10 Reasons why Clinical Psychology needs Experimental Psych - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

10 Reasons why Clinical Psychology needs Experimental Psychopathology

Graham C L Davey

University of Sussex,

UK

http://

www.papersfromsidcup.com

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/why-we-

worrySlide2

3 Misunderstandings of EP by Clinical Psychologists/Psychiatrists

The Clinical Psychologist desperately protective of their subject domain

The Journal

R

eviewer who completely misunderstands the purpose of Experimental Psychopathology

Experimental Psychopathologists are NOT trying to explain EVERYTHING!Slide3

What is Experimental Psychopathology?

The use of experimental models to mimic abnormal processes in healthy individuals (either animals or humans)

Allows the study of clinical processes under highly controlled conditions

Experiments provide evidence of causal relations between events that are a critical component of theory building

Experimental Psychopathology regularly borrows from other areas of core psychological knowledge to understand psychopathology

mechanisms

Does most clinical psychology research reflect these principles? – Probably not

Clinical Psychology research is in danger of being highjacked by genetics and neuroscience because of the poor quality of much empirical researchSlide4

What makes EP a valid method for studying Psychopathology?

Vervliet

&

Raes

(2013) – The External Validity of Experimental Psychopathology

Face Validity

Predictive Validity

Construct Validity

Diagnostic ValiditySlide5

Face Validity

The degree of phenomenological similarity between the behaviour in the model and the symptoms of the disorder

The formalistic similarity between the behaviour in the model and the behaviour in the psychopathology

A relatively weak criterion for external validitySlide6

Predictive Validity

The degree to which the performance in the model predicts performance in the disorder

Can you use the model to predict the performance or outcomes in your clinical population?Slide7

Construct Validity

Requires an elaborated theory of the disorder and of the model, and good theoretical reasons to assume that the processes described in the model parallel the clinical process of interest

For example, theories of the psychopathology and theories underlying the model allude to the same theoretical processes – if so, elaborating the model can inform knowledge of the psychopathology

Using conditioning theory to elaborate conditioning models of specific phobiasSlide8

Diagnostic Validity

Diagnostic validity will demonstrate that the model taps into processes that are unique to patients or are genuinely representative of patient populationsSlide9

Examples of Experimental Psychopathology Research

Applying conditioning theory to psychopathology (construct validity)

Studying interpretation biases in psychopathology (face validity)

Models of perseverative worrying and rumination (predictive validity; construct

validity; diagnostic validity)

Identifying the active ingredients in interventions and treatmentsSlide10

Applying Conditioning Theory to Psychopathology

In the 1980s there were many attempts to explain various forms of psychopathology in terms of conditioning and associative learning

Therefore, study of conditioning principles in lab analogues of psychopathology should help to elaborate the clinical

models

Sensory preconditioning, UCS inflation, Latent InhibitionSlide11

Sensory Preconditioning & UCS Inflation (White & Davey, 1989)

Individual sees a stranger have a heart attack on a bus (sensory preconditioning)

Later, the individual has a close relative die of a heart attack (inflates aversiveness of heart attacks)

Individual now becomes fearful of riding on buses

A hypothetical example of how conditioning can explain the acquisition of fear without trauma being directly associated with the feared stimulusSlide12

Sensory Preconditioning & UCS Inflation (White & Davey, 1989)

Test this hypothesis in a formalistically similar conditioning experiment in the lab

Validate the process by identifying examples of sensory preconditioning and UCS inflation in the history of individuals with clinically diagnosed symptoms (Davey, de Jong &

Tallis

, 1993)Slide13

Davey, de Jong & Tallis (1993)

Case 1. L.L. (male, aged 37

yr

) had always been mildly anxious in social situations, and this mild anxiety was mostly

accompanied

by physical symptoms. The most salient symptom was intestinal unease. On one occasion, when L.L. was alone at home and not anxious at all, similar symptoms of intestinal unease led to an uncontrollable attack of

diarrhea.

From that moment on, L.L. catastrophically interpreted the symptoms of intestinal unease that he regularly experienced in company as a signal for losing control again. He became extremely anxious and developed severe agoraphobic symptoms.

Case 3. M.F. (male, aged 29

yr

) worked as a bank employee. On one occasion the bank was robbed, and during the robbery M.F. was threatened with a gun. He had not been particularly anxious at the time and returned to work the next day without complaining of any residual fear symptoms. However, 10 days after the robbery he was interviewed by the police, and during this interview he was told that he was very lucky to be alive because the bank robber was considered to be a dangerous man who had already killed several people. From this point on M.F. did not return to work and developed severe PTSD symptoms. Slide14

Latent Inhibition & Dental Phobias (Davey, 1989)

Latent Inhibition is the regular prior exposure to a CS without association with any UCS

Latent inhibition makes it more difficult to associate that CS with a subsequent aversive UCS

Patients who reported a painful dental experience but did not acquire a dental phobia were significantly more likely to report a history of dental treatment favourable to the operation of latent inhibitionSlide15

Davey (1989) Dental Phobias & Latent InhibitionSlide16

What Psychological Processes contribute to

I

nterpretation

B

iases?

Many psychopathologies are associated with negative interpretation biases (anxiety, depression, etc.)

In the lab, we can explore some of the psychological processes that may generate interpretation biases

We would then need to search for evidence of predictive validity to show that these processes are relevant to those creating the biases in individual disorders

BUT – the knowledge generated by these lab studies is still valuable in that it can be used to test theories of individual psychopathologiesSlide17

Experienced Disgust causes a Negative Interpretation Bias (Davey, Bickerstaffe

& MacDonald, 2006)

Disgust is a universal negative emotion

Disgust was becoming implicated in a number of psychopathologies (animal phobias, contamination fears, OCD washing)

Like anxiety, did disgust cause a negative interpretation bias?

Such knowledge might be useful for elaborating clinical models of disgust-relevant

psychopathologies

A benefit of analogue experimental studies is that they suggest that the processes being studied are not dispositional ones peculiar to certain individualsSlide18

Davey, Bickerstaffe & MacDonald (2006)Slide19

Barrazonne & Davey (2009)Slide20

Construct Validity & Diagnostic Validity

Test the model in healthy individuals – to define the psychological processes involved (Face Validity)

Test that predictions from the model apply to relevant clinical populations (Predictive Validity)

Establish that the model taps into processes that are unique to relevant clinical populations (Diagnostic Validity)Slide21

Mood-as-Input and Depressive Rumination (Hawksley & Davey, 2010)Slide22

Depressive Rumination in a Clinical Population (Chan, Davey & Brewin

, 2013)Slide23

What’s Unique about Clinical Populations that makes them Vulnerable to Mood-as-Input Effects?

Meeten

& Davey (2011, Clinical Psychology Review)

Mood is likely to contribute to decision-making about perseveration:

The less objective knowledge one brings to the judgment task (e.g. problem-solving confidence)

The higher the concurrent cognitive load (clinical populations tend to adopt information processing styles that inflict a high cognitive load)

When mood cannot be discounted as a source of relevant information for the task (clinical populations will usually view the perseverative task as a means to alleviating or avoiding their negative mood)Slide24

What are the Active Ingredients of an Intervention?

Analogue studies suggest the effectiveness of EMDR treatment of PTSD can be explained in terms of working memory (van den

Hout

& Engelhard, 2012)

Recall of memories and eye movements both compete for working memory resources and this

act

to blur the memory

Versions of EMDR that don’t

utilise

eye movements (e.g. use bilaterally presented tones) therefore shouldn’t work in blurring memoriesSlide25

Van den Hout,

Rijkeboer

, Engelhard,

Klugkist

et al. (2012)Slide26

10 Reasons why Clinical Psychology needs Experimental Psychopathology

1. Can model psychopathology acquisition processes in healthy participants

2. Allows the study of psychopathology processes under highly controlled conditions

3. Experiments

provide evidence of causal relations between events that

are

a critical component of theory

building

4. Helps to inject core psychological knowledge into Clinical Psychology research

5. Helps to identify the active ingredients in interventions developed directly from clinical practiceSlide27

10 Reasons why Clinical Psychology needs Experimental Psychopathology

6. Allows the testing of psychopathology models in circumstances where doing so on clinical populations may be problematic

7. Can

provide Clinical Psychology with a rigorous set of scientific principles

for

conducting

research

8. Models developed in analogue studies can provide predictions for future studies to predict performance in clinical populations

9. Can help to prevent Clinical Psychology developing incestuous theoretical practices

10. Can help prevent Clinical Psychology re-inventing the wheelSlide28

Where do we go with Experimental Psychopathology?

We need to develop an Experimental Psychopathology ‘Manifesto’

We need to be more critical of clinical psychology models that are developed outside of a genuine experimental framework

We need to ensure that experimental psychopathology is taught as an explicit component in the training of clinical psychologists

We need more journals that will promote analogue controlled research of the kind advocated by Experimental PsychopathologySlide29

“Must haves” for all Experimental Psychopathologists

Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

Psychopathology – Second Edition