Note HIV infected is derived using CDCs national infection estimation guidelines Definitions HIVInfected Prevalent cases and estimated unaware cases of HIV infection end of year HIVDiagnosed ID: 372579
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SPECTRUM OF CARE ENGAGEMENT-ARIZONA PREV..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
SPECTRUM OF CARE ENGAGEMENT-ARIZONA PREVALENT CASES 2012
Note: HIV infected is derived using CDC’s national infection estimation guidelinesSlide2
Definitions
HIV-InfectedPrevalent cases and estimated unaware cases of HIV infection (end of year) HIV-Diagnosed
Prevalent cases
Linked to HIV Care
Prevalent cases with a documented lab test, doctor visit or medication use in the calendar year
Retained in HIV Care
Prevalent cases with a documented lab test, doctor visit or anti-retroviral (ARV) use in this calendar year and last calendar year
Need ARV Therapy
Prevalent cases whose last CD4 count of the calendar year was less than 350/µL, whose last viral load of the calendar year was greater than 100,000 copies/mL , who had a documented opportunistic infection or who had documented ARV use during the calendar year
On ARV Therapy
Prevalent cases with documented ARV use or whose last viral load of the calendar year was undetectable
Adherent/Undetectable
Prevalent cases whose last viral load of the calendar year was undetectableSlide3
SPECTRUM OF CARE ENGAGEMENT-ARIZONA PREVALENT CASES 2012Slide4
SPECTRUM OF CARE ENGAGEMENT- AZ PREVALENT CASES BY SEX 2012
*Significantly different (p <.05)
than
male
when controlling for age,
population density,
and
race/ethnicity(logistic regression)
*Slide5
SPECTRUM OF CARE ENGAGEMENT- AZ PREVALENT CASES BY RACE/ETHNICITY 2012
*Significantly different (p <.05) than Whites when controlling for age, sex, and county population density (logistic regression)
*