PPT-ATTACKING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE

Professor Ed Imwinkelried THE PARADOX The increasing using of expert testimony at trial VS The alarming insights into the margin of error in expert testimony THE LARGE NUMBER OF POTENTIAL ATTACKS. Art Hobson. Univ. of Arkansas. ahobson@uark.edu. Conceptual physics at U Arkansas. General physics, emphasizing modern physics, and societal topics.. The scientific process (we learn via . evidence. Natural. . Science. …it goes way beyond defying the “I before E except after C rule.”. Science. The body of knowledge about nature that represents the collective efforts, findings, insights, and wisdom of the human race.. Description .   . A: Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence, and is appropriate for understanding the natural . world; . but it provides only a limited understanding of the supernatural, aesthetic, or other ways of knowing, such as art, philosophy, or religion. . in Evidence. CJ341 – Cyberlaw & Cybercrime. Lecture . #21. M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP. D. J. Blythe, JD. School of Business & Management. Topics. Admissibility of Digital Evidence. The Courts & Digital Evidence. AYSO National Coaching Program. The Calm Before the Storm!!!!. We all get excited about our new rosters . Looking to see where the best players are. We dream of our own Barcelona Dynasty. We want our team to play like this team. Professor Guy Wellborn. Texas Rules of Evidence. Rule 702. Testimony by Experts. If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.. What Do You Think?. True of False. All scientists do experiments to get data.. A theory is unproven and lacks sufficient evidence to become a law. . Science and its methods can answer all questions.. 3. .OPPONENTS . ATTACKING FORMATION. 4. . OPPONENTS DEFENDING FORMATION. TEAM TASK. :. a) In. boxes 1 and 2, . draw your attacking and defending formations.. b) Play . your opponents. Watch how they are setting up in attack and defence. Draw these in . The Assertion-Evidence Approach. Michael Alley. College of Engineering. Penn State. Slides . influence the preparation, delivery, and understanding of a scientific presentation. [Alley, 2013]. PowerPoint’s . Elizabeth Gordon,. . NBCT. MYP & IB Biology Instructor. Me…. & You…. Middle School? High School?. Biology? Chemistry? Physics? Life Science?. My Dad’s a Space Alien. I . have evidence that proves . The Evolution-Creation Controversy. Robert Root-Bernstein and Donald L. . McEachron. i. n . Applying . Anthropology. . (2012:6-14). Difference between “I have a theory” and a . scientific theory. Believes—or claims to—that the Earth is really . flat. .. W. hy . are they wrong? what’s the counterevidence?. most of us don’t know; haven’t collected the data; don’t know what the data even are, why that’s evidence. Evaluating the Evidence. Jane Campbell Moriarty. Carol Los . Mansmann. Chair in Faculty . Scholarshipand. . Professor of . Law. moriartyj@duq.edu. Duquesne University School of . Law. August 10, 2016. The . Frye. Standard. 1923, . Frye v. United States. Rejected the scientific validity of the polygraph (lie detector). Set a standard for admission of scientific evidence. The procedure, technique, or principle must be “generally accepted” by relevant scientific community.