/
Shakespeare’s Belly Shakespeare’s Belly

Shakespeare’s Belly - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
384 views
Uploaded On 2016-02-20

Shakespeare’s Belly - PPT Presentation

Carnival and the Morality Tradition Interludes and morality plays Who originally performed by clergy later servants or wandering players and paid for by aristocratic patrons Where indoors halls of great ID: 224740

harry falstaff prince carnival falstaff harry carnival prince henry morality play world mankind part elizabethan thee thou honour vice audience thy time

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Shakespeare’s Belly" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Shakespeare’s Belly

Carnival and the Morality TraditionSlide2

Interludes and morality plays

Who?:

originally performed by clergy, later servants or wandering players and paid for by aristocratic patrons

Where?:

indoors – halls of great

households, inns

When?:

in between courses at household feasts and banquets –

interlude

literally means ‘in-between play’Slide3

Interludes and morality plays

Morality plays

Allegorical:

not directly

dramatising

Bible stories

‘Everyman’

figure, Virtues

and

Vices:

Performers cast in Vice roles were often expected to ad-lib (Wiles 2005: 4-5

);

The Vice would wear a motley coat and carry a wooden

dagger.

Mankind

was performed

during the winter festive season, c. 1470, probably for an aristocratic banquet somewhere in East Anglia (though it could have been performed in an inn).

Audience includes seated ‘sovereigns’ and standing ‘brothers’.Slide4

The Medieval HallSlide5

Mankind

All the characters in morality drama appeal directly to the audience, offering advice, injunctions, suggestions etc.

The opening

speech sets up

Mercy as the voice

of moral authority:

MERCY

.

Mercy is my name, that

mourneth

for your

offence.

Divert

not yourselves in time of

temptation,

That

ye may be acceptable to God at your going hence. (18-20)

On the other hand, Mischief, as David Wiles puts it, ‘is

at once the villain, whom the audience learn to shun, and the welcome game-maker who makes the play

possible’

(2005: 1-2

):

MISCHIEF

.

I say, sir! I am come hither to make you

game;

Yet

, bade ye me not go out in the devil’s

name,

And

I will abide. (68-70)Slide6

Mankind: body vs. soul

MANKIND.

My name is Mankind. I have my

composition

Of

a body and of a soul, of condition

contrary.

Betwixt

the twain is a great

division;

He

that should be subject, now he hath the victory. (193-6

)

MERCY

.

Distemper not your brain with good ale, nor with

wine!

Measure

is treasure: I forbid you not the

use;

Measure

yourself ever! Beware of excess! (235-7

)

TITIVILLUS

.

Arise, and

avent

thee! Nature compels!

MANKIND.

I will into

thi

[s] yard, sovereigns! and come again

soon;

For

dread of the colic, and eke of the

stone,

I

will go do that needs must be

done;

My

beads shall be here for whomsoever will else. (561-5)Slide7

Mankind: Vices

‘In

other early interludes written for professional troupes we find that the Vices are venial rather than deadly sins. They offer man a life of holiday pleasures. Pride is paired with Riot in

Youth

. Lust-and-liking and Folly in

Mundus et

Infans

set up

carnivalesque

freedom as an alternative to ecclesiastical discipline

.’

(Wiles 2005: 3)

New Guise, Nought and Now-a-Days as entertainers: dancers, singers, practical jokers and play-actors

Mixture

of scatological humour and blasphemy:

NOW-A-DAYS

.

I pray you heartily, worshipful

clerk!

To

have this English made in Latin:

I have eaten a dishful of

curds,

And

I have

shitten

your mouth full of turds.’Slide8

Mankind: dramaturgy of sinning and redemption

NOW-A-DAYS

(to Mercy)

. When ye will, go forth your way!

Men

have little dainty of your

play

Because

ye make no sport. (265-7)

Inversion

of authority: mock Latin,

parodic

version of law court

Platea

dimension: local and topical

references

Audience participation: first the blasphemous Christmas carol, then payment to see

TitivillusSlide9

Mankind: dramaturgy of sinning and redemption

TITIVILLUS.

And ever ye did, for me keep now your

silence!

Not

a word! I charge you, pain of forty

pence!

A

pr

[et]

ty

game shall be showed you ere ye go hence. (590-2)

Breaking

complicity: the Vices’ cruelty becomes clear by the end of the play as they gleefully help Mankind to kill

himself.Slide10

Henry IV as morality drama

The morality play as model for the story of

the young Henry

V was already implicit in

the earlier drama

The Famous Victories of Henry V

(printed c. 1594).

Shakespeare follows this pattern to some extent…

KING

HENRY.

…Therefore, friends,

As far as to the sepulchre of Christ –

Whose soldier now, under whose blessed cross

We are impressed and engaged to fight –

Forthwith a power of English shall we levy,

Whose arms were moulded in their mothers’ womb

To chase these pagans in those holy fields

Over whose acres walked those blessed feet

Which fourteen hundred years ago were nailed,

For our advantage, on the bitter cross. (1.1.18-27)

PRINCE HARRY.

For

my part, I may speak it to my shame

,

I

have a truant been to

chivalry.

(5.1.93-4)Slide11

Falstaff as Vice

PRINCE HARRY.

…that

reverend Vice, that grey Iniquity, that father Ruffian, that Vanity in

Years…

(2.5.458-9

)

LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.

You follow the young prince up and down, like his ill angel. (Part Two, 1.2.150-1)

Bardolph

as junior Vice?

Francois

Laroque

describes

Falstaff as

‘Shakespeare’s

most extraordinary clown and expert in all tricks –

carnivalesque

jokes, theatrical ad-libbing, bibulous word games or superb comic monologues to obfuscate his lies or cover his bad

faith’ (2002: 70).Slide12

Falstaff as Vice

PRINCE

HARRY.

Pray God you have

not murdered

some of

them.

FALSTAFF.

Nay,

that’s

past praying

for.

I have peppered

two of them. Two

I am sure I have

paid – two rogues in

buckram suits. I tell thee what, Hal, if I

tell thee

a lie, spit in my face, call me horse.

Thou

knowest

my old ward – here I lay, and thus I bore my point. Four rogues in buckram let drive at me.PRINCE HARRY. What, four? Thou saidst but two even now.FALSTAFF. Four, Hal, I told thee four.POINS. Ay, ay, he said four.FALSTAFF. These four came all afront, and mainly thrust at me. I made me no more ado, but took all their seven points in my target, thus. (2.5.174-86)Slide13

Inversion of morality

PRINCE HARRY.

I see a good amendment of life in thee, from praying to

purse-taking.

FALSTAFF

.

Why, Hal,

’tis

my vocation, Hal.

’Tis

no sin for a man to labour in his vocation. (

1.2.104-5)

FALSTAFF

.

Company, villainous company, hath been the spoil of

me.

BARDOLPH

.

Sir John, you are so fretful, you cannot live

long.

FALSTAFF

.

Why, there is it: come sing me a bawdy song, make me merry. I was as virtuously given as a gentleman need to be; virtuous enough: swore little, diced not – above seven times a week, went to a bawdy-house once in a quarter – of an hour, paid money that I borrowed – three of four times; lived well and in good compass: and now I live out of all order, out of all compass. (3.3.9-19)Slide14

Falstaff as improviser and game-maker

‘Shall we have a play extempore?’ (2.5.282-3)

PRINCE

HARRY.

Do thou stand for my father, and examine me upon the particulars of my

life.

FALSTAFF

.

Shall I? Content. This chair shall be my state, this dagger my sceptre, and this cushion my

crown.

PRINCE

HARRY.

Thy state is taken for a joined-stool, thy golden sceptre for a leaden dagger, and thy precious rich crown for a pitiful bald crown. (2.5.379-85)

Falstaff improvises in iambic pentameter (2.5.395-401)Slide15

Carnival and Lent (Pieter Bruegel, 1559)Slide16

Carnival and Lent (Pieter Bruegel, 1559)Slide17

Falstaff as embodiment of Carnival

Falstaff as

‘All-

hallown

summer’ (1.2.157), a ‘roasted

Manningtree

ox’ (2.5.458), ‘

Martlemas

’ (

Part Two

, 2.2.86), ‘wassail candle’ (

Part Two

, 1.2.145

).

Social status: both a knight and a pickpocket

Anachronistic identity: ruffs, sack, playhouse, Pistol

Linguistic play:

‘If manhood, good manhood, be not forgot upon the face of the earth, then am I a

shotten

herring’

(2.5.128-9

); ‘

If I fought not with fifty of them, I am a bunch of radish’ (2.5.187).Slide18

Carnival and the Elizabethan stage

David Wiles:

‘The

Elizabethan theatre stood at a point of transition between the modern concept of theatre as part of a leisure industry and the medieval or pre-urban concept of drama as part of an

inversionary

or

carnivalesque

mode of living life

.’ (2005

: xii)

Theatres in the Elizabethan period were distinctly

carnivalesque

spaces, as Bristol argues:

‘Theatre occupies a marginal space as well as a marginal time. This is pragmatically true of the earliest Elizabethan playhouses, which were situated outside the formal jurisdiction of the city authorities, although they remained de facto an integral part of the city’s economic activity.’ (1983: 648)Slide19

Carnival and the Elizabethan stageSlide20

Carnival and the Elizabethan stage

Stubbes

equated theatre with carnival:

‘… some spend the Sabbath day (for the most part) in frequenting of bawdy stage-plays and interludes, in maintaining Lords of Misrule (for so they call a certain kind of play which they use), May games, church-ales, feasts, and wakes: in piping, dancing, dicing, carding, bowling, tennis-playing: in bear-baiting, cock-fighting, hawking, hunting, and such like; … whereby the Lord God is dishonoured, his Sabbath violated, his word neglected, his sacraments contemned, and his people marvellously corrupted and carried away from true virtue and godliness.’ (

Stubbes

,

Anatomie

of Abuses

)Slide21

The Saturnalian pattern

Barber considers ‘the tendency for Elizabethan comedy to

be

a saturnalia, rather than to

represent

saturnalian

experience’ (1972: 36

).

Northrop

Frye (‘The Argument of Comedy’, 1948):

‘…

the action of the comedy begins in a world represented as a normal world, moves into the green world, goes into a metamorphosis there in which the comic resolution is achieved, and returns to the normal world.’ (Palmer 1984: 80

)

(Is

A Midsummer Night’s Dream

‘closed off’ in this sense? Is

Henry IV

?)Slide22

Audience complicity

Falstaff’s direct address:

Kempe’s

stand-up?

There’s honour for

you’

(5.3.32-3

).

As with the medieval Vice

, the dark side of Falstaff’s moral ambivalence becomes clearer as the play progresses:

PRINCE

HARRY.

I did never see such pitiful rascals.

FALSTAFF.

Tut, tut, good enough to toss, food for powder, food for powder. They’ll fill a pit as well as better.

Tush

, man, mortal men, mortal men. (4.2.64-7)

FALSTAFF.

I have led my ragamuffins where they are peppered; there’s not three of my hundred and fifty left alive, and they are for the town’s end, to beg during life. (5.3.35-8)Slide23

Audience complicity

PRINCE HARRY.

Why, thou

owest

God a death.

Exit

FALSTAFF.

’Tis

not due yet. I would be loath to pay him before his day. What need I be so forward with him that calls not on me? Well,

’tis

no matter; honour pricks me on. Yea, but how if honour prick me off when I come on? How then? Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm? No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No. Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? No. What is honour? A word. What is in that word ‘honour’? What is that ‘honour’? Air. A trim reckoning! Who hath it? He that died o’ Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No.

’Tis

insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I’ll none of it. Honour is a mere

scutcheon

. And so ends my catechism. (5.1.126-40)Slide24

Audience complicity

But Harry gets there first!

PRINCE

HARRY.

I know you all, and will awhile

uphold

The

unyoked humour of your

idleness.

Yet

herein will I imitate the

sun,

Who

doth permit the base contagious

clouds

To

smother up his beauty from the

world,

That

, when he please again to be

himself,

Being

wanted, he may be more wondered

at

By breaking through the foul and ugly mistsOf vapours that did seem to strangle him.[…]I’ll so offend to make offence a skill,Redeeming time when men think least I will. (1.2. 192-214)Indeed, at the end, his father tells him: ‘Thou hast redeemed thy lost opinion, / And showed thou mak’st some tender of my life, / In this fair rescue thou hast brought to me’ (5.4.46-9).PRINCE HARRY. I shall hereafter, my thrice-gracious lord, / Be more myself. (3.2.92-3)Slide25

Complicating the morality reading

KING HENRY.

I’ll make a voyage to the Holy Land

To wash the blood off from my guilty hand. (

Richard II

, 5.6.49-50)

KING

HENRY.

My blood hath been too cold and temperate,

Unapt to stir at these indignities,

And you have found me; for accordingly

You tread upon my patience. But be sure

I will from henceforth rather be myself,

Mighty and to be feared, than my condition,

Which hath been smooth as oil, soft as young down,

And therefore lost that title of respect

Which the proud soul ne’er pays but to the proud. (1.3.1-9)Slide26

Complicating the morality reading

KING HENRY.

And

then I stole all courtesy from heaven,

And dressed myself in such humility

That I did pluck allegiance from men’s hearts,

Loud shouts and salutations from their mouths,

Even in the presence of the crowned King.

Thus did I keep my person fresh and new,

My presence, like a robe pontifical –

Ne’er seen but wondered at – and so my state,

Seldom but sumptuous, showed like a feast

And won by rareness such solemnity. (3.2.50-9)Slide27

Hotspur’s morality play

HOTSPUR

.

Shall it for shame be spoken in these days,

Or fill up chronicles in time to come,

That men of your nobility and power

Did gage them both in an unjust behalf,

As both of you, God pardon it, have done:

To put down Richard, that sweet lovely rose,

An plant this thorn, this canker, Bolingbroke?

And shall it in more shame be further spoken

That you are fooled, discarded and shook off

By him for whom these shames ye underwent?

No; yet time serves wherein you may redeem

Your banished honours, and restore yourselves

Into the good thoughts of the world again… (1.3.168-80)Slide28

Falstaff as figure of pathos?

KING

HENRY V.

I know thee not, old

man. Fall

to thy

prayers.

How ill white hairs become a fool and jester!

I have long

dreamt

of such a kind of man,

So

surfeit-swelled

, so old and so

profane;

But

being

awake,

I do despise my dream.

Make less thy body hence, and more thy

grace.

Leave gormandizing; know the grave doth gape

For thee thrice wider than for other men

. (Part Two, 5.5.45-52)Hal verbally (and perhaps literally) ‘kills’ Falstaff by stripping him of his festive timelessness and locating him within (towards the end of) a human lifespan. Double-meaning of ‘old’: ‘Old Jack Falstaff’ is enduring, established, always renewed, representative of ‘all the world’; ‘old man’ is near death.Slide29

Henry IV as saturnalia?

C. L. Barber:

‘The

implications of the

saturnalian

attitude are more drastically and inclusively expressed here than anywhere else, because here misrule is presented along with rule and along with the tensions that challenge rule. Shakespeare dramatizes not only holiday but also the need for holiday and the need to limit holiday

.’ (1972

: 192

)

PRINCE

HARRY.

If all the year were playing holidays, / To sport would be as tedious as to work (1.2.201-2)

PRINCE

HARRY.

What, is it a time to jest and dally now? (5.3.55) 

‘My

own view… is that the dynamic relation of comedy and serious action is

saturnalian

rather than satiric, that the misrule works, through the whole dramatic rhythm, to consolidate rule

.’ (Barber 1972

: 205

)Slide30

Henry IV as saturnalia?

For Terry Eagleton, carnival is

a

licensed

affair in every sense, a permissible rupture of hegemony, a contained popular blow-off as disturbing and relatively ineffectual as a revolutionary work of art (1981: 148).

In this version of carnival, argues

Baz

Kershaw,

the prevailing order is strengthened, for at the end of the

carnivalesque

day the revellers return to a living whose rules are set by the dominant ideologies, with energies dissipated and their sense of the liberality of the regime re-animated. The temporary transgression of a hierarchical normality is a strategy for reinforcing it in the long run. (1992: 73)Slide31

Henry IV as subversive?

Play-acting as means of adopting other identities – and their accompanying

world-views…

‘All spectators perceived in this environment that their own identities and moral codes existed in relation to opposites and alternatives. No one mode of organizing experience … had any overriding validity, any fixed hierarchical precedence, within the physical ambit of the playhouse.’ (Wiles 2005: 93

)

Everything in relief; mockery not so much invalidation as

recontextualisation

of a particular set of

values?Slide32

Henry IV as subversive?

For

Bakhtin

, carnival offers something very different: ‘the chance to have a new outlook on the world, to realize the relative nature of all that exists, and to enter a completely new order of things’ (1965: 34).

‘Carnival with all its images, indecencies, and curses affirms the people’s immortal, indestructible character. In the world of carnival the awareness of the people’s immortality is combined with the realization that established authority and truth are relative.’ (

Bakhtin

1965: 256)Slide33

References

Bakhtin

, M. (1965)

Rabelais and His World

, trans. H.

Iswolsky

, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Barber, C. L. (1972)

Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Form and its Relation to Social Custom

, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bristol, M. D. (1983) ‘Carnival and the Institutions of Theatre in Elizabethan England’,

ELH

, 50: 4, 637-654.

Eagleton, T. (1986)

William Shakespeare

, London: Basil Blackwell.

Gurr

, A. (2002)

Playgoing

in Shakespeare’s London

(2nd ed.), Cambridge:

C. U. P.

Kershaw, B. (1992)

The Politics of Performance: Radical theatre as cultural intervention

, London: Routledge.Slide34

References

Laroque

, F. (2002)

‘Popular Festivity’

in

Leggatt

, A. [ed.]

The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Comedy

, Cambridge: C. U. P., pp. 64-78.

Palmer, D. J [ed.] (1984)

Comedy: Developments in Criticism

, London: Macmillan.

Rackin

, P. (1991)

Stages of History: Shakespeare’s English Chronicles

, London:

Routledge

.

Weimann

, R. (1987)

Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the

Theater

: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function

, Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Wiles, D. (2005) Shakespeare’s Clown: Actor and Text in the Elizabethan Playhouse, Cambridge: C. U. P.