartothebaselinespeci cation.Aonestandarddeviationpositiveshockinducesadeclineinannualizedalphaof38bps.Next,otheroutcomevariablesareconsideredforthebaselineregressionmodelthatin-cludesfundandtime xede ects.TableB.2,column1estimatestheregressiononthe1-monthaheadrawreturnslessthereturnonthefund'sbenchmarkindex.Thisisestimatedovertheentire2001toJune2018daterangewithoutinteractionsonthehomepricegrowth APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2140variable.Overall,amarginallysigni cantandnegativecoecientisfound,indicatingthatduringbothnormaltimesandrecessionsthereisanegativee ectonreturnsfromhomepricegrowth.DuringperiodsofeconomicexpansionthisisconsistentwiththeresultsfoundinthispaperandduringperiodsofcontractiontheresultisconsistentwithSto manetal.(2018).Sto manetal.(2018) ndanegativeandmarginallysigni cante ectofhomepricesonrawreturnsduringperiodsofnegativehomepricegrowth,whichtheyattributetocareerconcerns.Whilethispaper ndsthatduringperiodsofpositivehomepricegrowth,overcon- dencefrompositivehomepricegrowthalsodecreasesperformance.Theyfoundnoe ectofhousepricegrowthonrisk-adjustedreturnsduringtheGreatRecession,alsoconsistentwiththeresultsinthispaper.Incolumn2ofTableB.2,thebaselinemodelisestimatedonmonthlyalphaforthesubsequent12-months.ThesubsequentoneyearaheadmonthlyalphaisestimatedfromaregressionofFama-French-Carhartonthesubsequent12monthsusing12monthlyobserva-tions.Theresultisnegativeandsigni cantatthe5%level.Column3replacesnetalphawithgrossalpha(alphabeforef

153 ees)andtheresultisuna ected.Asafourt
ees)andtheresultisuna ected.Asafourthmethodforcalculatingalpha,TableB.3replicatesTable2.2witha1-monthforecastofalphausingex-anteinformation.Foreachmonthlyfundobservation,theprior12monthperiodisusedtoestimateaFama-French-Carhartregression(themonthlyobservationisomittedifthefundmanagergrouphaslessthan12monthsofhistoricaldatamanagingthefund).Usingthesefactorloadings,the1-monthaheadalphaisestimated.Theresultbecomesstrongerwiththisprocedure.Anotherconcernmaybethatformostfunds,housinginformationisonlyobservedforasubsetofmanagers.Ifthesampleisrestrictedtofundsforwhicha100%ofthemanagersweremerged,theresultremainsandslightlyimproves(TableB.2column4).Thechoiceofclusteringatthefundleveldoesnotallowforcorrelationacrossfundswithinamonth.Regressionswithreturnstypicallyclusteratthemonthlevel.However,inthispaperthee ectisbeingestimatedo ofchangesinhomepricegrowth,whicharecorrelatedacrosstime.Toshowthatthechoiceofclusteringisnota ectingsigni cance,incolumn5ofTableB.2standarderrorsareclusteredbytimeandtheresultisuna ected.TheremainderofthecolumnsinTable2.2arealsouna ectedifclusteredbymonth(availableuponrequest).Anadditionalconcerncouldbethattheresultsareuniquetothemeasureof3-yearlaggedhomepricegrowth.Toproviderobustnessaroundthis,TableB.4replicatesTable2.2withthe3-yearhomepricegrowthmeasurereplacedwith2and4-yearhomepricegrowthmeasures.Theresultsarelargelyunchanged,showingthattheresultisnotdrivenbythechoiceofthehomepricegrowthmeasure.Anotherconcernisthatthechoiceofrestrictingthepopulationtofundmanagergroupsthatlastedforatleast24monthsiscausingasurvivorshiporothertypeofbiasintheresults.TableB.5replicatesTable2.2onsampleswherethefundmanagergroupssurvivedforatleast12monthsandsurvivedforatleast36months.Again,theresultsarelargelyunchanged.Theaboverobustnesschecksruleoutmanypotentialconcernswiththeprimaryresultsofthispaper. APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2141B.2AppendixTablesforChapter2 APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHA

154 PTER2142 TableB.1:E ectWithinCommuti
PTER2142 TableB.1:E ectWithinCommutingZonebyTimeofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha (1)(2)(3)(4)AllPeriodsHPI0HPI0AllPeriods ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)-0.135-0.264-0.0153(-1.88)(-2.41)(-0.10)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.284(-2.60)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)-0.0508(-0.35) #Obs87247595792766887247R-squared0.1900.2020.2160.206 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Robustnessofthebaselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalpha,withcommutingzonebytime xede ectsandabatteryofcontrols.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;cz=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+cz;t+Controlsit+i;t;czwherecz;taremonthlytimebycommutingzone xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative)andControlsitiscomprisedof:Morningstarfundcategory xede ects,numberofmanager xede ects,anindicatorforifthemanagerownsasecondhome,anindicatorforifthemanagerhasanadvanceddegree(aboveundergraduate),andnon-parametric xede ectsforTNA,homevalue,combinedLTV(CLTV),averagezipcodelevelincome(fromthe2010IRSSOI),andthepercentofnon-whitehouseholdsatthezipcodelevel(fromthe2000Census).b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfund

155 sareincluded. APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHAPTE
sareincluded. APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2143 TableB.2:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonVariousFundReturnMeasures (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)Y=RGrossi;t+1Y= i;t+1!t+12mY=Grossb FFCY=Netb FFCClusterbyMonth�RBenchmark;t+1Merged100%ofManagers ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)-0.113(-1.67)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.189-0.263-0.302-0.258(-2.10)(-3.46)(-2.43)(-3.38)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)-0.154-0.141-0.00643-0.148(-1.21)(-1.27)(-0.03)(-1.02) #Obs8486473367848642173087719R-squared0.7820.2640.08950.1160.0901 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Robustnessofthebaselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalpha,withfundandtime xede ects.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:Yi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.Yi;t;aiseither:netb FFC,grossb FFC,Ri;t+1�RBenchmark;t+1,or i;t+1!t+12m(estimatedfroma1-yearregressionofFama-French-Carhartwith12monthlyobservations).Column4isrestrictedtofundsforwhich100%ofthemanagersweremergedtoATTOMandcolumn5repeatstheprimaryregressionwithclusteringbymonth(insteadofbyfund).b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromap

156 revioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonths
revioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2144 =TableB.3:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha,UsingEx-AnteInformation (1)(2)(3)(4)AllPeriodsHPI0HPI0AllPeriods ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)-0.190-0.2640.131(-2.70)(-2.56)(0.70)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.312(-3.40)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)-0.187(-1.20) #Obs73087490102407773087R-squared0.08740.08410.1250.0904 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Robustnessoftheestimationofalphainthebaselineregressionmodel.Alphaisestimatedwithfactorsestimatedfromex-anteinformation.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfromestimatingafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodelontheprior12monthsofmonthlydata(fromt�12tot).Thefactorsfromtheseregressionsarethenusedtocalculatethealphainmontht+1.Ifthefundmanagergrouphaslessthan12monthsofdatathenthemonthisomitted.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.OnlyactivelymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. APPENDIXB.

157 APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2145 TableB.4:E ect
APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2145 TableB.4:E ectof2and4-YearHomePriceGrowthonFundAlpha (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)2-yearHPIGrowth4-yearHPIGrowth AllHPIHPI0HPI0AllHPI AllHPIHPI0HPI0AllHPI ln(n-yearHPIi;t�1)-0.179-0.2700.259 -0.165-0.203-0.121(-2.67)(-2.65)(1.50) (-3.37)(-2.68)(-1.09)ln(n-yearHPI+i;t�1)-0.296 -0.212(-3.28) (-3.26)ln(n-yearHPI�i;t�1)0.0751 -0.147(0.53) (-1.65) #Obs87719589012881887719 81841552832655881841R-squared0.08770.08930.1170.0904 0.08800.09350.1150.0905 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Robustnessofthebaselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalpha,withfundandtime xede ects,onthechoiceofthe3-yearhomepricegrowthmeasure.Estimationoftheregressionmodelutilizingeither2yearor4yearhomepricegrowth(inlieuof3yearhomepricegrowth):b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(n-yearHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingatleast24monthsofdata.Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan24monthsaredroppedandfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppediftherearegreaterthan10managersorifTNA,measuredin2000dollars,fallsbelow$15million.Onlyactive

158 lymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareinclude
lymanagedUSdomesticequityfundsareincluded. APPENDIXB.APPENDIXTOCHAPTER2146 TableB.5:E ectofHomePriceGrowthonFundAlphaforFundManagersWhoSurvivedAtLeast12(36)Months (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)Survived12monthsSurvived36months AllHPIHPI0HPI0AllHPI AllHPIHPI0HPI0AllHPI ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)-0.163-0.219-0.0383 -0.159-0.229-0.00770(-2.90)(-2.57)(-0.28) (-2.75)(-2.53)(-0.05)ln(3yrHPI+i;t�1)-0.242 -0.256(-3.28) (-3.30)ln(3yrHPI�i;t�1)-0.149 -0.0920(-1.38) (-0.82) #Obs94216650162920094216 78786527972598978786R-squared0.09150.09610.1160.0937 0.08530.08770.1140.0878 tstatisticsinparenthesesp0:10,p0:05,p0:01Robustnessofthebaselinemodelformonthlyforecastsofalpha,withfundandtime xede ects,ontherestrictionoffundmanagershavingtosurviveforatleast24months.Estimationoftheregressionmodel:b FFCi;t;a=c+ ln(3yrHPIi;t�1)+i+t+a+itawhereiarefund xede ects(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime),taremonthlytime xede ects(interactedwithindicatorsforpositiveandnegativehomepricegrowthinregressionswherehomepricegrowthissegmentedonbeingpositiveornegative),andaarenon-parametric xede ectsforTNA.b FFCi;t;aaremonthlyalphasobtainedfrombackingoutthemonthlypricingerrorsfromafundlevel(foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime)regressionoftheFama-French-Carhart4-factormodel.Thepricingmodelisestimatedonmonthlydatausingbetween12and36monthsofdata(dependingonthecolumns).Standarderrorsareclusteredatthefundlevel,foreachmergednon-disjointperiodoftime.Unboundedvariablesarewinsorizedatthe1%and99%level.Fundswithmanagergroupsthatlastedforfewerthan12or36monthsaredropped(dependingonthecolumns)andfundmanagerswhoownedtheirprimaryhomeforfewerthan36monthsaredropped(theexceptionbeingifafundmanagermovedfromaprevioushomethatwasalsomerged).Fundmonthsaredroppedifthere

Related Contents


Next Show more