PPT-SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING:

Author : olivia-moreira | Published Date : 2016-12-08

External Audit Perspective Dionysios Karamalikis November 9 2010 1 Award Identification At the time of the award identifying to the subrecipient the federal award

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING:: Transcript


External Audit Perspective Dionysios Karamalikis November 9 2010 1 Award Identification At the time of the award identifying to the subrecipient the federal award information and applicable compliance requirements. The recipient or someone nominated by the recipient MUST be available during the 1230AM 230PM delivery window to accept the delivery Otherwise the delivery will be brought back to the store and it must be picked up by the recipient before clos ing Click the Recipients tab Then c lick the recipient line to highlight it 2 Click on the Recipients drop down menu and choose Add to Blacklist When the warning box pop s up click OK You will notice that the recipient icon now has changed to an envelop & Enforcement. By. Alan . Conway & Debbie Chen. MONITORING. The purpose of project monitoring is to ensure that the terms and conditions of awards are fulfilled. Project monitoring shall be the joint responsibility of the Grants Officer, Program Officer, award recipient, and/or their designees. Monitoring may take the form of site visits, written and/or oral reports, meetings, or any other form of communication deemed appropriate by the Grants Officer for keeping apprised of project progress.. Steve Birkhofer. A-133 . and Sub-Recipient Monitoring. Colleges & Universities benefited greatly from the more than $500 . bil. in grants awarded in FY 2012 to various non-federal entities. The Single Audit Act of 1984 (amended in 1996, revised 2003 & 2007) and OMB A-133 provide audit guidelines applicable to colleges and universities to ensure that these funds are expended properly.. January . 2017. Presented by:. Derek Brown, . ORSO. Anke Moore, SPS. Recording date of this workshop is . January 27, 2017. Some of the rules and procedures discussed in this workshop are subject to change.. resources against waste and fraud. Ensure accuracy and reliability. Secure compliance. Evaluate the level of performance in all organizational units. Provide management peace of mind. Good business practice. Presented by:. Derek Brown, ORSO. Anke Moore, SPS. Lucas Sanchez, ORSO. Ty Simanson, IPN. Recording date of this workshop is . March 23, 2018. Some of the rules and procedures discussed in this workshop are subject to change.. of the last two campaigns. The award is presented annually to the Rang - er who, as chosen by the fans, “goes above and beyond the call of duty.” • Was the recipient of the Team MVP aw Global Patient Monitoring Devices Market was worth USD 36.6 Billion in 2020, and it is further projected to reach USD 68.4 Billion by 2027, at a CAGR of 9.6% during 2021-2027 ITMZ FY18-23932Page 1of 28FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATEDELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURINGZONE TAX CREDIT AGREEMENTBETWEENTHE WISCONSIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONANDSIO INTERNATION 1505-0271Expiration Date November 30 2021US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYCORONAVIRUS STATEAND LOCALFISCAL RECOVERY FUNDSRecipient name and address Recipient to provideDUNS Number Recipient to provideTaxp 1505-0271Expiration Date November 30 20211ASSURANCESOF COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS ASSURANCESOF COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE VI OF THECIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964recipient namedbelow hereinafter re PCS . Staff. , and . Recipient All Need to Know. Prepared by Emily Gantz McKay and Hila Berl. EGM Consulting, LLC. Note: . This training is designed for planning councils as described in the Ryan White legislation, rather than other types of planning bodies. Planning councils have legislative responsibilities and are independent entities that work closely with but are not responsible to the recipient. Jurisdictions with planning bodies that lack such legislative guidance may have a very different relationship, though much of this training module is likely to be relevant if the planning body plays roles similar to those of a planning council.. PCS . Staff. , and . Recipient All Need to Know. Prepared by Emily Gantz McKay and Hila Berl. EGM Consulting, LLC. Note: . This training is designed for planning councils as described in the Ryan White legislation, rather than other types of...

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"SUB-RECIPIENT MONITORING:"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents